The Missed Value of Underutilizing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: A Systematic Review

Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality.

METHODS

Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices.

RESULTS

The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches.

CONCLUSION

The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.

Deep Brain Stimulation of Bilateral Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei in Pediatric Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of pediatric patients with nonlesional, drug-resistant epilepsy, including patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), remains a challenge given the lack of resective targets in most patients and shows seizure freedom rates <50% at 5 years. The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is less certain in children than in adults. This study examined clinical and seizure outcomes for pediatric patients with LGS undergoing DBS targeting of the centromedian thalamic nuclei (CMTN).

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis was performed of patients aged ≤19 years with clinical diagnosis of LGS undergoing bilateral DBS placement to the CMTN from 2020 to 2021 by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

Four females and 2 males aged 6-19 years were identified. Before surgery, each child experienced at least 6 years of refractory seizures; 4 children had experienced seizures since infancy. All took antiseizure medications at the time of surgery. Five children had previous placement of a vagus nerve stimulator and 2 had a previous corpus callosotomy. The mean length of stay after DBS was 2 days. No children experienced adverse neurologic effects from implantation; the mean follow-up time was 16.3 months. Four patients had >60% reduction in seizure frequency after surgery, 1 patient experienced 10% reduction, and 1 patient showed no change. No children reported worsening seizure symptoms after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributes to the sparse literature describing CMTN DBS for children with drug-resistant epilepsy from LGS. Our results suggest that CMTN DBS is a safe and effective therapeutic modality that should be considered as an alternative or adjuvant therapy for this challenging patient population. Further studies with larger patient populations are warranted.

Comparing vagus nerve stimulation and resective surgery outcomes in patients with co-occurring autism and epilepsy to patients with epilepsy alone: A population-based study

Autism and epilepsy commonly co-occur. Understanding trends in healthcare utilization and in-hospital outcomes amongst patients with autism and epilepsy can help optimize care and reduce costs. We compared hospital outcomes amongst patients with autism and epilepsy to those with epilepsy alone undergoing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and resective/disconnective surgery. Differences in discharge status, in-hospital mortality, mean length of stay (LOS), cost and surgical/medical complications were examined. Elective surgical admissions amongst patients with epilepsy alone and co-occurring autism and epilepsy were identified in the 2003-14 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using previously validated ICD-9-CM case definitions. One patient with co-occurring epilepsy and autism was matched to three epilepsy patients for age, sex and (1) VNS and (2) resective/disconnective surgery. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to examine the outcomes of interest. Data were collected on: (1) VNS-52 (mean age: 12.79 ± 1.03; 19.27% female) hospital admissions in persons with comorbid autism and epilepsy, 156 (mean age: 12.84 ± 0.71; 19.31% female) matched controls with epilepsy alone; (2) resective/disconnective surgery-113 (mean age: 12.99 ± 0.84; 24.55% female) with comorbid autism and epilepsy, 339 (mean age: 13.37 ± 0.68; 23.86% female) matched controls with epilepsy alone. Compared to patients with epilepsy alone, patients with autism and epilepsy who underwent either surgery showed no differences for in-hospital mortality, discharge status, mean LOS, hospitalization cost, and surgical/medical complications. Our study shows the feasibility and safety of epilepsy VNS and resective surgery in those with ASD do not differ with those with epilepsy alone, contrary to the prevalent safety concerns of epilepsy surgery in patients with ASD.

Epilepsy Impacts Families and Communities: Persistent Gaps and Inequities

EFFECT OF EPILEPSY ON FAMILIES, COMMUNITIES, AND SOCIETY

Adam P. Ostendorf , Satyanarayana Gedela Seminars in Pediatric Neurology Volume 24, Issue 4, November 2017, Pages 340-347 The effect of epilepsy extends beyond those with the diagnosis and impacts families, communities and society. Caregiver and sibling quality of life is often negatively affected by frequent seizures, comorbid behavioral and sleep disorders and stigma surrounding the diagnosis. Furthermore, the negative effects can be magnified by individual coping styles and resources available to families of those with epilepsy. Beyond the family and immediate caregivers, epilepsy affects local communities by drawing additional resources from education systems. The direct costs of caring for an individual with epilepsy and the indirect costs associated with decreased productivity place financial strain on individuals and health care systems throughout the world. This review details factors affecting family and caregiver quality of life and provides several approaches through which health care providers may address these concerns. Furthermore, we examine the financial effect of epilepsy on society and review emerging strategies to lessen health care use for individuals with epilepsy.

