A National Audit of Pancreatic Enzyme Prescribing in Pancreatic Cancer from 2015 to 2023 in England Using OpenSAFELY-TPP

Using Data to Improve Healthcare: A Case Study of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement in Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

In the UK, guidelines recommend pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to all people with unresectable pancreatic cancer. In 2023, we published a national audit of PERT which showed suboptimal prescribing and wide regional variation in England. The aim of this manuscript was to describe how we used the PERT audit to drive improvements in healthcare.

METHODS

Building on the PERT audit, we deployed an online dashboard which will deliver ongoing updates of the PERT audit. We developed a collaborative intervention with cancer nurse specialists (CNS) to improve care delivered to people with pancreatic cancer. The intervention called Creating a natiOnAL CNS pancrEatic cancer network to Standardise and improve CarE (COALESCE) will use the dashboard to evaluate improvements in prescribing of PERT.

RESULTS

We demonstrated how large databases of electronic healthcare records (EHRs) can be used to improve cancer care. The PERT audit was implemented into a dashboard for tracking the progress of COALESCE. We will measure improvements in PERT prescribing as the intervention with CNS progresses.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving healthcare is an ongoing and iterative process. By implementing the PERT dashboard, we created a resource-efficient, automated evaluation method enabling COALESCE to deliver a sustainable change. National-scale databases of EHRs enable rapid cycles of audits, providing regular feedback to interventions, working systematically to deliver change. Here, the focus is on pancreatic cancer. However, this methodology is transferable to other areas of healthcare.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses play a key role in collecting good quality data which are needed in clinical audits to identify shortcomings in healthcare. Nurse-driven interventions can be designed to improve healthcare. In this study, we capitalize on the unique role of CNS coordinating care for every patient with cancer. COALESCE is the first national collaborative study which uses CNS as researchers and change agents.

Comprehensive, long-term evaluation of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy

AIMS

Treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) improves quality of life, clinical outcomes, and survival. However, diagnosing PEI following PD is challenging owing to the difficulties with current tests and often non-specific symptoms. This work aims to quantify the true rate of long-term PEI in patients following a PD.

METHODS

Patients underwent a PEI screen approximately one to two years following PD for oncologic indication, including the 13C Mixed triglyceride breath test (13CMTGT), faecal elastase 1 (FE-1) and the PEI Questionnaire (PEI-Q). Four reviewers with expertise in PEI reviewed the results blinded to other decisions to classify PEI status; disagreements were resolved on consensus.

RESULTS

26 patients were recruited. Of those with valid test results, these were indicative of PEI based on pre-specified thresholds for 60 % (15/25) for the 13CMTGT, 82 % (18/22) for FE-1, and 88 % (22/25) for the PEI-Q. After discussion between reviewers, the consensus PEI prevalence was 81 % (95 % CI: 61-93 %; 21/26), with 50 % (N = 13) classified as having severe, 23 % (N = 6) moderate, and 8 % (N = 2) mild PEI.

DISCUSSION

Since no ideal test exists for PEI, this collation of diagnostic modalities and blinded expert review was designed to ascertain the true rate of long-term PEI following PD. This required our cohort to survive a year, travel to hospital, and undergo a period of starvation and PERT hold, and therefore there is likely to be recruitment bias towards fitter, younger patients with less aggressive pathology. Despite this, over 80 % were deemed to have PEI, with over 90 % of these being considered moderate or severe.