Rare true-positive outcome of spinal cord monitoring in patients under age 4 years

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Patients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver.

CONCLUSION

Concerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Auxiliary Significance of DNEP for MEP-positive Event During Severe Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the intraoperative neuromonitoring auxiliary significance of descending neurogenic-evoked potential (DNEP) for motor-evoked potential (MEP) during severe spinal deformity surgery when MEP-positive event occurs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MEP detection is the most widely applied neurological monitoring technique in spinal deformity surgery. MEP is quite vulnerable to anesthesia, blood pressure, and other intraoperative factors, leading to a high false-positive rate of MEP (3.2%-45.0%), which has greatly interfered with the surgical process. At present, the widely used "presence-or-absence" alarm criteria of MEP is not enough to solve the problem of false positive of MEP.

METHODS

A total of 205 cases undergoing severe spinal deformity correction were retrospectively studied. Overall, 74 MEP-positive cases were classified as 2 subgroups: DNEP (+) and DNEP (-) groups. The MEP recovery, wake-up test, and Frankle grade were used to assess the neurological functions. The perioperative and long-term neurological outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in preoperative scoliosis angle and kyphosis angle between DNEP (-) and DNEP (+) groups. Patients in DNEP (-) group showed more MEP improvement (81.5%), compared with the DNEP (+) group (53.2%). The Wake-up test showed 59.3% motor function deficit cases in DNEP (-) group, which was lower than the 87.2% in DNEP (+) group. More patients in DNEP (-) group had normal nerve function (Frankel level E) than those in DNEP (+) group immediately after surgery, as well as at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

MEP-positive cases with intraoperative DNEP (-) showed superior prognosis after severe spinal deformity surgery. Intraoperative DNEP could be regarded as an important quantitative tool to assist MEP to monitor neurological injury and can serve as a temporary substitution monitoring technique after MEP is lost.

The Prognostic Value of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring by Combining Somatosensory- and Motor-Evoked Potentials for Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery in Patients with Neurological Deficit

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To explore a relation between somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential (SEPs, MEPs) and corresponding thoracic cord function for thoracic spinal decompression surgery (TSDS) in patients with neurological deficit.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although SEPs and MEPs monitoring has been developed as an essential technique in spinal surgery. There are limited data on the reliability of using SEPs and MEPs for TSDS and its prognosis.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients underwent TSDS in our hospital, 91 patients completed the trial. All the patients were divided into three subgroups according to the changes of MEPs and SEPs: neither SEPs nor MEP deteriorated -. Simply MEP deteriorated and both SEPs and MEP deteriorated -. Bispectral (BIS) was used to monitor the depth of sedation, which ranged from 40 to 60 by varying the infusion speed of anesthetics. The pre- and postoperative spinal function was assessed by muscle strength and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at three time points:1) before surgery; 2) immediately after general anesthesia recovery; 3) after 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine cases showed neither SEPs nor MEP deteriorated -, 10 cases showed only MEP deteriorated, and 12 cases showed both SEPs and MEP deteriorated -. The patients in the group where neither SEPs nor MEP deteriorated had the best recovery of the extremity muscle strength, the shortest recovery time (8.10 ± 1.60, P < 0.05), and toe movement time (8.50 ± 1.60, P < 0.05). There is a strong correlation between SEPs variability ratio at T4 time point and JOA recovery ratio (JOA RR) in the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Combined SEPs and MEPs monitoring are important for TSDS in patients with neurological deficit and it is helpful for evaluating postoperative prognosis. It is more accurate to record SEPs at T4 time point to predict the patients' prognosis.Level of Evidence: 3.

Survivals of the Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potentials Response in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery: What Are the Neurologic Outcomes of Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cases study from a prospective patient register.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the clinical implication regard to the survivals of motor-evoked potential (MEP) response.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has become an essential component for decreasing the incidence of neurological deficits during spine surgeries. Significant motor-evoked potential (MEP) loss but does not vanish completely is common especially in some high-risk and complicated pediatric spine deformity surgeries.