Number of epilepsy surgeries has decreased despite an increase in pre-surgical evaluations at a tertiary pediatric epilepsy center in Ontario

OBJECTIVE

A recent U.S. study reported that the number of epilepsy surgeries has remained stable or declined in recent years despite an increase in pre-surgical evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate trends in pre-surgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery from 2001 to 2019 and to determine whether these trends have changed in the later period (2014-2019) compared to earlier period (2001-2013).

METHODS

This study evaluated trends in pre-surgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery at a tertiary pediatric epilepsy center. Children with drug resistant epilepsy who were evaluated for surgery were included. Clinical data, reasons for not undergoing surgery, and surgical characteristics of surgery patients were collected. Overall trends and trends in later period compared to earlier period for pre-surgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 1151 children who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery and 546 underwent surgery. There was an upward trend in pre-surgical evaluation in the earlier period (rate ratio [RR]=1.04 (95%CI:1.02-1.07), p<0.001) and the trajectory of presurgical evaluation in the later period was not significantly different to the earlier period (RR=1.00 [95%CI:0.95-1.06], p = 0.88). Among the reasons for not undergoing surgery, failure to localize the seizures occurred more frequently in later period than earlier period (22.6% vs. 17.1% respectively, p = 0.024). For number of surgeries, there was an upward trend between 2001 and 2013 (RR=1.08 [95%CI:1.05-1.11], p<0.001), and a decreasing trend in the later period compared to earlier period (RR=0.91 [95%CI:0.84-0.99], p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Despite an increasing trend in pre-surgical evaluation, there was a decreasing trend in the number of epilepsy surgery in the later period as there was a larger proportion of patients in whom the seizures could not be localized. Trends in presurgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery will continue to evolve with introduction of technologies such as stereo-EEG and minimally invasive laser therapy.

Family Burden and Epilepsy Surgery in Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

 Family burden (FB) in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is significantly higher than that in children with non-DRE. Epilepsy surgery is an established approach to treat DRE, and this study examines the impact of pediatric epilepsy surgery on FB.

METHODS

 We retrospectively analyzed data of families and pediatric patients with focal structural DRE treated with epilepsy surgery at our epilepsy center from April 2018 to November 2021. We examined the relationship between cognitive, behavioral, and epilepsy-specific data and the FB measured with the German version of the Impact on Family Scale before and after epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

 The study cohort included 31 children with DRE at a mean age of 9 years at surgery (range = 0-16) and a mean epilepsy duration of 3 years (range = 0-14). Cognitive impairment correlated with FB in children with DRE prior to surgery. At the last assessment, 14.5 months (mean, range = 6-24) after epilepsy surgery, 87.2% of patients were seizure-free, FB values had decreased by 75.0%, and behavioral problems had decreased by 85,7%. Cognitive functions remained stable following epilepsy surgery.

CONCLUSION

 In children with DRE, epilepsy surgery reduces FB. Given the considerable impact of families on the development and wellbeing of their children, the impact of epilepsy surgery should be communicated to affected families.

Invasive Intracranial Electroencephalogram (EEG) Monitoring for Epilepsy in the Pediatric Patient With a Shunt

The use of invasive intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring in the patient with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversionary shunt presents a conundrum -- the presence of a percutaneous electrode passing into the intracranial compartment presents a pathway for entry of pathogens to which a chronically implanted device like a shunt is especially susceptible to infection. In this case report, we describe the clinical and radiological features, medical and surgical management, and treatment outcomes of pediatric patients with shunted hydrocephalus who underwent invasive intracranial monitoring over an eight-year period. Three cases of children undergoing invasive intracranial monitoring were included in this study. Invasive monitoring for each patient occurred over three to six days. In each case, invasive intracranial monitoring was completed successfully, without resulting infection or shunt malfunction. While the second procedure was complicated by the formation of a pneumocephalus, there was no associated midline shift, and invasive intracranial monitoring was completed without incidence. Each patient received further surgery that successfully reduced seizure frequency. This study suggests that, while children with CSF diversionary shunts are at an inherently increased risk for infection and other complications, invasive intracranial monitoring is a relatively safe and feasible option in these patients. Future studies should explore the optimal duration for intracranial monitoring in pediatric patients with chronically implanted devices.

