The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement

A Dual-Screw Technique for Vertebral Compression Fractures via Robotic Navigation in the Osteopenic Lumbar Spine: An In-Vitro Biomechanical Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVES

Multi-rod constructs maximize posterior fixation, but most use a single pedicle screw (PS) anchor point to support multiple rods. Robotic navigation allows for insertion of PS and cortical screw (CS) within the same pedicle, providing 4 points of bony fixation per vertebra. Recent studies demonstrated radiographic feasibility for dual-screw constructs for posterior lumbar spinal fixation; however, biomechanical characterization of this technique is lacking.

METHODS

Fourteen cadaveric lumbar specimens (L1-L5) were divided into 2 groups (n = 7): PS, and PS + CS. VCF was simulated at L3. Bilateral posterior screws were placed from L2-L4. Load control (±7.5Nm) testing performed in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR) to measure ROM of: (1) intact; (2) 2-rod construct; (3) 4-rod construct. Static compression testing of 4-rod construct performed at 5 mm/min to measure failure load, axial stiffness.

RESULTS

Four-rod construct was more rigid than 2-rod in FE (P < .001), LB (P < .001), AR (P < .001). Screw technique had no significant effect on FE (P = .516), LB (P = .477), or AR (P = .452). PS + CS 4-rod construct was significantly more stable than PS group (P = .032). Stiffness of PS + CS group (445.8 ± 79.3 N/mm) was significantly greater (P = .019) than PS (317.8 ± 79.8 N/mm). Similarly, failure load of PS + CS group (1824.9 ± 352.2 N) was significantly greater (P = .001) than PS (913.4 ± 309.8 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-screw, 4-rod construct may be more stable than traditional rod-to-rod connectors, especially in axial rotation. Axial stiffness and ultimate strength of 4-rod, dual-screw construct were significantly greater than rod-to-rod. In this study, 4-rod construct was found to have potential biomechanical benefits of increased strength, stiffness, stability.

The effect of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on the primary stability of stand-alone implant construct versus posterior stabilization in oblique lumbar interbody fusion with osteoporotic bone quality- a finite element study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) can provide an ideal minimally invasive solution for achieving spinal fusion in an older, more frail population where decreased bone quality can be a limiting factor. Stabilization can be achieved with bilateral pedicle screws (BPS), which require additional incisions and longer operative time. Alternatively, a novel self-anchoring stand-alone lateral plate system (SSA) can be used, where no additional incisions are required. Based on the relevant literature, BPS constructs provide greater primary biomechanical stability compared to lateral plate constructs, including SSA. This difference is further increased by osteoporosis. Screw augmentation in spinal fusion surgeries is commonly used; however, in the case of OLIF, it is a fairly new concept, lacking a consensus-based guideline.

PURPOSE

This comparative finite element (FE) study aimed to investigate the effect of PMMA screw augmentation on the primary stability of a stand-alone implant construct versus posterior stabilization in OLIF with osteoporotic bone quality.

STUDY DESIGN

The biomechanical effect of screw augmentation was studied inside an in-silico environment using computer-aided FE analysis.

METHODS

A previously validated and published L2-L4 FE model with normal and osteoporotic bone material properties was used. Geometries based on the OLIF implants (BPS, SSA) were created and placed inside the L3-L4 motion segment with increasing volumes (1-6 cm3) of PMMA augmentation. A follower load of 400 N and 10 Nm bending moment (in the three anatomical planes) were applied to the surgical FE models with different bone material properties. The operated L3-L4 segmental range of motion (ROM), the inserted cage's maximal caudal displacements, and L4 cranial bony endplate principal stress values were measured.

RESULTS

The nonaugmented values for the BPS construct were generally lower compared to SSA, and the difference was increased by osteoporosis. In osteoporotic bone, PMMA augmentation gradually decreased the investigated parameters and the difference between the two constructs as well. Between 3 cm3 and 4 cm3 of injected PMMA volume per screw, the difference between augmented SSA and standard BPS became comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, augmentation can enhance the primary stability of the constructs and decrease the difference between them. Considering leakage as a possible complication, between 3 cm3 and 4 cm3 of injected PMMA per screw can be an adequate amount for SSA augmentation. However, further in silico, and possibly in vitro and clinical testing is required to thoroughly understand the investigated biomechanical aspects.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study sheds light on the possible biomechanical advantage offered by augmented OLIF implants and provides a theoretical augmentation amount for the SSA construct. Based on the findings, the concept of an SSA device with PMMA augmentation capability is desirable.

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Augmentation Enhances the Mechanical Characteristics of Midfoot Beam Constructs in Charcot Neuroarthropathy Cadaver Model

BACKGROUND

Even with the best conservative care, patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) of the foot and ankle often ulcerate, increasing their risk of infection, amputation, and death. Surgical fixation has been associated with risk of recurrent ulceration, potentially due to poor bone quality prone to recurrent deformity and ulceration. We propose midfoot beam reconstruction with PMMA augmentation as a novel means of improving fixation.

METHODS

A protocol was developed to create characteristic CN midfoot fragmentation both visually and fluoroscopically in each of 12 matched-pair cadaveric feet. Afterward, the pairs were divided into 2 groups: (1) midfoot beam fusion surgery alone, and (2) midfoot beam fusion surgery augmented with PMMA. A solid 7.0-mm beam was placed into the medial column and a solid 5.5-mm beam was placed across the lateral column. In the PMMA group, 8 to 10 mL of PMMA was inserted into the medial column. The hindfoot of each specimen was potted and the metatarsal heads were cyclically loaded for 1800 cycles, followed by load to failure while load and displacement were continually recorded.

RESULTS

One specimen in the beam alone group failed before reaching the 1800th cycle and was not included in the failure analysis. The midfoot beam only group demonstrated greater mean displacement during cycle testing compared with the PMMA group, P < .05. The maximum force (N), stiffness (N/mm), and toughness (Nmm) were all significantly greater in the group augmented with PMMA, P < .05.

CONCLUSION

In a CN cadaveric model, PMMA augmentation significantly decreased gapping during cyclic loading and nearly doubled the load to failure compared with midfoot beams alone.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this biomechanical study demonstrate that augmentation of midfoot beams with PMMA increases the strength and stiffness of the fusion construct. This increased mechanical toughness may help reduce the risk of nonunion and infection in patients with neuropathic midfoot collapse.

Outcome of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures in elderly: A systematic review

Introduction

Adequate guidelines for treatment of people over 65 years, suffering traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurologic deficit, are currently lacking.

Research question

The aim of this study was to systematically review the available literature regarding the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal trauma in elderly patients.

Material and methods

A systematic review according the PRISMA guidelines was performed. Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central register were searched until June 2021. Risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated. Clinical and radiological results, as well as complications of conservative or surgical treatment were reviewed.

Results

Six articles were included (one prospective randomized trial, two prospective and three retrospective cohort studies). In these studies conflicting results were observed with regard to pain, radiological results and complications following both conservative and surgical treatment strategies for thoracolumbar spine fractures in elderly.

Discussion and conclusion

Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures in elderly should focus on early mobilization to reduce complications and hospital stay. This may improve functional outcome and prevent worsening of frailty in this vulnerable group of patients. To elucidate the optimal treatment for elderly patient with thoracolumbar fractures, future research should focus on patient specific treatment rather than the mere difference between outcome of surgical and conservative treatment.

Hydroxyapatite particle shape affects screw attachment in cancellous bone when augmented with hydroxyapatite-containing hydrogels

Screw-bone construct failures are a true challenge in orthopaedic implant fixation, particularly in poor quality bone. Whilst augmentation with bone cement can improve the primary stability of screws, there are cements, e.g. PMMA, that may impede blood flow and nutrients and hamper bone remodelling. In this study, soft, non-setting biomaterials based on Hyalectin gels and hydroxyapatite (HA) particles with different morphological parameters were evaluated as potential augmentation materials, using a lapine ex vivo bone model. The pull-out force, stiffness, and work to fracture were considered in evaluating screw attachment. The pull-out force of constructs reinforced with Hyalectin containing irregularly shaped nano-HA and spherically shaped micro-HA particles were found to be significantly higher than the control group (no augmentation material). The pull-out stiffness increased for the micro-HA particles and the work to fracture increased for the irregular nano-HA particles. However, there were no significant augmentation effect found for the spherical shaped nano-HA particles. In conclusion, injectable Hyalectin gel loaded with hydroxyapatite particles was found to have a potentially positive effect on the primary stability of screws in trabecular bone, depending on the HA particle shape and size.

