The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study

The clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C device vs. plate-cage in managing traumatic central cord syndrome

Purpose

To assess the efficacy and complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with ROI-C device vs. conventional anterior plate and cage system (APCS) in managing traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS).

Methods

A total of 37 patients diagnosed with TCCS who underwent ACDF with ROI-C implant and APCS were recruited in this retrospective study from June 2012 to February 2020. Radiological parameters and clinical results were recorded and compared through follow-up time. Characteristics of patients and complications were also recorded.

Results

All patients tolerated the procedure well. The average follow-up time was 25.00 ± 7.99 months in the ROI-C group, and 21.29 ± 7.41 months in the APCS group. The blood loss and operation time were significantly lower in the ROI-C group than in the APCS group. Radiological parameters and clinical results were all improved postoperatively and maintained at the final follow-up. Fusion was achieved in all patients. ROI-C group had a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than the APCS group. Only 1 case of ALD was observed at the final follow-up in the APCS group.

Conclusions

Both ROI-C device and APCS demonstrated satisfactory clinical effects and safety in managing symptomatic single-level traumatic central cord syndrome with underlying instability. Both techniques could improve and maintain cervical lordosis and disc height. ROI-C device was related to a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia, shorter operation time, and less blood loss.

Use of zero-profile device for contiguous three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison with cage and plate construct

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare a traditional cervical cage with a zero-profile (ZP) fixation device in patients who underwent three-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in terms of patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA], and Neck Disability Index [NDI] scores), radiographic findings (sagittal alignment 2 years after surgery and likelihood of fusion), and complications.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective case series. Between January 2012 and December 2016, 58 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who required three-level ACDF procedures, as identified by spinal surgeons, were treated with three-level ACDF and an anterior cage-plate construct (ACPC) (n = 38) or a three-level stand-alone ZP device (n = 20). On the basis of patient choice, patients were divided into two groups (ACPC group and ZP group). All patients completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patient-reported outcome scores included VAS, JOA, and NDI scores. The radiographic findings included sagittal alignment and likelihood of fusion 2 years after surgery. Data related to patient-reported outcomes and sagittal alignment were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

The clinical outcomes, including VAS, JOA, and NDI scores, showed improvement in both groups, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Sagittal alignment and height of the fused segments were restored in all patients. However, the authors found no differences between the ZP and ACPC groups, and the groups exhibited similar fusion rates. The authors found no differences in complications, including dysphagia, adjacent-segment degeneration, and postoperative hematoma, between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ZP implants yielded satisfactory long-term clinical and radiological outcomes that were similar to those of the standard ACPC. Additionally, the rates of complications between the groups were not significantly different. Although the best surgical option for multilevel CSM remains controversial, the results of this work suggest that ACDF with the ZP device is feasible, safe, and effective, even for multilevel CSM.

Cervical spine alignment and clinical outcomes after multilevel anterior cervical decompression and fusion with or without plate: A minimal 5-year follow-up of a CONSORT-compliant article

It was reported imperative on cervical sagittal alignment reconstruction after anterior multilevel procedures with self-locked stand-alone cage (SSC) or anterior cage-with-plate (ACP) system multilevel while there was little knowledge about the relationship on cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.To identify the importance of cervical sagittal alignment after 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on cervical spondylotic myelopathy with SSC and ACP system.Seventy-seven patients with SSC system (SSC group) and 52 cases with ACP system (ACP group) from February 2007 to September 2013 were enrolled with well-matched demographics. Cervical alignment included C2-7 lordosis (CL), operated-segment cervical lordosis (OPCL), upper and lower adjacent-segment cervical lordosis, range of motion of upper and lower adjacent segment at preoperation, immediate postoperation, and the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes contained the neck disability index (NDI), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogous scale (VAS) of arm and neck and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Patients were then divided into CL improved subgroup (IM subgroup) and non-improved subgroup (NIM subgroup).There were improvements on CL and OPCL in both groups. The change of CL and OPCL larger in ACP group (P < .05) but upper adjacent-segment cervical lordosis/lower adjacent-segment cervical lordosis and range of motion of upper adjacent segment/range of motion of lower adjacent segment were of no significance. NDI, JOA, and VAS got improvement in both groups at immediate postoperation and the final follow-up while ASD was in no difference between SSC and ACP group. A total of 80 patients (39 vs 41) acquired CL improvement with a larger population in ACP group. There were no differences on the rate of ASD, NDI, JOA, VAS, and their change between IM and NIM subgroup. The changes of CL were not correlated to NDI, JOA, VAS, and their change.SSC and ACP group both provide improved OPCL and efficacy on 3-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy with little impact on adjacent segment. The change of CL is not correlated to clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Zero-profile Anchored Spacer Versus Plate-and-Cage After 1-Level ACDF With Complete Uncinate Process Resection: A 3-Year Assessment of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the zero-profile anchored spacer device (Zero-p) and traditional plate-and-cage implant (plate-and-cage) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with complete uncinate process resection (UPR) to treat 1-level cervical degenerative disk disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

We retrospectively surveyed the data from all patients who underwent single-level ACDF with complete UPR between 2009 and 2013.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 80 patients participated in 3 years of follow-up. Among them, Zero-p (38 patients) and plate-and-cage (42 patients) approaches were used in ACDF with complete UPR. Clinical outcomes and radiographic results were compared between 2 groups and they were followed for 39.1±2.2 months.