METHODS

A total of 1820 young patients (mean age = 12.2 years) underwent spinal deformity correction were mainly analyzed. Intraoperative monitoring (somatosensory-evoked potential, MEP, free-run electromyography, free-run electromyography) and postoperative neurologic outcomes were mainly analyzed in this study. All patients with monitoring alerts were divided into two groups: group 1, intraoperative MEP recovery group; and group 2, no obvious MEP recovery group. Moreover, the patients would be followed up strictly if he/she showed IOM alerting. The surviving MEP response was identified as significant monitoring alerts (80%-95% MEP Amp. loss) associated with high-risk surgical maneuvers.

RESULTS

The results showed that there were 32 pediatric patients (group 1, 21 cases and group 2, 11 cases) presenting significant MEP monitoring alerts (80%-95% loss) relative to baseline. The patients in group 1 presented the partial/entire signal recovery from MEP alerts and they did not show spinal cord deficits postoperation. The patients in group 2 without obvious intraoperative MEP recovery showed different levels of new spinal deficits, no patient showed postoperative complete paraplegia or permanent spinal cord/nerve root deficits.

CONCLUSION

When the intraoperative MEP changes significant and persistent but without totally disappeared, the rate of postoperative neural complication is relatively low. The chance of recovery of these neurological deficits is very high. Therefore, this phenomenon may be used to predictive of nonpermanent paraplegia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Predictors for blood loss in pediatric patients younger than 10 years old undergoing primary posterior hemivertebra resection: a retrospective study

Background

Blood loss during hemivertebra resection may be substantial. Few studies have examined the risk factors of blood loss undergoing hemivertebra resection, especially those in patients under 10 years old.

Methods

Patients under 10 years old diagnosed with congenital scoliosis and hemivertebra were retrospectively included from January 2014 to October 2017. They all had primary posterior hemivertebra resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Perioperative information was collected and multivariable linear logistic regression was performed to determine the independent risk factors of blood loss.

Results

One hundred three patients were included. The mean total blood loss was 346 + 178 ml. The percentage of total blood loss to the EBV was 27.0 + 13.3%. Multivariable linear logistic regression indicated that preoperative total Cobb angle (P = 0.046) and the number of fused levels (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of total blood loss. Preoperative platelet count and preoperative coagulation function were not associated with blood loss in patients undergoing hemivertebra resection.

Conclusions

Preoperative total Cobb angle and the number of fused levels determined the blood loss for patients undergoing hemivertebra resection.

High-Risk Surgical Maneuvers for Impending True-Positive Intraoperative Neurologic Monitoring Alerts: Experience in 3139 Consecutive Spine Surgeries

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neurologic monitoring (IONM) has become an essential component for decreasing the incidence of spinal cord injury during spine surgeries. Many high-risk surgical maneuvers that result in significant IONM alerts have not been reported systematically. Our objective was to thoroughly summarize some common high-risk surgical points associated with IONM alerts in various spine surgeries.

METHODS

Between November 2010 and April 2017, 62 patients with true-positive IONM alerts from 3139 spine surgeries were enrolled. Transcranial motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-run electromyography were used for IONM. All 62 patients were identified as true-positive IONM cases.

RESULTS

Of 3139 patients, 101 demonstrated significant IONM changes-62 true-positive cases, 14 false-positive cases, and 25 indeterminate IONM results. IONM alerts most often occurred in thoracic screw placement (n = 10, 16.1%), osteotomy (n = 22, 35.5%), correction (n = 19, 30.6%), and spinal cord decompression (n = 11, 17.8%). Appropriate timely measures are indicated in response to IONM alerts during high-risk surgical maneuvers. Ten (10/62, 16.1%) patients showed permanent postoperative neurologic deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

IONM alerts are often associated with some specific high-risk surgical maneuvers. Careful and timely observation is crucial.