Commentary on development and assessment of a digital X-ray software tool to determine vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Finite element analysis of the indirect reduction of posterior pedicle screw fixation for a thoracolumbar burst fracture

Because burst fractures often involve damage to the column and posterior structures of the spine, the fracture block may invade the spinal canal and compress the spinal cord or the cauda equina, causing corresponding neurological dysfunction. When a thoracolumbar burst fracture is accompanied by the presence of bone in the spinal canal, whether posterior surgery requires spinal canal incision decompression is still controversial. Computed tomography images of the thoracolumbar spine of a 31-year-old male with an L1 burst fracture and Mimics 10.0 were used to establish a three-dimensional fracture model for simulating the indirect reduction process. The model was imported into Ansys 10.0 (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA), and a 1 to 10 mm displacement was loaded 10° behind the Z-axis on the upper endplate of the L1 vertebral body to simulate position reduction and open reduction. The displacement and stress changes in the intervertebral disc, fractured vertebral body and posterior longitudinal ligament were observed during reduction. Under a displacement loaded 10° behind the Z-axis, the maximum stress in the vertebral body was concentrated on the upper disc of the injured vertebrae. The maximum displacement was in the anterior edge of the vertebral body of the injured vertebrae, and the vertebral body height and the anterior lobes were essentially restored. When the displacement load was applied in the positive Z-axis direction, the maximum displacement was in the posterior longitudinal ligament behind the injured vertebrae. Under a 6 mm load, the posterior longitudinal ligament displacement was 11.3 mm. Under an 8 mm load, this displacement significantly increased to 15.0 mm, and the vertebral stress was not concentrated on the intervertebral disc. A reduction in the thoracolumbar burst fractures by positioning and distraction allowed the injured vertebrae to be restored to normal height and kyphosis. The reduction in the posterior longitudinal ligament can push the bone block in the spinal canal into the reset space and achieve a good reset.

Radiographic Axial Malalignment is Associated With Pretreatment Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Measures in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Implementation of a Novel Radiographic Software Tool

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between apical vertebral axial rotation and pretreatment patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), disability, and pain in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) using a novel radiographic software tool.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent studies have demonstrated that in ADS, sagittal and coronal plane deformity are weakly to moderately associated with HRQOL, disability, and pain. However, as ADS is a three-dimensional spinal deformity, the impact of axial malalignment on HRQOL is yet to be determined.

METHODS

A total of 74 ADS patients were enrolled. HRQOL measures included the Short Form-36v2 (SF-36v2) and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r). Disability and pain measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and numeric rating scale back and leg pain. Radiographic measures included Cobb angle (CA), sagittal spinopelvic parameters, lateral and anteroposterior (AP) translation of the apical vertebra. The amount of apical vertebral axial rotation was measured on digital AP radiograph images using a novel software technology. Subjects were stratified into four clinical groups based on the degree of apical vertebral axial rotation.

RESULTS

Apical vertebral axial rotation showed no association with lateral (r = 0.21; p = .15) and AP (r = 0.08, p = .80) translation of the apical vertebra. A significant moderate association was found between apical vertebral axial rotation and Cobb angle (r = 0.57; p < .05). Patients in the group with the highest degree of apical vertebral axial rotation reported significantly worse ODI and SRS-22r Subtotal and Pain scores (p < .05), irrespective of sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that reports on the association between apical vertebral axial rotation and pretreatment HRQOL, disability, and pain in ADS. This study suggests that increased apical vertebral axial rotation is associated with suboptimal pretreatment health status scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Considerations in sagittal evaluation of the scoliotic spine

PURPOSE

To predict the sagittal spinal parameters as measured in a 3D model of the spine using the 2D radiographic measurements.

METHODS

Bi-planar low-dose stereoradiography images of 73 right thoracic AIS patients were processed to generate 3D models of the spine and pelvis. T1-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, and pelvic rotation were calculated using these 3D models. With the same X-rays, T1-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, thoracic and lumbar frontal curves, and pelvic rotation (calculated from the frontal and sagittal distances between the femoral heads) were manually measured on the X-rays by two independent observers. 3D sagittal parameters were predicted from only 2D sagittal parameters (simple regression) and from 2D sagittal parameters, 2D frontal parameters, and pelvic rotation (multiple regression). The simple and multiple regression models were compared for efficiency and accuracy of prediction.

RESULTS

Comparing single and multiple regression models, multiple regression improved the prediction of the 3D sagittal parameters for kyphosis (R² = 0.78-0.86) and lordosis (R² = 0.88-0.92) measurements when compared to simple regression. The impact of pelvic rotation was significant when 2D kyphosis was higher than 40° and thoracic curve was less than 60° or 2D kyphosis was less than 40° and thoracic curve was higher than 60°, p < 0.05. Lordosis of 60° and higher were more prone to measurement error when pelvic rotation was present, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Both pelvic rotation and frontal deformity affect the accuracy of the 2D sagittal measurements of the scoliotic spine. We suggest the importance of the 3D considerations in sagittal evaluation of AIS.