Reducing opioid utilization after appendectomy: A lesson in implementation of a multidisciplinary quality improvement project

Rethinking hospital postoperative resource use: A national analysis of pediatric appendectomy patients admitted to children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

The increased use of remote monitoring and telemedicine support may help alleviate the need for some of the postoperative inpatient hospital care and reduce health care costs, but little is known about current postoperative hospital resource use patterns. We aim to describe hospital resources use patterns in pediatric patients postappendectomy for complicated appendicitis and to evaluate the potential of earlier discharge with remote monitoring.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database for patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Health care use/costs (antibiotics, intravenous fluids [proxy for diet], analgesics, laboratory studies, and imaging tests) were determined using administrative billing data. Potentially avoidable days were defined as nondischarge days without codes for intravenous opioid pain medication or intravenous fluids. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

In total, 24,165 patients were included: 8,300 patients (34.3%) had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day, totaling 13,970 days or 14.2% of all hospitalization days. Median hospitalization cost was $19,434 [$15,658-$25,157], with accommodation and operating room being the greatest contributors. Public insurance and minority races and ethnicities were associated with greater odds of potentially avoidable days. More than 80% of hospitalized patients had intravenous antibiotics through 10 days postoperatively. More than 20% received opioids daily.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one third of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis could have had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day. Remote monitoring and telemedicine support should be explored and could help with earlier discharge and lower costs.

Cold Therapy for Pain Control in Pediatric Appendectomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Topical ice has been shown to reduce pain scores and opioid use in adults with midline abdominal incisions. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a cold therapy system in children following laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

Patients 7 years and older who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our institution from December 2021-September 2022 were eligible. Patients were randomized to standard pain therapy (control) or standard plus cold therapy (treatment) utilizing a modified ice machine system with cool abdominal pad postoperatively. Pain scores on the first 3 postoperative days (PODs), postoperative narcotic consumption, and patient satisfaction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were randomized, 29 to each group. Average survey response rate was 74% in control and 89% in treatment patients. There was no significant difference in median pain scores or narcotic use between groups. Cold therapy contributed to subjective pain improvement in 71%, 74%, and 50% of respondents on PODs 1, 2, and 3 respectively.

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients reported cold therapy to be a helpful adjunct in pain control after appendectomy, though it did not reduce postoperative pain scores or narcotic use in our cohort - likely due to this population's naturally expedient recovery and low baseline narcotic requirement.

TYPE OF STUDY

Randomized Controlled Trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pain Management After Ambulatory Pediatric General and Urologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Many studies evaluating opioid stewardship interventions' effects on postoperative pain rely on emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions, but patient-reported pain scores represent a more complete picture of the postoperative experience. This study compares patient-reported pain scores after ambulatory pediatric and urologic procedures and the effect of an opioid stewardship intervention that nearly eliminated the use of outpatient narcotics.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study including 3173 pediatric patients who underwent ambulatory procedures from 2015 to 2019, during which there was an intervention to reduce narcotic prescriptions. Postoperative day one phone calls assessed pain levels using a four-point scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain controlled with medication, or severe pain uncontrolled with medication). We quantified the proportion of patients prescribed opioids pre-versus post-intervention and compared pain scores for patients receiving opioid versus non-opioid regimens.

RESULTS

Opioid prescription rates demonstrated a 6.5-fold reduction after opioid stewardship efforts. The majority of patients (2838) received non-opioids, with only 335 patients receiving opioids. Opioid patients reported moderate/severe pain slightly more than non-opioid patients (14.1% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.04). On by-procedure analyses, there were no subgroups in which non-opioid patients reported significantly higher pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid postoperative pain regimens appear to be effective, with only 10.4% of patients reporting moderate/severe pain after ambulatory procedures. Future studies assessing patient-reported outcomes are necessary to optimize pain control for all patients and to determine whether there is ever an indication for opioid prescription after ambulatory general pediatric or urologic surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective comparative study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Pediatric Pain and Pain Management After Ambulatory Plastic Surgery: Trends in the Age of Opioid Awareness

BACKGROUND

Overprescribing by physicians has been shown to be a major contributor to the opioid epidemic. Although pediatric ambulatory plastic surgery patients are commonly prescribed opioids for postoperative pain control, there is a lack of evidence for their necessity. This study aimed to investigate the role of prescribed narcotics in the ambulatory pediatric plastic surgery setting.

