1
|
Jiang SH, Chaudhry NS, Nie JW, Patel S, Ansari D, Nie JZ, Shah P, Patel J, Mehta AI. Discharge within 1 day following elective single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a propensityscore-matched analysis of predictors, complications, and readmission. Asian Spine J 2024; 18:362-371. [PMID: 38779702 PMCID: PMC11222876 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective case-control study using 8 years of data from a nationwide database of surgical outcomes in the United States. PURPOSE This study aimed to improve our understanding of the risk factors associated with a length of stay (LOS) >1 day and aid in reducing postoperative hospitalization and complications. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE Despite the proven safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), some patients face prolonged postoperative hospitalization. METHODS Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was divided into patients with LOS up to 1 day (LOS ≤1 day), defined as same day or next-morning discharge, and patients with LOS >1 day (LOS >1 day). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of LOS >1 day. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare pre- and postdischarge complication rates. RESULTS A total of 12,664 eligible patients with TLIF were identified, of which 14.8% had LOS ≤1 day and 85.2% had LOS >1 day. LOS >1 day was positively associated with female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3, and operation length of >150 minutes. Patients with LOS >1 day were more likely to undergo intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and reoperation (0.1% vs. 0.6%, p=0.004). No significant differences in the rates of postdischarge complications were found between the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with worsened preoperative status, preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, and prolonged operative time are more likely to require prolonged hospitalization and blood transfusions and undergo unplanned reoperation. To reduce the risk of prolonged hospitalization and associated complications, patients indicated for TLIF should be carefully selected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam H. Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nauman S. Chaudhry
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Lakeland, FL, USA
| | - James W. Nie
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Saavan Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Darius Ansari
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jeffrey Z. Nie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Pal Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jaimin Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ankit I. Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aripaka SS, Chughtai SA, Jørgensen LM, Bech-Azeddine R, Mikkelsen JD. Expression of cytokines at baseline correlate/predict in the disc the outcome of surgery after disc degeneration: A 12-month follow-up study. Pain Pract 2024. [PMID: 38745359 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent condition that comprise a large portion of outpatient practice, challenging the diagnosis and treatment. However, the diagnostic tools are limited to clinical history, physical examination and imaging. Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a significant cause of LBP, and emerging literature confirms the elevated levels of biomarkers in the discs. These biomarkers may serve as a tool for diagnosis, but may also be useful in predicting the treatment outcome. Here, we examine the expression of various cytokines on 1-year recovery from patients with LBP. METHODS Patient-reported outcome (PRO) in terms of pain intensity (VAS), disability (ODI), and quality of life (Eq-5D) is collected from 44 patients at baseline and 12 months after surgery to study the influence of baseline TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNA expression in both annulus fibrosus (AF) and nucleus pulposus (NP). RESULTS Between baseline and follow-up, our cohort showed improvement in VAS back pain (p < 0.001), VAS leg pain (p < 0.001), ODI (p = 0.02), and Eq-5D (p = 0.01). Baseline levels of IL-1 β was positively correlated with VAS back pain scores in AF (p = 0.05) and NP (p = 0.01) at 1-year follow-up. TNF-α expression at baseline was also positively correlated to ODI scores (p = 0.01) at follow-up and inversely correlated to improvements in ODI score between baseline and follow-up, suggesting that high TNF-α expression at baseline is associated with poor outcomes from surgery. CONCLUSION The results from our study support that TNF-α expression at baseline can serve as a very important predictor of treatment response from lumbar fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay S Aripaka
- Neurobiology Research Unit, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sajjad Ahmad Chughtai
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Spine Research Unit, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Louise M Jørgensen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Spine Research Unit, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Rachid Bech-Azeddine
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Spine Research Unit, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jens D Mikkelsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park S, Jeong YH, Ha BJ, Yoo BS, Kim SH, Lee CK, Yi S, Ha Y, Kim KN, Shin DA. Fusion rate of Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 compared with local bone autograft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders. Spine J 2023; 23:1877-1885. [PMID: 37516282 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins-2 (rhBMP-2) for spinal fusion has been reported to be effective. However, most studies have focused on posterolateral and anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and few have investigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of the delivery of Escherichia coli-derived rhBMP-2 (E.BMP-2) with hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) poloxamer hydrogel composite carriers for PLIF. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent 1 to 3 levels of PLIF for lumbar degenerative disc disorders between 2015 and 2020 with a follow-up of ≥1 year were enrolled. In total, 254 patients (357 levels) were included in the analysis. The evaluation was performed at each segment level. In the E.BMP-2 group, 160 patients (221 levels) received autologous local bone with E.BMP-2 (maximum 0.5 mg/level), and in the control group, 94 patients (136 levels) received only local bone graft. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome of this study was to compare the X-ray and CT fusion rates between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included analysis of the patients' clinical outcomes and postoperative complications on CT scans. METHODS Clinical evaluations were performed using a visual analog scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index for disability, and physical and mental component summaries of the Short Form 36-Item Form Health Survey to assess functional effects and quality of life. The fusion was evaluated using radiography and CT. On radiography, solid fusion was defined when the difference between extension and flexion was less than 5°. On CT, solid fusion was defined when the upper and lower vertebral bodies were connected by the trabecular bone (bone bridge formation). In addition, complications such as osteolysis, cage subsidence, and screw loosening were investigated using CT. RESULTS All clinical results for low back pain, disability, and quality of life in both groups were excellent and showed statistically significant improvements compared with baseline (p<.0001). According to the X-ray evaluations, fusion was achieved in 92.31% (204/221) of the patients in the E.BMP-2 group and 82.35% (112/136) of the patients in the control group (p=.0041). According to the CT evaluations, the fusion rates were 93.21% (206/221) and 88.24% (120/136) in the E.BMP-2 and control groups (p=.1048), respectively. Except for screw loosening, which had a significantly higher incidence in the control group (p=.0014), the rates of most postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the adjunctive use of a low dose of E.BMP-2 with HA and β-TCP hydrogel can effectively promote bone fusion, making it a promising option for patients with limited autograft availability or compromised bone quality in PLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangman Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeong Ha Jeong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byeong Jin Ha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Seok Yoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Heon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Kyu Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Ha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Keung Nyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Ah Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mills ES, Shelby T, Bouz GJ, Hah RJ, Wang JC, Alluri RK. A Decreasing National Trend in Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty. Global Spine J 2023; 13:2271-2277. [PMID: 35180023 PMCID: PMC10538335 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221079571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective National Database Study. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the national trend of lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) utilization from 2005 to 2017. METHODS Patients undergoing primary LDA between 2005 and 2017 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Year of the procedure, demographic, socioeconomic, hospital, and cost parameters were analyzed. The data was weighted using provided weights from the NIS database to generate national estimates of LDA procedure incidence. Lastly, we assessed the incidence of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) between 2005 and 2017 to serve as a historical comparison. RESULTS An estimated 20 460 patients underwent primary LDA in the United States between 2005 and 2017. There was an initial decrease in LDA procedures between 2005 and 2006 and then a plateau between 2006 and 2009. From 2010 to 2013, there was a significant year-over-year decrease in annual LDA procedures performed, followed by a second plateau from 2014 to 2017. Overall, LDA procedures decreased 82% from 2005 to 2017. Over the same time, the annual incidence of CDA utilization increased 795% from approximately 474 procedures in 2005 to 4245 procedures in 2017 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar disc arthroplasty utilization decreased 82% from 2005 to 2017, with a significant decrease in the rate of utilization noted after 2010. The utilization of LDA to treat selected degenerative lumbar conditions has not paralleled the increasing popularity of CDA, and, in fact, has demonstrated a nearly opposite utilization trend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S. Mills
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tara Shelby
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gabriel J. Bouz
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Raymond J. Hah
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey C. Wang
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ram K. Alluri
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gornet MF, Eastlack RK, Peacock J, Schranck FW, Lotz JC. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) identification of chemically painful lumbar discs leads to improved 6-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes for discogenic low back pain surgeries. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023:10.1007/s00586-023-07665-w. [PMID: 37014434 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07665-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE MRS was shown to reliably quantify relative levels of degenerative pain biomarkers, differentiating painful versus non-painful discs in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain (DLBP), and this correlates with surgical success rates. We now report results based on more patients and longer follow-up. METHODS Disc MRS was performed in DLBP patients who subsequently received lumbar surgery. Custom post-processing (NOCISCAN-LS®; Aclarion Inc.) calculated disc-specific NOCISCORES® that reflect relative differences in degenerative pain biomarkers for diagnosing chemically painful discs. Outcomes in 78 patients were evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Surgical success (≥ 15-point ODI improvement) was compared between surgeries that were "Concordant" (Group C) versus "Discordant" (Group D) with NOCISCORE-based diagnosis for painful discs. RESULTS Success rates were higher for Group C versus Group D: 6 months (88% vs. 62%; p = 0.01), 12 months (91% vs. 56%; p < 0.001), and 24 months (85% vs. 63%; p = 0.07). Success rates for Group C surgeries were also higher than Group D surgeries in a variety of sub-group comparisons. Group C had a greater reduction in ODI from pre-operative to follow-up than Group D [absolute change (% change), (p)]: 6 months: - 35 (- 61%) versus - 23 (- 39%), (p < 0.05); 12 months: - 39 (- 69%) versus - 22 (- 39%), (p < 0.01); and 24 months: - 38 (- 66%) versus - 26 (- 48%), (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION More successful, sustained outcomes were obtained when surgically treating chemically painful discs identified by NOCISCAN-LS post-processed disc MRS exams. Results suggest that NOCISCAN-LS provides a valuable new diagnostic tool to help clinicians better select treatment levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew F Gornet
- The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis, 14825 N. Outer Forty Road, Suite 200, St Louis, MO, 63017, USA.