Percutaneous Juxtapedicular Cement Salvage of Failed Spinal Instrumentation? Institutional Experience and Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Instrumented spinal fusion constructs sometimes fail because of fatigue loading, frequently necessitating open revision surgery. Favorable outcomes after percutaneous juxtapedicular cement salvage (perc-cement salvage) of failing instrumentation have been described; however, this approach is not widely known among spine surgeons , and its biomechanical properties have not been evaluated. We report our institutional experience with perc-cement salvage and investigate the relative biomechanical strength of this technique as compared with 3 other common open revision techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent perc-cement salvage was conducted. Biomechanical characterization of revision techniques was performed in a cadaveric model of critical pedicle screw failure. Three revision cohorts involved removal and replacement of hardware: (1) screw upsizing, (2) vertebroplasty, and (3) fenestrated screw with cement augmentation. These were compared with a cohort with perc-cement salvage performed using a juxtapedicular trajectory with the failed primary screw remaining engaged in the vertebral body.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent perc-cement salvage from 2018 to 2022 to address screw haloing and/or endplate fracture threatening construct integrity. Pain palliation was reported by 8/10 patients. Open revision surgery was required in 4/10 patients, an average of 8.9 months after the salvage procedure (range 6.2-14.7 months). Only one revision was due to progressive hardware dislodgement. The remainder avoided open revision surgery through an average of 1.9 years of follow-up. In the cadaveric study, there were no significant differences in pedicle screw pullout strength among any of the revision cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Perc-cement salvage of failing instrumentation is reasonably efficacious. The technique is biomechanically noninferior to other revision strategies that require open surgery for removal and replacement of hardware. Open revision surgery may be avoided by perc-cement salvage in select cases.

Utilization of Antibiotic Bone Cement in Spine Surgery: Pearls, Techniques, and Case Review

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) encompasses a spectrum of spinal infections ranging from isolated mild vertebral osteomyelitis to severe diffuse infection with associated epidural abscess and fracture. Although patients can often be treated with an initial course of intravenous antibiotics, surgery is sometimes required in patients with sepsis, spinal instability, neurological compromise, or failed medical treatment. Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) has been widely used in orthopedic extremity surgery for more than 150 years, both for prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial infection. However, relatively little literature exists regarding its utilization in spine surgery. This article describes ABC utilization in orthopedic surgery and explains the technique of ABC utilization in spine surgery. Surgeons can choose from multiple premixed ABCs with variable viscosities, setting times, and antibiotics or can mix in antibiotics to bone cements themselves. ABC can be used to fill large defects in the vertebral body or disc space or in some cases to coat instrumentation. Surgeons should be wary of complications such as ABC extravasation as well as an increased difficulty with revision. With a thorough understanding of the properties of the cement and the methods of delivery, ABC is a powerful adjunct in the treatment of spinal infections.

Biomechanical Study of 3 Osteoconductive Materials Applied in Pedicle Augmentation and Revision for Osteoporotic Vertebrae: Allograft Bone Particles, Calcium Phosphate Cement, Demineralized Bone Matrix

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed biomechanical properties of pedicle screws enhanced or revised with 3 materials. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these materials in pedicle augmentation and revision.

METHODS

One hundred twenty human cadaveric vertebrae were utilized for in vitro testing. Vertebrae bone density was evaluated. Allograft bone particles (ABP), calcium phosphate cement (CPC), and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) were used to augment or revise pedicle screw. Post the implantation of pedicle screws, parameters such as insertional torque, pullout strength, cycles to failure and failure load were measured using specialized instruments.

RESULTS

ABP, CPC, and DBM significantly enhanced biomechanical properties of the screws. CPC augmentation showed superior properties compared to ABP or DBM. ABP-augmented screws had higher cycles to failure and failure loads than DBM-augmented screws, with no difference in pullout strength. CPC-revised screws exhibited similar strength to the original screws, while ABP-revised screws showed comparable cycles to failure and failure loads but lower pullout strength. DBM-revised screws did not match the original screws' strength.

CONCLUSION

ABP, CPC, and DBM effectively improve pedicle screw stability for pedicle augmentation. CPC demonstrated the highest efficacy, followed by ABP, while DBM was less effective. For pedicle revision, CPC is recommended as the primary choice, with ABP as an alternative. However, using DBM for pedicle revision is not recommended.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: Neurological status, Oncologic tumor behavior, Mechanical stability, and Systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: neurological status, Oocologic tumor behavior, mechanical stability and systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Literature Review

This literature review aimed to review the current understanding, indications, and limitations of pedicle screw instrumentation cement augmentation. Since they were first reported in the 1980s, pedicle screw cement augmentation rates have been increasing. Several studies have been published to date that describe various surgical techniques and the biomechanical changes that occur when cement is introduced through the screw-bone interface. This article provides a concise review of the uses, biomechanical properties, cost analysis, complications, and surgical techniques used for pedicle screw cement augmentation to help guide physician practices. A comprehensive review of the current literature was conducted, with key studies, and contributions from throughout history being highlighted. Patients with low bone mineral density are the most well-studied indication for pedicle screw cement augmentation. Many studies show that cement augmentation can improve pullout strength in patients with low bone mineral density; however, the benefit varies inversely with pathology severity and directly with technique. The various screw types are discussed, with each having its own mechanical advantages. Cement distribution is largely dependent on the filling method and volume of cement used. Cement composition and timing of cement use after mixing are critical considerations in practice because they can significantly alter the bone-cement and screw-cement interfaces. Overall, studies have shown that pedicle screw cement augmentation has a low complication rate and increased pullout strength, justifying its universal use in patients with a suboptimal bone-implant interface.

Cervical vertebral body replacement using a modern in situ expandable and angulable corpectomy cage system: early clinical and radiological outcome

PURPOSE

Vertebral body replacement (VBR) cages are commonly implanted to reconstruct the cervical vertebrae in cases of tumour, trauma, spondylodiscitis, and degeneration. Expandable cages have been widely used for this purpose; however, the lacking congruence at the implant-bone interface and consequent implant displacement were considered as a serious drawback of such systems. Aim of this study is to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcome of a modern in situ not only expandable but also angulable cervical corpectomy cage system.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients who underwent a single or multilevel cervical VBR procedure were included and retrospectively evaluated in this single-centre case series. The neurological status was assessed using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score. Complications were categorized into surgical (including implant-associated) and general medical. Radiographic parameters included regional angulation, segmental height, and coronal alignment.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59.5 ± 20.6 years. The recorded ASIA score improved postoperatively by 10 points (p  0.0001). Surgical including implant-associated complication rates were 19.05%. Radiographic evaluation showed a height gain of 11.2 mm (p < 0.0001), lordotic correction of 7° (p < 0.0001), and coronal alignment of 3° (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up, loss of angulation correction of 1.9° (p  0.0002), subsidence of 1.92 mm (p  0.0006), and fusion rates of 68.42% were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an in situ angulable and expandable cage system in cervical VBR seems to offer better results compared to conventional static or expandable cages regarding segmental height gain, lordotic correction, and clinical improvement as well as low complication and revision rates. Significant height gain in multilevel surgeries is associated with higher rates of implant-associated complications.

A Biomechanical Study on Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Augmented With Cement in Osteoporotic Spines

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of cement-augmented cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation.

METHODS

Forty-nine CBT screws were inserted into lumbar vertebrae guided by three-dimensionally printed templates, and then injected with 0, .5, or 1.0 mL of polymethylmethacrylate. The screw placement accuracy, cement dispersion, and cement leakage rate were evaluated radiologically. Biomechanical tests were performed to measure the axial pull-out strength and torque value.