METHODS

All assenting patients/guardians, ages 0 to 17 years, who underwent an ambulatory plastic surgery procedure by 1 attending surgeon from March 2018 to March 2019, were asked to participate in the study. A questionnaire was distributed at the first postoperative visit to interrogate postoperative pain, management, and narcotic use.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients/guardians completed the questionnaire. Seventy-eight percent (74) of patients picked up the narcotic medication, with 33% (31) taking at least 1 dose of narcotics, and only 9% (9) taking 4 or more doses. Patients overall found no difference in efficacy of the narcotics versus nonprescription analgesics (3.93/5 and 4.31/5, P = 0.11). Age was a significant predictor, with older patients requiring more narcotics (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.24; P = 0.019). The type of surgery a patient underwent was not a significant predictor of the amount of narcotic used. Few patients knew how to properly dispose of the excess narcotics, with almost 50% still having it stored in their homes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the majority of pediatric ambulatory plastic surgery patients do not require narcotic pain medications and experience adequate pain relief with over-the-counter analgesics. Importantly, education on proper disposal of narcotic medications may be a simple, yet effective target to decrease opioid availability for abuse.

A multi-institutional approach for decreasing narcotic prescriptions after laparoscopic appendectomy

Background

Appendicitis is a common indication for surgical hospital admission. Uncomplicated appendicitis is typically treated with surgical intervention, most commonly a laparoscopic appendectomy. As with many procedures, narcotic utilization is highly varied among surgeons for postoperative pain control. With the opioid epidemic and a demonstrated link between excessive narcotic prescriptions paving the way to dependence and addiction, it is more important than ever to decrease the circulation of these medications. We hypothesized that a perioperative, multimodal analgesia strategy coupled with monthly feedback reports comparing hospitals narcotic prescribing habits would decrease, and in some cases eliminate, the use of outpatient narcotics in adults after laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods

A quality improvement project was initiated to provide monthly feedback to surgeons on narcotic prescribing habits after adult laparoscopic appendectomies. A multi-hospital database was created to include adult patients that were diagnosed with acute appendicitis, treated with laparoscopic appendectomy, and discharged within 48 h of surgery. The database provided information regarding the number of narcotic doses prescribed on discharge. Participating hospitals selected a site champion who distributed monthly prescribing reports. A protocol was created and distributed to participating sites that provided a guideline for preoperative and postoperative pain medication management. The intervention period was 10/1/2019–3/31/2020. We utilized the preceding year’s data (October 1, 2018–September 30, 2019) as the pre-intervention control group. We also compared results between local and distant sites to see if personal connection to surgeons influenced the results.

Results

A total of 1785 appendectomies were performed during the study period at participating hospitals. The average number of prescribed narcotics decreased from 23.6 doses during the control period to 14.2 during the intervention (p < 0.001). There was no change in the number of total narcotic prescriptions (8.9 vs 7.9%, p = 0.52). Overall, the average number of narcotics prescribed decreased by 40% with similar decrease in average prescribed narcotics for local and distant hospitals, respectively (47.7% vs 42.1%). Average narcotic dose during the first 2 months of intervention at the local hospitals was 9.7 and 11.1 for the last 2 months of intervention (p = 0.69). Average narcotic dose during the first 2 months of intervention at the distant hospitals was 19.5 and 13.4 for the last 2 months of intervention (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

A multimodal pain regimen combined with a monthly narcotic prescription report provided to prescribers decreases the average number of narcotic prescriptions after laparoscopic appendectomy. Local sites demonstrated immediate decrease in narcotic utilization compared to distant sites whose change occurred more gradually.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09107-y.

Opioid prescribing to preteen children undergoing ambulatory surgery in the United States

BACKGROUND

Overuse and misuse of opioids is a continuing crisis. The most common reason for children to receive opioids is postoperative pain, and they are often prescribed more than needed. The amount of opioids prescribed varies widely, even for minor ambulatory procedures. This study uses a large national sample to describe filled opioid prescriptions to preteen patients after all ambulatory surgical procedures and common standard procedures.

METHODS

We analyzed Truven Health MarketScan data for July 2012 through December 2016 to perform descriptive analyses of opioid fills by age and geographic area, change over time, second opioid fills in opioid-naïve patients, and variation in the types and amount of medication prescribed for 18 common and standard procedures in otolaryngology, urology, general surgery, ophthalmology, and orthopedics.

RESULTS

Over 10% of preteen children filled perioperative opioid prescriptions for ambulatory surgery in the period 2012 to 2016. The amount prescribed varied widely (median 5 days' supply, IQR 3-8, range 1-90), even for the most minor procedures, for example, frenotomy (median 4 days' supply, IQR 2-5, range 1-60). Codeine fills were common despite safety concerns. Second opioid prescriptions were filled by opioid-naïve patients after almost all procedures studied. The rate of prescribing declined significantly over time and varied substantially by age and across census regions.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified opioid prescribing outside of the norms of standard practice in all of the specialties studied. Standardizing perioperative opioid prescribing and developing guidelines on appropriate prescribing for children may reduce the opioids available for misuse and diversion.