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffrey C Lotz
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheng H, Liu J, Shi L, Hei X. The Rehabilitation-Related Effects on the Fear, Pain, and Disability of Patients With Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurospine 2023; 20:278-289. [PMID: 37016875 PMCID: PMC10080435 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2245056.528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The lumbar fusion is an important surgery for the orthopedic diseases. The rehabilitation might improve the outcome of patients with lumbar fusion surgery. The rehabilitation-related effects can be revealed by a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The purpose of this study is to clarify the rehabilitation effects in the patients with lumbar fusion surgery.Methods: We performed a systematic search and a meta-analysis for the RCT of rehabilitation treatment on the patients with lumbar fusion surgery. The comparison between rehabilitation treatment (including psychological rehabilitation, exercise, and multimodal rehabilitation) and typical treatment was performed to find if the rehabilitation treatment can improve the outcome after the lumbar fusion surgery. Fifteen studies of lumbar fusion patients under rehabilitation treatment and typical treatment were enrolled in a variety of rehabilitation modalities. The focused outcome was the rehabilitation-related effects on the fear, disability, and pain of patients after the lumbar fusion surgery.Results: Five hundred twenty-eight rehabilitation subjects and 498 controls were enrolled. The psychological-related rehabilitation showed a significant decrease in pain-related fear when compared to usual treatment. The multimodal rehabilitation can improve the disability outcome to a greater extent when compared to usual treatment. The multimodal rehabilitation seemed to have a more significantly positive effect to decrease disability after lumbar fusion surgery. In addition, the exercise and multimodal rehabilitation can relieve the pain after lumbar fusion surgery. The exercise rehabilitation seemed to have a more significantly positive effect to relieve pain after lumbar fusion surgery.Conclusion: The rehabilitation might relieve the pain-related fear, disability, and pain after lumbar fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyan Cheng
- Department of Military Clinic Area, The No.901 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Unit of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Hefei, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Ezhou Central Hospital, Ezhou, China
| | - Lin Shi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Dalian NO.2 People’s Hospital, Liaoning, Dalian, China
| | - Xiuxiu Hei
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
- Corresponding Author Xiuxiu Hei Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elmorsy SEH, Abulnasr HA, Hassan Y, Samra M, Eissa EM. Functional outcome of surgical management of low mid-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis when considering the sagittal balance parameters preoperatively: a prospective study. Chin Neurosurg J 2022; 8:35. [PMID: 36434653 PMCID: PMC9700965 DOI: 10.1186/s41016-022-00303-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective study objectives. A sagittal balance is a good tool to improve the functional outcome of spine spondylolisthesis surgeries, primarily noted that it has a good impact in deformity surgery and then applied to every spine surgery and the aim of this study is to evaluate its functional outcome when considered in preoperative planning for non-dysplastic low- and mid-grade spondylolisthesis surgeries. METHOD Forty patients diagnosed as low- or mid-grade non-dysplastic spondylolisthesis had undergone surgery at Cairo University after failed medical treatment had been evaluated preoperatively by measuring the sagittal balance parameters which include SVA, spinopelvic angles, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence and then measure it along a follow-up period of 1 year postoperatively started from February 2018 and correlate it with functional outcome using Oswestry score (ODI)and VAS. Correction of parameters has been estimated preoperatively by manual estimation and Surgimap application then applied during the operation. RESULTS All patients were treated by surgical treatment through posterior transpedicular screw fixation with conventional or reduction screws and fusion ± TLIF cages. The mean of lumbar lordosis and mean spinopelvic angles were increased in a statistically significant manner. Pelvis tilt was decreased in a statistically insignificant manner. The mean of pelvic incidence was not changed and statistically insignificant, and this is matching the fact that pelvic incidence is a constant parameter. The sacral slope was increased in a statistically insignificant manner. Final results showed that 37 had a statistically significant improvement in their ODI >20% at the last visit. Three patients had a poor clinical outcome with ODI scorFinal results showed that 37 had a statistically significant improvement in their ODI >20% at the last visit. Three patients had a poor clinical outcome with ODI score of >20% improvement, and we noticed that the level of pathology was at the level of L4L5, SVA was positive and worsen postoperatively, and also, it is accompanied by decreased lumbar lordosis. Change in ODI means statistically significant improvement when considering sagittal parameters preoperation and during operation. CONCLUSION Sagittal balance parameters should be considered in the surgical management of low-grade spondylolisthesis cases to improve their functional outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yousry Hassan
- grid.7776.10000 0004 0639 9286Neurosurgery Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Magdy Samra
- grid.7776.10000 0004 0639 9286Neurosurgery Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ehab Mohamed Eissa
- grid.7776.10000 0004 0639 9286Neurosurgery Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cummins D, Hindoyan K, Wu HH, Theologis AA, Callahan M, Tay B, Berven S. Reoperation and Mortality Rates Following Elective 1 to 2 Level Lumbar Fusion: A Large State Database Analysis. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1708-1714. [PMID: 33472423 PMCID: PMC9609528 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220986148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE Reoperation to lumbar spinal fusion creates significant burden on patient quality of life and healthcare costs. We assessed rates, etiologies, and risk factors for reoperation following elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion. METHODS Patients undergoing elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were identified using the Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) state inpatient databases from Florida and California. Patients were tracked for 5 years for any subsequent lumbar fusion. Cox proportional hazard analyses for reoperation were assessed using the following covariates: fusion approach type, age, race, Charlson comormidity index, gender, and length of stay. Distribution of etiologies for reoperation was then assessed. RESULTS 71, 456 patients receiving elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were included. A 5-year reoperation rate of 13.53% and mortality rate of 2.22% was seen. Combined anterior-posterior approaches (HR = 0.904, p < 0.05) and TLIF (HR = 0.867, p < 0.001) were associated with reduced risk of reoperation compared to stand-alone anterior approaches and non-TLIF posterior approaches. Age, gender, and number of comorbidities were not associated with risk of reoperation. From 1 to 5 years, degenerative disease rose from 43.50% to 50.31% of reoperations; mechanical failure decreased from 37.65% to 29.77%. CONCLUSIONS TLIF and combined anterior-posterior approaches for 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion are associated with the lowest rate of reoperation. Number of comorbidities and age are not predictive of reoperation. Primary etiologies leading to reoperation were degenerative disease and mechanical failure. Mortality rate is not increased from baseline following 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cummins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA,Daniel Cummins, Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU
320-W, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Kevork Hindoyan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hao-Hua Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alekos A. Theologis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Callahan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bobby Tay
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sigurd Berven
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Karamian BA, Mao J, Toci GR, Lambrechts MJ, Canseco JA, Qureshi MA, Silveri O, Minetos PD, Jallo JI, Prasad S, Heller JE, Sharan AD, Harrop JS, Woods BI, Kaye ID, Hilibrand A, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD. Clinical Outcomes at One-year Follow-up for Patients With Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1055-1061. [PMID: 35797595 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE To compare health-related quality of life outcomes at one-year follow-up between patients who did and did not develop surgical site infection (SSI) after thoracolumbar spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA SSI is among the most common healthcare-associated complications. As healthcare systems increasingly emphasize the value of delivered care, there is an increased need to understand the clinical impact of SSIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective 3:1 (control:SSI) propensity-matched case-control study was conducted for adult patients who underwent thoracolumbar fusion from March 2014 to January 2020 at a single academic institution. Exclusion criteria included less than 18 years of age, incomplete preoperative and one-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, and revision surgery. Continuous and categorical data were compared via independent t tests and χ 2 tests, respectively. Intragroup analysis was performed using paired t tests. Regression analysis for ∆ patient-reported outcome measures (postoperative minus preoperative scores) controlled for demographics. The α was set at 0.05. RESULTS A total of 140 patients (105 control, 35 SSI) were included in final analysis. The infections group had a higher rate of readmission (100% vs. 0.95%, P <0.001) and revision surgery (28.6% vs. 12.4%, P =0.048). Both groups improved significantly in Physical Component Score (control: P =0.013, SSI: P =0.039), Oswestry Disability Index (control: P <0.001, SSI: P =0.001), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back (both, P <0.001), and VAS Leg (control: P <0.001, SSI: P =0.030). Only the control group improved in Mental Component Score ( P <0.001 vs. SSI: P =0.228), but history of a SSI did not affect one-year improvement in ∆MCS-12 ( P =0.455) on regression analysis. VAS Leg improved significantly less in the infection group (-1.87 vs. -3.59, P =0.039), which was not significant after regression analysis (β=1.75, P =0.050). CONCLUSION Development of SSI after thoracolumbar fusion resulted in increased revision rates but did not influence patient improvement in one-year pain, functional disability, or physical and mental health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Karamian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer Mao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gregory R Toci
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark J Lambrechts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jose A Canseco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mahir A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Olivia Silveri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul D Minetos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jack I Jallo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Srinivas Prasad
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joshua E Heller
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ashwini D Sharan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James S Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Barrett I Woods
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan Hilibrand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher K Kepler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gregory D Schroeder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The Impact of Osteoporosis on Adverse Outcomes After Short Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:573-579. [PMID: 35297812 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Osteoporosis affects nearly 200 million individuals worldwide. There are little available data regarding outcomes in patients with osteoporosis who undergo short-segment lumbar fusion for degenerative disk disease (DDD). We sought to identify a relationship between osteoporosis and risk of adverse outcomes in patients with DDD undergoing short-segment lumbar fusion. METHODS Using the New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, all patients with DDD who underwent 2- to 3-level lumbar fusion from 2009 through 2011 were identified. Patients with bone mineralization disorders and other systemic and endocrine disorders and surgical indications of trauma, systemic disease(s), and infection were excluded. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of osteoporosis and compared for demographics, hospital-related parameters, and 2-year complications and revision surgeries. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to identify notable predictors of complications. RESULTS A total of 29,028 patients (osteoporosis = 1,353 [4.7%], nonosteoporosis = 27,675 [95.3%]) were included. Patients with osteoporosis were older (66.9 vs 52.6 years), more often female (85.1% vs 48.4%), and White (82.8% vs 73.5%) (all P < 0.001). The Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index did not significantly differ between groups. Hospital lengths of stay and total charges were higher for patients with osteoporosis (4.9 vs 4.1 days; $74,484 vs $73,724; both P < 0.001). Medical complication rates were higher in patients with osteoporosis, including acute renal failure and deep-vein thrombosis (both P < 0.01). This cohort also had higher rates of implant-related (3.4% vs 1.9%) and wound (9.8% vs 5.9%) complications (both P < 0.01). Preoperative osteoporosis was strongly associated with 2-year medical and surgical complications (odds ratios, 1.6 and 1.7) as well as greater odds of revision surgeries (odds ratio, 1.3) (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients with osteoporosis undergoing 2- to 3-level lumbar fusion for DDD were at higher risk of 2-year medical and surgical complications, especially implant-related and wound complications. These findings highlight the importance of rigorous preoperative metabolic workup and patients' optimization before spinal surgery.