RESULTS

Overall, 83.67% of the screws were inserted without pedicle perforation. In the 1.0 mL group, cement dispersed into the pedicle zone and formed a concentrated mass more often than in the .5 mL group, but not significantly more often (P > .05). The total cement leakage rate was 18.75%. Compared with the control group, the torque value was slightly higher in the .5 mL group (P = .735) and significantly higher in the 1.0 mL group (P = .026). However, there was no significant difference between the .5 and 1.0 mL groups (P = .431). The maximal pull-out force (Fmax) was increased by 52.85% and 72.73% in the .5 and 1.0 mL groups, respectively, compared with the control group (P < .05). However, the difference was not significant between the 2 cemented groups (P = .985).

CONCLUSIONS

Cement augmentation is a useful method for increasing CBT screw stability in osteoporotic spines. The cement injection volume is recommended to be 1 mL for each screw, and the cement should disperse into the vertebral body than the pedicle zones.

Biomechanical evaluation and optimal design of a pedicle screw with double bent rods internal fixation system based on PE-PLIF fusion

Problems, such as broken screws, broken rods, and cage subsidence after clinical spinal fusion surgery affect the success rate of fusion surgery and the fixation effect of fusion segments, and these problems still affect the treatment and postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, we used the biomechanical finite element analysis method to analyze and study the fixation effect of three kinds of spinal internal fixation systems on L4-L5 lumbar spine segments in percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF). The three different fixation systems compared in this study include bilateral pedicle screw fixation (M1); bilateral pedicle screw with cross-link fixation (M2); bilateral pedicle screws with double bent rods fixation (M3). The internal fixation systems with different structures were analyzed with the help of Hypermesh, and Abaqus. It was found that the internal fixation system with double bent rods reduced screw stresses by 23.8 and 22.2% in right and left axial rotation than the traditional bilateral pedicle screw system, while titanium rod stresses were reduced by 9.6, 3.7, 9.6, and 2.9% in flexion, left and right lateral bending, and right axial rotation, respectively, and L5 upper endplate stresses were reduced by 35.5, 18.9, 38.4, 10.2, and 48.3% in flexion, left and right lateral bending, and left and right axial rotation, respectively. The spinal range of motion (ROM) of the M3 internal fixation system was less than that of the M1 and M2 internal fixation systems in left lateral bending, left lateral rotation, and right axial rotation, and the intact vertebral ROM was reduced by 93.7, 94.9, and 90.9%, respectively. The double bent rod structure of the spinal internal fixation system has better biomechanical properties, which can effectively reduce the risk of screw breakage, loosening, cage subsidence, and endplate collapse after fusion surgery.

A biomechanical study of osseointegrated patient-matched additively manufactured implant for treatment of thumb amputees

Thumb amputations leads to 50 % loss in hand functionality. To date, silicone vacuum prosthesis and autologous transplantation are the most adopted treatment solutions: nevertheless, vacuum prostheses lack in stability and cause skin issue and surgical treatment is not always accepted by patients. Osseointegrated implants were demonstrated to enhance stability, restore osseoperception and increase the time of prosthesis use. Thumb amputations present varying stump sizes: a standard size implant cannot address specificity of each patient, while a patient matched solution can meet surgeon requirements, by geometrical features of implant. The fixture presented in the current paper is the first additively manufactured patient matched osseointegrated implant for the treatment of thumb amputees. The current work aims to verify and validate a predictive finite element model (FEM) for mechanical strength of the presented fixture. FEM was demonstrated to correctly evaluate the mechanical strength of patient matched device. Minimum strength requirements were calculated in different core diameters: FEM were experimentally validated. Safety factor of 1.5 was guaranteed. Finally, considerations on performance of the prototype were carried out by means of insertion tests in Sawbones and axial pull-out force assessment. Cadaver tests to evaluate the entire procedure and production process are ongoing.

Pedicle screw augmentation in posterior constructs of the thoracolumbar spine: How many pedicle screws should be augmented?

BACKGROUNDS

To evaluate the effects of different pedicle screw augmentation strategies on screw loosening and adjacent segment collapse at the proximal end of long-segment instrumentation.

METHODS

Eighteen osteoporotic (9 male, 9 female donors; mean age: 74.7 ± 10.9 [SD] years) thoracolumbar multi-segmental motion segments (Th11 - L1) were assigned as follows: control, one-level augmented screws (marginally), and two-level augmented screws (fully augmented) groups (3 × 6). Pedicle screw placement was performed in Th12 and L1. Cyclic loading in flexion started with 100-500 N (4 Hz) and was increased by 5 N every 500 cycles. Standardized lateral fluoroscopy images with 7.5 Nm loading were obtained periodically during loading. The global alignment angle was measured to evaluate the overall alignment and proximal junctional kyphosis. The intra-instrumental angle was used to evaluate screw fixation.

FINDINGS

Considering screw fixation as a failure criterion, the failure loads of the control (683 N), and marginally (858 N) and fully augmented (1050 N) constructs were significantly different (ANOVA p = 0.032).Taking the overall specimen alignment as failure criteria, failure loads of the three groups (control 933 ± 271.4 N, marginally 858 N ± 196 N, and full 933 ± 246.3 N were in the same range and did not show any significance (p = 0.825).

INTERPRETATION

Global failure loads were comparable among the three groups and unchanged with augmentation because the adjacent segment and not the instrumentation failed first. Augmentation of all screws showed significant improved in screw anchorage.

Second-generation bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws for osteoporosis: biomechanical and finite element analyses

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical and finite element analyses were performed to investigate the efficacy of second-generation bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws (CICPS) in osteoporosis.

METHODS

This study used the biomechanical test module of polyurethane to simulate osteoporotic cancellous bone. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement was used to anchor the pedicle screws in the module. The specimens were divided into two groups for the mechanical tests: the experimental group (second-generation CICPS) and control group (first-generation CICPS). Safety was evaluated using maximum shear force, static bending, and dynamic bending tests. Biomechanical stability evaluations included the maximum axial pullout force and rotary torque tests. X-ray imaging and computed tomography were used to evaluate the distribution of bone cement 24 h after PMMA injection, and stress distribution at the screw fracture and screw-cement-bone interface was assessed using finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Mechanical testing revealed that the experimental group (349.8 ± 28.6 N) had a higher maximum axial pullout force than the control group (277.3 ± 8.6 N; P < 0.05). The bending moments of the experimental group (128.5 ± 9.08 N) were comparable to those of the control group (113.4 ± 20.9 N; P > 0.05). The screw-in and spin-out torques of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group (spin-in, 0.793 ± 0.015 vs. 0.577 ± 0.062 N, P < 0.01; spin-out, 0.764 ± 0.027 vs. 0.612 ± 0.049 N, P < 0.01). Bone cement was mainly distributed at the front three-fifths of the screw in both groups, but the distribution was more uniform in the experimental group than in the control group. After pullout, the bone cement was closely connected to the screw, without loosening or fragmentation. In the finite element analysis, stress on the second-generation CICPS was concentrated at the proximal screw outlet, whereas stress on the first-generation CICPS was concentrated at the screw neck, and the screw-bone cement-bone interface stress of the experimental group was smaller than that of the control group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that second-generation CICPS have higher safety and stability than first-generation CICPS and may be a superior choice for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw stability after 360-degree turnback from full insertion: effects of screw shape, pilot hole profile and bone density

Intraoperative pedicle screw depth adjustment after initial insertion, including both forward and backward adjustments, is sometimes necessary to facilitate rod application and ensure that the screw is in the correct position, which is determined by intraoperative fluoroscopy. Adjusting the screw with forward turns has no negative influence on the screw fixation stability; however, screw turnback may weaken the fixation stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical properties of screw turnback and demonstrate the reduction in the fixation stability after the screw is turned 360° from its full insertion position. Commercially available synthetic closed-cell polyurethane foams with three different densities simulating various degrees of bone density were utilized as substitutes for human bone. Two different screw shapes (cylindrical and conical) together with two different pilot hole profiles (cylindrical and conical) were tested. Following specimen preparation, screw pullout tests were conducted using a material test machine. The mean maximal pullout strength between full insertion and 360-degree turnback from full insertion in each setting was statistically analyzed. The mean maximal pullout strength after 360-degree turnback from full insertion was generally lower than that at full insertion. The reduced mean maximal pullout strength after turnback increased with decreasing bone density. Conical screws had significantly lower pullout strength after 360-degree turnback than cylindrical screws. The mean maximal pullout strength was reduced by up to approximately 27% after 360-degree turnback when using a conical screw in a low bone density specimen. Additionally, specimens treated with a conical pilot hole presented a less reduction in pullout strength after screw turnback as compared to those with a cylindrical pilot hole. The strength of our study was that we systematically investigated the effects of various bone densities and screw shapes on screw stability after turnback, which has rarely been reported in the literature. Our study suggests that pedicle screw turnback after full insertion should be reduced in spinal surgeries, particularly procedures that use conical screws in osteoporotic bone. Pedicle screw secured with a conical pilot hole might be beneficial for screw adjustment.

Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Versus Bone Cement Screw for Fixation in Porcine Spinal Low Bone Mass Model

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of in vitro animal.

OBJECTION

To compare the biomechanics of cortical bone trajectory screw (CBT) and bone cement screw (BC) in an isolated porcine spinal low bone mass model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The choice of spinal fixation in patients with osteoporosis remains controversial. Is CBT better than BC? Research on this issue is lacking.

METHODS

Ten porcine spines with 3 segments were treated with EDTA decalcification. After 8 weeks, all the models met the criteria of low bone mass. Ten specimens were randomly divided into groups, group was implanted with CBT screw (CBT group) and the other group was implanted with bone cement screw (BC group). The biomechanical material testing machine was used to compare the porcine spine activities of the two groups in flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotation, and then insertional torque, pull-out force, and anti-compression force of the 2 groups were compared. Independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups.

RESULTS

Ten 3 segments of porcine spine models with low bone mass were established, and the bone mineral density of all models was lower than 0.75 g/cm 2 . There is no difference between the CBT and BC groups in flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotation angle, P >0.05. However, there were significant differences between the 2 groups and the control group, with P ＜0.01. The 2 groups significantly differed between the insertional torque ( P =0.03) and the screw pull-out force ( P =0.021). The anti-compression forces between the 2 groups have no significant difference between the two groups ( P =0.946).

CONCLUSIONS

The insertional torque and pull-out force of the CBT were higher than those of the BC in the isolated low bone porcine spine model. The range of motion and anti-compression ability of the model was similar between the 2 fixation methods.

Risk factor analysis of bone cement leakage for polymethylmethacrylate-augmented cannulated pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of cement leakage (CL) for polymethylmethacrylate-augmented cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) in spinal degenerative diseases and provided technical guidance for clinical surgery.

Methods

This study enrolled 276 patients with spinal degenerative disease and osteoporosis who were augmented using CPSs (835 screws in total) from May 2011 to June 2018 in our hospital. The patients' age, sex, bone mineral density (BMD), diagnosis, augmented positions, number of CPS implanted, and CL during surgery were recorded. CL was observed by postoperative computed tomography (CT) and was classified by Yeom typing.

Results

A total of 74 (74/835, 8.9%) CPSs in 64 patients leaked (64/276, 23.2%). CL was significantly correlated with the number and position of screws (P < 0.05), but not with sex, age, and BMD (P > 0.05). The position, number of CPSs, fracture, degenerative scoliosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and revision surgery were risk factors for CL (P < 0.05). Augmentation of the thoracic vertebral body, fracture, and ankylosing spondylitis were independent risk factors for Type S. Augmentation of the lumbar vertebral body, lumbar disc herniation, and lumbar spondylolisthesis were independent risk factors for Type B (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

CL has a high incidence in clinical practice. High-risk factors for leakage should be addressed to avoid serious complications. Particularly, it is necessary to develop alternative solutions once CPSs can't be used in surgery caused by CL.

Is human bone matrix a sufficient augmentation method revising loosened pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone? - A biomechanical evaluation of primary stability

INTRODUCTION

Despite good screw anchorage and safe screw trajectory, screw loosening occurs in several cases, especially in osteoporotic individuals. The aim of this biomechanical analysis was to evaluate the primary stability of revision screw placement in individuals with reduced bone quality. Therefore, revision via enlarged diameter screws was compared to the use of human bone matrix as augmentation to improve the bone stock and screw coverage.

METHODS

11 lumbar vertebral bodies from cadaveric specimens with a mean age of 85.7 years (± 12.0 years) at death were used. 6.5 mm diameter pedicle screws were inserted in both pedicles and hereafter loosened using a fatigue protocol. Screws were revised inserting a larger diameter screw (8.5 mm) in one pedicle and a same diameter screw with human bone matrix augmentation in the other pedicle. The previous loosening protocol was then reapplied, comparing maximum load and cycles to failure between both revision techniques. Insertional torque was continuously measured during insertion of both revision screws.

FINDINGS

The number of cycles and the maximum load until failure were significantly greater in enlarged diameter screws than in augmented screws. The enlarged screws' insertional torque was also significantly higher than of the augmented screws.

INTERPRETATION

Human bone matrix augmentation does not reach the same ad-hoc fixation strength as enlarging the screw's diameter by 2 mm and is therefore biomechanically inferior. Regarding the immediate stability, a thicker screw should therefore be prioritised.

Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical and radiological outcomes for screw track augmentation with fibular allograft in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss along the screw track.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients, 18 men (60%) and 12 women (40%), with a mean age 52 years (range 34- 68). Fibular allograft was prepared by cutting it into longitudinal strips 50 mm in length. Three allograft struts were inserted into the screw track. Six mm tap used to tap between the 3 fibular struts. Eight- or 9-mm diameter, and 45 or 50 mm in length screw was then inserted. The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain for clinical outcome. Computed tomography scan (CT) performed at 12 months postoperative visit to assess fibular graft incorporation along the pedicle screw track, any screw loosening and the interbody as well as posterolateral fusion.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 29 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. CT scan obtained at last follow-up showed incorporation of fibular allograft and solid fusion in all patients except one.

CONCLUSION

The fibular allograft augmentation of the pedicle screw track in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss is a viable option. It allows for biologic fixation at the screw-bone interface and has some key advantages when compared to currently available methods.

The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods

OBJECTIVE

Screw loosening is a widely reported issue after spinal screw fixation and triggers several complications after lumbar interbody fusion. Osteoporosis is an essential risk factor for screw loosening. Hounsfield units (HU) value is a credible indicator during bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. As compared with the general evaluation of BMD, we hypothesized that specific measurements of HU at the precise location of the future screw insertion may be a better predictor of screw loosening.

METHODS

Clinical data of 56 patients treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) of the L4-L5 segments with an anterior lateral single rod (ALSR) screw fixation were reviewed in this study. Vertebral bodies with ≥ 1 mm width radiolucent zones around the screw were defined as screw loosening. HU in the insertional screw positions, the central transverse plane, and the average values of three and four planes were measured. Regression analyses identified independent risk factors for screw loosening separately. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to evaluate predictive performance.

RESULTS

The local HU values were significantly lower in the loosening group, regardless of the selected measuring methods. The AUC of screw loosening prediction was higher in the insertional screw positions' HU than other frequently used methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The HU value measured in the insertional screw position is a better predictor of ALSR screw loosening than other methods. The risk of screw loosening should be reduced by optimizing the trajectory of the screw based on the measurement of HU in preoperative CT.

KEY POINTS

• Osteoporosis is an essential risk factor for screw loosening, and Hounsfield units (HU) are a credible predictor during bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. • The HU value measured in the insertional screw position is a better predictor of screw loosening than other frequently used HU measurement methods. • The risk of screw loosening might potentially be reduced by optimizing the trajectory of the screw based on the measurement of HU in preoperative CT.

Novel Polyethylene Terephthalate Screw Sleeve Implant: Salvage Treatment in a Case of Spine Instability after Vertebroplasty Failure

INTRODUCTION

The management of osteoporotic fractures is sometimes rather challenging for spinal surgeons, and considering the longer life expectancy induced by improved living conditions, their prevalence is expected to increase. At present, the approaches to osteoporotic fractures differ depending on their severity, location, and the patient's age. State-of-the-art treatments range from vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty to hardware-based spinal stabilization in which screw augmentation with cement is the gold standard.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of a 74-year-old man with an L5 osteoporotic fracture. The patient underwent a vertebroplasty (VP) procedure, which was complicated by a symptomatic cement leakage in the right L4-L5 neuroforamen. We urgently decompressed the affected pedicle via hemilaminectomy. At that point, the column required stability. The extravasation of cement had ruled out the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws but leaving the pedicular screws alone was not considered sufficient to achieve stability. We decided to cover the screws with a polyethylene terephthalate sleeve (OGmend^®) to avoid additional cement leakage and to reinforce the screw strength required by the poor bone quality.

