The effects of the antiresorptive agents calcitonin and pamidronate on spine fusion in a rabbit model

Blockade of Osteoclast-Mediated Bone Resorption With a RANKL-Inhibitor Enhances Bone Formation in a Rat Spinal Fusion Model

STUDY DESIGN

Rat spine fusion model.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine whether administration of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in a rat model of spinal fusion increases bone volume, bone density, and decreases osteoclasts in the fusion mass.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

OPG is a soluble RANK-ligand inhibitor that blocks osteoclast differentiation and activation. This makes it a potential agent to control the remodeling process and enhance bone mass during spinal fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats received a one-level spinal fusion of L4-L5 with bone allograft. Rats were then divided into four groups according to initiation of treatment: (1) saline on day 0 (saline), (2) OPG on day 0 (OPG D0), (3) OPG on day 10 (OPG D10), and (4) OPG on day 21 (OPG D21) postsurgery. After their initial injection, rats received weekly subcutaneous injections of OPG (10 mg/kg) and were euthanized six weeks postsurgery. MicroCT analysis of the fusion site and histological analysis of bone surface for quantification of osteoclast lining was performed.

RESULTS

Increased bone volume in the fusion site and around the spinous process was seen in OPG D0 and OPG D10 when compared with saline. Mean trabecular thickness was greater in all groups receiving OPG compared with saline, with OPG D0 and OPG D10 having significantly greater mean trabecular thickness than OPG D21. All OPG groups had less bone surface lined with osteoclasts when compared with Saline, with OPG D0 and OPG D10 having fewer than OPG D21.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that OPG inhibited osteoclast bone resorption, which led to greater bone at the fusion site. Future studies investigating OPG on its own or in combination with an osteogenic factor to improve spinal fusion outcomes are warranted to further elucidate its potential therapeutic effect.

Cost-utility Analysis of Neoadjuvant Teriparatide Therapy in Osteopenic Patients Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A cost-utility analysis study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of neoadjuvant teriparatide therapy in osteopenic patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is increasing evidence supporting preoperative use of anabolic agents such as teriparatide for preoperative optimization of ASD patients with poor bone density. However, such treatments are associated with added costs. To our knowledge, the cost-utility of teriparatide in osteopenic patients undergoing ASD surgery has not been established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analysis model was developed for a hypothetical 68-year-old female patient with osteopenia ( T score <-1.0) undergoing a T11 to pelvis instrumented spinal fusion for ASD. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to create estimates for event probabilities, costs, and quality adjusted life years at each node. Key model assumptions were that administration of a 4-month preoperative teriparatide course reduced 2-year postoperative reoperation rates [for pseudarthrosis from 5% to 2.5% and for proximal junctional failure (PJF) from 15% to 5%]. Monte Carlo simulations were used to calculate the mean incremental cost utility ratio and incremental net monetary benefits. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to estimate the contribution of individual parameters to uncertainty in the model.

RESULTS

Teriparatide was the favored strategy in 82% of the iterations. The mean incremental cost utility ratio for the teriparatide strategy was negative (higher net benefit, lower net cost), and lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality adjusted life year. Teriparatide use was associated with a mean incremental net monetary benefit of $3,948. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the factors with the greatest impact on the model were the incidence of PJF in the no teriparatide group, the duration and monthly cost of treatment, and the cost of reoperation due to PJF.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant teriparatide is a cost-effective strategy to reduce postoperative complications in patients with osteopenia undergoing ASD surgery.

Craniospinal Surgery in Hajdu-Cheney Syndrome: A Review of Case Reports

Hajdu-Cheney syndrome (HCS) is a rare metabolic bone disorder that results in severe osteoporosis and various skeletal deformities. Craniospinal pathology is commonly associated with it, but surgical management is challenging due to the distorted anatomy, reduced bone strength, and fusion failure due to osteolysis. Hence, the surgical difficulty in these patients requires careful consideration. In this study, we systematically review all published operative cases and complications to provide a comprehensive review pertaining to the spine and/or cranium in patients with HCS. By highlighting these cases and their associated complications, we aim to prepare practitioners who treat this difficult pathology.

Osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Bisphosphonates and teriparatide are the most common therapies used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Their impact on fusion rates in osteoporotic patients following spinal fusion has yet to be concretely defined, with previous systematic reviews focusing heavily on bisphosphonates and lacking clinical insight on the utility of teriparatide. Herein the authors present an updated meta-analysis of the utility of both bisphosphonates and teriparatide in improving spinal fusion outcomes in osteoporotic patients.

METHODS

After a comprehensive search of the English-language literature in the PubMed and Embase databases, 11 clinical studies were included in the final qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of these studies, 9 investigated bisphosphonates, 7 investigated teriparatide, and 1 investigated a combination of teriparatide and denosumab. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated where appropriate.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of the postoperative use of bisphosphonate demonstrated better odds of successful fusion as compared to that in controls during short-term monitoring (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.72-6.42, p = 0.0003) but not long-term monitoring (p > 0.05). Bisphosphonate use was also shown to significantly reduce the likelihood of postoperative vertebral compression fracture (VCF; OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.59, p = 0.01) and significantly reduce Oswestry Disability Index scores (mean difference [MD] = -2.19, 95% CI -2.94 to -1.44, p < 0.00001) and visual analog scale pain scores (MD = -0.58, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.38, p < 0.00001). Teriparatide was found to significantly increase fusion rates at long-term postoperative periods as compared to rates after bisphosphonate therapy, with patients who received postoperative teriparatide therapy 2.05 times more likely to experience successful fusion (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17-3.59, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors demonstrate the benefits of bisphosphonate and teriparatide therapy independently in accelerating fusion during the first 6 months after spinal fusion surgery in osteoporotic patients. In addition, they show that teriparatide may have superior benefits in spinal fusion during long-term monitoring as compared to those with bisphosphonates. Bisphosphonates may be better suited in preventing VCFs postoperatively in addition to minimizing postoperative disability and pain.

Does the use of preoperative bisphosphonates in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis affect lumbar fusion rates? Analysis from a national spine registry

OBJECTIVE

Bisphosphonates are used to increase bone strength in treating osteopenia and osteoporosis, but their use for increasing lumbar fusion rates has been controversial. The objective of this study was to determine if preoperative treatment with bisphosphonates affects the reoperation rates for nonunions (operative nonunion rates) following lumbar fusions in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis.