Collapse
|
11
|
Deer TR, Grider JS, Pope JE, Lamer TJ, Wahezi SE, Hagedorn JM, Falowski S, Tolba R, Shah JM, Strand N, Escobar A, Malinowski M, Bux A, Jassal N, Hah J, Weisbein J, Tomycz ND, Jameson J, Petersen EA, Sayed D. Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN). J Pain Res 2022; 15:1325-1354. [PMID: 35546905 PMCID: PMC9084394 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s355285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- Centers for Pain Relief, Charleston, WV, USA
- Correspondence: Timothy R Deer, The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, WV, 25301, USA, Tel +1 304 347-6141, Email
| | - Jay S Grider
- UK HealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Tim J Lamer
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sayed E Wahezi
- Montefiore Medical Center, SUNY-Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Steven Falowski
- Director Functional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | - Reda Tolba
- Pain Management Department, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Jay M Shah
- SamWell Institute for Pain Management, Colonia, NJ, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alex Escobar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | | | - Anjum Bux
- Bux Pain Management, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Hah
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Nestor D Tomycz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Pain Medicine, Multidisciplinary Pain Fellowship, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stosch-Wiechert K, Wuertz-Kozak K, Hitzl W, Szeimies U, Stäbler A, Siepe CJ. Clinical and radiological mid- to long-term investigation of anterior lumbar stand-alone fusion: Incidence of reoperation and adjacent segment degeneration. BRAIN AND SPINE 2022; 2:100924. [PMID: 36248179 PMCID: PMC9560690 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Stosch-Wiechert
- Schön Klinik Vogtareuth, Department of Neurology, Pain Care Center, Krankenhausstr. 20, 83569, Vogtareuth, Germany
- Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Corresponding author. Department of Neurology, Pain Care Center, Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute of the Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Salzburg, Austria, Krankenhausstr. 20, D-83569, Vogtareuth, Germany.
| | - Karin Wuertz-Kozak
- Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Rochester Institute of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 160 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Research Office (Biostatistics), Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 20, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Paracelsus Medical University, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Müllner Hauptstr. 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Research Program Experimental Ophthalmology and Glaucoma Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Austria
| | - Ulrike Szeimies
- Radiological Institute Munich-Harlaching, Grünwalder Str. 72, 81547, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Stäbler
- Radiological Institute Munich-Harlaching, Grünwalder Str. 72, 81547, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Siepe
- Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Spine Center, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knezevic NN, Paredes S, Cantillo S, Hamid A, Candido KD. Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2021; 2:676730. [PMID: 35295439 PMCID: PMC8915709 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.676730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has proven benefits in controlling chronic low back pain and can be performed via the midline interlaminar (MIL) or transforaminal (TF) approach. A modified interlaminar approach, the parasagittal interlaminar (PIL), has surfaced as a more reliable, safe, and suitable approach to minimize complications related to MIL and TF. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of PIL with both MIL and TF approaches in adult patients with a history of chronic low back pain. Methods: A literature search was conducted using major electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Selected studies included patients with unilateral radicular symptoms, secondary to lumbar intervertebral disc hernias or degenerative lumbar disc disease, that, additionally, received ESIs via PIL or either MIL or TF under fluoroscopic guidance. Randomized and observational studies with pain relief score and/or functional disability assessment and at least a 2-week follow-up were included. Results: The search led to the initial identification of 174 studies. Following the screening, eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis and seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the statistical analysis. PIL showed statistically significantly more pain relief and functional improvement than MIL at 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-procedure. Compared to TF, PIL showed statistically significantly more pain relief at 3- and 6-month after the procedure. Additionally, PIL showed benefits in terms of lower mean fluoroscopy time, less radiation exposure, zero adverse events in all the included studies, no cases of intravascular spread compared with the TF approach, and a higher anterior epidural spread (AES) of PIL compared with TF. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the PIL approach is an effective and safe alternative to the MIL and TF approaches in patients presenting with chronic low back pain when epidural injections are indicated, demonstrating a higher level of pain relief and a stronger improvement in functionality post-procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Stephania Paredes
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Santiago Cantillo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Albara Hamid
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Kenneth D. Candido
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Segmental Lordosis Gain Is a Prognostic Radiological Factor of Good Functional Outcome After the Implantation of a Single-Level Prosthesis or a Hybrid Construct for Lumbar Disc Degeneration. World Neurosurg 2021; 152:e597-e602. [PMID: 34129973 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify radiological factors and functional outcomes associated with good results after implantation of a single lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct (anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lumbar disc prosthesis) in the setting of painful degenerative lumbar discopathy. METHODS This single-center, retrospective 10-year study included 92 patients ˃18 years old with chronic low back pain evolving for at least 1 year. The patients had degenerative disc disease and had failed conservative treatment and underwent lumbar arthroplasty. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Functional evaluation was based on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical rating scale. Radiological analysis was based on lumbar x-rays and magnetic resonance imaging parameters. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to the reduction in ODI score (>15 points or <15 points), and statistical analysis was done in both groups to find predictive radiological factors for a satisfactory functional outcome. RESULTS Clinically, 60 patients (65.2%) had a satisfactory functional result and 32 patients (34.8%) had a poor outcome according to ODI score. Radiographically, gain in segmental lordosis was statistically associated with good functional outcomes (8.9° for ODI decrease >15 vs. 3.2° for ODI decrease <15). CONCLUSIONS This study determined that gain in segmental lordosis is associated with a satisfactory functional outcome after a single-level lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct. Our study demonstrates that segmental lordosis gain may represent a significative useful positive predictor factor of patient outcome.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hegmann KT, Travis R, Andersson GBJ, Belcourt RM, Carragee EJ, Eskay-Auerbach M, Galper J, Goertz M, Haldeman S, Hooper PD, Lessenger JE, Mayer T, Mueller KL, Murphy DR, Tellin WG, Thiese MS, Weiss MS, Harris JS. Invasive Treatments for Low Back Disorders. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:e215-e241. [PMID: 33769405 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000001983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This abbreviated version of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's Low Back Disorders guideline reviews the evidence and recommendations developed for invasive treatments used to manage low back disorders. METHODS Comprehensive systematic literature reviews were accomplished with article abstraction, critiquing, grading, evidence table compilation, and guideline finalization by a multidisciplinary expert panel and extensive peer-review to develop evidence-based guidance. Consensus recommendations were formulated when evidence was lacking and often relied on analogy to other disorders for which evidence exists. A total of 47 high-quality and 321 moderate-quality trials were identified for invasive management of low back disorders. RESULTS Guidance has been developed for the invasive management of acute, subacute, and chronic low back disorders and rehabilitation. This includes 49 specific recommendations. CONCLUSION Quality evidence should guide invasive treatment for all phases of managing low back disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt T Hegmann
- American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Elk Grove Village, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bech-Azeddine R, Fruensgaard S, Andersen M, Carreon LY. Outcomes of decompression without fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and substantial back pain. J Neurosurg Spine 2021. [DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.spine20684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The predominant symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is neurogenic claudication or radicular pain. Some surgeons believe that the presence of substantial back pain is an indication for fusion, and that decompression alone may lead to worsening of back pain from destabilization associated with facet resection. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with LSS and clinically significant back pain could obtain substantial improvements in back pain after a decompression alone without fusion.
METHODS
The DaneSpine database was used to identify 2737 patients with LSS without segmental instability and a baseline back pain visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 50 who underwent a decompression procedure alone without fusion. Standard demographic and surgical variables and patient outcomes, including back and leg pain VAS score (0–100), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D at baseline and at 12 months postoperatively, were collected.