CONCLUSION

In the evolving technologies used for spinal surgery, screws sleeve implants such as OGmend^® are a useful addition to the surgeon's armamentarium when an increased pull-out strength is required and other options are not available.

Evaluation of an Injectable Biphasic Calcium Sulfate/Hydroxyapatite Cement for the Augmentation of Fenestrated Pedicle Screws in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Biomechanical Cadaver Study

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is one of the most promising approaches to enhance the anchoring of screws in the osteoporotic spine. To date, there is no ideal cement for pedicle screw augmentation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an injectable, bioactive, and degradable calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite (CaS/HA) cement could increase the maximum pull-out force of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Herein, 17 osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were obtained from a single fresh-frozen human cadaver and instrumented with fenestrated pedicle screws. The right screw in each vertebra was augmented with CaS/HA cement and the un-augmented left side served as a paired control. The cement distribution, interdigitation ability, and cement leakage were evaluated using radiographs. Furthermore, pull-out testing was used to evaluate the immediate mechanical effect of CaS/HA augmentation on the pedicle screws. The CaS/HA cement presented good distribution and interdigitation ability without leakage into the spinal canal. Augmentation significantly enhanced the maximum pull-out force of the pedicle screw in which the augmented side was 39.0% higher than the pedicle-screw-alone side. Therefore, the novel biodegradable biphasic CaS/HA cement could be a promising material for pedicle screw augmentation in the osteoporotic spine.

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a new bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw in the treatment of spondylolysis-type lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis: a retrospective study

Purpose

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of a bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) in the treatment of spondylolysis-type lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 37 patients (Dual-energy X-ray bone density detection showed different degrees of osteoporosis) with spondylolysis-type lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent lumbar spondylolisthesis reduction and fusion using a new type of injectable bone cement screw from May 2011 to March 2015. Postoperative clinical efficacy was evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Imaging indexes were used to evaluate the stability of internal fixation of the devices 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter. The safety of the CICPS was assessed by the prevalence of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 124 CICPS were implanted intraoperatively. Bone cement leakage occurred in 3 screws (2.42%), and no clinical discomfort was found in any patients. All 37 patients were followed up with an average follow-up time of 26.6 ± 13.4 months (12–58 months). In the evaluation of the clinical effects of the operation, the average postoperative VAS score of the patients decreased from 4.30 ± 1.58 before surgery to 0.30 ± 0.70 after surgery (P < 0.001), and the ODI decreased from 47.27% ± 16.97% before surgery to 3.36% ± 5.70% after surgery (P < 0.001). No screw was loose, broken or pulled out.

Conclusion

CICPS is safe and effective in the treatment of spondylolysis-type lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by osteoporosis.

Biomechanical Comparison of Salvage Pedicle Screw Augmentations Using Different Biomaterials

Allograft bone particles, hydroxyapatite/β-hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP), calcium sulfate (CS), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement are biomaterials clinically used to fill defective pedicles for pedicle screw augmentation. Few studies have systematically investigated the effects of various biomaterials utilized for salvage screw stabilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of screws augmented with these four different materials and the effect of different pilot hole sizes and bone densities on screw fixation strength. Commercially available synthetic bones with three different densities (7.5 pcf, 15pcf, 30 pcf) simulating different degrees of bone density were utilized as substitutes for human bone. Two different pilot hole sizes (3.2 mm and 7.0 mm in diameter) were prepared on test blocks to simulate primary and revision pedicle screw fixation, respectively. Following separate specimen preparation with these four different filling biomaterials, a screw pullout test was conducted using a material test machine, and the average maximal screw pullout strength was compared among groups. The average maximal pullout strength of the materials, presented in descending order, was as follows: bone cement, calcium sulfate, HA/β-TCP, allograft bone chips and the control. In samples in both the 3.2 mm pilot-hole and 7.0 mm pilot-hole groups, the average maximal pullout strength of these four materials increased with increasing bone density. The average maximal pullout strength of the bone cement augmented salvage screw (7.0 mm) was apparently elevated in the 7.5 pcf test block. Salvage pedicle screw augmentation with allograft bone chips, HA/β-TCP, calcium sulfate, and bone cement are all feasible methods and can offer better pullout strength than materials in the non-augmentation group. Bone cement provides the most significantly augmented effect in each pilot hole size and bone density setting and could be considered preferentially to achieve larger initial stability during revision surgery, especially for bones with osteoporotic quality.

Cementless posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of OI patients with severe spine deformity-a case series

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to present the outcomes all patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) who underwent cementless posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of severe spine deformity in our institution.

METHODS

All patients with OI who underwent surgical correction of their spine deformity in our institution between 2003 and 2020 were enrolled. The collected data included demographics, operative and follow-up findings, medical history, bisphosphonate therapy, HGT protocol, pre- and post-HGT and postoperative scoliosis and kyphosis curve measurements, hospitalization length, complications, and revision surgeries. General treatment strategies included cessation of bisphosphonate therapy around the surgery, 30-day HGT protocol, titanium rods, cementless screw technique, and a high implant density policy.

RESULTS

Eleven consecutive patients with OI who underwent surgery for spine deformity in our institution were identified. The mean age at surgery was 15.6 ± 2.3. Mean follow-up period was 6.6 ± 5.8 years. The mean pre- and postoperative scoliosis curves were 85.4 ± 19.3° and 43.1 ± 12.5°, respectively, representing a 49.5% correction rate. Five patients underwent HGT and achieved a mean correction of 27.6 ± 7.1° (31.6%) preoperatively. Implant density ratio was 1.5 (screw or hook/level). Mean postoperative hospitalization length was 5.9 ± 1.6 days. One patient had deep wound infection which resolved following treatment according to our protocol for surgical site infection, and one patient had skull penetration by one of the halo pins.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of severe spine deformity in OI patients with cementless posterior spinal fusion is safe and effective after applying a specific preoperative strategy.

[Cement augmentation in spinal surgery]

Bone cement has been used in spinal surgery for as long as 50 years. In contemporary spinal surgery, cement augmentation of fractured osteoporotic vertebrae in the form of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty as well as cement augmentation of pedicle screws in instrumented procedures of any etiology are established as standard procedures. Both procedures are very effective, although the benefits of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty procedures have been controversially discussed in the past. Overall, complications rarely occur. The most relevant complication is cement leakage, which is asymptomatic in the majority of cases but in the worst case might lead to neurological deficits, embolic events and even circulatory collapse. Prevention of cement leakage is therefore crucial. Risk factors for cement leakage and preventive measures are presented in a comprehensive review based on the available literature.

Innovation of Surgical Techniques for Screw Fixation in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine

Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly populations and is a major public health problem worldwide. It is not uncommon for spine surgeons to perform spinal instrumented fusion surgeries for osteoporotic patients. However, in patients with severe osteoporosis, instrumented fusion may result in screw loosening, implant failure or nonunion because of a poor bone quality and decreased pedicle screw stability as well as increased graft subsidence risk. In addition, revision surgeries to correct failed instrumentation are becoming increasingly common in patients with osteoporosis. Therefore, techniques to enhance the fixation of pedicle screws are required in spinal surgeries for osteoporotic patients. To date, various instrumentation methods, such as a supplemental hook, sublaminar taping and sacral alar iliac screws, and modified screwing techniques have been available for reinforcing pedicle screw fixation. In addition, several materials, including polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite stick/granules, for insertion into prepared screw holes, can be used to enhance screw fixation. Many biomechanical tests support the effectiveness of these augmentation methods. We herein review the current therapeutic strategies for screw fixation and augmentation methods in the surgical treatment of patients with an osteoporotic spine.

