Utility of motor evoked potentials to diagnose and reduce lower extremity motor nerve root injuries during 4,386 extradural posterior lumbosacral spine procedures

The diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring for detecting postoperative bowel and bladder dysfunction in spinal oncology surgery: a case series

PURPOSE

Postoperative bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) poses a significant risk following surgery of the sacral spinal segments and sacral nerve roots, particularly in neuro-oncology cases. The need for more reliable neuromonitoring techniques to enhance the safety of spine surgery is evident.

METHODS

We conducted a case series comprising 60 procedures involving 56 patients, spanning from September 2022 to January 2024. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of sacral reflexes (bulbocavernosus and external urethral sphincter reflexes) and compared them with transcranial motor evoked potentials (TCMEP) incorporating anal sphincter (AS) and external urethral sphincter (EUS) recordings, as well as spontaneous electromyography (s-EMG) with AS and EUS recordings.

RESULTS

Sacral reflexes demonstrated a specificity of 100% in predicting postoperative BBD, with a sensitivity of 73.33%. While sensitivity slightly decreased to 64.71% at the 1-month follow-up, it remained consistently high overall. TCMEP with AS/EUS recordings did not identify any instances of postoperative BBD, whereas s-EMG with AS/EUS recordings showed a sensitivity of 14.29% and a specificity of 97.14%.

CONCLUSION

Sacral reflex monitoring emerges as a robust adjunct to routine neuromonitoring, offering surgeons valuable predictive insights to potentially mitigate the occurrence of postoperative BBD.

Application of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) for Preventing Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical value of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) for dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery with and without IONM.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted on 46 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Twenty-three patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery did not undergo IONM (non-IONM group), while the other 23 patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery did ("IONM group"). The swallowing function of patients was evaluated using the EAT-10 and endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the incidence of swallowing difficulties between the intervention group and the control group on the third day or sixth week after surgery. At the 12th week after surgery, the incidence of swallowing difficulties in the intervention group and the control group was significantly different (43.5% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

IONM is a promising tool for identifying and protecting the spinal cord and nerves during anterior cervical surgery. Our research revealed that IONM significantly reduced the occurrence of swallowing disorders 12 weeks after surgery, but the effect was not significant at the third or sixth week after surgery.

Repeated L5 Nerve Root Compromise Detected with Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP), but Not Electromyography (EMG): A Case Report

We report a case where neuromonitoring, using motor evoked potentials (MEP), detected an intraoperative L5 nerve root deficit during a lumbosacral decompression and instrumented fusion procedure. Critically, the MEP changes were not preceded nor accompanied by any significant spontaneous electromyography (sEMG) activity. Presumptive L5 innervated muscles, including tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and gluteus maximus, were targets for nerve root surveillance using combined MEP and sEMG techniques. During a high-grade spondylolisthesis correction procedure, attempts to align a left-sided rod resulted in repeated loss and recovery cycles of MEP from the TA and EHL. No accompanying EMG alerts were associated with any of the MEP changes nor were MEP variations seen from muscles innervated above and below L5. After several attempts, the rod alignment was achieved, but significant MEP signal decrement (72% decrease) remained from the EHL. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant foot drop on the left side that recovered over a period of 3 months. This case contributes to a growing body of evidence that exclusive reliance on sEMG for spinal nerve root scrutiny can be unreliable and MEP may provide more dependable data on nerve root patency.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication.

METHODS

The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.

Identifying Suspected Volume Conduction Contamination of External Anal Sphincter Motor Evoked Potentials in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery

PURPOSE

Iatrogenic injury to sacral nerve roots poses significant quality of life issues for patients. Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring can be used for intraoperative surveillance of these important structures. We hypothesized that volume conducted depolarizations from gluteus maximus (GM) may contaminate external anal sphincter (EAS) MEP results during lumbosacral spine surgery.

METHODS

Motor evoked potential from the EAS and medial GM in 40 patients were prospectively assessed for inter-muscle volume conduction during lumbosacral spine surgeries. Peak latency matching between the EAS and GM MEP recordings conditionally identified volume conduction (VC+) or no volume conduction (VC-). Linear regression and power spectral density analysis of EAS and medial GM MEP amplitudes were performed from VC+ and VC- data pairs to confirm intermuscle electrical cross-talk.

RESULTS

Motor evoked potential peak latency matching identified putative VC+ in 9 of 40 patients (22.5%). Mean regression coefficients (r2) from peak-to-peak EAS and medial GM MEP amplitude plots were 0.83 ± 0.04 for VC+ and 0.34 ± 0.06 for VC- MEP (P < 0.001). Power spectral density analysis identified the major frequency component in the MEP responses. The mean frequency difference between VC+ EAS and medial GM MEP responses were 0.4 ± 0.2 Hz compared with 3.5 ± 0.6 Hz for VC- MEP (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support using peak latency matching between EAS and GM MEP to identify spurious MEP results because of intermuscle volume conduction. Neuromonitorists should be aware of this possible cross-muscle conflict to avoid interpretation errors during lumbosacral procedures using EAS MEP.

Utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in detecting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgical correction of spinal deformity has been shown to reduce iatrogenic injury in pediatric and adult populations. Although motor-evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG) have been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in detecting spinal cord and nerve root injuries, their utility in detecting motor and sensory nerve root injury in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains unknown.

PURPOSE

We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of unimodal and multimodal IONM in the surgical management of HGS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for treatment of HGS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data on patient demographics, spinopelvic and spondylolisthesis parameters, and the presence of pre-and postoperative neurological deficits were collected.

METHODS

Intraoperative MEP, SSEP, and EMG alerts were recorded. Alert criteria were defined as a change in amplitude of more than 50% for MEP and/or SSEP, with or without change in latency, and more than 10 seconds of sustained EMG activity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each modality and the combination of MEP and SSEP. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

RESULTS

Fifty-four pediatric patients with HGS undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2021 in a single tertiary center were included. Seventy-two percent (39/54) of patients were female; the average age of patients was 13.7±2.3 years. The sensitivity of MEP in detecting new postoperative neurologic deficit was 92.3% (95% CI [64.0-99.8]), SSEP 77.8% (95% CI [40.0-97.2]), EMG 69.2% (95% CI [38.6-90.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 100% (95% CI [73.5-100]). The specificity of MEP was 80.0% (95% CI [64.4-91.0]), SSEP 95.1% (95% CI [83.5-99.4]), EMG 65.9% (95% CI [49.4-79.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 82.9% (95% CI [67.9-92.9]). The accuracy of SSEP was 92.0% (95% CI [80.8%-97.8%]), and the combination of MEP and SSEP was 86.8% (95% CI [74.7%-94.5%]). Twelve (22.2%) patients had a new motor or sensory deficit diagnosed immediately postoperatively. Nine patients made a full recovery, and 3 had some neurologic deficit on final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Unimodal IONM using SSEP and MEP alone were accurate in diagnosing sensory and motor nerve root injuries, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in predicting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric HGS improved further with the use of multimodal IONM (combining MEP and SEP). We recommend the utilization of multimodal IONM in all HGS PSF surgeries.

Utility of transcranial motor-evoked potential changes in predicting postoperative deficit in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether TcMEP alarms can predict the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficit in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. The secondary aim was to determine whether the various types of TcMEP alarms including transient and persistent changes portend varying degrees of injury risk.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase regarding outcomes of transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring during lumbar decompression and fusion surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of TcMEP alarms for predicting postoperative deficit were calculated and presented with forest plots and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included, consisting of 4923 patients. The incidence of postoperative neurological deficit was 0.73% (36/4923). The incidence of deficits in patients with significant TcMEP changes was 11.79% (27/229), while the incidence in those without changes was 0.19% (9/4694). All TcMEP alarms had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 63 and 95% with a DOR of 34.92 (95% CI 7.95-153.42). Transient and persistent changes had sensitivities of 29% and 47%, specificities of 96% and 98%, and DORs of 8.04 and 66.06, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TcMEP monitoring has high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting postoperative neurological deficit in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery. Patients who awoke with new postoperative deficits were 35 times more likely to have experienced TcMEP changes intraoperatively, with persistent changes indicating higher risk of deficit than transient changes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Diagnostic Systematic Review.

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Protocol for Decreasing Unacceptable Movements during Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping with Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring: A Historical Control Study and Meta-Analysis

Injury can occur during intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring caused by patient movement related to insufficient neuromuscular blocking agent use. Here, we evaluated the incidence of unacceptable movements in patients undergoing intraoperative MEP monitoring following our anesthetic protocol. We reviewed the anesthesia records of 419 patients who underwent unruptured cerebral aneurysm clipping with intraoperative MEP monitoring. The anesthetic protocol included target-controlled infusion with a fixed effect-site propofol concentration of 3 μg/mL and an adjustable effect-site remifentanil concentration of 10-12 ng/mL. We compared our findings of the intraoperative parameters and incidence of spontaneous movement and respiration with those of published meta-analysis studies. Spontaneous movement and respiration occurred in one (0.2%) patient each. The meta-analysis included six studies. The pooled proportions of spontaneous movement and respiration were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-16.5%) and 4.1% (95% CI, 0.5-14.1%), respectively. The proportion of spontaneous movement in our study was significantly lower than that in previous studies (p = 0.013), with no significant difference in spontaneous respiration (p = 0.097). Following our center's anesthesia protocol during cerebral aneurysm clipping resulted in a low incidence of spontaneous respiration and movement, indicating its safety for patients undergoing intraoperative MEP monitoring.