RESULTS

Duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospitalization were significantly lower in the Zero-p group than the plate-and-cage group (P<0.001). The clinical outcomes of visual analog scale, neck disability index, and the Odom criteria were improved after operation in both groups. The fusion rates, C2-C7 lordosis, T1 slope, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, sellar turcica-C7 sagittal vertical axis, and spinocranial angle after single-level ACDF were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Subsidence occurred in 5 cases (13%) in the Zero-p group and 10 cases (37%) in the plate-and-cage group (P<0.05). The horizontal length of the Zero-p implant was longer than that of allograft bone. Fusion occurred in 37 cases (95%) of the Zero-p group and 40 cases (94%) in the plate-and-cage group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Zero-p and plate-and-cage are effective when single-level ACDF with complete UPR was performed. Both groups showed good clinical outcomes, but Zero-p has more benefits than plate-and-cage such as lower duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, and rate of subsidence compared with plate-and-cage. Surgeons should be aware of these results so that postoperative complications such as subsidence can be avoided.

The biomechanical study of cervical spine: A Finite Element Analysis

The biomechanical study helps us to understand the mechanics of the human cervical spine. A three dimensional Finite Element (FE) model for C3 to C6 level was developed using computed tomography (CT) scan data to study the mechanical behaviour of the cervical spine. A moment of 1 Nm was applied at the top of C3 vertebral end plate and all degrees of freedom of bottom end plate of C6 were constrained. The physiological motion of the cervical spine was validated using published experimental and FE analysis results. The von Mises stress distribution across the intervertebral disc was calculated along with range of motion. It was observed that the predicted results of functional spine units using FE analysis replicate the real behaviour of the cervical spine.

Does zero-profile anchored cage accompanied by a higher postoperative subsidence compared with cage-plate construct? A meta-analysis

Background

The zero-profile anchored cage (ZP) has been widely used for its lower occurrence of dysphagia. However, it is still controversial whether it has the same stability as the cage-plate construct (CP) and increases the incidence of postoperative subsidence. We compared the rate of subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with ZP and CP to determine whether the zero-profile device had a higher subsidence rate.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of studies that compared the subsidence rates of ZP and CP. An extensive and systematic search covered the PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA guidelines and identified ten articles that satisfied our inclusion criteria. Relevant clinical and radiological data were extracted and analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Ten trials involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of postoperative subsidence in the ZP group was significantly higher than that in the CP group [15.1% (89/588) versus 8.8% (51/581), OR = 1.97 (1.34, 2.89), P = 0.0005]. In the subgroup analysis, we found that the definition of subsidence did not affect the higher subsidence rate in the ZP group. Considering the quantity of operative segments, there was no significant difference in the incidence of subsidence between the two groups after single-level fusion (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.61–3.37, P = 0.41). However, the subsidence rate of the ZP group was significantly higher than that of the CP group (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.55–4.40, P = 0.0003) after multilevel (≥ 2-level) procedures. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, JOA score, NDI score, fusion rate, or cervical alignment in the final follow-up between the two groups. In addition, the CP group had a longer operation time and a higher incidence of dysphagia than the ZP group at each follow-up time.

Conclusion

Based on the limited evidence, we suggest that ZP has a higher risk of postoperative subsidence than CP, although with elevated swallowing discomfort. A high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trial is required to validate our results in the future.

Zero-Profile Implantation Combined with Miniscrew Fixation via Anterior Approach for Huge Teardrop Fracture of Axis

BACKGROUND

We present 3 case reports to share our experience and explore the safety and efficacy of treating huge teardrop fracture of the axis (HTDFA).

CASE DESCRIPTION

Case 1: A 47-year-old man suffered from generalized pain after falling from a height. Case 2: A 39-year-old woman suffered facial contusions and lacerations during a car accident, and her neck was sore. Case 3: A 51-year-old woman was hit in the face during a car accident, and her neck was sore. These 3 patients had limited neck movement and no nerve injury, and their radiographs showed HTDFA. The patients were treated with Zero-Profile (Zero-P) implant placement combined with miniscrew fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of HTDFA by Zero-P implant placement combined with miniscrew fixation is effective and stable. The last follow-up examination of the patients showed that fusion had been achieved, and their neck pain had disappeared. Anterior reduction, diskectomy, and Zero-P implantation combined with miniscrew fixation can be used to treat HTDFA. Both avulsed teardrop fragment removal and C2-3 bone grafting lead to bone healing. This method is effective, safe, and simple for the treatment of HTDFA.