Learning Curve and Initial Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Objective

We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and accuracy of full-endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (FE-PLIF) by assessing the learning curve and initial clinical outcomes.

Summary of Background Data

Low back pain is one of the crucial medical conditions worldwide. FE-PLIF has been reported to be a minimally invasive method to treat mechanical low back pain, but there lacks a thorough evaluation on this new technique.

Methods

The patients were divided into three groups in the order of operating date, implying that Group A consisted of the initial 12 cases, Group B the subsequent 12 cases, and Group C the last 12 cases. The data of patients were reviewed for gender, age, preoperative symptoms, satisfaction, as well as clinical outcomes demonstrated by visual analog scale (VAS). The operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded to demonstrate the learning curve and the extent of radiographic exposure. Statistical significance was set at a p &lt; 0.05 (two-sided).

Results

The patients enrolled in this study were followed up at an average of 1.41 ± 0.24 years. Overall, patients were satisfied with the surgery. The average number of intraoperative fluoroscopy was 6.97 ± 0.74. A significant improvement was observed in the VAS of both lumbar pain and leg pain. The overall fusion rate was 77.7%. Complications were reported in two patients in Group A, one in Group B, and none in Group C. The average operative time showed a trend of gradual decline. The learning curve was characterized using a cubic regression analysis as y = –27.07x + 1.42x2–0.24x3 + 521.84 (R2 = 0.617, p = 0.000).

Conclusions

FE-PLIF is an effective and safe method for treating low back pain caused by short-segmental degenerative diseases. The learning curve of this technique is steep at the initial stage but acceptable and shows great potential for improvement.

Reinforcement of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Hydroxyapatite Granules in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine: Biomechanical Performance and Clinical Outcomes

In percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation of the osteoporotic spine, rigid screw fixation obtaining strong stabilization is important for achieving successful treatment outcomes. However, in patients with severe osteoporosis, it is difficult to obtain PPS fixation with sufficient stability. PPS fixation has potential disadvantages with respect to maintaining secure stabilization in comparison to conventional pedicle screw fixation. In PPS fixation, bone grafting to achieve posterior spine fusion is generally not applicable and transverse connectors between the rods cannot be used to reinforce the fixation. Various augmentation methods, including additional hooks, sublaminar bands, and hydroxyapatite (HA) sticks, are available for conventional pedicle screw fixation. On the other hand, there has been no established augmentation method for PPS fixation. Recently, we developed a novel augmentation technique for PPS fixation using HA granules. This technique allows the percutaneous insertion of HA granules into the screw hole along the guidewire prior to insertion of the PPS. We have used this augmentation technique for PPS fixation in various spine surgeries in patients with osteoporosis. In our previous studies, biomechanical analyses demonstrated that PPS fixation was significantly enhanced by augmentation with HA granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. Furthermore, augmentation with HA granules was considered to decrease the incidence of screw loosening and implant failure following PPS fixation in patients with osteoporotic spine. In this article, we describe the surgical procedures of the augmentation method using HA granules and summarize our data from the biomechanical analysis of augmentation for PPS fixation. We also review the surgical outcomes of PPS fixation with augmentation using HA granules.

Hydroxyapatite Use in Spine Surgery—Molecular and Clinical Aspect

Hydroxyapatite possesses desirable properties as a scaffold in tissue engineering: it is biocompatible at a site of implantation, and it is degradable to non-toxic products. Moreover, its porosity enables infiltration of cells, nutrients and waste products. The outcome of hydroxyapatite implantation highly depends on the extent of the host immune response. Authors emphasise major roles of the chemical, morphological and physical properties of the surface of biomaterial used. A number of techniques have been applied to transform the theoretical osteoconductive features of HAp into spinal fusion systems—from integration of HAp with autograft to synthetic intervertebral implants. The most popular uses of HAp in spine surgery include implants (ACDF), bone grafts in posterolateral lumbar fusion and transpedicular screws coating. In the past, autologous bone graft has been used as an intervertebral cage in ACDF. Due to the morbidity related to autograft harvesting from the iliac bone, a synthetic cage with osteoconductive material such as hydroxyapatite seems to be a good alternative. Regarding posterolateral lumbar fusion, it requires the graft to induce new bone growth and reinforce fusion between the vertebrae. Hydroxyapatite formulations have shown good results in that field. Moreover, the HAp coating has proven to be an efficient method of increasing screw fixation strength. It can decrease the risk of complications such as screw loosening after pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic patients. The purpose of this literature review is to describe in vivo reaction to HAp implants and to summarise its current application in spine surgery.

A novel surgical planning system using an AI model to optimize planning of pedicle screw trajectories with highest bone mineral density and strongest pull-out force

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model in identifying optimized transpedicular screw trajectories with higher bone mineral density (BMD) as well as higher pull-out force (POF) in osteoporotic patients.

METHODS

An innovative pedicle screw trajectory planning system called Bone’s Trajectory was developed using a 3D graphic search and an AI-based finite element analysis model. The preoperative CT scans of 21 elderly osteoporotic patients were analyzed retrospectively. The AI model automatically calculated the number of alternative transpedicular trajectories, the trajectory BMD, and the estimated POF of L3–5. The highest BMD and highest POF of optimized trajectories were recorded and compared with AO standard trajectories.

RESULTS

The average patient age and average BMD of the vertebral bodies were 69.6 ± 7.8 years and 55.9 ± 17.1 mg/ml, respectively. On both sides of L3–5, the optimized trajectories showed significantly higher BMD and POF than the AO standard trajectories (p < 0.05). On average, the POF of optimized trajectory screws showed at least a 2.0-fold increase compared with AO trajectory screws.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel AI model performs well in enabling the selection of optimized transpedicular trajectories with higher BMD and POF than the AO standard trajectories.

Does augmentation increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws? A biomechanical cadaver study

Purpose

Open reduction and internal fixation using anterior plate osteosynthesis currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of symphyseal disruptions. Since postoperative screw loosening with consequent implant failure is frequently observed, this study aims to evaluate if and to what extent augmentation can increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws to improve the constructs stability.

Methods

Twelve human cadaveric anterior pelvic rings were separated at the symphyseal joint for bilateral testing, consequently achieving comparable sites. First, one non-augmented screw was drilled into the superior pubic ramus, whereas the contralateral side was primarily augmented. The screws were then withdrawn with a constant speed of 10 mm/min and the fixation strengths determined by the force (N) displacement (mm) curve. Finally, the primary non-augmented site was secondary augmented, representing revision surgery after initial implant failure, and the corresponding fixation strength was measured again.

Results

Augmentation compared to non-augmented screws displayed significantly higher pull-out forces with an increase in pull-out force by 377% for primary and 353% for secondary augmentation (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force comparing primary and secondary augmentation (p = 0.74).

Conclusions

Primary and secondary augmentation significantly increases the stability of symphyseal screws and, therefore, potentially decreases rates of implant failure.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01963-6.

Improved fixation stability for repairing pedicle screw loosening using a modified cement filling technique in porcine vertebrae

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been applied clinically and biomechanically repair loose pedicle screws. Controversies have arisen over data due to uncontrolled cement properties, various locations and sizes of fenestrated holes in repair screws, irregular holes and different bone densities of specimens. In this study, the pullout strength was compared for two techniques, the modified technique to use PMMA to augment a threaded hole and the traditional technique with retrograde injection of a PMMA filling, for standard loose screws in porcine vertebrae. Both techniques provided statistically significant results for sufficiently randomized specimens and experimental procedures. The difference in the pullout strength between conical and cylindrical screws for the aforementioned cement augmentation techniques was also investigated. Twenty-four single-level fresh-frozen lumbar vertebrae from L1 to L6 were harvested from four mature pigs. A total of 0.8 ml of PMMA was retrograde injected into screw holes with a 5.5 mm diameter, followed by insertion of a 5.0 mm diameter repair screw in the traditional group (n = 12). A stiff threaded PMMA hole was created with a 4.5 mm tapping screw before insertion of repair screws in the modified group (n = 12). Two screw geometries were randomly assigned as cylindrical (n = 6) and conical (n = 6) in each group. The correlations between filling techniques, screw geometries and axial pullout strength were analyzed. An appropriate screw trajectory and insertion depth were confirmed using X-ray imaging prior to pullout testing in both groups. For a given screw geometry (cylindrical or conical), the pullout force of the modified group was significantly higher than that of the traditional group. There was no significant difference in the pullout force between the screw geometries for a given filling technique. The cement augmentation technique is far more influential than the screw outer geometry. The modified PMMA technique created a greater anchor force than the traditional method and could be an alternative for revision of pedicle screw loosening.