Intraoperative transabdominal MEPs: four case reports

Four recent cases utilizing transabdominal motor-evoked potentials (TaMEPs) are presented as illustrative of the monitoring technique during lumbosacral fusion, sciatic nerve tumor resection, cauda equina tumor resection, and lumbar decompression. Case 1: In a high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis revision fusion, both transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) and TaMEPs detected a transient focal loss of left tibialis anterior response in conjunction with L5 nerve root decompression. Case 2: In a sciatic nerve tumor resection, TcMEPs responses were lost but TaMEPs remained unchanged, the patient was neurologically intact postoperatively. Case 3: TaMEPs were acquired during an L1-L3 intradural extramedullary cauda equina tumor resection utilizing a unique TaMEP stimulation electrode. Case 4: TaMEPs were successfully acquired with little anesthetic fade utilizing an anesthetic regimen of 1.1 MAC Sevoflurane during a lumbar decompression. While the first two cases present TaMEPs and TcMEPs side-by-side, demonstrating TaMEPs correlating to TcMEPs (Case 1) or a more accurate reflection of patient outcome (Case 2), no inference regarding the accuracy of TaMEPs to monitor nerve elements during cauda equina surgery (Cases 3) or the lumbar decompression presented in Case 4 should be made as these are demonstrations of technique, not utility.

Confirming a C5 Palsy with a Motor Evoked Potential Trending Algorithm during Insertion of Cervical Facet Spacers: A Case Study

The use of cervical facet spacers has shown favorable clinical results in the treatment of cervical spondylotic disease; however, there are limited data regarding neurological complications associated with the procedure. This case report demonstrates the specificity of multi-myotomal motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in detecting acute postoperative C5 palsy following placement of facet spacers. A posterior cervical fusion with decompression and instrumentation involving DTRAX (Providence Medical Technology; Lafayette, CA) was used to treat a patient with cervical stenosis and myelopathy. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) consisting of MEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and free-run electromyography (EMG), was used throughout the procedure. Immediately following the placement of the DTRAX spacers at C4-5, a decrease in amplitudes from the right deltoid and biceps MEP recordings (>65%) was detected. All other IONM modalities remained stable; it is noteworthy that there was an absence of mechanically elicited EMG. A novel post-alert regression analysis trending algorithm of MEP amplitudes confirmed the visual alert. This warning along with an intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine subsequently resulted in the decision to remove one of the facet spacers. Surgical intervention did not result in recovery of the aforementioned MEP recordings, which remained attenuated at the time of wound closure. Postoperatively, the patient exhibited an immediate right C5 palsy (2/5). A post-surgery application of the trending algorithm demonstrated that it correlated to the visual alert until the end of monitoring.

Machine Learning Application of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential to Predict Positive Functional Outcomes of Patients

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been used to help monitor the integrity of the nervous system during spine surgery. Transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) has been used lately for lower lumbar surgery to prevent nerve root injuries and also to predict positive functional outcomes of patients. There were a number of studies that proved that the TcMEP signal's improvement is significant towards positive functional outcomes of patients. In this paper, we explored the possibilities of using a machine learning approach to TcMEP signal to predict positive functional outcomes of patients. With 55 patients who underwent various types of lumbar surgeries, the data were divided into 70 : 30 and 80 : 20 ratios for training and testing of the machine learning models. The highest sensitivity and specificity were achieved by Fine KNN of 80 : 20 ratio with 87.5% and 33.33%, respectively. In the meantime, we also tested the existing improvement criteria presented in the literature, and 50% of TcMEP improvement criteria achieved 83.33% sensitivity and 75% specificity. But the rigidness of this threshold method proved unreliable in this study when different datasets were used as the sensitivity and specificity dropped. The proposed method by using machine learning has more room to advance with a larger dataset and various signals' features to choose from.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring during surgery for lumbar stenosis

The indications for neuromonitoring during lumbar stenosis surgery are defined by the risks associated with patient positioning, the approach, decompression of neural elements, deformity correction, and instrument implantation. The routine use of EMG and SEP alone during lumbar stenosis surgery is no longer supported by the literature. Lateral approach neuromonitoring with EMG only is also suspect. Lumbar stenosis patients often present with multiple co-morbidities which put them at risk during routine pre-surgical positioning. Frequently encountered morbid obesity and/or diabetes mellitus may play a role in monitorable and preventable brachial plexopathy after "superman" positioning or femoral neuropathy from groin pressure after prone positioning, for example. Deformity correction in lumbar stenosis surgery often demands advanced implementation of multiple neuromonitoring modalities: EMG, SEP, and MEP. Because the bulbocavernosus reflex detects the function of the conus medullaris and sacral somato afferent/efferent fibers of the cauda equina, it may also be recorded. The recommendation to record pedicle screw thresholds has become more nuanced as surgeon dependence on 3D imaging, navigation, and robotics has increased. Neuromonitoring in lumbar stenosis surgery has been subject mainly to uncontrolled case series; prospective cohort trials are also needed.