RESULTS
A total of 1891 patients (69%) had 12-month follow-up data available for analysis; the mean age was 66.4 years, 860 (46%) were male, the mean BMI was 27.8 kg/m2, and 508 (27%) were current smokers. At 12 months postoperatively, there were statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001) from baseline for back pain (72.1 to 42.1), leg pain (71.2 to 41.3), EQ-5D (0.35 to 0.61), and ODI (44.1 to 27.8).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with LSS, clinically substantial back pain, and no structural instability obtain improvement in back pain after decompression-only surgery and do not need a concomitant fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachid Bech-Azeddine
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen
| | | | - Mikkel Andersen
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Middelfart Hospital, Middelfart; and
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Leah Y. Carreon
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Middelfart Hospital, Middelfart; and
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sunderland G, Foster M, Dheerendra S, Pillay R. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Review of 2699 Cases. Global Spine J 2021; 11:172-179. [PMID: 32875849 PMCID: PMC7882820 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219896541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE Despite numerous advances in the technology and techniques available to spinal surgeons, lumbar decompression remains the mainstay of degenerative lumbar spine surgery. It has proven efficacy in trials, but only limited evidence of advantage over conservative management in large scale systematic reviews. We collated data from a large surgically managed cohort to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively populated database. Patient demographics, surgical details, and patient outcomes (Spine Tango core outcome measures index [COMI]-Low Back) were collected for 2699 lumbar decompression surgeries. RESULTS Lumbar decompression was shown to be successful at improving leg pain (mean improvement in visual analogue scale [VAS] at 3 months = 4) and to a lesser extent, back pain (mean improvement in VAS at 3 months = 2.61). Mean improvement in COMI score was 3.15 for all-comers. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCID) in COMI score (-2 points) was achieved in 73% of patients by 2-year follow-up. Primary surgery was more effective than redo surgery: odds ratio 0.547 (95% CI 0.408-0.733, P < .001). The benefits across all outcomes were maintained for the 2-year follow-up period. Patients can be classified according to their outcome as "early responders"; achieving MCID by 3 months (61% primary vs 41% redo), "late responders"; achieving MCID by 2 years (15% vs 20%) or nonresponders (24% vs 39%). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar decompression is effective in improving quality of life in appropriately selected patients. Patient-reported outcome measures collected routinely and collated within a registry are a powerful tool for assessing the efficacy of lumbar spine interventions and allow accurate counseling of patients perioperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sujay Dheerendra
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, UK
| | - Robin Pillay
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zawy Alsofy S, Nakamura M, Ewelt C, Kafchitsas K, Lewitz M, Schipmann S, Suero Molina E, Santacroce A, Stroop R. Retrospective Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Monosegmental Lumbar Fusion, and Impact of Virtual Reality on Surgical Planning and Strategy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 82:399-409. [PMID: 33540454 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Spinal fusion for symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis can be accomplished using an open or minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Evaluation of segmental spondylolisthesis and instabilities and review of their therapies are inseparably connected with lumbar tomographic imaging. We analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent MIS or open monosegmental dorsal fusion and compared surgical outcomes along with complication rates. We furthermore evaluated the influence of virtual reality (VR) visualization on surgical planning in lumbar fusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient files were retrospectively analyzed regarding patient- and disease-related data, operative performance, surgical outcomes, and perioperative surgical complications. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively visualized via VR software. A questionnaire evaluated the influence of three-dimensional (3D) VR images versus two-dimensional CT and MRI scans on therapy planning, fusion method, and surgical technique and procedure. RESULTS Overall, 171 patients were included (MIS/open: 90/81). MIS was associated with less blood loss, shorter surgery time and hospital stay, lower complication rates, equivalent long-term patient-reported outcomes, but lower fusion rates and higher late reoperation rates than open surgery. Image presentation using VR significantly influenced the recommended surgical therapies (decompression only/decompression and fusion; p = 0.02), had no significant influence on the recommended fusion method (rigid/dynamic/stand-alone; p = 0.77), and, in cases of rigid fusion, a significant influence on the recommended technique (MIS/open; p = 0.03) and fusion procedure (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION In patients with monosegmental degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis, MIS fusion was advantageous concerning perioperative complication rates and perioperative surgical outcomes, but disadvantageous regarding fusion and reoperation rates compared to open fusion. 3D-VR-based analysis of sectional images significantly influenced the recommended surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Zawy Alsofy
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Barbara-Hospital Hamm-Heessen, Academic Hospital of Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Hamm, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Makoto Nakamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Hospital Köln-Merheim, Witten/Herdecke University, Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Christian Ewelt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Barbara-Hospital Hamm-Heessen, Academic Hospital of Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Hamm, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Kafchitsas
- Department of Spine Surgery, Asklepios Orthopedic Hospital Lindenlohe, Schwandorf, Bayern, Germany
| | - Marc Lewitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Barbara-Hospital Hamm-Heessen, Academic Hospital of Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Hamm, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schipmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Eric Suero Molina
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Antonio Santacroce
- Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Barbara-Hospital Hamm-Heessen, Academic Hospital of Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Hamm, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Stroop
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
One Year Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Investigation Device Trial of a Novel Conformal Mesh Interbody Fusion Device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:E126-E132. [PMID: 32991515 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective multicenter investigational device exempt trial is underway evaluating a novel conformable mesh interbody fusion device in subjects undergoing single-level fusion for degenerative disc disease. Patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were offered enrollment. There is no comparative group in this study. OBJECTIVE Establish the short and long-term safety and effectiveness of a novel conformable mesh interbody fusion device in subjects undergoing single-level fusion for degenerative disc disease unresponsive to conservative care. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion remains a critical procedure for patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease. Increasingly minimally invasive techniques have been proposed to minimize muscle dissection and tissue damage with the goal of minimizing pain and length of stay. METHODS One hundred two subjects were enrolled across 10 sites. Ninety nine subjects remained available for follow-up at 12-months. Physical evaluations/imaging were performed serially through 12-months. Validated assessment tools included 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function, and computerized tomography scan for fusion. Independent committees were used to identify adverse events and for assessment of radiographic fusion. RESULTS Reductions in low back pain (LBP)/leg pain and improvements in functional status occur early and are maintained through 12-month follow-up. Mean VAS-LBP change from baseline to 6-weeks post-op (-46 mm) continued to improve through 12 months (-51 mm). Similar trends were observed for leg pain. Mean ODI change from baseline to 6 weeks post-op (-17) was almost doubled by 12 months (-32). Fusion rates at 12-months are high (98%). No device-related serious adverse events have occurred. CONCLUSION 12-month outcomes demonstrated excellent patient compliance and positive outcomes for pain, function, fusion, and device safety. Clinical improvements were observed by 6-weeks post-op and appear durable up to 1 year later. A novel mesh interbody device may provide an alternative means of interbody fusion that reduces connective tissue disruption.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
|
20
|
Xu W, Ran B, Luo W, Li Z, Gu R. Is Lumbar Fusion Necessary for Chronic Low Back Pain Associated with Degenerative Disk Disease? A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2020; 146:298-306. [PMID: 33253955 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumbar fusion versus nonoperative care for the treatment of chronic low back pain associated with degenerative disk disease. METHODS A comprehensive duplicate electronic database search including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was conducted to identify relevant prospective studies published up to June 30, 2020. The main outcomes including clinical results, complications, and all-cause additional surgeries were presented in the form of short- (<2 years) and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up results. Analyses were performed in Review Manager software 5.3. RESULTS Six prospective studies involving 159 patients for short-term follow-up and 675 for long-term follow-up were included. The 2 interventions exhibited little difference in regard to short- and long-term Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain, except that lumbar fusion might bring about lower additional surgery rate (risk ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.98; P = 0.04), and higher complication rate (risk ratio, 21.46; 95% confidence interval, 4.34 to 106.04; P = 0.0002) in the long term. CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis determined that fusion surgery was no better than nonoperative treatment in terms of the pain and disability outcomes at either short- or long-term follow-up. It is necessary for clinicians to weigh the risk of complications associated with fusion surgery against additional surgeries after nonoperative treatment. Considering lax patient inclusion criteria in the existing randomized clinical trials, the result needs to be further confirmed by high-quality research with stricter selection criteria in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbo Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Bingbing Ran
- Department of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Wenqi Luo
- Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Zimeng Li
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Rui Gu
- Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Passias PG, Horn SR, Segreto FA, Bortz CA, Pierce KE, Vasquez-Montes D, Moon J, Varlotta CG, Raman T, Frangella NJ, Stekas N, Lafage R, Lafage V, Gerling MC, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ, Fischer CR. ODI Cannot Account for All Variation in PROMIS Scores in Patients With Thoracolumbar Disorders. Global Spine J 2020; 10:399-405. [PMID: 32435558 PMCID: PMC7222681 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219851478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of single institution. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores in thoracolumbar patients. METHODS Included: Patients ≥18 years with a thoracolumbar spine condition (spinal stenosis, disc herniation, low back pain, disc degeneration, spondylolysis). Bivariate correlations assessed the linear relationships between ODI and PROMIS (Physical Function, Pain Intensity, and Pain Interference). Correlation cutoffs assessed patients with high and low correlation between ODI and PROMIS. Linear regression predicted the relationship of ODI to PROMIS. RESULTS A total of 206 patients (age 53.7 ± 16.6 years, 49.5% female) were included. ODI correlated with PROMIS Physical Function (r = -0.763, P < .001), Pain Interference (r = 0.800, P < .001), and Pain Intensity (r = 0.706, P < .001). ODI strongly predicted PROMIS for Physical Function (R 2 = 0.58, P < .001), Pain Intensity (R 2 = 0.50, P < .001), and Pain Interference (R 2 = 0.64, P < .001); however, there is variability in PROMIS that ODI cannot account for. ODI questions about sitting and sleeping were weakly correlated across the 3 PROMIS domains. Linear regression showed overall ODI score as accounting for 58.3% (R 2 = 0.583) of the variance in PROMIS Physical Function, 63.9% (R 2 = 0.639) of the variance in Pain Interference score, and 49.9% (R 2 = 0.499) of the variance in Pain Intensity score. CONCLUSIONS There is a large amount of variability with PROMIS that cannot be accounted for with ODI. ODI questions regarding walking, social life, and lifting ability correlate strongly with PROMIS while sitting, standing, and sleeping do not. These results reinforce the utility of PROMIS as a valid assessment for low back disability, while indicating the need for further evaluation of the factors responsible for variation between PROMIS and ODI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G. Passias
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, Manhattan, NY, USA,Peter G. Passias, NYU School of Medicine, Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John Moon
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | - Tina Raman
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Minimal-invasive Stand-alone-Fusion des lumbosakralen Übergangs. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE 2020; 32:192-199. [DOI: 10.1007/s00064-020-00661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
23
|
Jacobsen MK, Andresen AK, Jespersen AB, Støttrup C, Carreon LY, Overgaard S, Andersen MØ. Randomized double blind clinical trial of ABM/P-15 versus allograft in noninstrumented lumbar fusion surgery. Spine J 2020; 20:677-684. [PMID: 32001384 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Due to poor bone stock in the elderly, a noninstrumented fusion is commonly performed in Scandinavia when instability is present. Allograft bone is often used as graft extender with consequent low fusion rates. The use of 15 amino acid residue (ABM/P-15) has shown superior fusion rates in dental and cervical spinal surgery but no clinical studies have been conducted in noninstrumented lumbar fusion surgery. PURPOSE To evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROs) and the intertransverse fusion rate in noninstrumented posterolateral fusion with either ABM/P-15 or allograft. STUDY DESIGN Double-blind randomized clinical trial. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients 60 years or older with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing decompression and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES Visual analog scales for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index and EuroQoL-5D. METHODS One hundred one patients were enrolled in the study and randomized 1:1 to either ABM/P-15 (mixed 50/50, 5cc/level) or allograft bone (30 g/level), both mixed with local bone graft. PROs were collected at baseline and at 12 and 24 months after surgery. The patients underwent 1-year postoperative fine cut computed tomography-scans (0.9 mm) with reconstructions, independently evaluated by three reviewers. Fusion status was concluded by consensus of two of the three as "fusion" or "no fusion." RESULTS There were 49 patients available for analysis in both cohorts. The two groups were similar in terms of sex distribution, age, and number of levels fused. The fusion rate was significantly higher in the ABM/P-15 group with 50% fused compared with 20% in the allograft group. PROs at baseline and at all follow-up time points were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing noninstrumented posterolateral fusion augmented with ABM/P-15 had a statistically significantly higher fusion rate compared with allograft when evaluated with postoperative fine cut computed tomography-scans (0.9 mm) with reconstructions. However, this did not translate to better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kjær Jacobsen