METHODS

The authors conducted a cohort study using data from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry. Patients (aged ≥ 50 years) with a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis who underwent primary elective lumbar fusions for degenerative disc disease, deformity, or spondylolisthesis were included in the cohort. Repeated spinal procedures at the index lumbar levels were noted through chart review. Reoperations for symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunions), time to nonunion, and the nonunion spine level(s) were also identified. The crude 2-year cumulative incidence of operative nonunions was calculated as 1 minus the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the association between preoperative bisphosphonate use and operative nonunion after adjustment for covariates. Analysis was stratified by osteopenia and osteoporosis diagnosis.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 1040 primary elective lumbar fusion patients, 408 with osteopenia and 632 with osteoporosis. Ninety-seven (23.8%) patients with osteopenia and 370 (58.5%) patients with osteoporosis were preoperative bisphosphonate users. For the osteopenia group, no operative nonunions were observed in patients with preoperative bisphosphonate, while the crude 2-year incidence was 2.44% (95% CI 0.63–4.22) in the nonuser group. For the osteoporotic group, after adjustment for covariates, no difference was observed in risk for operative nonunions between the preoperative bisphosphonate users and nonusers (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.20–4.55, p = 0.964).

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors’ knowledge, this study presents one of the largest series of patients with the diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis in whom the effects of preoperative bisphosphonates on lumbar fusions were evaluated using operative nonunion rates as an outcome measure. The results indicate that preoperative bisphosphonate use had no effect on the operative nonunion rates for patients with osteoporosis. Similar indications were not confirmed in osteopenia patients because of the low nonunion frequency. Further studies are warranted to the determine if preoperative and postoperative timing of bisphosphonate use has any effect on lumbar fusion rates.

Histological evaluation of the healing process of autografted mandibular bone defects in rats under treatment with zoledronate

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the healing process of autografted mandibular bone defects in rats treated with zoledronate (ZOL).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 180 Wistar rats were divided into four groups: group L received intravenous infusion of two doses of 0.06 mg/kg ZOL, nine weeks apart; group H received 0.06 mg/kg ZOL, while groups C and NC received normal saline at three-week intervals for nine weeks. Three weeks following the last infusion, a unilateral mandibular bone defect (5 mm) was created. Except in the NC group, all defects were repaired with autologous iliac bone graft. Fifteen animals from each group were sacrificed on postoperative Day 20, Day 40, and Day 60. Graft healing was scored using a histological grading system (ranging from 1 to 6).

RESULTS

Histological evaluations performed on postoperative Day 60 showed that the mandibular defects were mainly repaired with fibrous tissue in the NC and H groups (93.00% ± 7.51% and 82.67% ± 13.08%, respectively) and with bone in the C and L groups (75.33% ± 14.20% and 92.67% ± 8.84%, respectively). The percentage of fibrous tissue and bone as well as the healing score of the NC and H groups were significantly different (P = 0.001) from those of the C and L groups. However, these were not different between neither the NC and H groups nor the C and L groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the present study the hypothesis can be established that there also might be a dose-dependent effect of ZOL on the healing of bone grafts in humans. This hypothesis has to be verified or rejected in clinical trials.

Radiographic and functional outcomes of bisphosphonate use in lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To date, there are conflicting reports with no consensus on the influence of bisphosphonates on lumbar fusion. The goal of this study was to compare the radiographic and functional outcomes of patients that had lumbar fusion with and without bisphosphonates.

METHODS

A systematic search of multiple medical reference databases was conducted for studies comparing bisphosphonate use to controls following spinal fusion. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model for heterogeneity. Radiographic outcome measures included fusion rates and risk of screw loosening, cage subsidence and vertebral fracture. Functional outcomes measures included Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale score for back and leg pain.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonate use was statistically suggestive of a higher fusion rate compared to controls (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.87-5.56, p = 0.09). There was no difference in screw loosening rates between the bisphosphonate group and controls (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.14-1.48, p = 0.19). However, bisphosphonate use was associated with decreased odds of cage subsidence and vertebral fractures compared to controls (cage subsidence: OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.75, p = 0.01; vertebral fracture: OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.48, p = 0.0007).

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonate use does not appear to impair successful lumbar fusion compared to controls. Additionally, bisphosphonate use was associated with decreased odds of cage subsidence and vertebral fractures compared to controls that had lumbar fusion. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Investigational growth factors utilized in animal models of spinal fusion: Systematic review

BACKGROUND

Over 400000 Americans annually undergo spinal fusion surgeries, yet up to 40% of these procedures result in pseudoarthrosis even with iliac crest autograft, the current “gold standard” treatment. Tissue engineering has the potential to solve this problem via the creation of bone grafts involving bone-promoting growth factors (e.g., bone morphogenetic protein 2). A broad assessment of experimental growth factors is important to inform future work and clinical potential in this area. To date, however, no study has systematically reviewed the investigational growth factors utilized in preclinical animal models of spinal fusion.

AIM

To review all published studies assessing investigational growth factors for spinal fusion in animal models and identify promising agents for translation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases with searches run on May 29^th, 2018. The search query was designed to include all non-human, preclinical animal models of spinal fusion reported in the literature without a timespan limit. Extracted data for each model included surgical approach, level of fusion, animal species and breed, animal age and sex, and any other relevant characteristics. The dosages/sizes of all implant materials, spinal fusion rates, and follow-up time points were recorded. The data were analyzed and the results reported in tables and text. PRISMA guidelines were followed for this systematic review.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were included in this study, comprising 14 experimental growth factors: AB204 (n = 1); angiopoietin 1 (n = 1); calcitonin (n = 3); erythropoietin (n = 1); basic fibroblast growth factor (n = 1); growth differentiation factor 5 (n = 4), combined insulin-like growth factor 1 + transforming growth factor beta (n = 4); insulin (n = 1); NELL-1 (n = 5); noggin (n = 1); P-15 (n = 1); peptide B2A (n = 2); and secreted phosphoprotein 24 (n = 1). The fusion rates of the current gold standard treatment (autologous iliac crest bone graft, ICBG) and the leading clinically used growth factor (BMP-2) ranged widely in the included studies, from 0-100% for ICBG and from 13%-100% for BMP-2. Among the identified growth factors, calcitonin, GDF-5, NELL-1, and P-15 resulted in fusion rates of 100% in some cases. In addition, six growth factors - AB204, angiopoietin 1, GDF-5, insulin, NELL-1, and peptide B2A - resulted in significantly enhanced fusion rates compared to ICBG, BMP-2, or other internal control in some studies. Large heterogeneity in animal species, fusion method, and experimental groups and time points was observed across the included studies, limiting the direct comparison of the growth factors identified herein.