Development and validation of a geometrically personalized finite element model of the lower ligamentous cervical spine for clinical applications

Epidemiological and clinical studies show that the magnitude and scope of cervical disease are on the rise, along with the world's rising aging population. From a biomechanical perspective, the cervical spine presents a wide inter-individual variability, where its motion patterns and load sharing strongly depend on the anatomy. This study aimed to first develop and validate a geometrically patient-specific model of the lower cervical spine for clinical applications, and secondly to use the model to investigate the spinal biomechanics associated with typical cervical disorders. Based on measurements of 30 parameters from X-ray radiographs, the 3D geometry of the vertebrae and intervertebral discs (IVDs) were developed, and detailed finite element models (FEMs) of the lower ligamentous cervical spine for 6 subjects were constructed and simulated. The models were then used for the investigation of different grades of IVD alteration. The multi directional range of motion (ROM) results were in alignment with the in-vitro and in-Silico studies confirming the validity of the model. Severe disc alteration (Grade 3) presented a significant decrease in the ROM and intradiscal pressure (flexion, extension, and axial rotation) on the C5-C6 and slightly increase on the adjacent levels. Maximum stress in Annulus Fibrosus (AF) and facet joint forces increased for Grade 3 for both altered and adjacent levels. The novel validated geometrically-personalized FEM presented in this study potentially offers the clinical community a valuable quantitative tool for the noninvasive analyses of the biomechanical alterations associated with cervical spine disease towards improved surgical planning and enhanced clinical outcomes.

Comparison among perfect-C®, zero-P®, and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease

BACKGROUND

We intended to analyze the efficacy of a new integrated cage and plate device called Perfect-C for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to cure single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

We enrolled 148 patients who were subjected to single-level ACDF with one of the following three surgical devices: a Perfect-C implant (41 patients), a Zero-P implant (36 patients), or a titanium plate with a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage (71 patients). We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and radiological results among the three groups.

RESULTS

The length of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the Perfect-C group than in the Zero-P and plate-with-cage groups (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up visit, heterotopic ossification (HO) was not observed in any cases (0%) in the Perfect-C and Zero-P groups but was noted in 21 cases (30%) in the plate-with-cage group. The cephalad and caudal plate-to-disc distance (PDD) and the cephalad and caudal PDD/anterior body height (ABH) were significantly greater in the Perfect-C and Zero-P groups than in the plate-with-cage group (P < 0.05). Subsidence occurred in five cases (14%) in the Perfect-C group, in nine cases (25%) in the Zero-P group, and in 15 cases (21%) in the plate-with-cage group. Fusion occurred in 37 cases (90%) in the Perfect-C group, in 31 cases (86%) in the Zero-P group, and in 68 cases (95%) in the plate-with-cage group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Perfect-C, Zero-P, and plate-with-cage devices are effective for treating single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. However, the Perfect-C implant has many advantages over both the Zero-P implant and conventional plate-cage treatments. The Perfect-C implant was associated with shorter operation times and hospitalization durations, less blood loss, and lower subsidence rates compared with the Zero-P implant or the titanium plate with a PEEK cage.

Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the segmental stability of a stand-alone spacer (SAS) device compared with the traditional anterior cervical plate (ACP) construct in the setting of a 2-level cervical fusion construct or as a hybrid construct adjacent to a previous 1-level ACP construct.

METHODS

Twelve human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were nondestructively tested with a custom 6-degree-of-freedom spine simulator under axial rotation (AR), flexion-extension (FE), and lateral bending (LB) at 1.5 N m loads. After intact analysis, each specimen underwent instrumentation and testing in the following 3 configurations, with each specimen randomized to the order of construct: (A) C5-7 SAS; (B) C5-6 ACP, and C6-7 SAS (hybrid); (C) C5-7 ACP. Full range of motion (ROM) data at C5-C7 was obtained and analyzed by each loading modality utilizing mean comparisons with repeated measures analysis of variance with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact specimen, all tested constructs had significantly increased segmental stability at C5-C7 in AR and FE ROM, with no difference in LB ROM. At C5-C6, all test constructs again had increased segmental stability in FE ROM compared with intact (10.9° ± 4.4° Intact vs SAS 6.6° ± 3.2°, P < .001; vs.Hybrid 2.9° ± 2.0°, P = .005; vs ACP 2.1° ± 1.4°, P < .001), but had no difference in AR and LB ROM. Analysis of C6-C7 ROM demonstrated all test groups had significantly greater segmental stability in FE ROM compared with intact (9.6° ± 2.7° Intact vs SAS 5.0° ± 3.0°, P = .018; vs Hybrid 5.0° ± 2.7°, P = .018; vs ACP 4.4° ± 5.2°, P = .005). Only the hybrid and 2-level ACP constructs had increased stability at C6-C7 in AR ROM compared with intact, with no difference for all test groups in LB ROM. Comparison between test constructs demonstrated no difference in C5-C7 and C6-C7 segmental stability in all planes of motion. However, at C5-C6 comparison between test constructs found the 2-level SAS had significantly less segmental stability compared to the hybrid (6.6° ± 3.2° vs 2.9° ± 2.0°, P = .025) and ACP (6.6° ± 3.2° vs 2.1° ± 1.4°, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found the currently tested SAS device may be a reasonable option as part of a 2-level hybrid construct, when used below an adjacent 1-level ACP, but should be used with careful consideration as a 2-level SAS construct. Consequences of decreased segmental stability in FE are unknown; however, optimal immediate fixation stability is an important surgical principle to avoid loss of fixation, segmental kyphosis, interbody graft subsidence, and pseudarthrosis.