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Andreas Killerich Andresen
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Annette Bennedsgaard Jespersen
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Christian Støttrup
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Leah Y Carreon
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Søren Overgaard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ø Andersen
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ould-Slimane M, Cantogrel P, Lefèvre E, Parent HF, Gauthé R. Minimally invasive unilateral lumbar interbody fusion (UNILIF) in over-80-year-olds. Continuous series of 42 patients at 1.4 years' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106:275-279. [PMID: 32171688 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In lumbar stenosis, surgery aims to improve quality of life in increasingly elderly patients. Minimally invasive techniques better suit the requirements of elderly patients with increasing functional demand. HYPOTHESIS The UNILIF unilateral lumbar interbody fusion technique improves functional scores at 1 year in over-80 year-olds, with low morbidity. METHOD Patients undergoing minimally invasive decompression with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) associated to unilateral pedicle screwing for degenerative lumbar stenosis were analyzed at a minimum 1 year's follow-up. SF12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Quebec scores and sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters were assessed at follow-up. Surgical and general complications were also collated. RESULTS In all, 42 patients (64.3% female; mean age, 83.7±2.9 years) were treated by UNILIF at levels L2-L3 (3.8%), L3-L4 (15.4%), L4-L5 (71.2%) and L5-S1 (9.6%). Mean follow-up was 520±226 days (range, 340-1166 days). Mean preoperative SF12 score was 77.5±10.9, with significant improvement at last follow-up: 81.9±138 (p<0.05). Mean preoperative ODI was 44.4%±14.0, with significant improvement at last follow-up: 32.4%±13.3 (p<0.001). Mean preoperative Quebec score was 42.9±19.9, with significant improvement at last follow-up: 28.5±21.9 (p<0.001). Spinopelvic sagittal balance was not affected by the UNILIF procedure. There were no cases of infection or severe general complications during follow-up, although 2 cases of non-union required revision surgery. CONCLUSION Lumbar stenosis surgery by UNILIF improved functional scores at 1 year, with low morbidity. It is a suitable strategy for degenerative lumbar stenosis in elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, non-comparative cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mourad Ould-Slimane
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, institut régional du Rachis, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Pauline Cantogrel
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, institut régional du Rachis, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Emeric Lefèvre
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, institut régional du Rachis, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France
| | | | - Rémi Gauthé
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, institut régional du Rachis, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brown SJ, Turner SA, Balain BS, Davidson NT, Roberts S. Is Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells a Possibility for Biological Spinal Fusion? Cartilage 2020; 11:181-191. [PMID: 29361851 PMCID: PMC7097985 DOI: 10.1177/1947603518754628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a simple, biologically robust method for inducing calcification of degenerate intervertebral discs (IVD) could be developed to provide an alternative treatment for patients requiring spinal fusion. DESIGN Nucleus pulposus (NP) cells isolated from 14 human IVDs were cultured in monolayer and exposed to osteogenic medium, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VitD3), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) 2/7 to determine if they could become osteogenic. Similarly explant cultures of IVDs from 11 patients were cultured in osteogenic media with and without prior exposure to VitD3 and BMP-2. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by alkaline phosphatase activity and areas of calcification identified by alizarin red or von Kossa staining. Expression of osteogenic genes during monolayer culture was determined using polymerase chain reaction and explant tissues assessed for BMP inhibitors. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were used for comparison. RESULTS Standard osteogenic media was optimum for promoting mineralization by human NP cells in monolayer. Some osteogenic differentiation was observed with 10 nM VitD3, but none following application of PTH or BMPs. Regions of calcification were detected in 2 of the eleven IVD tissue explants, one cultured in osteogenic media and one with the addition of VitD3 and BMP-2. CONCLUSIONS Human NP cells can become osteogenic in monolayer and calcification of the extracellular matrix can also occur, although not consistently. Inhibitory factors within either the cells or the extracellular matrix may hinder osteogenesis, indicating that a robust biological fusion at this time requires further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon J. Brown
- Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
- ISTM, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Sarah A. Turner
- Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
- ISTM, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Birender S. Balain
- Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
| | - Neil T. Davidson
- Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
| | - Sally Roberts
- Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
- ISTM, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sharif S, Shaikh Y, Bajamal AH, Costa F, Zileli M. Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. World Neurosurg X 2020; 7:100077. [PMID: 32613190 PMCID: PMC7322802 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Lumbar spine stenosis represents a complex degenerative pathology that has been a subject of significant dispute when it comes to fusion. A review of the literature from 2008 to 2019 was performed on the role of fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Using the key words "lumbar spinal stenosis," "lumbar fusion," "lumbar decompression," and "lumbar pedicle screw fixation," the search revealed 490 papers. Of these, only Level 1 or Level 2 evidence papers were selected, leading to only 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were analyzed. None of the good-quality studies (RCTs) performed so far have proven any clinical benefit of adding fusion to degenerative lumbar spine decompression. The effect of spinal instability on the outcome following decompression remains controversial. At present, no unanimous criteria exist among the RCTs to identify what constitutes true instability. Fusion for instability or stenosis alone remains controversial, and the results are unconvincing. At this point, the issue expands to not only lumbar degenerative diseases but spinal fractures and lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. We thereby present the consensus of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Committee, which formulated the indications for lumbar spine fusion in degenerative lumbar stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Sharif
- Department of Neurosurgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Yousuf Shaikh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Hafid Bajamal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Airlangga University, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Francesco Costa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mehmet Zileli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ege University Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Endler P, Ekman P, Berglund I, Möller H, Gerdhem P. Long-term outcome of fusion for degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:1526-1533. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b12.bjj-2019-0427.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF). Patients and Methods A total of 2874 patients who were operated on at one or two lumbar levels were followed for a mean of 9.2 years (3.6 to 19.1) for any additional lumbar spine surgery. Patient-reported outcome data were available preoperatively (n = 2874) and at one year (n = 2274), two years (n = 1958), and a mean of 6.9 years (n = 1518) postoperatively and consisted of global assessment and visual analogue scales of leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol five-dimensional index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and satisfaction with treatment. Statistical analyses were performed with competing-risks proportional hazards regression or analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline variables. Results The number of patients with additional surgery were 32/183 (17%) in the PLF group, 229/1256 (18%) in the IPLF group, and 439/1435 (31%) in the IBF group. With the PLF group as a reference, the hazard ratio for additional lumbar surgery was 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.72) for the IPLF group and 2.13 (95% CI 1.45 to 3.12) for the IBF group. All patient-reported outcomes improved after surgery (p < 0.001) but were without statistically significant differences between the groups at the one-, two- and 6.9-year follow-ups (all p ≥ 0.12). Conclusion The addition of interbody fusion to posterolateral fusion was associated with a higher risk for additional surgery and showed no advantages in patient-reported outcome Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1526–1533
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Endler
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Ekman
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ivan Berglund
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hans Möller
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul Gerdhem
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Psychological predictors of quality of life and functional outcome in patients undergoing elective surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2019; 29:349-359. [PMID: 31414288 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06106-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the correlation between patients' psychopathological predisposition, disability and health-related quality of life (QOL) after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease. METHODS We prospectively included patients undergoing decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis or disc herniation with additional fusion of up to two segments. Patients completed a structured psychological assessment including the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (ADS-K), Post-Traumatic Stress Scale-10 (PTSS-10), State Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Anxiety and State Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait Anxiety (STAI-S and STAI-T) and Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) before surgery, after 3 and 12 months. Outcome measures included EuroQol 5D (EQ), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. RESULTS In total, 245 patients between March 2013 and November 2017 received surgery, of which 180 (73.5%) fully completed follow-up after 3 months and 12 months. QOL scores significantly increased by 3 months (EQ: +0.2; p < 0.001; SF-36 PCS: +7.0; p < 0.001; SF-36 MCS: +3.3; p = 0.018), a benefit which was retained at 12 months, without statistically significant difference between fused and non-fused patients. Depressed patients exhibited impaired mean scores of EQ (0.58 vs. 0.36; p < 0.001) and ODI mean scores (35.5 vs. 51.9; p < 0.001) at baseline, which significantly improved and converged with scores of non-depressed patients after 12 months. Linear regression analysis identified statistically significant predictors in age, STAI-T and SF-36 MCS for post-operative QOL and disability. CONCLUSION Despite exhibiting pronounced psychological distress preoperatively, patients may significantly benefit from surgery with an outcome equal to psychologically healthy patients after 12 months. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
|
29
|
Fleming J, Glassman SD, Miller A, Dimar JR, Djurasovic M, Carreon LY. The Effect of Symptom Duration on Outcomes After Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Global Spine J 2019; 9:487-491. [PMID: 31431870 PMCID: PMC6686385 DOI: 10.1177/2192568218804557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Longitudinal comparative cohort. OBJECTIVES To determine if the duration of symptoms in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis affects postoperative outcomes after 1- or 2-level decompression and fusion. METHODS Patients undergoing primary surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at a single Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) participating site were identified. Demographic, surgical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data, including baseline and 12-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain (BP, 0-10), leg pain (LP, 0-10), and EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) scores were collected. Individual medical records were reviewed for data on duration of symptoms prior to surgery. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts-those with preoperative symptom duration of less than 1 year, 1 to 2 years, or greater than 2 years. RESULTS Complete data was available in 123 patients. Significant improvement in ODI, BP, and LP scores were observed in all groups. At 12-month follow-up improvement in ODI, BP, or LP was similar among the cohorts; with a trend toward significance with better improvement in LP scores in patients with a symptom duration of less than 1 year to those with symptom duration greater than 2 years (P = .058). CONCLUSIONS The duration of symptoms up to 2 years prior to surgery may not be a useful predictor of improvement of back pain or disability scores in patients with spondylolisthesis requiring decompression and fusion. Although there was a positive trend for improvement in leg pain for those with a shorter duration of symptoms, this did not reach statistical significance in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Fleming
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Steven D. Glassman
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA,University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Adam Miller
- University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - John R. Dimar
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA,University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Mladen Djurasovic
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA,University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Leah Y. Carreon