CONCLUSION

Several promising investigational growth factors for spinal fusion have been identified herein; directly comparing the fusion efficacy and safety of these agents may inform clinical translation.

Medical optimization of lumbar fusion in the osteoporotic patient

PURPOSE

In patients undergoing lumbar fusion, osteoporosis has been shown to lead to poorer outcomes and greater incidence of fusion-related complications. Given the undesirable effect of osteoporosis on lumbar fusion surgery, a number of medications have been proposed for use in the peri- and postoperative period to mitigate risks and enhance outcomes. The purpose of this review was to summarize and synthesize the current literature regarding medical management of osteoporosis in the context of lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted in October 2016, using permutations of various search terms related to osteoporosis, medications, and lumbar fusion.

RESULTS

Teriparatide injections may lead to faster, more successful fusion, and may reduce fusion-related complications. Bisphosphonate therapy likely does not hinder fusion outcomes and may be useful in reducing certain complications of fusion in osteoporotic patients. Calcitonin and selective estrogen receptor modulator therapy show mixed results, but more research is necessary to make a recommendation. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with poor fusion outcomes, but evidence for supplementation in patients with normal serum levels is weak.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the current body of research appears to support the use of teriparatide therapy to enhance lumbar fusion outcomes in the osteoporotic patient, although the extent of research on this topic is limited. Additionally, very little evidence exists to cease any of the mentioned osteoporosis treatments prior to lumbar fusion.

Effects of combined teriparatide and zoledronic acid on posterior lumbar vertebral fusion in an aged ovariectomized rat model of osteopenia

There has been no study regarding the effect of a combination of teriparatide (TPTD) and zoledronic acid (ZA) on vertebral fusion. In this study, we investigate the effect of single and combined TPTD and ZA treatment on lumbar vertebral fusion in aged ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Sixty two-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomized and underwent bilateral L4-L5 posterolateral intertransverse fusion after 10 months. The OVX rats received vehicle (control) treatment, or ZA (100 µg/kg, once), or TPTD (60 µg/kg/2 d for 42 d), or ZA + TPTD until they were euthanized at 6 weeks following lumbar vertebral fusion. The lumbar spine was harvested. Bone mineral density (BMD), bone fusion, bone volume (BV), and bone formation rate (BFR)were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), radiography, micro-computed tomography, and histomorphometry. Compared with vehicle (control) treatment, ZA and TPTD monotherapy increased bone volume (BV) at fusion site, and ZA + TPTD combined therapy had an additive effect. Treatment with TPTD and ZA + TPTD increased the bone fusion rate when compared with the control group. ZA monotherapy did not alter the rate of bone fusion. The TPTD and ZA + TPTD treatment groups had increased mineral apposition rate (MAR), mineralizing surfaces/bone surface ((MS/BS), and BFR/BS compared with the OVX group. Our experiment confirm that the monotherapy with TPTD and combination therapy with ZA + TPTD in an OVX rat model of osteopenia following lumbar vertebral fusion surgery increased bone fusion mass and bone fusion rate, and ZA + TPTD combined therapy had an additive effect on bone fusion mass. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:937-944, 2018.

The Therapeutic Effects of Combination Therapy with Curcumin and Alendronate on Spine Fusion Surgery in the Ovariectomized Rats

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of combination therapy with curcumin and alendronate on spine fusion surgery in ovariectomized rats.

Methods

Thirty-two female Sprague-Dawley rats (12 weeks old) underwent bilateral ovariectomy (OVX). Eight weeks after surgery, animals underwent intertransverse spine fusion at L4–5. The rats were randomly distributed amongst 4 groups; untreated OVX group, curcumin administered group, alendronate administered group, and the combination therapy group. At 8 weeks after fusion surgery, the animals were sacrificed and the fusion mass was assessed by manual palpation, radiographic scan, and micro-computed tomographic scan. In addition, mechanical strength was determined by a 3-point bending test.

Results

Based on the results of manual palpation testing and 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography scanning, solid bone fusion rate was 50% (4 of 8) in the OVX group, 75% (6 of 8) in the alendronate-only and curcumin-only group, and 87.5% (7 of 8) in the combination therapy group, respectively. The combination therapy group had a higher fusion rate compared with the other treatment groups, though not statistically significantly (p>0.05). And the combination therapy group had a significant increase in fusion volume at 8 weeks after spine fusion surgery compared with curcumin-only group (p=0.039). The 3-point bending test showed that combination therapy group had a significantly greater maximal load value compared to that of curcumin-only group (p=0.024).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that additional treatment of curcumin and alendronate after spine fusion surgery in rat can promote higher fusion volume, and improve bone mechanical strength.

Bisphosphonate's and Intermittent Parathyroid Hormone's Effect on Human Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review of the Literature

There has been a conscious effort to address osteoporosis in the aging population. As bisphosphonate and intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) therapy become more widely prescribed to treat osteoporosis, it is important to understand their effects on other physiologic processes, particularly the impact on spinal fusion. Despite early animal model studies and more recent clinical studies, the impact of these medications on spinal fusion is not fully understood. Previous animal studies suggest that bisphosphonate therapy resulted in inhibition of fusion mass with impeded maturity and an unknown effect on biomechanical strength. Prior animal studies demonstrate an improved fusion rate and fusion mass microstructure with the use of intermittent PTH. The purpose of this study was to determine if bisphosphonates and intermittent PTH treatment have impact on human spinal fusion. A systematic review of the literature published between 1980 and 2015 was conducted using major electronic databases. Studies reporting outcomes of human subjects undergoing 1, 2, or 3-level spinal fusion while receiving bisphosphonates and/or intermittent PTH treatment were included. The results of relevant human studies were analyzed for consensus on the effects of these medications in regards to spinal fusion. There were nine human studies evaluating the impact of these medications on spinal fusion. Improved fusion rates were noted in patients receiving bisphosphonates compared to control groups, and greater fusion rates in patients receiving PTH compared to control groups. Prior studies involving animal models found an improved fusion rate and fusion mass microstructure with the use of intermittent PTH. No significant complications were demonstrated in any study included in the analysis. Bisphosphonate use in humans may not be a deterrent to spinal fusion. Intermittent parathyroid use has shown early promise to increase fusion mass in both animal and human studies but further studies are needed to support routine use.