Cervical Burst Fracture in a Patient with Contiguous 2-Level Cervical Stand-Alone Cages

BACKGROUND

Cervical stand-alone interbody cages have seen increasingly wider use over the plate-and-screw construct in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical disc herniation and degenerative spondylotic conditions. Despite positive clinical outcomes, the efficacy and safety of using these devices in contiguous multilevel ACDF has remained controversial. This report discusses a burst fracture seen as a complication in multilevel cervical stand-alone cage use.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 39-year-old woman with a history of C5-C6 and C6-C7 ACDF with contiguous stand-alone interbody cages 2 years prior, presented with recurrent arm and neck pain with myelopathy. Computed tomography scan revealed a burst fracture of the C6 vertebral body with retropulsion of fragments compressing the spinal cord.

CONCLUSIONS

This case suggests that use of cervical stand-alone cages in contiguous levels may cause late complications despite good instrumentation and illustrates the need for more careful consideration of technique selection in multilevel ACDF.

An In Vitro Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cervical Extension Plates for Stabilizing Degenerated Adjacent Levels

STUDY DESIGN

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of 2 extender plates in a human cervical cadaveric model.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate 2 extender plates, placed adjacent to initially implanted plates and to compare their biomechanical stability with traditional techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Traditionally, adjacent level degeneration is surgically treated by removing the previously implanted plate and extending the instrumentation to the new degenerated level. The exposure needed to remove the previously implanted plate may be extensive. To overcome these complications, cervical extension plates, which add-on to the initially implanted plate, were developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver cervical spines (C2-C7) were divided into 2 groups of 7 for a series of constructs to be tested. In group 1, an extender plate, which attaches to its own primary plate, was tested. In group 2, a universal extender plate, which can be placed adjacent to any previously implanted plate, was tested. The specimens prepared were mounted on a 6-degree-of-freedom spine simulator and were sequentially tested in the following order: (1) intact; (2) single-level plate; (3) single-level plate with extender plates; and (4) 2-level plate. An unconstrained pure moment of ±1.5 N m was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

All instrumented constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared with the intact condition. In both the groups, single-level plates with adjacent extender plates demonstrated stability comparable to their respective 2-level plates in all loading modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Extender plates give surgeons the opportunity to treat adjacent levels without removing the primary implants, which may reduce the overall risk of damage to vital neurovascular structures. From this cadaveric biomechanical model, both types of extender plates prove to be viable options for treating adjacent level degeneration.

Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Introduction

Supplemental posterior instrumentation has been widely used to enhance stability and improve fusion rates in higher risk patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). These typically involve posterior lateral mass or pedicle screw fixation with significant inherent risks and morbidities. More recently, cervical cages placed bilaterally between the facet joints (posterior cervical cages) have been used as a less disruptive alternative for posterior fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability achieved by both posterior cages and ACDF at a single motion segment and determine the stability achieved with posterior cervical cages used as an adjunct to single- and multilevel ACDF.

Methods

Seven cadaveric cervical spine (C2–T1) specimens were tested in the following sequence: intact, C5–C6 bilateral posterior cages, C6–C7 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages, and C3–C5 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages. Range of motion in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was measured for each condition under moment loading up to ±1.5 Nm.

Results

All fusion constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared to intact in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (P<0.05). Similar stability was achieved with bilateral posterior cages and plated ACDF at a single level. Posterior cages, when placed as an adjunct to ACDF, further reduced range of motion in both single- and multilevel constructs (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The biomechanical effectiveness of bilateral posterior cages in limiting cervical segmental motion is comparable to single-level plated ACDF. Furthermore, supplementation of single- and multilevel ACDF with posterior cervical cages provided a significant increase in stability and therefore may be a potential, minimally disruptive option for supplemental fixation for improving ACDF fusion rates.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Comparison Between Zero Profile Implants and Anterior Cervical Plate and Spacer

Introduction: Interposition grafts combined with anterior plating currently remain the gold standard for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The use of anterior plates increases fusion rates but may be associated with higher rates of postoperative dysphagia. The aim of the current study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using zero-profile anchored spacers versus standard interposition grafts with anterior plating.

Methods: This was a retrospective case series. A total of 53 male and 51 female consecutive patients (164 total operated levels) who underwent ACDF between 2007 and 2011 were included. The mean clinical follow-up was 15.7 ± 1.2 (SEM) months for patients with zero-profile implants and 14.8 ± 2.1 months for patients with conventional ACDF with anterior plating. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, complications, and radiographic imaging were reviewed. Dysphagia was determined using the Bazaz criteria.