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA,Leah Y. Carreon, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim WJ, Lee JW, Kim SM, Park KY, Chang SH, Song DG, Choy WS. Precautions for Combined Anterior and Posterior Long-Level Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: Perioperative Surgical Complications Related to the Anterior Procedure (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion). Asian Spine J 2019; 13:823-831. [PMID: 31154755 PMCID: PMC6773981 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2018.0304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective, single-center study. Purpose We aimed to determine the perioperative complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) as a first-stage procedure in combined anterior and posterior operation for adult spinal deformity (ASD) along with sagittal imbalance. Specifically, we aimed to identify the radiological and clinical types of perioperative surgical complications and the factors affecting these complications. Overview of Literature OLIF has recently gained popularity, and there are several reports of good outcomes and only a few of complications with OLIF; however, a few studies have focused on the perioperative surgical complications of ASD along with sagittal imbalance. Methods The perioperative period was a 1-week interval between the anterior and posterior procedures. All patients underwent simple radiography and magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively and postoperatively. Cage placement was evaluated for displacement (i.e., subsidence and migration) and vertebral body fracture. Clinical patient complaints were evaluated perioperatively. Student t-test was used for data analysis. Results A total of 46 patients were included, totaling 138 fusion segments. A week after OLIF, 14 patients/33 segments (30.4%/23.9%) demonstrated endplate injury-associated cage placement change. Subsidence was the most common cage placement-related complication. As compared with patients without endplate injury, those with endplate injuries showed significantly larger correction angles and a higher proportion of them had larger height cages than the disk height in the full-extension lateral view. Although 32.6% of the patients experienced perioperative clinical complications, they were relatively minor and transient. The most common complication was severe postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale score of >7), and hip flexor weakness spontaneously resolved within 1 week. Conclusions OLIF yielded more than expected endplate injuries from treatment modalities for ASD along with sagittal imbalance. Therefore, surgeons should be cautious about endplate injury during OLIF procedures. It is difficult to accomplish lordosis correction via OLIF alone; therefore, surgeons should not attempt this impractical correction goal and insert an immoderate cage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whoan Jeang Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jae Won Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Su Min Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kun Young Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Shann Haw Chang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Dae Geon Song
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Won Sik Choy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Miscusi M, Serrao M, Conte C, Ippolito G, Marinozzi F, Bini F, Troise S, Forcato S, Trungu S, Ramieri A, Pierelli F, Raco A. Spatial and temporal characteristics of the spine muscles activation during walking in patients with lumbar instability due to degenerative lumbar disk disease: Evaluation in pre-surgical setting. Hum Mov Sci 2019; 66:371-382. [PMID: 31153034 DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Our purpose was to investigate the spatial and temporal profile of the paraspinal muscle activation during gait in a group of 13 patients with lumbar instability (LI) in a pre-surgical setting compared to the results with those from both 13 healthy controls (HC) and a sample of 7 patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), which represents a chronic untreatable condition, in which the spine muscles function is expected to be widely impaired. Spatiotemporal gait parameters, trunk kinematics, and muscle activation were measured through a motion analysis system integrated with a surface EMG device. The bilateral paraspinal muscles (longissimus) at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 levels and lumbar iliocostalis muscles were evaluated. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between groups in the step length, step width, and trunk bending and rotation. As regard the EMG analysis, significant differences were found in the cross-correlation, full-width percentage and center of activation values between groups, for all muscles investigated. Patients with LI, showed preserved trunk movements compared to HC but a series of EMG abnormalities of the spinal muscles, in terms of left-right symmetry, top-down synchronization, and spatiotemporal activation and modulation compared to the HC group. In patients with LI some of such EMG abnormalities regarded mainly the segment involved by the instability and were strictly correlated to the pain perception. Conversely, in patients with FBSS the EMG abnormalities regarded all the spinal muscles, irrespective to the segment involved, and were correlated to the disease's severity. Furthermore, patients with FBSS showed reduced lateral bending and rotation of the trunk and a reduced gait performance and balance. Our methodological approach to analyze the functional status of patients with LI due to spine disease with surgical indications, even in more complex conditions such as deformities, could allow to evaluate the biomechanics of the spine in the preoperative conditions and, in the future, to verify whether and which surgical procedure may either preserve or improve the spine muscle function during gait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Miscusi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy; Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariano Serrao
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy; Movement Analysis LAB, Policlinico Italia, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Giorgio Ippolito
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Marinozzi
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical & Thermal Measurement Lab, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabiano Bini
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical & Thermal Measurement Lab, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Troise
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical & Thermal Measurement Lab, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Francesco Pierelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy
| | - Antonino Raco
- Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barrey CY, Le Huec JC. Chronic low back pain: Relevance of a new classification based on the injury pattern. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105:339-346. [PMID: 30792166 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to define the role for surgery in the treatment of chronic low back pain (cLBP) and to develop a new classification of cLBP based on the pattern of injury. HYPOTHESIS Surgery may benefit patients with cLBP, and a new classification based on the injury pattern may be of interest. METHOD A systematic literature review was performed by searching Medline, the Cochrane Library, the French public health database (Banque de Données en Santé Publique), Science Direct, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse. The main search terms were "back pain" OR "lumbar" OR "intervertebral disc replacement" OR "vertebrae" OR "spinal" AND "surgery" OR "surgical" OR "fusion" OR "laminectomy" OR "discectomy". RESULTS Surgical techniques available for treating cLBP consist of fusion, disc replacement, dynamic stabilisation, and inter-spinous posterior devices. Compared to non-operative management including intensive rehabilitation therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy, fusion is not better in terms of either function (evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) or pain (level 2). Fusion is better than non-operative management without intensive rehabilitation therapy (level 2). There is no evidence to date that one fusion technique is superior over the others regarding the clinical outcomes (assessed using the ODI). Compared to fusion or multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapy, disc replacement can produce better function and less pain, although the differences are not clinically significant (level 2). The available evidence does not support the use of dynamic stabilisation or interspinous posterior devices to treat cLBP due to degenerative disease (professional consensus within the French Society for Spinal Surgery). The following recommendations can be made: non-operative treatment must be provided for at least 1 year before considering surgery in patients with cLBP due to degenerative disease; patients must be fully informed about alternative treatment options and the risks associated with surgery; standing radiographs must be obtained to assess sagittal spinal alignment and a magnetic resonance imaging scan to determine the mechanism of injury; and, if fusion is performed, the lumbar lordotic curvature must be restored. DISCUSSION This work establishes the need for a new classification of cLBP based on the presumptive mechanism responsible for the pain. Three categories should be distinguished: non-degenerative cLBP (previously known as symptomatic cLBP), in which the cause of pain is a trauma, spondylolysis, a tumour, an infection, or an inflammatory process; degenerative cLBP (previously known as non-specific cLBP) characterised by variable combinations of degenerative alterations in one or more discs, facet joints, and/or ligaments, with or without regional and/or global alterations in spinal alignment (which must be assessed using specific parameters); and cLBP of unknown mechanism, in which the pain seems to bear no relation to the anatomical abnormalities (and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale may be helpful in this situation). This classification should prove useful in the future for constituting well-defined patient groups, thereby improving the assessment of treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II, systematic review of level II studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric Yves Barrey
- Service de chirurgie du rachis et de la moelle épinière, hôpital P. Wertheimer, GHE, hospices civils de Lyon; université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France.
| | - Jean-Charles Le Huec
- Service de chirurgie du rachis 2, unité d'orthopédie-traumatologie, hôpital universitaire Pellegrin, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | -
- Société française de chirurgie du rachis (SFCR), 56, rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gornet MG, Peacock J, Claude J, Schranck FW, Copay AG, Eastlack RK, Benz R, Olshen A, Lotz JC. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can identify painful lumbar discs and may facilitate improved clinical outcomes of lumbar surgeries for discogenic pain. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2019; 28:674-687. [PMID: 30610465 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-05873-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to refine clinical MRS to optimize performance and then determine whether MRS-derived biomarkers reliably identify painful discs, quantify degeneration severity, and forecast surgical outcomes for chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. METHODS We performed an observational diagnostic development and accuracy study. Six hundred and twenty-three (623) discs in 139 patients were scanned using MRS, with 275 discs also receiving provocative discography (PD). MRS data were used to quantify spectral features related to disc structure (collagen and proteoglycan) and acidity (lactate, alanine, propionate). Ratios of acidity to structure were used to calculate pain potential. MRS-SCOREs were compared to PD and Pfirrmann grade. Clinical utility was judged by evaluating surgical success for 75 of the subjects who underwent lumbar surgery. RESULTS Two hundred and six (206) discs had both a successful MRS and independent pain diagnosis. When comparing to PD, MRS had a total accuracy of 85%, sensitivity of 82%, and specificity of 88%. These increased to 93%, 91%, and 93% respectively, in non-herniated discs. The MRS structure measures differed significantly between Pfirrmann grades, except grade I versus grade II. When all MRS positive discs were treated, surgical success was 97% versus 57% when the treated level was MRS negative, or 54% when the non-treated adjacent level was MRS positive. CONCLUSION MRS correlates with PD and may support improved surgical outcomes for CLBP patients. Noninvasive MRS is a potentially valuable approach to clarifying pain mechanisms and designing CLBP therapies that are customized to the patient. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ryan Benz
- SoCal Bioinformatics, Inc, Glendale, CA, USA
| | - Adam Olshen
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Lotz
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Robinson WA, Hevesi M, Carlson BC, Schulte S, Petfield JL, Freedman BA. Spinal Fusions in Active Military Personnel: Who Gets a Lumbar Spinal Fusion in the Military and What Impact Does It Have on Service Member Retention? Mil Med 2019; 184:e156-e161. [PMID: 30690620 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William A Robinson
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN
| | - Mario Hevesi
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN
| | - Bayard C Carlson
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN
| | - Spencer Schulte
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.,William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5005 N Piedras St., El Paso, TX
| | - Joseph L Petfield
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.,Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, U.S. Hospital, MCEU-LST, Landstuhl, Germany
| | - Brett A Freedman
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Deer TR, Grider JS, Pope JE, Falowski S, Lamer TJ, Calodney A, Provenzano DA, Sayed D, Lee E, Wahezi SE, Kim C, Hunter C, Gupta M, Benyamin R, Chopko B, Demesmin D, Diwan S, Gharibo C, Kapural L, Kloth D, Klagges BD, Harned M, Simopoulos T, McJunkin T, Carlson JD, Rosenquist RW, Lubenow TR, Mekhail N. The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment. Pain Pract 2018; 19:250-274. [PMID: 30369003 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can lead to compression of neural elements and manifest as low back and leg pain. LSS has traditionally been treated with a variety of conservative (pain medications, physical therapy, epidural spinal injections) and invasive (surgical decompression) options. Recently, several minimally invasive procedures have expanded the treatment options. METHODS The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group convened to evaluate the peer-reviewed literature as the basis for making minimally invasive spine treatment (MIST) recommendations. Eleven consensus points were clearly defined with evidence strength, recommendation grade, and consensus level using U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria. The Consensus Group also created a treatment algorithm. Literature searches yielded 9 studies (2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]; 7 observational studies, 4 prospective and 3 retrospective) of minimally invasive spine treatments, and 1 RCT for spacers. RESULTS The LSS treatment choice is dependent on the degree of stenosis; spinal or anatomic level; architecture of the stenosis; severity of the symptoms; failed, past, less invasive treatments; previous fusions or other open surgical approaches; and patient comorbidities. There is Level I evidence for percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression as superior to lumbar epidural steroid injection, and 1 RCT supported spacer use in a noninferiority study comparing 2 spacer products currently available. CONCLUSIONS MISTs should be used in a judicious and algorithmic fashion to treat LSS, based on the evidence of efficacy and safety in the peer-reviewed literature. The MIST Consensus Group recommend that these procedures be used in a multimodal fashion as part of an evidence-based decision algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- Center for Pain Relief, Charleston, West Virginia, U.S.A
| | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | - Jason E Pope
- Evolve Restorative Clinic, Santa Rosa, California, U.S.A
| | - Steven Falowski