Perioperative Medical Management of Spine Surgery Patients With Osteoporosis

Management of spine surgery patients with osteoporosis is challenging because of the difficulty of instrumenting and the potential complications, including nonunion and adjacent level fractures. Treatment of this patient population should involve a multidisciplinary approach including the spine surgeon, primary care physician, endocrinologist, and physical therapist. Indication for preoperative treatment before spinal fusion surgery is unclear. All patients should receive calcium and vitamin D. Hormone replacement therapy, including estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators, should be considered for elderly female patients with decreased bone mass. Bisphosphonates or intermittent parathyroid hormone are reserved for those with significant bone loss in the spine. Pretreatment with antiresorption medications affect bone remodeling, which is a vital part of graft incorporation and fusion. Although there have been numerous animal studies, there is limited clinical evidence. Accordingly, surgery should be delayed, if possible, to treat the osteoporosis before the intervention. Treatment may include bisphosphonates, as well as newer agents, such as recombinant parathyroid hormone. Further clinical data are needed to understand the relative advantages/disadvantage of antiresorptive vs anabolic agents, as well as the impact of administration of these medications before vs after fusion surgery. Future clinical studies will enable better understanding of the impact of current therapies on biomechanics and fusion outcomes in this unique and increasingly prevalent patient population.

Protective effect of calcitonin on lumbar fusion-induced adjacent-segment disc degeneration in ovariectomized rat

Background

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and pathological changes in the spinal cord are major causes of back pain. In addition to its well-established anti-resorptive effect on bone, calcitonin (CT) potentially exerts protective effects on IVD degeneration in ovariectomized rats. However, possible therapeutic effects of CT on lumbar fusion-induced adjacent-segment disc degeneration (ASDD) have not been investigated yet. In this study, we examined the effects of CT on IVD degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion in ovariectomized rats.

Methods

Posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) at L4–5 was performed 4 weeks after ovariectomy (OVX) or sham surgery in female Sprague–Dawley rats. Following PLF + OVX, rats received either salmon CT (OVX + PLF + sCT, 16 IU/Kg/2d) or vehicle (OVX + PLF + V) treatment for 12 weeks; the remaining rats were divided into Sham + V, OVX + V, and PLF + V groups. Fusion status was analyzed by manual palpation and radiography. Adjacent segment disc was assessed by histological, histomorphometric, immunohistochemical analysis. L6 vertebrae microstructures were evaluated by micro-computed tomography.

Results

Histological analysis showed more severe ASDD occurred in OVX + PLF + V rats compared with the OVX + V or PLF + V groups. CT treatment suppressed the score for ASDD, increased disc height, and decreased the area of endplate calcification. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that CT decreased the expression of collagen type-I, matrix metalloproteinase-13, and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4, whereas it increased the expression of collagen type-II and aggrecan in the disc. Micro-computed tomography indicated that CT increased bone mass and improved the microstructure of the L6 vertebrae.

Conclusions

These results suggest that CT can prevent ASDD, induce beneficial changes in IVD metabolism, and inhibit deterioration of the trabecular microarchitecture of vertebrae in osteoporotic rats with lumbar fusion.

Determination of PCNA, cyclin D3, p27, p57 and apoptosis rate in normal and dexamethasone-induced intrauterine growth restricted rat placentas

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a major clinical problem, which causes perinatal morbidity and mortality. One of the reasons for IUGR is abnormal placentation. In rats, fetal-placental exposure to maternally administered glucocorticoids decreases birth weight and placental weight. Proper placental development depends on the proliferation and differentiation of trophoblasts. Our knowledge about the mitotic regulators that play key roles in synchronizing these events is limited. Also the mechanisms underlying the placental growth inhibitory effects of glucocorticoids have not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunolocalization, mRNA and protein levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cyclin D3, p27 and p57 in normal and dexamethasone-induced IUGR Wistar rat placentas by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry and Western blot. We also compared apoptotic cell numbers at the light microscopic level via terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end-labeling (TUNEL) and transmission electron microscopy. Glucocorticoid levels were higher in IUGR rats than in control rats after 60 and 120min of injection. We showed reduced gene and protein expressions of PCNA and cyclin D3 and increased expressions of p27 and p57 in IUGR placentas compared to control placentas. Apoptotic cell number was higher in the placentas of the IUGR group. In brief we found that maternal dexamethasone treatment led to a shift from cell proliferation to apoptosis in IUGR placentas. Dexamethasone induced placental and embryonal abnormalities which could be associated with reduced expressions of PCNA and cyclin D3, increased expressions of p27 and p57 and increased rate of apoptosis in IUGR placentas.

Influence of alendronate and endplate degeneration to single level posterior lumbar spinal interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

Using alendronate after spinal fusion is a controversial issue due to the inhibition of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. In addition, there are an increasing number of reports that the endplate degeneration influences the lumbar spinal fusion. The object of this retrospective controlled study was to evaluate how the endplate degeneration and the bisphosphonate medication influence the spinal fusion through radiographic evaluation.

METHODS

In this study, 44 patients who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using cage were examined from April 2007 to March 2009. All patients had been diagnosed as osteoporosis and would be recommended for alendronate medication. Endplate degeneration is categorized by the Modic changes. The solid fusion is defined if there was bridging bone between the vertebral bodies, either within or external to the cage on the plain X-ray and if there is less than 5° of angular difference in dynamic X-ray.

RESULTS

In alendronate group, fusion was achieved in 66.7% compared to 73.9% in control group (no medication). Alendronate did not influence the fusion rate of PLIF. However, there was the statistical difference of fusion rate between the endplate degeneration group and the group without endplate degeneration. A total of 52.4% of fusion rate was seen in the endplate degeneration group compared to 91.3% in the group without endplate degeneration. The endplate degeneration suppresses the fusion process of PLIF.

CONCLUSION

Alendronate does not influence the fusion process in osteoporotic patients. The endplate degeneration decreases the fusion rate.

Expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and peroxiredoxin 6 (Prdx6) proteins in healthy and pathologic placentas of human and rat

A relationship has been shown between preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and oxidative stress (OS). Since such pregnancies experience OS, we aimed to detect the distribution pattern and expression levels of a transcription factor, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) that has a role in the regulation of antioxidant enzymes, and peroxiredoxin 6 (Prdx6) an antioxidant enzyme, in human healthy, IUGR, PE and in groups of rat healthy and IUGR placentas using immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. Both Nrf2 and Prdx6 immunoreactivities were weaker in human and rat IUGR group placentas compared to human and rat control group placentas, respectively. Nrf2 and Prdx6 were immunostained in labyrinth trophoblasts, decidua, giant, glycogen and fetal vessel endothelial cells in rat control and IUGR group placentas. Nrf2 and Prdx6 immunoreactivities were seen in the decidua, syncytiotrophoblasts, villous stromal cells, and vascular endothelium in human control, IUGR and PE group placentas. Results of Nrf2 and Prdx6 Western blotting applied for rat and human placentas were compatible with the results of Nrf2 and Prdx6 immunohistochemical observations with regard to rat and human placentas. Down-regulation of Nrf2 and Prdx6 proteins in human and rat IUGR group placentas may have led to the formation of OS which may have impaired proliferation and invasion of cytotrophoblasts.

Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery

PURPOSE

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common radiographic finding following long spinal fusions. Whether PJK leads to negative clinical outcome is currently debatable. A systematic review was performed to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and treatments of PJK.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the terms 'proximal junctional kyphosis' and 'proximal junctional failure'. Excluding reviews, commentaries, and case reports, we analyzed 33 studies that reported the prevalence rate, risk factors, and discussions on PJK following spinal deformity surgery.

RESULTS

The prevalence rates varied widely from 6 to 61.7%. Numerous studies reported that clinical outcomes for patients with PJK were not significantly different from those without, except in one recent study in which adult patients with PJK experienced more pain. Risk factors for PJK included age at operation, low bone mineral density, shorter fusion constructs, upper instrumented vertebrae below L2, and inadequate restoration of global sagittal balance.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of PJK following long spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity was high but not clinically significant. Careful and detailed preoperative planning and surgical execution may reduce PJK in adult spinal deformity patients.

Effect of Pentoxifylline on Spinal Fusion: An Experimental Study in Rabbits

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, animal model.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of pentoxifylline (PTX) on spinal fusion in a rabbit model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies assert that PTX increases new bone formation. Because PTX seems to have these profound effects on bone metabolism, it may be hypothesized that it may enhance spinal fusion.

METHODS

Twenty-four New Zealand white rabbits were randomized and each received single-level posterolateral, inter-transverse process fusion with autologous iliac crest. In group 1, 12 male New Zealand white rabbits were treated with intravenous PTX treatment in 100-mg/kg/day dose after the surgical procedure. In group 2, 12 received no PTX medication and were accepted as the control group. Nine weeks after surgery, the animals were killed. The spines were tested via a manual palpation test, biomechanical testing, plain radiography, computed tomographic scans, and histomorphometric analysis.

RESULTS

The fusion rates of manual palpation were 40% in the control group and 80% in the PTX group (P = 0.17). Using a 5-grade radiographical system, the mean fusion grade was 2.4 in the control group and 3.1 in PTX group (P = 0.012). Total displacement of the fused level for the control group under flexion and extension was 0.2515 mm and was lower for the PTX-treated group: 0.1266 mm (P = 0.012). In the control group, the mean bone volume of the fusion mass determined from computed tomographic analysis was 4.0678 cm, whereas in the PTX group it was 4.7802 cm (P = 0.009). The mean trabecular bone area was 14% and 19% for the control and PTX groups, respectively (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The differences between groups was statistically significant in terms of radiological fusion grading, biomechanical testing, volume of the fusion mass, and percentage of trabecular bone area. These results suggest that PTX may have a beneficial effect on spinal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

The effect of zoledronic acid on the volume of the fusion-mass in lumbar spinal fusion

Background

Few studies have explored the effects of bisphosphonates on bony healing in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Most previous studies used animal models and found that bisphosphonate shows negative effects on spinal fusion consolidation. We intended to evaluate the effect of a single-dose of zoledronic acid on the volume of the fusion-mass in lumbar spinal fusion.

Methods

A retrospective review was carried out on 44 patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent one or two-level posterolateral fusion from January 2008 and January 2011. They were divided into 4 groups: group 1, autograft and zoledronic acid; group 2, allograft and zoledronic acid; group 3, autograft alone; and group 4, allograft alone. Functional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography scans were used to evaluate and quantify the volume of the fusion-mass. The visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the short form 36 (SF-36) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

Results

The mean volume of the fusion-mass per level was 8,814 mm³, 8,035 mm³, 8,383 mm³, and 7,550 mm³ in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, but there were no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.829). There were no significant decreases in the volume of the fusion-mass (p = 0.533) in the zoledronic acid groups (groups 1 and 2). The VAS, the ODI, and the SF-36 at the 6-month follow-up after surgery were not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the 4 groups. The VAS, the ODI, and the SF-36 were not correlated with the volume of the fusion-mass (p = 0.120, 0.609, 0.642).

Conclusions

A single dose of zoledronic acid does not decrease the volume of the fusion-mass in patients undergoing spinal fusion with osteoporosis. Therefore, we recommend that zoledronic acid may be used after spinal fusion in osteoporotic patients.

Factors influencing arthrodesis rates in a rabbit posterolateral spine model with iliac crest autograft

PURPOSE

The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse spine arthrodesis model has been widely used to evaluate spinal biologics. However, to date, the validity and reproducibility of performance of iliac crest bone graft, the most common and critical control group, has not been firmly established. We evaluated original research publications that utilized this model, identified which experimental conditions affected fusion rates, and developed an algorithm to predict fusion rates for future study designs.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed for publications through December, 2011 that utilized this model to evaluate fusion rates elicited by iliac crest autograft. All study parameters were recorded, and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the effects of these variables on fusion rates as determined by either manual palpation or radiographs.

RESULTS

Seventy studies with 959 rabbits in 102 groups met the inclusion criteria. Excluding studies that measured fusion at 4 or fewer weeks or intentionally tried to decrease the fusion rate, the overall fusion rate for autograft was 58.3 ± 16.3 % (mean ± SD) as determined by manual palpation and 66.4 ± 17.8 % by plain radiographs. Regression analysis demonstrated a difference between these outcome measures with a trend towards significance (p = 0.09). Longer time points and larger volumes of autograft resulted in significantly greater reported fusion rates (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Neither strain, age, weight, nor vertebral level significantly affected fusion rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although experimental conditions varied across studies, time point evaluation and autograft volume significantly affected fusion rates. Despite some variability demonstrated across certain studies, we demonstrated that when the time point and volume of autograft were controlled for, the iliac crest control group of the rabbit posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model is both reliable and predictably affected by different experimental conditions.

Pharmacophysiology of bone and spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In recent years, the number of complex spinal surgeries has increased significantly in the elderly population, where the prevalence of low bone density is highest. Consequently, spine surgeons often treat osteoporotic patients who are associated with higher rates of instrumentation failure. Therefore, establishing a successful fusion requires an appropriate substrate for bone formation and local bone remodeling. The fusion process can be supported by therapies that seek to shift the balance of bone homeostasis to increased formation and reduced resorption.