Results: Clinical outcome scores improved in both groups as measured by the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association and Nurick scores. Zero-profile constructs gave rise to significantly less prevertebral soft tissue swelling compared to constructs with anterior plates postoperatively (15.74 ± 0.52 as compared to 20.48 ± 0.85 mm, p < 0.001) and at the latest follow-up (10.88 ± 0.39 mm vs. 13.72 ± 0.67 mm, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia at the latest follow-up (1.5% vs. 20%, p=0.001, zero-profile vs. anterior plate, respectively).

Conclusion: Zero-profile implants lead to functional outcomes similar to standard anterior plate constructs. Avoiding the use of an anterior locking plate may decrease the risk of persistent postoperative dysphagia.

An initial biomechanical investigation of fusionless anterior tether constructs for controlled scoliosis correction

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is often unsuccessful and requires surgical intervention. Theoretically, anterior fusionless surgery can achieve correction as the patient grows to skeletal maturity.

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study was to determine differences in range of motion (ROM) between multiple anterior tether constructs and tensioning techniques. Coronal plane Cobb angles were evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a cadaveric biomechanical study.

METHODS

Cadaveric spines underwent biomechanical testing to investigate two factors relevant to anterior tether reconstruction: (1) effect of fixation at the T4, superior, and T12, inferior, levels (S-I), as opposed to fixation at all T4-T12 continuous levels (Cont.); and (2) tensioning of the tether sequentially (SEQ T) or only at terminal points (T). Reconstructions were conducted at Cont., and ROM and coronal plane Cobb angles were measured. Rigid rods (R) were used as control for the tether. Funding for the present study was provided by Globus Medical, Inc., and three of five authors are employees of Globus Medical, Inc.

RESULTS

Normalized lateral bending ROM for intact was 100(±33)%. The S-I R construct reduced motion to 39(±8)%. Tethering at terminal points resulted in ROM for S-I T and S-I No T of 61(±21)% and 70(±17)%, respectively. Screws placed at every level resulted in motion of 28(±9)% for the Cont. R construct, and a stepwise increase in motion to 44(±15)%, 47(±18)%, and 71(±19)%, respectively, for Cont. SEQ T, Cont. T, and Cont. No T. These relative trends were the same in all loading modes. Average change in overall coronal plane Cobb angle from intact was 4.6(±3.2)° and 9.9(±5.5)° for Cont. T and Cont. SEQ T constructs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tensioned tether constructs allowed greater ROM than rigid constructs, and no significant difference in ROM was noted between tensioning techniques. Sequential tensioning can produce greater correction with no biomechanical advantage.

A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients underwent three-level ACDF using self-locking stand-alone PEEK cages (group A), and 26 patients underwent three-level ACDF using cages and plate fixation (group B) were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by pre- and post-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI). The operation time, blood loss, surgical results according to Odom's criteria and post-operative dysphagia status were also recorded. Radiological outcomes including fusion, cervical Cobb's lordosis, fused segment angle, disc height, and cage subsidence were assessed.

RESULTS

Clinical outcome measures such as dysphagia and fusion rate and the results of surgery evaluated according to Odom's criteria were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) between groups. The operation time was shorter and blood loss was less in group A (P < 0.05). The NDI and JOA scores showed significant improvements in both groups after surgery at each time point (P < 0.05) with no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05). Post-operative cage subsidence, the loss of disc height, cervical lordosis and the fused segment angle were relatively higher in group A than group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF using self-locking stand-alone cages showed similar clinical results as compared to ACDF using cages and plate fixation for the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy. However, potential long-term problems such as cage subsidence, loss of cervical lordosis and fused segment angle post-operatively were shown to be associated with patients who underwent ACDF using self-locking stand-alone cages.

Biomechanical comparison of a novel transoral atlantoaxial anchored cage with established fixation technique - a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) fixation has been introduced to achieve reduction, decompression, fixation and fusion of C1-C2 through a transoral-only approach. However, it may also be associated with potential disadvantages, including dysphagia and load shielding of the bone graft. To prevent potential disadvantages related to TARP fixation, a novel transoral atlantoaxial fusion cage with integrated plate (Cage + Plate) device for stabilization of the C1-C2 segment is designed. The aims of the present study were to compare the biomechanical differences between Cage + Plate device and Cage + TARP device for the treatment of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

METHODS

A detailed, nonlinear finite element model (FEM) of the intact upper cervical spine had been developed and validated. Then a FEM of an unstable BI model treated with Cage + Plate fixation, was compared to that with Cage + TARP fixation. All models were subjected to vertical load with pure moments in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) of C1-C2 segment and maximum von Mises Stress of the C2 endplate and bone graft were quantified for the two devices.

RESULTS

Both devices significantly reduced ROM compared with the intact state. In comparison with the Cage + Plate model, the Cage + TARP model reduced the ROM by 82.5 %, 46.2 %, 10.0 % and 74.3 % in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The Cage + Plate model showed a higher increase stresses on C2 endplate and bone graft than the Cage + TARP model in all motions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the novel Cage + Plate device may provide lower biomechanical stability than the Cage + TARP device in flexion, extension, and axial rotation, however, it may reduce stress shielding of the bone graft for successful fusion and minimize the risk of postoperative dysphagia. Clinical trials are now required to validate the reproducibility and advantages of our findings using this anchored cage for the treatment of BI with IAAD.

Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although stand-alone cages were advocated to be superior to plate-cage construct (PCC) because of comparable clinical outcomes and fewer plate-related complications, cage dislocation and subsidence were frequently mentioned in multilevel fusion. There are some concerns about whether these issues can be effectively prevented in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by stand-alone anchored spacer (SAAS).

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare clinical outcomes, radiologic parameters, and complications of PCC and SAAS in the treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 38 consecutive patients with three-level CSM (ACDF with PCC, 20 patients; ACDF with SAAS, 18 patients) were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Neck Disability Index. The radiologic evaluations included cervical alignment (CA), segmental angle (SA), postoperative curvature loss (PCL), and incidence of subsidence.

METHODS

All the aforementioned parameters were compared before and after surgery between two groups. Besides, the aforementioned results were also compared between the two groups. The complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 30.3 months. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes between the two groups (p>.05). Additionally, no significant differences existed in fusion rate between the two groups. There were significant differences in PCL of SA and CA and correction of SA between the two groups (p<.05). Besides, the incidence of subsidence (9 of 54 levels, 16.7%) was recorded in the SAAS group, and the potential of SAAS to reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia was not proven. No other complications were observed in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgical treatment of three-level CSM, PCC is superior to SAAS in correction and maintenance of SA and avoiding cage subsidence, although the technique of ACDF with SAAS yielded encouraging clinical outcomes and high fusion rate.

A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical analysis of different multilevel cervical fixation techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the multilevel stability of a cervical anchored spacer (AS) with established fixation techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To avoid plate-related complications, for example, dysphagia zero-profile AS has been developed. The use of these new zero-profile implants for treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease is widely accepted after encouraging biomechanical results for single-level instrumentation. However, there is only little knowledge about the biomechanical stability of these zero-profile devices in multilevel instrumentations.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C3-C7) were nondestructively tested in a biomechanical 3-dimensional spine test setup. Segmental range of motion (ROM) under torsional load of 1.5 N·m was measured optoelectronically. Intact spine baseline measurement specimens were tested with 2- and 3-level instrumentation including (1) stand-alone PEEK-cage; (2) PEEK-cage plus locking plate; and (3) AS. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Comparison of baseline ROM and stand-alone PEEK-cage instrumentation showed a significant lower segmental ROM only for 2-level instrumentations. Cage plus plate and AS were able to reduce segmental ROM significantly (P < 0.05) in 2- and 3-level instrumentations. Comparing cage plus plate and AS, a significant lower ROM was detected for flexion/extension in 2- and 3-level instrumentation and for lateral bending in 2-level instrumentation using cage plus plate.

CONCLUSION

Segmental stability decreases with the number of instrumented segments regardless of the used implant. Comparing the different fixation techniques biomechanically, the locking plate and cage construct was stiffer in all test modes than the anchored devices in multilevel constructs. However, it remains unclear what the clinical significance may be.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Despite an increase in the clinical use of no-profile anchored interbody cages (AIC) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, there is little published biomechanical data describing its stabilizing effect relative to the traditional anterior plating technique over two contiguous levels.

PURPOSE

To biomechanically compare the acute stability conferred by a stand-alone interbody fusion device with three integrated fixation screws ("anchored cage") with a traditional six-hole rigid anterior plate in a two contiguous levels (C4-C5+C5-C6) fusion construct. We hypothesized that the anchored cage would confer comparable segmental rigidity to the cage and anterior plate construct.

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical laboratory study using cadaveric human cervical spines.

METHODS

Seven (n=7) cadaveric human cervical spines (C3-C7) were subjected to quasistatic, pure-moment loading (±1.5 Nm) in flexion-extension (flex/ext), right/left lateral bending (RB/LB), and right/left axial rotation (RR/LR) for the following test conditions: intact; after discectomy and insertion of the AIC at C4-C5 and C5-C6 with anchoring screws engaged; after the removal of the integrated anchoring screws and instrumentation of an anterior locking plate (ALP) over both levels; and cage-only (CO) configuration with screws and anterior plate removed. Intervertebral range of motion (ROM) at the instrumented levels was the primary biomechanical outcome.

RESULTS

Flex/ext, RB/LB, and RR/LR ROMs were significantly reduced (p<.001) over both levels by AIC and ALP constructs relative to the CO construct. Significant reduction in flex/ext motion was achieved with the ALP (6.8±3.7) relative to the AIC (10.2°±4.6°) (p=.041) construct. No significant differences were seen in ROM reductions over the two levels between the AIC and APL groups in lateral bending or axial rotation (p>.826).