- Functional Neurosurgery, St. Lukes University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Tim J Lamer
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | | | - David A Provenzano
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Dawood Sayed
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Eric Lee
- Summit Pain Alliance, Sonoma, California, U.S.A
| | - Sayed E Wahezi
- Montefiore Medical Center, SUNY-Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, U.S.A
| | - Chong Kim
- Center for Pain Relief, Charleston, West Virginia, U.S.A
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Mayank Gupta
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, HCA Midwest Health, Overland Park, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Rasmin Benyamin
- Millennium Pain Center, Bloomington, Illinois, U.S.A.,College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A
| | | | - Didier Demesmin
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Pain Medicine, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, U.S.A
| | - Sudhir Diwan
- Manhattan Spine and Pain Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Christopher Gharibo
- Pain Medicine and Orthopedics, NYU Langone Hospitals Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Leo Kapural
- Carolina's Pain Institute at Brookstown, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - David Kloth
- Department of Anesthesiology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut, U.S.A
| | - Brian D Klagges
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Amoskeag Anesthesiology, Manchester, New Hampshire, U.S.A
| | - Michael Harned
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | - Tom Simopoulos
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | | | | | | | | | - Nagy Mekhail
- Evidence-Based Pain Management Research and Education, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Activity of Daily Living After Long Level Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity: Compared With Over 60-Year-Old Degenerative Spine Patients Without Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43:1638-1647. [PMID: 29649087 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective single center study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate 1) the activity of daily living (ADL) of three categorized patients group; over 60-year-old degenerative spine patients without adult spinal deformity (ASD), nonoperative ASD patients, and operative ASD patients, 2) what kinds of activities would be impaired, and 3) how the ADL changes over time after long level fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is still debate how surgeons could decide treatment methods for old-aged adult spinal deformity, operatively or not. There was lack of information how long level fusion impacts daily activities, especially sedentary Asian lifestyle. In Asia, impaired ADL is much more important issue because of different lifestyle. METHODS Patients were categorized into three groups; Group 1 was over 60-year old aged degenerative spine disease without deformity, Group 2 was ASD patients who did not have surgery, and Group 3 was ASD patients who had surgery for deformity correction. Patients were evaluated using answer Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, and Assessment activities of daily living for sedentary Asian culture (ADL-SA) questionnaire. RESULTS Group 1 showed nearly full functions in every activity (ADL-SA: 41.4). ADL-SA scores of Group 2 were similar to Group 1 (P = 0.452). However, get up from bottom (P < 0.001), and pick up object (P < 0.001) were impaired. After long level fusion, ADL was impaired but gradually improved by time. From postoperative 1 year, total ADL score recovered to acceptable range. However, among ADL, activities associated sedentary lifestyle (get up from bottom, wipe floor, pick up object, and sit cross-legged) were still impaired after 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION ADL was impaired after long level fusion; however it would improve as time goes by. However, among ADL, activities associated sedentary lifestyle was still impaired. Hence give enough information to patients about limited activities before deciding operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
37
|
Treatment outcome of quality of life and clinical symptoms in patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc diseases: which treatment modality is superior? INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2018; 43:875-881. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4248-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
38
|
D'Oro A, Buser Z, Brodke DS, Park JB, Yoon ST, Youssef JA, Meisel HJ, Radcliff KE, Hsieh P, Wang JC. Trends and Costs of External Electrical Bone Stimulators and Grafting Materials in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Asian Spine J 2018; 12:973-980. [PMID: 30322261 PMCID: PMC6284136 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective review. Purpose To identify the trends in stimulator use, pair those trends with various grafting materials, and determine the influence of stimulators on the risk of revision surgery. Overview of Literature A large number of studies has reported beneficial effects of electromagnetic energy in healing long bone fractures. However, there are few clinical studies regarding the use of electrical stimulators in spinal fusion. Methods We used insurance billing codes to identify patients with lumbar disc degeneration who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Comparisons between patients who did and did not receive electrical stimulators following surgery were performed using logistic regression analysis, chi-square test, and odds ratio (OR) analysis. Results Approximately 19% of the patients (495/2,613) received external stimulators following ALIF surgery. There was a slight increase in stimulator use from 2008 to 2014 (multi-level R2=0.08, single-level R2=0.05). Patients who underwent multi-level procedures were more likely to receive stimulators than patients who underwent single-level procedures (p<0.05; OR, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 3.02–4.57). Grafting options associated with most frequent stimulator use were bone marrow aspirates (BMA) plus autograft or allograft for single-level and allograft alone for multi-level procedures. In both cohorts, patients treated with bone morphogenetic proteins were least likely to receive electrical stimulators (p<0.05). Patients who received stimulation generally had higher reimbursements. Concurrent posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) (ALIF+PLF) increased the likelihood of receiving stimulators (p<0.05). Patients who received electrical stimulators had similar revision rates as those who did not receive stimulation (p>0.05), except those in the multilevel ALIF+PLF cohort, wherein the patients who underwent stimulation had higher rates of revision surgery. Conclusions Concurrent PLF or multi-level procedures increased patients’ likelihood of receiving stimulators, however, the presence of comorbidities did not. Patients who received BMA plus autograft or allograft were more likely to receive stimulation. Patients with and without bone stimulators had similar rates of revision surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony D'Oro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Darrel Scott Brodke
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jong-Beom Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uijongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijongbu, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hsieh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Chun Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Long-term comparative study between transforaminal and interlaminar epidural injection of steroids in lumbar radiculopathy due to single-level disc herniation. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2018. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
40
|
Martinelli TC, Effgen EA, Brazolino MAN, Cardoso IM, Maia TC, Jacob Junior C. Avaliação do ganho de altura discal e lordose lombar obtido pelas técnicas de fusão intersomática transforaminal e posterior. Rev Bras Ortop 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbo.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
41
|
Martinelli TC, Effgen EA, Brazolino MAN, Cardoso IM, Maia TC, Jacob Junior C. Evaluation of the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation obtained by the techniques of transforaminal and posterior lumbar intersomatic fusion. Rev Bras Ortop 2018; 53:527-531. [PMID: 30245989 PMCID: PMC6147762 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Evaluate the discal height and lumbar lordosis gains, comparatively, according to the two lumbar arthrodesis techniques, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), used in the treatment of spinal degenerative diseases. Methods The present study, retrospective, was done with 60 patients who underwent decompression and 1 level lumbar arthrodesis in the Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (HSCMV), between January 2010 and December 2015. The patients were divided in two groups of 30 each, according to the utilized intersomatic arthrodesis technique: TLIF or PLIF. All patients presented pathologies at the L4-L5 level. In this study, the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation were evaluated by analyzing spinal radiographies of the pre and post-operatory periods from patients of the two groups, measured by the software Surgimap®. In addition, the pain intensity in the post-operatory period was estimated by the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain). Results Both techniques presented a gain in the discal height in the post-operatory. There was no statistically significant difference between the discal height variation obtained with the PLIF technique when compared to the TLIF technique (p = 0.139). In the same way, there was no statistically significant difference in the lumbar lordosis variation between the two studied groups (p = 0.184). By the EVA Pain analysis, there was no significant difference in the pain intensity in the post-operatory period between both arthrodesis surgeries. Conclusion There is no difference in the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation, as well as in the pain intensity in the post-operatory periods, in patients who underwent 1 level intersomatic arthrodesis when comparing the PLIF and TLIF techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Cardoso Martinelli
- Escola Superior de Ciências Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (EMESCAM), Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | - Erica Antunes Effgen
- Escola Superior de Ciências Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (EMESCAM), Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | | | - Igor Machado Cardoso
- Column Group, Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (HSCMV), Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | - Thiago Cardoso Maia
- Column Group, Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (HSCMV), Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | - Charbel Jacob Junior
- Column Group, Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (HSCMV), Vitória, ES, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koenders N, Rushton A, Verra ML, Willems PC, Hoogeboom TJ, Staal JB. Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2018; 28:696-709. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5680-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
43
|
Risk Factors, Additional Length of Stay, and Cost Associated with Postoperative Ileus Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients. World Neurosurg 2018; 115:e185-e189. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
44
|
Which Domains of the ODI Best Predict Change in Physical Function in Patients After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43:805-812. [PMID: 29028759 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to determine the differential improvement of the various individual items of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and to determine their relationship to other measures of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The ODI is an easily scored, common, 10-item questionnaire about symptoms relevant to lumbar spine pathology. It is not clear if all of the items can be reliably applied to spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the differential improvement of the various individual items of the ODI and to determine their relationship to other measures of HRQOL. METHODS Analysis of a prospective registry of patients treated at an academic medical center was undertaken. At baseline, standardized outcome measures including ODI and SF12 PCS were collected on all patients undergoing elective fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Multiple linear regressions were performed using change in SF12 PCS as the dependent variable and change in ODI components as the independent variables. RESULTS Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were collected on 196 patients (mean age 60.4 years). There were statistically significant differences in improvement among ODI items. Surprisingly, the most improvement after surgery was noted in the standing, sex life, and social life domains. The least improvement was noted in the personal care, sleeping, and sitting domains. Linear regression for change in ODI components versus change in SF-12 PCS revealed a significant correlation (R = 0.353, P ≤ 0.001). The only retained domains in the final model were change in lifting, standing, and traveling as predictors for ΔPCS. CONCLUSION All domains of the ODI do not improve equally after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Some of the domains that improve most (e.g., sex life) have no discernible relationship to the known pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Based upon these results, we conclude that the item bank and composite scoring of the ODI are inappropriate for evaluating quality of life in studies of surgically treated degenerative spondylolisthesis patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
45
|
Miscusi M, Ramieri A, Forcato S, Giuffrè M, Trungu S, Cimatti M, Pesce A, Familiari P, Piazza A, Carnevali C, Costanzo G, Raco A. Comparison of pure lateral and oblique lateral inter-body fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disk disease: a multicentric cohort study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2018; 27:222-228. [PMID: 29671108 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5596-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The most effective interbody fusion technique for degenerative disk disease (DDD) is still controversial. The purpose of our study is to compare pure lateral (LLIF) and oblique lateral (OLIF) approaches for the treatment of lumbar DDD from L1-L2 to L4-L5, in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS 45 patients underwent lumbar interbody fusion for pure lumbar DDD from L1-L2 to L4-L5 through LLIF (n = 31, mean age 62.1 years, range 45-78 years) or OLIF (n = 14, mean age 57.4 years, range 47-77 years). Clinical evaluations were performed with ODI and SF-36 tests. Radiological assessment was based on the modification of coronal segmental Cobb angles and segmental lumbar lordosis (L1-S1). RESULTS On ODI and SF-36, all patients presented good results at follow-up, with 26% the difference between the LIF and OLIF groups on ODI scale in the post-operative period, and 3.9 and 8.8 points difference on physical and mental SF-36 in favor of OLIF. Radiological parameters improved significantly in both groups. The mean correction was 6.25° for cCobb (11.3° in LIF and 1.9° in OLIF), 2.5° for sLL (2° in LLIF and 4° in OLIF). CONCLUSIONS LLIF and OLIF represent safe and effective MIS procedures for the treatment of lumbar DDD. LLIF had some risks of motor deficit and monitoring is mandatory, though it addressed more the coronal deformities. OLIF did not imply risks for motor deficits, but attention should be paid to vascular anatomy. It was more effective in kyphotic segmental deformities. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Miscusi
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ramieri
- Don Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
- Don Gnocchi Foundation, ONLUS, Via M. Caviglia, 30, Rome, Italy.