PURPOSE

Thorough understanding of the physiology of bone formation and adjunctive therapies can help improve fusion rates. Therefore, we present a thorough review of the latest pharmacologic agents used to enhance bone strength and surgical spinal fusion.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature.

RESULTS

Current knowledge on bone physiology has led to the development of several pharmacologic agents that enhance bone formation and strengthen the human skeleton. At present, natural supplements of vitamin D and calcium or synthetic medications like bisphosphonates are widely used before and after spine surgeries to enhance bone fusion. Additional physiologic agents, including testosterone, parathyroid hormone, calcitonin, and growth hormone, have been shown to improve bone mass density or spinal fusion in both animal and human studies. As in other medical fields, gene therapy has shown viability and promise with the use of both viral and nonviral vectors.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the understanding of bone physiology, numerous natural and synthetic pharmacologic agents have been developed to enhance the body's skeleton and to improve outcomes of spinal fusion surgery.

The effect of therapies for osteoporosis on spine fusion: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Fusion of the spine requires de novo bone formation and remodeling, processes that rely heavily on the action of the osteoblast and osteoclast. Bisphosphonate drugs and intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) therapy are widely prescribed to treat osteoporosis and act on the osteoblast/osteoclast complex. The impact of these medications on spine fusion is not known.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the available evidence on the potential impact of bisphosphonates and PTH on fusion rate and fusion quality in spinal arthrodesis.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All available literature regarding the impact of bisphosphonates and PTH on spinal fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fusion rate and histologic, microstructural, or biomechanical measures of fusion quality.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature published between 1980 and 2011 was conducted using major electronic databases. The results of studies meeting criteria for inclusion were then aggregated and examined for consensus on the effect of these medications on spine fusion.

RESULTS

The literature contained 18 animal studies and one clinical trial investigating the impact of these medications on spine fusion. Most animal studies evaluating the impact of bisphosphonates on fusion rate have not found statistically significant changes with treatment, although this fact may be attributable to low statistical power. The animal literature does suggest that bisphosphonate therapy results in a less histologically mature fusion mass; however, the impact of these changes on fusion mass biomechanics is unclear. The only available human study suggests that these bisphosphonates may increase the radiographically defined fusion rate but did not demonstrate an impact on clinical outcome. In animals, PTH improves the fusion rate and fusion mass microstructure, but data on its effect on fusion mass biomechanics are lacking. No studies have evaluated the impact of PTH on spine fusion in humans.

CONCLUSIONS

In animals, bisphosphonate therapy appears to impede maturation of the fusion mass, with an unclear effect on mechanical strength. This effect was not seen in the lone human study, which suggested that these medications improved the radiographically defined fusion rate. The available animal studies on intermittent PTH treatment suggest that it may improve fusion rate and fusion mass microstructure. Given the widespread use of these agents, further investigation into their impact on human spine fusion is necessary to inform the care of patients with osteoporosis who are undergoing spine surgery.

Calcitonin enhanced lumbar spinal fusion in a New Zealand rabbit model: a study with morphologic and molecular analysis

STUDY DESIGN

In this study, the effect of calcitonin on lumbar spinal fusion was studied in a New Zealand rabbit model.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether calcitonin can enhance lumbar spinal fusion in a New Zealand rabbit model and whether calcitonin can enhance expression genes involved in osteogenesis and angiogenesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Calcitonin is used to treat osteoporosis and diseases involving accelerated bone turnover. Studies have shown that calcitonin might also promote bone cell proliferation and bone formation, suggesting its possible role in promoting spinal fusion, but few data are available.

METHODS

The effect of calcitonin on lumbar spinal fusion was analyzed in 32 New Zealand rabbits. Each rabbit received 2 autologous iliac bone grafts (one between L4-L5 without fixation, one between L6-L7 with fixation). Sixteen rabbits received calcitonin (calcitonin group, 1 U/kg daily from day 1 to the day of sacrifice), whereas the other 16 did not (control). At weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8, after examination for spinal fusion with radiography, 4 rabbits from each group were sacrificed. Each graft was histologically scored under light microscopy. In addition, we analyzed the messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of collagen I (Col I), bone morphometric protein 2 (BMP-2), insulinlike growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), genes known to be involved in osteogenesis and angiogenesis, in each graft.

RESULTS

With both fixation and without fixation, the bone grafts in rabbits receiving calcitonin showed a higher spinal fusion rate and higher histologic scores from week 2 to week 8, and had higher mRNA levels of Col I, BMP-2, IGF-1, and VEGF at all time points except BMP-2 and IGF-1 at week 1, than grafts in rabbits without receiving calcitonin.

CONCLUSION

Calcitonin can enhance lumbar spinal fusion. One mechanism might be through upregulating genes involved in osteogenesis and angiogenesis.

The effects of zoledronic acid and hyperbaric oxygen on posterior lumbar fusion in a rabbit model

We studied the effects of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and zoledronic acid (ZA) on posterior lumbar fusion using a validated animal model. A total of 40 New Zealand white rabbits underwent posterior lumbar fusion at L5-6 with autogenous iliac bone grafting. They were divided randomly into four groups as follows: group 1, control; group 2, HBO (2.4 atm for two hours daily); group 3, local ZA (20 μg of ZA mixed with bone graft); and group 4, combined HBO and local ZA. All the animals were killed six weeks after surgery and the fusion segments were subjected to radiological analysis, manual palpation, biomechanical testing and histological examination. Five rabbits died within two weeks of operation. Thus, 35 rabbits (eight in group 1 and nine in groups 2, 3 and 4) completed the study. The rates of fusion in groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.015) were higher than in group 1 (p < 0.001) in terms of radiological analysis and in group 4 was higher than in group 1 with regard to manual palpation (p = 0.015). We found a statistically significant difference in the biomechanical analysis between groups 1 and 4 (p = 0.024). Histological examination also showed a statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 4 (p = 0.036). Our results suggest that local ZA combined with HBO may improve the success rate in posterior lumbar spinal fusion.