Association Between Characteristics of National Association of Epilepsy Centers and Reported Utilization of Specific Surgical Techniques

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nearly one-third of persons with epilepsy will continue having seizures despite trialing multiple antiseizure medications. Epilepsy surgery may be beneficial in these cases, and evaluation at a comprehensive epilepsy center is recommended. Numerous palliative and potentially curative approaches exist, and types of surgery performed may be influenced by center characteristics. This article describes epilepsy center characteristics associated with epilepsy surgery access and volumes in the United States.

METHODS

We analyzed National Association of Epilepsy Centers 2019 annual report and supplemental survey data obtained with responses from 206 adult epilepsy center directors and 136 pediatric epilepsy center directors in the United States. Surgical treatment volumes were compiled with center characteristics, including US Census region. We used multivariable modeling with zero-inflated Poisson regression models to present ORs and incidence rate ratios of receiving a given surgery type based on center characteristics.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% with individual element missingness less than 4% across 352 observations undergoing univariate analysis. Multivariable models included 319 complete observations. Significant regional differences were present. The rates of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) were lower at centers in the Midwest (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92; p = 0.006) and Northeast (IRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.96; p = 0.022) compared with those in the South. Conversely, responsive neurostimulation implantation rates were higher in the Midwest (IRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.1-1.91; p = 0.008) and West (IRR 1.91, 95% CI 1.49-2.44; p < 0.001) compared with the South. Center accreditation level, institution type, demographics, and resources were also associated with variations in access and rates of potentially curative and palliative surgical interventions.

DISCUSSION

Epilepsy surgery procedure volumes are influenced by US epilepsy center region and other characteristics. These variations may affect access to specific surgical treatments for persons with drug resistant epilepsy across the United States.

Minimally Invasive Destructive, Ablative, and Disconnective Epilepsy Surgery

Conventional epilepsy surgery performed by microsurgical dissection typically requires large cranial working windows created with high-speed drills and lengthy incisions. In the past few decades, minimally invasive techniques have been developed with smaller incisions, comparable efficacy, shorter hospitalizations, and better safety profiles. These minimally invasive alternatives utilize stereotactic, ultrasonic, radiotherapeutic, and endoscopic techniques. Although not able to completely replace conventional surgery for all etiologies of epilepsy, these minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized modern epilepsy surgery and have been an invaluable asset to the neurosurgeon's repertoire. The endoscope has allowed for surgeons to have adequate visualization during resective and disconnective epilepsy surgeries using keyhole or miniature craniotomies. Modern stereotactic techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency ablation can be used as viable alternatives for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and can destroy lesional tissue deep areas without the approach-related morbidity of microsurgery such as with hypothalamic hamartomas. These stereotactic techniques do not preclude future surgery in the settings of treatment failure and have been used successfully after failed conventional surgery. Multiple ablation corridors can be performed in a single procedure that can be used for lesioning of large targets or to simplify treating multifocal epilepsies. These stereotactic techniques have even been used successfully to perform disconnective procedures such as hemispherotomies and corpus callosotomies. In patients unable to tolerate surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery is a minimally invasive option that can result in improved seizure control with minimal procedural risks. Advances in minimally invasive neurosurgery provide viable treatment options for drug-resistant epilepsy with quicker recovery, less injury to functional brain, and for patients that may otherwise not choose conventional surgery.

