1
|
Smit AK, Gokoolparsadh A, McWhirter R, Newett L, Milch V, Hermes A, McInerney-Leo A, Newson AJ. Ethical, legal, and social issues related to genetics and genomics in cancer: A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Genet Med 2024; 26:101270. [PMID: 39282688 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Genomics is increasingly being incorporated into models of care for cancer. Understanding the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in this domain is important for successful and equitable implementation. We aimed to identify ELSI scholarship specific to cancer control and genomics. To do this, we undertook a scoping literature review and narrative synthesis, identifying 46 articles that met inclusion criteria. Eighteen ELSI themes were developed, including (1) equity of access, which included structural barriers to testing and research, access to preventive and follow-up care, and engagement with health systems; (2) family considerations, such as an ethical obligation to disseminate relevant genomic information to at-risk family members; (3) legal considerations, including privacy and confidentiality, genetic discrimination, and the prospective duty to reclassify variants; and (4) optimizing consent processes in clinical care and research. Gaps in the literature were identified with respect to equity for people living in rural or remote areas, and how to provide ethical care within culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse communities, including First Nations peoples. Our findings suggest a need for a multidisciplinary approach to examining ELSI in cancer genomics beyond initial test indication and within the broader context of the mainstreaming of genomics in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Akira Gokoolparsadh
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebekah McWhirter
- ANU College of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Lyndsay Newett
- National Centre for Indigenous Genomics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT Australia
| | - Vivienne Milch
- Cancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW Australia; Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Azure Hermes
- National Centre for Indigenous Genomics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT Australia
| | - Aideen McInerney-Leo
- Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harris CS, Pozzar RA, Conley Y, Eicher M, Hammer MJ, Kober KM, Miaskowski C, Colomer-Lahiguera S. Big Data in Oncology Nursing Research: State of the Science. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151428. [PMID: 37085404 PMCID: PMC11225574 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the state of oncology nursing science as it pertains to big data. The authors aim to define and characterize big data, describe key considerations for accessing and analyzing big data, provide examples of analyses of big data in oncology nursing science, and highlight ethical considerations related to the collection and analysis of big data. DATA SOURCES Peer-reviewed articles published by investigators specializing in oncology, nursing, and related disciplines. CONCLUSION Big data is defined as data that are high in volume, velocity, and variety. To date, oncology nurse scientists have used big data to predict patient outcomes from clinician notes, identify distinct symptom phenotypes, and identify predictors of chemotherapy toxicity, among other applications. Although the emergence of big data and advances in computational methods provide new and exciting opportunities to advance oncology nursing science, several challenges are associated with accessing and using big data. Data security, research participant privacy, and the underrepresentation of minoritized individuals in big data are important concerns. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE With their unique focus on the interplay between the whole person, the environment, and health, nurses bring an indispensable perspective to the interpretation and application of big data research findings. Given the increasing ubiquity of passive data collection, all nurses should be taught the definition, characteristics, applications, and limitations of big data. Nurses who are trained in big data and advanced computational methods will be poised to contribute to guidelines and policies that preserve the rights of human research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn S Harris
- Postdoctoral Scholar, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel A Pozzar
- Nurse Scientist at Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA and Instructor at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yvette Conley
- Professor, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Associate Professor and Director of the Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marilyn J Hammer
- Director, The Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA and Lecturer at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kord M Kober
- Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Christine Miaskowski
- Professor, Schools of Medicine and Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Senior Nurse Scientist and Junior Lecturer, Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker A, Bonham VL, Boyce A, Clayton EW, Garcia D, Johnson S, Laeyendecker O, Lewis M, Margolick JB, Mathews D, Parker MJ, Spicer P, Thio CL, Geller G, Kahn J. Ethical Issues in Genetics and Infectious Diseases Research: An Interdisciplinary Expert Review. ETHICS, MEDICINE, AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:100684. [PMID: 34263019 PMCID: PMC8274576 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Research in genetics and infectious diseases (ID) presents novel configurations of ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSIs) related to the intersection of genetics with public health regulations and the control of transmissible diseases. Such research includes work both in pathogen genetics and on the ways that human genetics affect responses to ID. This paper identifies and systematizes the unique issues at this intersection, based on an interdisciplinary expert review. BASIC PROCEDURES This paper presents results of a formal issue-spotting exercise among twenty experts in public health, law and genomics, biobanking, genetic epidemiology, ID medicine and public health, philosophy, ethics and ID, ethics and genomics, and law and ID. The focus of the exercise was on the collection, storage, and sharing of genetic information relating to ID. MAIN FINDINGS The issue-spotting exercise highlighted the following ELSIs: risks in reporting to government authorities, return of individual research results, and resource allocation - each taking on specific configurations based on the balance between public health and individual privacy/protection. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS The public health implications of interactions between genomics and ID frame considerations for equity and justice. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, these issues are especially pressing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Walker
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Vence L. Bonham
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda MD 20894 USA
| | - Angie Boyce
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville TN 37232 USA
| | - Debra Garcia
- International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories, 750 W Pender St #301, Vancouver BC V6C 1G8 Canada
| | - Stephanie Johnson
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and the Humanities and Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD UK
| | - Oliver Laeyendecker
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore MD 21205 USA,National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Ln, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Michelle Lewis
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Joseph B. Margolick
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Debra Mathews
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205 USA,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Michael J. Parker
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and the Humanities and Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD UK
| | - Paul Spicer
- Department of Anthropology and the Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, 455 W Lindsey St, Norman OK 73069 USA
| | - Chloe L. Thio
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Gail Geller
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205 USA,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| | - Jeffrey Kahn
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205 USA,Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore MD 21205 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kurnat-Thoma E, Fu MR, Henderson WA, Voss JG, Hammer MJ, Williams JK, Calzone K, Conley YP, Starkweather A, Weaver MT, Shiao SPK, Coleman B. Current status and future directions of U.S. genomic nursing health care policy. Nurs Outlook 2021; 69:471-488. [PMID: 33487404 PMCID: PMC8282091 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As genomic science moves beyond government-academic collaborations into routine healthcare operations, nursing's holistic philosophy and evidence-based practice approach positions nurses as leaders to advance genomics and precision health care in routine patient care. PURPOSE To examine the status of and identify gaps for U.S. genomic nursing health care policy and precision health clinical practice implementation. METHODS We conducted a scoping review and policy priorities analysis to clarify key genomic policy concepts and definitions, and to examine trends and utilization of health care quality benchmarking used in precision health. FINDINGS Genomic nursing health care policy is an emerging area. Educating and training the nursing workforce to achieve full dissemination and integration of precision health into clinical practice remains an ongoing challenge. Use of health care quality measurement principles and federal benchmarking performance evaluation criteria for precision health implementation are not developed. DISCUSSION Nine recommendations were formed with calls to action across nursing practice workforce and education, nursing research, and health care policy arenas. CONCLUSIONS To advance genomic nursing health care policy, it is imperative to develop genomic performance measurement tools for clinicians, purchasers, regulators and policymakers and to adequately prepare the nursing workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Kurnat-Thoma
- National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Mei R Fu
- William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
| | | | - Joachim G Voss
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Kathleen Calzone
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | - S Pamela K Shiao
- Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Bernice Coleman
- Nursing Research and Performance Improvement, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|