Bisphosphonates in orthopedic applications

Bisphosphonates (BPs) exert potent effects on the skeleton. As such, there are important questions relating to how treatment with BPs for metabolic disorders might affect outcomes of orthopedic problems. A further question is what role, if any, might BPs play as adjunctive therapeutics for orthopedic problems. This article outlines the research thus far in the application of BPs to the management of osteonecrosis, bone repair, and joint arthroplasty. Many animal studies show a benefit to decreasing bone resorption in models of osteonecrosis. These include studies in both small and large animals, backed up by limited human data. Further clinical trials are underway for this indication. In bone repair, again, multiple studies exist. There are concerns that BPs could interfere with the normal processes of healing. Some of the controversy about benefits or adverse effects of BPs in this context can be distilled down to effects of dosing and administration. With some exceptions, longer intervals between dosing seem to be more beneficial while not producing adverse healing effects in animal studies. In joint arthroplasty, animal studies suggest a role for topical or systemic BPs for enhancing bone on-growth to implant surfaces and strength of mechanical fixation, although these are yet to be confirmed in clinical studies. Clinical studies show that BPs inhibit periprosthetic bone loss due to strain-adaptive remodeling and after impaction bone grafting, although an efficacy in inhibiting inflammatory bone loss due to wear particle-induced osteolysis has not been confirmed. Lastly, as anabolic drugs have become available, there is increasing interest in their combined use with BPs. From experimental data, manipulation of both the anabolic and catabolic responses is a powerful approach in models of bone repair.

Does alendronate disturb the healing process of posterior lumbar interbody fusion? A prospective randomized trial

Object

Bisphosphonate medications are widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, but they might disturb the healing process of spinal fusion. The object of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonate medication on spinal fusion through radiographic, clinical, and biological assessments.

Methods

A total of 40 patients with osteoporosis who were candidates for single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion were randomly assigned to the alendronate group (alendronate sodium 35 mg/week) or the control group (vitamin D, alfacalcidol 1 μg/day). Pedicle screw fixation and carbon polyetheretherketone cages were used for all the patients. Bone graft material was prepared as a mixture of local bone and β-tricalcium phosphate in a ratio of 2:1. Functional radiography and CT scans were used to evaluate fusion status and cage subsidence. The incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) occurring after surgery (subsequent VCFs) was assessed by means of MR imaging. Bridging bone formation was graded into 3 categories: Grade A (bridging bone through bilateral cages), Grade B (bridging bone through a unilateral cage), or Grade C (incomplete bony bridging). A solid fusion was defined as less than 5° of angular motion in flexion-extension radiographs and the presence of bridging bone through the cage (Grade A or B). Clinical outcome was evaluated by means of the Oswestry Disability Index. Bone metabolic markers (serum bone alkaline phosphatase, serum and urine Type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides) were measured to investigate the biological effects of alendronate on spinal fusion.

Results

Bridging bone formation (Grade A or B) was more frequently observed in the alendronate group at all postoperative assessment periods. At 1-year postoperative follow-up, a solid fusion was achieved in 95% of the patients in the alendronate group and 65% of those in the control group. Cage subsidence (> 2 mm) was observed in 5% of the alendronate group and 29% of the control group. No vertebral fractures were observed in the alendronate group, whereas 24% of patients in the control group showed subsequent VCFs. There was no statistically significant between-groups difference in clinical outcomes, but poor clinical results in the control group were associated with pseudarthrosis and subsequent VCFs. Biochemical analysis of bone turnover demonstrated that alendronate inhibited bone resorption from the early phase of the fusion process and also suppressed bone formation after 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

Favorable mechanical circumstances provided by alendronate overcame its detrimental biological effect on the healing process of spinal fusion. The authors recommend that osteoporosis patients undergoing spinal fusion take bisphosphonates throughout the postoperative period.

Standardizing care for high-risk patients in spine surgery: the Northwestern high-risk spine protocol

STUDY DESIGN

Review article of current literature on the preoperative evaluation and postoperative management of patients undergoing high-risk spine operations and a presentation of a multidisciplinary protocol for patients undergoing high-risk spine operation.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based outline of modifiable risk factors and give an example of a multidisciplinary protocol with the goal of improving outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Protocol-based care has been shown to improve outcomes in many areas of medicine. A protocol to evaluate patients undergoing high-risk procedures may ultimately improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

The English language literature to date was reviewed on modifiable risk factors for spine surgery. A multidisciplinary team including hospitalists, critical care physicians, anesthesiologists, and spine surgeons from neurosurgery and orthopedics established an institutional protocol to provide comprehensive care in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods for patients undergoing high-risk spine operations.

RESULTS

An example of a comprehensive pre-, peri-, and postoperative high-risk spine protocol is provided, with focus on the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing high-risk spine operations and modifiable risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Standardizing preoperative risk assessment may lead to better outcomes after major spine operations. A high-risk spine protocol may help patients by having dedicated physicians in multiple specialties focusing on all aspects of a patients care in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases.

Effect of a single dose of pamidronate administered at the time of surgery in a rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model

Spinal fusion is usually performed on patients who receive bisphosphonates (BP); however, limited data on their action on spinal fusion are available. Previous studies in animal models have shown that chronic administrations of BP reduced spinal fusion rates, and only one study has shown that a single dose administration of zolendronic acid increased fusion rate. The objective of the present study was to evaluate if pamidronate (PA), which was previously demonstrated to reduce spinal fusion rate when administered continuously for 8 weeks, would increase the spinal fusion rate if administered in a single dose at the time of surgery in a rabbit model. Thirty-two New Zealand rabbits underwent an L5-L6 posterolateral intertransverse fusion with iliac crest autograft. Animals were randomized to receive either PA 3 mg/kg in a single dose immediately after surgery, or normal saline. Animals were killed 8 weeks after surgery and fusion was determined by manual palpation and radiographic analysis. Fusion healing was obtained in eight rabbits (50%) in the PA group and in four animals (25%) in the control group, p = 0.137. In a rabbit model, a single dose of PA did not decrease lumbar spinal arthrodesis consolidation rates, but it obtained a nonsignificant higher spinal fusion rate.

Effect of teriparatide [rhPTH(1,34)] and calcitonin on intertransverse process fusion in a rabbit model

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled animal study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of teriparatide and calcitonin after an intertransverse process spinal fusion in a rabbit model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It is widely recognized that some osteoporosis medications, including bisphosphonates, can interfere with bone healing. Although prescribed frequently in the treatment of osteoporosis, the effect of teriparatide and calcitonin on spinal fusion has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that teriparatide, being the only anabolic medication for osteoporosis treatment, would have a beneficial effect on spine fusion.

METHODS

Fifty-one New Zealand white rabbits underwent a posterolateral L5-L6 intertransverse process arthrodesis using autogenous iliac crest bone graft. The rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups. All animals received daily subcutaneous injections of group I (n = 17) 1 mL of saline placebo; group II (n = 17) 10 microg/kg/day of teriparatide; group III (n = 17) 14 IU/animal of calcitonin during the 8-week postoperative period. Postmortem analyses included manual palpation, radiographic, biomechanical, and histologic assessment. Three random 10x fields were examined/graded within the cephalad, middle, and caudal regions of each section (810 fields). Fusion quality was graded using the Emery histologic scale (0-7 based on fibrous/bone content of the fusion mass).