The effect of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation under various load cases : results from a combined experimental, micro-CT, and micro-finite element analysis

Aims

Anchorage of pedicle screw rod instrumentation in the elderly spine with poor bone quality remains challenging. Our study aims to evaluate how the screw bone anchorage is affected by screw design, bone quality, loading conditions, and cementing techniques.

Methods

Micro-finite element (µFE) models were created from micro-CT (μCT) scans of vertebrae implanted with two types of pedicle screws (L: Ennovate and R: S⁴). Simulations were conducted for a 10 mm radius region of interest (ROI) around each screw and for a full vertebra (FV) where different cementing scenarios were simulated around the screw tips. Stiffness was calculated in pull-out and anterior bending loads.

Results

Experimental pull-out strengths were excellently correlated to the µFE pull-out stiffness of the ROI (R² > 0.87) and FV (R² > 0.84) models. No significant difference due to screw design was observed. Cement augmentation increased pull-out stiffness by up to 94% and 48% for L and R screws, respectively, but only increased bending stiffness by up to 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Cementing involving only one screw tip resulted in lower stiffness increases in all tested screw designs and loading cases. The stiffening effect of cement augmentation on pull-out and bending stiffness was strongly and negatively correlated to local bone density around the screw (correlation coefficient (R) = -0.95).

Conclusion

This combined experimental, µCT and µFE study showed that regional analyses may be sufficient to predict fixation strength in pull-out and that full analyses could show that cement augmentation around pedicle screws increased fixation stiffness in both pull-out and bending, especially for low-density bone.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):797–806.

Inter-Rater Reliability of Hounsfield Units as a Measure of Bone Density: Applications in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to investigate the reliability of computed tomography (CT)-derived Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements and ascertain the correlation between HU with quantitative CT (qCT)-derived bone mineral density (BMD) in cases of traumatic thoracolumbar fracture, based on native CT scans.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data sets from patients who received native CT scans and bone mineral density measurements (qCT) of the same vertebral body. Two different CT scanner models were used. The inter-rater reliability of 4 raters, which measured HU in native CT scans, was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement (ICC_(3,1)). For the correlation between HU and qCT values, respectively the prediction of qCT based on HU, linear regression was used. Bland-Altman plots were used for visual comparison of predicted and measured qCT values.

RESULTS

In total 305 data sets were analyzed. CT scanner model was found to have no significant impact on HU (P = 0.125). The inter-rater reliability for HU measurements from native CT scans was ICC_(3,1)=0.932 (95% confidence interval 0.919-0.943, P < 0.001). The linear regression showed significant correlation of HU and qCT values for each rater (P < 0.001). The equation for qCT prediction with averaged coefficient and constant is qCT = 0.8 HU + 5. In the Bland-Altman plots no bias of predicted qCT values could be found, but a trend to overestimate predicted higher qCT values and underestimate lower qCT values, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HU measurement shows very high inter-rater reliability. The HU values correlate closely with qCT BMD values. In summary, it seems that HU measurement is a suitable tool to readily and accurately assess bone quality without further scans or effort in cases of thoracolumbar spinal trauma.

Outcomes of the use of cement-augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are few studies of the radio-clinical outcomes of cement-augmented cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) fixation in osteoporotic patients.

PURPOSE

To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes between groups receiving cement-augmented CPS and solid pedicle screws (SPS) in lumbar fusion surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative study PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 187 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis from 2014 to 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiological evaluation included screw failure, cage failure, rod breakage, and fusion grade at postoperative 6 months and 1 year. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scales for back pain (VAS-BP), leg pain (VAS-LP), Korean Oswestry disability index (K-ODI), and postoperative complications were also compared.

METHODS

Outcomes of patients with high risk factors for implant failure [old age, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease or chronic kidney disease (CKD)] who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cement-augmented CPS fixation (Group C, n=55) or SPS fixation (Group S, n=132) were compared.

RESULTS

324 pedicle screws in Group C and 775 pedicle screws in Group S were analyzed. Group C had a significantly higher average age and lower T-score, and included more patients with autoimmune disease and CKD than group S (all p<.05). Clear zones, screw migration and loss of correction were significantly less frequent in Group C (all p<.05). Thirteen screw breakages were observed; they were only in Group C (4.0%) and all were in the proximal of the two holes. Interbody and posterolateral fusion rates were not significantly different. At last follow-up, all clinical parameters including VAS-BP, VAS-LP, and K-ODI scores had improved significantly in both groups. Postoperative complications were not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In lumbar fusion surgery, using cement-augmented CPS in high-risk groups for implant failure could be a useful technical option for reducing acute radiological complications and obtaining clinical results comparable to those obtained using SPS in patients with low risk of implant failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Pull-out strength evaluation of cement augmented iliac screws in osteoporotic spino-pelvic fixation

INTRODUCTION

Spino-pelvic fixation has been widely accepted for surgical treatment of sacral tumor, scoliosis surgery and pelvic fractures. Cement augmentation of screws is an option to improve implant stability in osteoporotic bone quality. Aim of the present study is to compare iliac screw fixation without cement fixation and two cement application options in a biomechanical testing.

HYPOTHESIS

Cement augmentation of iliac screws leads to superior pull-out strength.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty female and osteoporotic human iliac bones were used. Three operation treatment groups were generated: Screw fixation (cannulated screws) without cement augmentation [Operation treatment (OT) A], screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement (cannulated screws) (OT B) and screw fixation with perforated screws and cement augmentation after screw placement (OTC). Pull-out tests were performed with a rate of 6mm/min. A load versus displacement curve was generated. Maximum pull-out force (N) was measured in the load-displacement curve.

RESULTS

Paired group 1 (OT A vs. OT B): Screw fixation without cement augmentation: 592.6N±335.07 and screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 996N±287.43 (p=0.0042). Paired group 2 (OT A vs. OT C): screw fixation without cement augmentation: 716.2N±385.86 and fenestrated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1324.88N±398.76 (p=0.0489). Paired group 3 (OT B vs. OT C): Screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 1077.2±486.66 and fenestrated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1298.2N±726.19 (p=0.3286).

DISCUSSION

Regarding iliac screw fixation for spino-pelvic ostesynthesis in osteoporotic bone, cement augmentation is significantly superior to solid iliac screw fixation respecting pull-out-strength. Nevertheless, further biomechanical studies are needed to verify these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable; biomechanical cadaver study.

A meta-analysis of complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws in osteoporosis of spine

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to provide updated and comprehensive evidence on the complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) in osteoporosis patients undergoing spinal instrumentation.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, Ovoid, and Google Scholar were screened from January 2000-February 2020 for studies reporting complications of CAPS in osteoporosis patients. Pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. The pooled risk of screw loosening, screw breakage and screw migration was 2.0% (0.2%-4.9%), 0.6% (0%-2.0%) and 0.2% (0%-1.2%) respectively. On pooling of data from 1277 patients, we found the risk of all cement leakage to be 21.8% (6%-43.1%). However, data from 1654 patients indicated the risk of symptomatic cement leakage was 1.2% (0.6%-1.9%). The incidence of pulmonary embolism was 3.0% (0.5%-6.8%) while the risk of symptomatic pulmonary embolism was 0.8% (0.2%-1.5%). Pooled risk of neurovascular complications was 1.6% (0.3%-3.6%), adjacent compression fracture was 3.3% (1.2%-6.2%) and infectious complications was 3.1% (1.1%-5.7%). There were high heterogeneity and variability in the study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of screw-related complications like loosening, breakage, and migration with the use of CAPS in spinal instrumentation of osteoporotic patients is low. The risk of cement leakage is high and variable but the incidence of symptomatic cement leakage and related neurovascular or pulmonary complications is low. Further studies using homogenous methods of reporting are needed to strengthen current evidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The Influence of Different Injection Hole Designs of Augmented Pedicle Screws on Bone Cement Leakage and Distribution Patterns in Osteoporotic Patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare cement distribution and leakage for 2 bone cement-augmented screws with different designs of injection holes in patients and the impact of screw locations and bone mineral density (BMD) on the results.