CONCLUSIONS

The anchored cage fusion construct conferred similar acute biomechanical stability in lateral bending and axial rotation ROMs relative to rigid anterior plating. We identified a statistically significant reduction (Δ=3.4°, combined over two levels) in sagittal plane ROM conferred by the ALP relative to the AIC construct. Our biomechanical findings may support the clinical use of no-profile integrated interbody devices over two contiguous levels in ACDF.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study

Object

Anterior cervical plating decreases the risk of pseudarthrosis following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Dysphagia is a common complication of ACDF, with the anterior plate implicated as a potential contributor. A zero-profile, stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody spacer has been postulated to minimize soft-tissue irritation and postoperative dysphagia, but studies are limited. The object of the present study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes for patients who underwent ACDF using a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device, with a focus on the course of postoperative prevertebral soft-tissue thickness and the incidence of dysphagia.

Methods

Using a surgical database, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who had undergone ACDF between August 2008 and October 2011. All patients received a Zero-P implant (DePuy Synthes Spine). The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for arm and neck pain were documented. Dysphagia was determined using the Bazaz criteria. Prevertebral soft-tissue thickness, spinal alignment, and subsidence were assessed as well.

Results

Twenty-two male and 19 female consecutive patients, with a mean age of 58.4 ± 14.68, underwent ACDF (66 total operated levels) in the defined study period. The mean clinical follow-up in 36 patients was 18.6 ± 9.93 months. Radiological outcome in 37 patients was assessed at a mean follow-up of 9.76 months (range 7.2–19.7 months). There were significant improvements in neck and arm VAS scores and the NDI following surgery. The neck VAS score improved from a median of 6 (range 0–10) to 0 (range 0–8; p < 0.001). The arm VAS score improved from a median of 2 (range 0–10) to 0 (range 0–7; p = 0.006). Immediate postoperative dysphagia was experienced by 58.4% of all patients. Complete resolution was demonstrated in 87.8% of affected patients at the latest follow-up. The overall median Bazaz score decreased from 1 (range 0–3) immediately postoperatively to 0 (range 0–2; p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up. Prevertebral soft-tissue thickness significantly decreased across all levels from a mean of 15.8 ± 4.38 mm to 10.1 ± 2.93 mm. Postoperative lordosis was maintained at the latest follow-up. Mean subsidence from the immediate postoperative to the latest follow-up was 4.1 ± 4.7 mm (p < 0.001). Radiographic fusion was achieved in 92.6% of implants. No correlation was found between prevertebral soft-tissue thickness and Bazaz dysphagia score.

Conclusions

A zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device for ACDF surgery produces clinical and radiological outcomes that are comparable to those for nonintegrated plate and spacer constructs. Chronic dysphagia rates are comparable to or better than those for previously published case series.

Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine

OBJECT

Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy. Within 10 years of undergoing ACDF, 19.2% of patients develop symptomatic adjacent-level degeneration. Performing ACDF adjacent to prior fusion requires exposure and removal of previously placed hardware, which may increase the risk of adverse outcomes. Zero-profile cervical implants combine an interbody spacer with an anterior plate into a single device that does not extend beyond the intervertebral disc space, potentially obviating the need to remove prior hardware. This study compared the biomechanical stability and adjacent-level range of motion (ROM) following placement of a zero-profile device (ZPD) adjacent to a single-level ACDF against a standard 2-level ACDF.

METHODS

In this in vitro biomechanical cadaveric study, multidirectional flexibility testing was performed by a robotic spine system that simulates flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation by applying a continuous pure moment load. Testing conditions were as follows: 1) intact, 2) C5-6 ACDF, 3) C4-5 ZPD supraadjacent to simulated fusion at C5-6, and 4) 2-level ACDF (C4-6). The sequence of the latter 2 test conditions was randomized. An unconstrained pure moment of 1.5 Nm with a 40-N simulated head weight load was applied to the intact condition first in all 3 planes of motion and then using the hybrid test protocol, overall intact kinematics were replicated subsequently for each surgical test condition. Intersegmental rotations were measured optoelectronically. Mean segmental ROM for operated levels and adjacent levels was recorded and normalized to the intact condition and expressed as a percent change from intact. A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze the ROM between test conditions with a 95% level of significance.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in immediate construct stability were found between construct Patterns 3 and 4, in all planes of motion (p > 0.05). At the operated level, C4-5, the zero-profile construct showed greater decreases in axial rotation (-45% vs -36%) and lateral bending (-55% vs -38%), whereas the 2-level ACDF showed greater decreases in flexion-extension (-40% vs -34%). These differences were marginal and not statistically significant. Adjacent-level motion was nearly equivalent, with minor differences in flexion-extension.

CONCLUSIONS

When treating degeneration adjacent to a single-level ACDF, a zero-profile implant showed stabilizing potential at the operated level statistically similar to that of the standard revision with a 2-level plate. Revision for adjacent-level disease is common, and using a ZPD in this setting should be investigated clinically because it may be a faster, safer alternative.

Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Some postoperative complications after anterior cervical fusions have been attributed to anterior cervical plate (ACP) profiles and the necessary wide operative exposure for their insertion. Consequently, low-profile stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws (SIS) have been developed. Although SIS constructs have demonstrated similar biomechanical stability to the ACP in single-level fusions, their role as a stand-alone device in multilevel reconstructions has not been thoroughly evaluated.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the acute segmental stability afforded by an SIS device compared with the traditional ACP in the setting of a multilevel cervical arthrodesis.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

METHODS

Thirteen human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were nondestructively tested with a custom 6 df spine simulator under axial rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral bending loading. After intact analysis, eight single-levels (C4-C5/C6-C7) from four specimens were instrumented and tested with ACP and SIS. Nine specimens were tested with C5-C7 SIS, C5-C7 ACP, C4-C7 ACP, C4-C7 ACP+posterior fixation, C4-C7 SIS, and C4-C7 SIS+posterior fixation. Testing order was randomized with each additional level instrumented. Full range of motion (ROM) data were obtained and analyzed by each loading modality, using mean comparisons with repeated measures analysis of variance. Paired t tests were used for post hoc analysis with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

No significant difference in ROM was noted between the ACP and SIS for single-level fixation (p>.05). For multisegment reconstructions (two and three levels), the ACP proved superior to SIS and intact condition, with significantly lower ROM in all planes (p<.05). When either the three-level SIS or ACP constructs were supplemented with posterior lateral mass fixation, there was a greater than 80% reduction in ROM under all testing modalities (p<.05), with no significant difference between the ACP and SIS constructs (p>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The SIS device may be a reasonable option as a stand-alone device for single-level fixation. However, SIS devices should be used with careful consideration in the setting of multilevel cervical fusion. However, when supplemented with posterior fixation, SIS devices are a sound biomechanical alternative to ACP for multilevel fusion constructs.

A unique modular implant system enhances load sharing in anterior cervical interbody fusion: a finite element study

Background

The efficacy of dynamic anterior cervical plates is somewhat controversial. Screws in static-plate designs have a smaller diameter and can cut through bone under load. While not ideal, this unintended loosening can help mitigate stress shielding. Stand-alone interbody devices with integral fixation have large endplate contact areas that may inhibit or prevent loosening of the fixation. This study investigates the load sharing ability of a novel dynamic plate design in preventing the stress shielding of the graft material compared to the non-dynamic devices.

Methods

An experimentally validated intact C5-C6 finite element model was modified to simulate discectomy and accommodate implant-graft assembly. Four implant iterations were modeled; InterPlate titanium device with dynamic surface features (springs), InterPlate titanium non-dynamic device, InterPlate titanium design having a fully enclosed graft chamber, and the InterPlate design in unfilled PEEK having a fully enclosed graft chamber. All the models were fixed at the inferior-most surface of C6 and the axial displacement required to completely embed the dynamic surface features was applied to the model.

Results

InterPlate device with dynamic surface features induced higher graft stresses compared to the other design iterations resulting in uniform load sharing. The distribution of these graft stresses were more uniform for the InterPlate dynamic design.

Conclusions

These results indicate that the dynamic design decreases the stress shielding by increasing and more uniformly distributing the graft stress. Fully enclosed graft chambers increase stress shielding. Lower implant material modulus of elasticity does not reduce stress shielding significantly.

Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws

OBJECT The clinical success rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures are substantially reduced as more cervical levels are included in the fusion procedure. One method that has been proposed as an adjunctive technique for multilevel ACDF is the placement of screws across the facet joints ("transfacet screws"). However, the biomechanical stability imparted by transfacet screw placement (either unilaterally or bilaterally) has not been reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the acute stability conferred by implementation of unilateral and bilateral transfacet screws to an ACDF construct. METHODS Eight C2-T1 fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (3 female and 5 male; mean age 50 years) were tested. Three different instrumentation variants were performed on cadaveric cervical spines across C4-7: 1) ACDF with an intervertebral spacer and standard plate/screw instrumentation; 2) ACDF with an intervertebral spacer and standard plate/screw instrumentation with unilateral facet screw placement; and 3) ACDF with an intervertebral spacer and standard plate/screw instrumentation with bilateral facet screw placement. Kinetic ranges of motion in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at 1.5 Nm were captured after each of these procedures and were statistically analyzed for significance. RESULTS All 3 fixation scenarios produced statistically significant reductions (p < 0.05) in all 3 bending planes compared with the intact condition. The addition of a unilateral facet screw to the ACDF construct produced significant reductions at the C4-5 and C6-7 levels in lateral bending and axial rotation but not in flexion-extension motion. Bilateral facet screw fixation did not produce any statistically significant decreases in flexion-extension motion compared with unilateral facet screw fixation. However, in lateral bending, significant reductions at the C4-5 and C5-6 levels were observed with the addition of a second facet screw. The untreated, adjacent levels (C2-3, C3-4, and C7-1) did not demonstrate significant differences in range of motion. CONCLUSIONS The data demonstrated that adjunctive unilateral facet screw fixation to an ACDF construct provides significant gains in stability and should be considered a potential option for increasing the likelihood for obtaining a successful arthrodesis for multilevel ACDF procedures.