Surgical Treatments for Epilepsies in Children Aged 1-36 Months: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early life epilepsies (epilepsies in children 1-36 months old) are common and may be refractory to antiseizure medications. We summarize findings of a systematic review commissioned by the American Epilepsy Society to assess evidence and identify evidence gaps for surgical treatments for epilepsy in children aged 1-36 months without infantile spasms.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 1/1/1999 to 8/19/21. We included studies reporting data on children aged 1 month to ≤36 months undergoing surgical interventions or neurostimulation for epilepsy and enrolling ≥10 patients per procedure. We excluded studies of infants with infantile spasms or status epilepticus. For effectiveness outcomes (seizure freedom, seizure frequency), studies were required to report follow-up at ≥ 12 weeks. For harm outcomes, no minimum follow-up was required. Outcomes for all epilepsy types, regardless of etiology, were reported together.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (in 19 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen prestudies/poststudies reported on efficacy, and 12 studies addressed harms. Surgeries were performed from 1979 to 2020. Seizure freedom for infants undergoing hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy ranged from 7% to 76% at 1 year after surgery. For nonhemispheric surgeries, seizure freedom ranged from 40% to 70%. For efficacy, we concluded low strength of evidence (SOE) suggests some infants achieve seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery. Over half of infants undergoing hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy achieved a favorable outcome (Engel I or II, International League Against Epilepsy I to IV, or >50% seizure reduction) at follow-up of >1 year, although studies had key limitations. Surgical mortality was rare for functional hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy and nonhemispheric resections. Low SOE suggests postoperative hydrocephalus is uncommon for infants undergoing nonhemispheric procedures for epilepsy.

DISCUSSION

Although existing evidence remains sparse and low quality, some infants achieve seizure freedom after surgery and ≥50% achieve favorable outcomes. Future prospective studies in this age group are needed. In addition to seizure outcomes, studies should evaluate other important outcomes (developmental outcomes, quality of life [QOL], sleep, functional performance, and caregiver QOL).

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021220352) on March 5, 2021.

Epilepsy center characteristics and geographic region influence presurgical testing in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Persons with drug-resistant epilepsy may benefit from epilepsy surgery and should undergo presurgical testing to determine potential candidacy and appropriate intervention. Institutional expertise can influence use and availability of evaluations and epilepsy surgery candidacy. This census survey study aims to examine the influence of geographic region and other center characteristics on presurgical testing for medically intractable epilepsy.

METHODS

We analyzed annual report and supplemental survey data reported in 2020 from 206 adult epilepsy center directors and 136 pediatric epilepsy center directors in the United States. Test utilization data were compiled with annual center volumes, available resources, and US Census regional data. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-squared tests for univariate analysis of procedure utilization. Multivariable modeling was also performed to assign odds ratios (ORs) of significant variables.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% with individual element missingness < 11% across 342 observations undergoing univariate analysis. A total of 278 complete observations were included in the multivariable models, and significant regional differences were present. For instance, compared to centers in the South, those in the Midwest used neuropsychological testing (OR = 2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-6.86; p = .018) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = = 1.14-6.61; p = .025) more commonly. For centers in the Northeast (OR = .46, 95% CI = .23-.93; p = .031) and West (OR = .41, 95% CI = .19-.87; p = .022), odds of performing single-photon emission computerized tomography were lower by nearly 50% compared to those in the South. Center accreditation level, demographics, volume, and resources were also associated with varying individual testing rates.

SIGNIFICANCE

Presurgical testing for drug-resistant epilepsy is influenced by US geographic region and other center characteristics. These findings have potential implications for comparing outcomes between US epilepsy centers and may inject disparities in access to surgical treatment.

Treatment gaps in epilepsy

Over 50 million people around the world have epilepsy, and yet, epilepsy recognition and access to care are ongoing issues. Nearly 80% of people with epilepsy live in low-and middle-income countries and face the greatest barriers to quality care. However, there are substantial disparities in care within different communities in high-income countries as well. Across the world, under-recognition of seizures continues to be an issue, leading to diagnostic and treatment delays. This stems from issues surrounding stigma, public education, basic access to care, as well as healthcare worker education. In different regions, people may face language barriers, economic barriers, and technological barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment. Even once diagnosed, people with epilepsy often face gaps in optimal seizure control with the use of antiseizure medications. Additionally, nearly one-third of people with epilepsy may be candidates for epilepsy surgery, and many either do not have access to surgical centers or are not referred for surgical evaluation. Even those who do often experience delays in care. The purpose of this review is to highlight barriers to care for people with epilepsy, including issues surrounding seizure recognition, diagnosis of epilepsy, and the initiation and optimization of treatment.