METHODS

This study recruited 40 patients who underwent instrumentation with cement-augmented screws. Screw holes of group A were 4 holes located in the distal one third of screws, while screw holes of group B were 6 holes located in distal, middle, and proximal sites. Postoperative computed tomography images were obtained to evaluate the rate and type of cement leakage and the distribution pattern of cement. The lateral or center position of screw tip, BMD, and T-score were also analyzed for their influence on the results.

RESULTS

Of 192 screws, 80 (41.7%) exhibited cement leakage on postoperative computed tomography. The incidence of cement distribution in the posterior half and type B leakage in group B was significantly higher compared with group A. In group A, the probability of cement distribution in the posterior half was significantly increased when the screw was laterally inserted. For both groups, the higher incidence of cement distribution in the posterior half was correlated with lower BMD and T-score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that screws with injection holes closer to the screw tip had higher incidences of distribution in the anterior half of the body and lower incidences of type B leakage. Patients with lower BMD and T-scores should be closely monitored, and a more centered position is recommended for screw insertion.

Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions

Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.

Cement-Augmented Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Spinal Metastases: Safety and Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the complication rates and long-term implant failure rates in a monocentric study of a consecutive cohort of patients with thoracolumbar spinal metastases after posterior instrumentation with a fenestrated carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CFRP) pedicle screw system.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed demographics, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale scores, complications, and implant failure rates.

RESULTS

Between June 2016 and November 2019, 51 consecutive patients underwent cement-augmented CFRP pedicle screw instrumentation at our institution. Mean age was 68 years (standard deviation 10.5), the median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status Scale of 80 increased to 90 postoperatively (P = 0.471). Most common primary entities were breast (25.5%), lung (15.7%), and prostate (13.7%) cancers. Of 428 placed screws, 293 (68.5%) were augmented with polymethylmethacrylate, a mean 6 per patient (standard deviation ±2). Screws were inserted via a minimally invasive system technique in 54.9% of cases. In total, 11.8% of patients had immediate postoperative sequelae related to the cement. Pulmonary cement embolisms were noted in 3 patients, 2 had paravertebral extravasation, and 1 had an embolism into a segmental artery. Of these 6, 2 patients with pulmonary embolisms reported related symptoms. Follow-up was available for 80.4%. After a mean 9.8 months, screw loosening was noted in 11.8% of cases on computed tomography, although it was asymptomatic in all but 1 patient. Screw pull-out did not occur. Neither cement-related (P = 0.353) nor general complication rates (P = 0.507) differed significantly between open and minimally invasive system techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous cement-augmented CFRP pedicle screw instrumentation facilitates artifact-reduced postoperative imaging, while maintaining a risk profile and implant failure rates comparable to conventional metallic instrumentation.

Alternatives to Traditional Pedicle Screws for Posterior Fixation of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Traditional pedicle screws are currently the gold standard to achieve stable 3-column fixation of the degenerative lumbar spine. However, there are cases in which pedicle screw fixation may not be ideal. Due to their starting point lateral to the pars interarticularis, pedicle screws require a relatively wide dissection along with a medialized trajectory directed toward the centrally located neural elements and prevertebral vasculature. In addition, low bone mineral density remains a major risk factor for pedicle screw loosening, pullout, and pseudarthrosis. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with posterior fixation techniques of the degenerative lumbar spine beyond the traditional pedicle screws.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were performed for 5 methods of posterior spinal fixation, including (1) cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws, (2) transfacet screws, (3) translaminar screws, (4) spinous process plates, and (5) fusion mass screws and hooks. Articles that had been published between January 1, 1990, and January 1, 2020, were considered. Non-English-language articles and studies involving fixation of the cervical or thoracic spine were excluded from our review.

RESULTS

After reviewing over 1,700 articles pertaining to CBT and non-pedicular fixation techniques, a total of 284 articles met our inclusion criteria. CBT and transfacet screws require less-extensive exposure and paraspinal muscle dissection compared with traditional pedicle screws and may therefore reduce blood loss, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay. In addition, several methods of non-pedicular fixation such as translaminar and fusion mass screws have trajectories that are directed away from or posterior to the spinal canal, potentially decreasing the risk of neurologic injury. CBT, transfacet, and fusion mass screws can also be used as salvage techniques when traditional pedicle screw constructs fail.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT and non-pedicular fixation may be preferred in certain lumbar degenerative cases, particularly among patients with osteoporosis. Limitations of non-pedicular techniques include their reliance on intact posterior elements and the lack of 3-column fixation of the spine. As a result, transfacet and translaminar screws are infrequently used as the primary method of fixation. CBT, transfacet, and translaminar screws are effective in augmenting interbody fixation and have been shown to significantly improve fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Sacroplasty Augmentation of Instrumented Pelvic Reconstruction After High Sacrectomy: A Technical Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

En bloc resection of sacral tumors is the most effective treatment to help prevent recurrence. Sacrectomy, however, can be destabilizing, depending on the extent of resection. Various surgical techniques for improving stability and enabling early ambulation have been proposed.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Here, we report a case in which we use PMMA (poly[methyl methacrylate]) to augment pelvic instrumentation to improve mechanical stability after sacrectomy for en bloc resection of a solitary fibrous tumor.

CONCLUSION

We highlight the use of sacroplasty augmentation of pelvic ring reconstruction to provide biomechanical stability without the need for fusion of any mobile spine segments, which allowed for early patient ambulation and no appreciable loss of range of motion or mobility.

Clinical Observations of Kümmell Disease Treatment Through Percutaneous Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with vertebroplasty for the treatment of stage III Kümmell disease.

METHODS

The clinical data and follow-up results of 22 patients with Kümmell disease who were admitted to our department from 2014 to 2018 were analyzed. There were 14 females and eight males, and the Age range was 58-81 years. All patients were followed up for 24 months. The treatment method was percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with vertebroplasty. The patient general information such as age, gender, bedrest time and location of fracture vertebrae were recorded. The clinical symptoms and imaging data of visual analogue scale (VAS), bone cement leakage, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb angle, anterior, middle and posterior height of the diseased vertebral body, and complications were recorded before operation and during follow-up.

RESULTS

For patients enrolled, no bone cement leakage was observed during the operation; no patients developed infections after operation. The operation was safe and resulted in a short bedrest time. The VAS score and ODI index at 3 and 24 months postoperative (2.86 ± 0.83, 31.68% ± 6.21%; 3.0 ± 0.82, 32.78% ± 6.05%) were significantly lower than that recoded preoperatively (7.59 ± 0.59, 71.5% ± 8.84%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was no significant difference between the records at 3 and 24 months after operation (P > 0.05). Imaging data showed that the bone cement and screws were in good position and did not move during postoperative and follow-up. The anterior, middle and posterior height of the diseased vertebral body measured 2 days after surgery (23.46 ± 4.72, 23.12 ± 3.05, 25.81 ± 2.22) and at last follow-up (20.83 ± 4.48, 21.78 ± 2.74, 24.74 ± 1.93) were higher than that recorded preoperatively (13.08 ± 4.49, 12.93 ± 3.53, 19.32 ± 2.73) (P < 0.05), and the Cobb angle measured 2 days and 24 months after operation (9.57 ± 4.63, 10.68 ± 3.97) were lower than that recorded preoperatively (28.24 ± 8.95) (P < 0.05), and no significant difference was found between the values recorded at 2 days and 24 months after operation (P > 0.05). Follow-up for 24 months, there was no re-fracture of the diseased vertebrae and internal fixation loosening, but two cases of adjacent vertebral refracture complications occurred, and the effect was good after PVP treatment.

CONCLUSION

Short-segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with vertebroplasty in the treatment of stage III Kümmel disease can effectively restore the height of the diseased vertebrae, kyphosis correction, reduce trauma, prevent the diseased vertebral body from collapsing again, and effectively improves clinical symptoms.