RESULTS

Histologic fusion rates for teriparatide averaged 86.7% and was significantly greater than the autograft control group (50%) (P = 0.033). Radiographically, there was a strong trend towards teriparatide being superior to the calcitonin group (85.7% vs. 56.3%, respectively; P = 0.07). The average Emery grading score was 5.99 +/- 1.46 SD for the autologous group and 6.26 +/- 0.93 SD for the teriparatide group (P = 0.031). Although not significant, the teriparatide group showed less motion in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that teriparatide enhances spinal fusion while calcitonin has a neutral effect. The teriparatide group had the best histologic fusion rate and Emery scores, while the calcitonin group was similar to the saline controls. Although not significant, the teriparatide group had a strong trend towards superior radiographic fusion over the calcitonin group.

The effect of anti-resorptive therapies on bone graft healing in an ovariectomized rat spinal arthrodesis model

Bone grafting is commonly used to treat skeletal disorders associated with a large bone defect or unstable joint. Spinal arthrodesis surgery, which is the most common application of bone graft, is performed in the elderly and anti-resorptive therapy is sometimes started postoperatively in patients with bone fragility due to osteoporosis, despite insufficient knowledge about the effects of these drugs on bone graft healing. Therefore, we studied the effect of bisphosphonates (BP) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) on bone graft healing in an ovariectomized rat spinal arthrodesis model. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=100) were ovariectomized or sham-operated, and randomized into four groups: Sham (sham-operated+vehicle), Ovx (ovariectomy+vehicle), Ovx-Rlx (ovariectomy+raloxifene, 1 mg/kg/day), and Ovx-Aln (ovariectomy+alendronate, 0.01 mg/kg/day). Four weeks after ovariectomy, lumbar spinal arthrodesis surgery was performed using an autologous bone graft. Animals were killed 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery, and fusion assessment, three-dimensional micro-computed tomography, histomorphometry, mRNA expression analysis, and serum bone metabolic marker analysis were performed. The results indicated that neither BP nor SERM significantly altered the fusion rate, but the bone graft healing process was differentially affected. BP inhibited endochondral ossification and graft bone resorption, but induced the growth of a larger, denser fusion mass compared to Ovx by strongly suppressing osteoclastic activity. SERM mildly suppressed bone remodeling, but did not significantly inhibit the ossification process, leading to a fusion mass comparable with that of Sham animals. These findings suggested that spinal fusion surgery outcome is not likely to be altered by BP or SERM treatment started immediately after spinal arthrodesis surgery; however, to avoid adverse effects of BP on bone graft healing, BP treatment should be delayed during the immediate postoperative period.

Risedronate did not block the maximal anabolic effect of PTH in aged rats

The study was designed to investigate if pre-treating rats with a therapeutic equivalent dose of risedronate blunted the anabolic effects of PTH, and whether a withdrawal period prior to PTH treatment would alter any effect of risedronate on PTH treatment. Skeletally mature rats were treated for 18 weeks with vehicle, risedronate, or risedronate for 8 weeks followed by vehicle for 10 weeks (withdrawal period). At the end of this period, animals were treated for a further 12 weeks with PTH or PTH vehicle. Trabecular and cortical bone mass were monitored by serial pQCT, or by DXA and microCT. Bone histomorphometry was performed on the proximal tibiae and tibial shafts for bone turnover parameters at week 40. Risedronate alone moderately increased while PTH alone markedly increased trabecular bone mass at the proximal tibial (35% and 200%, respectively) and lumbar vertebral body (14% and 36%, respectively). The maximum bone gains were similar with and without pretreatment with risedronate as compared to the PTH alone. Continuous administration of risedronate for 18 weeks prior to PTH treatment had lower percentage increases in proximal tibial BMD during the first 8 weeks of PTH treatments, and had lower active bone forming surface and bone formation rates after being treated with PTH 12 weeks as compared to the PTH alone group. However, with the 10-week withdrawal period, risedronate did not blunt the stimulatory effect of PTH on osteoblast activity as shown by similar bone formation rates as with PTH alone. Our findings suggest that while risedronate pretreatment may slow the bone anabolic response to PTH, a withdrawal period prior to PTH treatment allows osteoblastic activity to respond normally to PTH stimulation.

Effect of zoledronic acid in an L6-L7 rabbit spine fusion model

Previous studies have shown that zoledronic acid administration can increase mineral content and strength in distraction osteogenesis. Of the few studies that have examined the use of bisphosphonates in spinal arthrodesis, none have assessed the effect of single dose treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of enhancing spinal fusion rate using single dose zoledronic acid (ZA) to increase fusion-mass size and mineral density. Forty-eight New Zealand white rabbits underwent an L6-L7 intertransverse process fusion. The L6-L7 model is more challenging than the more commonly used level of L5-L6. Animals were randomly allocated to one of three groups, one received iliac crest bone graft alone, one group received iliac crest bone graft with locally administered zoledronic acid, 20 microg, and one group received iliac crest bone graft with a single dose of systemically administered zoledronic acid, 0.1 mg/kg. ZA doses were administered at the time of surgery. Twenty-four rabbits were culled at 6 weeks and 24 rabbits were culled at 12 weeks. Success of spinal fusion was determined by manual palpation. Specimens were evaluated radiographically, underwent quantitative computerised tomography analysis and were tested biomechanically in flexion and extension. In the six-week group, only five of the 24 spines fused with no noticeable trend with respect to treatment. In the 12-week group there was a trend toward increased fusion in the systemically administered ZA group (63%) versus the other two groups (25%) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Radiographically, the local ZA treatment group showed a delay in remodelling with the presence of unremodelled bone chips. The 12-week systemic ZA group exhibited an 86% increase in BMC, a 31% increase in vBMD and a 41% increase in the volume of the fusion-mass (p < 0.05). The 12-week local ZA group also showed significant increases in BMC (69%), vBMD (31%) and total fusion-mass volume (29%) (p < 0.05). Biomechanical testing showed that the range of motion in flexion decreased to 4.5 (+/-2.5) degrees and 4.8 (+/-4.7) degrees for the local and systemic groups respectively compared to 9.6 (+/-4.9) degrees for the control group (p < 0.05). This study has shown that zoledronic acid increased fusion-mass size and bone mineral content. Systemic ZA led to an increased fusion rate; however the fusion rate remained below 100%. We suggest that bisphosphonate treatment may require an anabolic conjunctive therapy to ensure enhanced successful fusion.