| | - Stefano Forcato
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, "Sapienza", University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mary Giuffrè
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sokol Trungu
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, "Sapienza", University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Cimatti
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, "Sapienza", University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pesce
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, "Sapienza", University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Familiari
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, "Sapienza", University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Amedeo Piazza
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Carnevali
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonino Raco
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, "Sapienza", University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Andrés-Cano P, Cerván A, Rodríguez-Solera M, Antonio Ortega J, Rebollo N, Guerado E. Surgical Infection after Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis: CT Analysis of Spinal Fusion. Orthop Surg 2018; 10:89-97. [PMID: 29770586 DOI: 10.1111/os.12371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence of infection after instrumented lumbar spine surgery, the demographic and surgical variables associated with acute infection, and the influence of infection and debridement on the consolidation of spinal fusion. METHODS After obtaining approval from the hospital ethics committee, an observational study was made on a prospective cohort of consecutive patients surgically treated by posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis (n = 139, 2005-2011). In all cases, the minimum follow-up period was 18 months. The following bivariate analysis was conducted of demographic and surgical variables: non-infection group (n = 123); infection group (n = 16). Fusion rates were determined by multislice CT. Logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Incidence of deep infection requiring debridement: 11.51% (95% confidence interval, 5.85-17.18]). Bivariate analysis: differences were observed in hospital stay (7.0 days [range, 4-10] vs 14.50 days [range, 5.25-33.75]; P = 0.013), surgical time (3.15 h vs 4.09 h; P = 0.004), body mass index (25.11 kg/m2 [22.58-27.0] vs 26.02 kg/m2 [24.15 to 29.38]; P = 0.043), Charlson comorbidity index (median, 0 vs 1; P = 0.027), and rate of unsuccessful consolidation according to CT (18.4% vs 72.7%; P = 0.0001). In a model of multivariate logistic regression, taking as the dependent variable unsuccessful arthrodesis after 1 year, and adjusting for the other independent variables (infection, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, and surgical time), the only variable that was significantly associated with an outcome of unsuccessful spinal fusion after 1 year was infection, with OR = 12.44 (95% confidence interval, 2.50-61.76). CONCLUSION Deep infection after instrumented lumbar spine arthrodesis is a common complication that compromises the radiographic outcome of surgery. Patients who develop a postoperative infection and require debridement surgery are 12 times less likely to achieve satisfactory radiological fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Andrés-Cano
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain.,Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Ana Cerván
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain
| | | | - Jose Antonio Ortega
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain
| | | | - Enrique Guerado
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prolo LM, Oklund SA, Zawadzki N, Desai M, Prolo DJ. Uninstrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Have Technological Advances in Stabilizing the Lumbar Spine Truly Improved Outcomes? World Neurosurg 2018; 115:490-502. [PMID: 29631080 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the 1980s, numerous operations have replaced posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with human bone. These operations often involve expensive implants and complex procedures. Escalating expenditures in lumbar fusion surgery warrant re-evaluation of classical PLIF with allogeneic ilium and without instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term fusion rate and clinical outcomes of PLIF with allogeneic bone (allo-PLIF). METHODS Between 1981 and 2006, 321 patients aged 12-80 years underwent 339 1-level or 2-level allo-PLIFs for degenerative instability and were followed for 1-28 years. Fusion status was determined by radiographs and as available, by computed tomography scans. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Economic/Functional Outcome Scale. RESULTS Of the 321 patients, 308 were followed postoperatively (average 6.7 years) and 297 (96%) fused. Fusion rates were lower for patients with substance abuse (89%, P = 0.007). Clinical outcomes in 87% of patients were excellent (52%) or good (35%). Economic/Functional Outcome Scale scores after initial allo-PLIF on average increased 5.2 points. Successful fusion correlated with nearly a 2-point gain in outcome score (P = 0.001). A positive association between a patient characteristic and outcome was observed only with age 65 years and greater, whereas negative associations in clinical outcomes were observed with mental illness, substance abuse, heavy stress to the low back, or industrial injuries. The total complication rate was 7%. CONCLUSIONS With 3 decades of follow-up, we found that successful clinical outcomes are highly correlated with solid fusion using only allogeneic iliac bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Prolo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sally A Oklund
- Western Transplantation Services, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Nadine Zawadzki
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Donald J Prolo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; Western Transplantation Services, San Jose, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Goyal A, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Goncalves S, Bydon M. Outcomes following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion for degenerative low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 167:122-128. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
49
|
Suñol A, Montoliu P, López M, Mascort J, Morales C. Traumatic L7 articular processes fracture and spondylolisthesis following dorsal lumbosacral laminectomy in a cat. JFMS Open Rep 2018; 4:2055116918760652. [PMID: 29552353 PMCID: PMC5846939 DOI: 10.1177/2055116918760652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Case summary A 12-year-old neutered male domestic shorthair cat was presented to our referral hospital with a chronic history of tenesmus and lumbosacral pain. A diagnosis of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) was made and a standard dorsal L7–S1 laminectomy was performed uneventfully, with complete recovery within 1 month. The cat was brought back 4 months later for investigation of lumbosacral pain after having suffered a minor traumatic event. Neurological examination identified a low tail carriage, weakness, exercise intolerance, left pelvic limb lameness and diminished withdrawal reflexes in both pelvic limbs with severe sacrocaudal pain. A traumatic facet fracture of the L7 articular processes and subsequent spondylolisthesis was diagnosed. A second surgery was performed to stabilise the region. The cat was normal on neurological examination 1 month later and no further clinical signs were noted. Relevance and novel information This is the first description of a fracture and spondylolisthesis as a possible postoperative complication after L7–S1 dorsal laminectomy in a cat. The case highlights the importance of postoperative changes in the supportive structures of the lumbosacral spine in cats after surgical treatment of DLSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Suñol
- Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Ars Veterinary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Montoliu
- Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Ars Veterinary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta López
- Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Ars Veterinary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Mascort
- Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Ars Veterinary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Morales
- Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Ars Veterinary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Buser Z, Ortega B, D’Oro A, Pannell W, Cohen JR, Wang J, Golish R, Reed M, Wang JC. Spine Degenerative Conditions and Their Treatments: National Trends in the United States of America. Global Spine J 2018; 8:57-67. [PMID: 29456916 PMCID: PMC5810888 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217696688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE Low back and neck pain are among the top leading causes of disability worldwide. The aim of our study was to report the current trends on spine degenerative disorders and their treatments. METHODS Patients diagnosed with lumbar or cervical spine conditions within the orthopedic subset of Medicare and Humana databases (PearlDiver). From the initial cohorts we identified subgroups based on the treatment: fusion or nonoperative within 1 year from diagnosis. Poisson regression was used to determine demographic differences in diagnosis and treatment approaches. RESULTS Within the Medicare database there were 6 206 578 patients diagnosed with lumbar and 3 156 215 patients diagnosed with cervical degenerative conditions between 2006 and 2012, representing a 16.5% (lumbar) decrease and 11% (cervical) increase in the number of diagnosed patients. There was an increase of 18.5% in the incidence of fusion among lumbar patients. For the Humana data sets there were 1 160 495 patients diagnosed with lumbar and 660 721 patients diagnosed with cervical degenerative disorders from 2008 to 2014. There was a 33% (lumbar) and 42% (cervical) increases in the number of diagnosed patients. However, in both lumbar and cervical groups there was a decrease in the number of surgical and nonoperative treatments. CONCLUSIONS There was an overall increase in both lumbar and cervical conditions, followed by an increase in lumbar fusion procedures within the Medicare database. There is still a burning need to optimize the spine care for the elderly and people in their prime work age to lessen the current national economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorica Buser
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Zorica Buser, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Elaine Stevely Hoffman Medical Research Center, HMR 710, 2011 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
| | | | - Anthony D’Oro
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Justin Wang
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ray Golish
- Jupiter Medical Center, Palm Beach, FL, USA
| | - Michael Reed
- The Spine Foundation, a Division of the North American Spine Society, Burr Ridge, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|