Diagnostic Accuracy of SSEP Changes During Lumbar Spine Surgery for Predicting Postoperative Neurological Deficit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies identified in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase with outcomes of patients who received intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during lumbar spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative lower extremity SSEP changes for predicting postoperative neurological deficit. As a secondary analysis, we evaluated three subtypes of intraoperative SSEP changes: reversible, irreversible, and total signal loss.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lumbar decompression and fusion surgery can treat lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis but carry a risk for nerve root injury. Published neurophysiological monitoring guidelines provide no conclusive evidence for the clinical utility of intraoperative SSEP monitoring during lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify studies with outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries with intraoperative SSEP monitoring. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated and presented with forest plots and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 5607 patients. All significant intraoperative SSEP changes had a sensitivity of 44% and specificity of 97% with a DOR of 22.13 (95% CI, 11.30-43.34). Reversible and irreversible SSEP changes had sensitivities of 28% and 33% and specificities of 97% and 97%, respectively. The DORs for reversible and irreversible SSEP changes were 13.93 (95% CI, 4.60-40.44) and 57.84 (95% CI, 15.95-209.84), respectively. Total loss of SSEPs had a sensitivity of 9% and specificity of 99% with a DOR of 23.91 (95% CI, 7.18-79.65).

CONCLUSION

SSEP changes during lumbar spine surgery are highly specific but moderately sensitive for new postoperative neurological deficits. Patients who had postoperative neurological deficit were 22 times more likely to have exhibited intraoperative SSEP changes.Level of Evidence: 2.

Perioperative management of spinal cord injury: the anesthesiologist's point of view

BACKGROUND

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating events a person can experience. It may be life-threatening or result in long-term disability. This narrative review aims to delineate a systematic step-wise airways, breathing, circulation and disability (ABCD) approach to perioperative patient management during spinal cord surgery in order to fill some of the gaps in our current knowledge.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the perioperative management of traumatic spinal injuries from May 15, 2020, to December 13, 2020. We consulted the PubMed and Embase database libraries.

RESULTS

Videolaryngoscopy supplements the armamentarium available for airway management. Optical fiberscope use should be evaluated when intubating awake patients. Respiratory complications are frequent in the acute phase of traumatic spinal injury, with an estimated incidence of 36-83%. Early tracheostomy can be considered for expected difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. Careful intraoperative management of administered fluids should be pursued to avoid complications from volume overload. Neuromonitoring requires investments in staff training and cooperation, but better outcomes have been obtained in centers where it is routinely applied. The prone position can cause rare but devastating complications, such as ischemic optic neuropathy; thus, the anesthetist should take the utmost care in positioning the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

A one-size fit all approach to spinal surgery patients is not applicable due to patient heterogeneity and the complexity of the procedures involved. The neurologic outcome of spinal surgery can be improved, and the incidence of complications reduced with better knowledge of patient-specific aspects and individualized perioperative management.

Impact of inhalational anesthetic agents on the baseline monitorability of motor evoked potentials during spine surgery: a review of 22,755 cervical and lumbar procedures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

During spine surgery, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are often utilized to monitor both spinal cord function and spinal nerve root or plexus function. While there are reports evaluating the impact of anesthesia on the ability of MEPs to monitor spinal cord function, less is known about the impact of anesthesia on the ability of MEPs to monitor spinal nerve root and plexus function.

PURPOSE

To compare the baseline monitorability and amplitude of MEPs during cervical and lumbar procedures between two cohorts based on the maintenance anesthetic regimen: a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) versus a regimen balanced with volatile inhalational and intravenous agents.

STUDY DESIGN

Baseline MEP data from a total of 16,559 cervical and 6,196 lumbar extradural spine procedures utilizing multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) including MEPs between January 2017 and March 2020 were obtained from a multi-institutional database. Two cohorts for each region of spine surgery were delineated based on the anesthetic regimen: a TIVA cohort and a Balanced anesthesia cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Age 18 and older. Fellowship support for 65,000 for year 2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Percent monitorability and amplitudes of baseline MEPs.

METHODS

The baseline monitorability of each muscle MEP was evaluated by the IONM team in real-time and recorded in the patient's electronic medical record. The relation between anesthetic regimen and baseline monitorability was estimated using mixed effects logistic regression, with distinct models for cervical and lumbar procedures. Subsets of cervical and lumbar procedures from each anesthesia cohort in which all MEPs were deemed monitorable were randomly selected and the average peak-to-trough amplitude of each muscle MEP was retrospectively measured. Mixed-effects linear regression models were estimated (one each for cervical and lumbar procedures) to assess possible differences in average amplitude associated with anesthesia regimen.

RESULTS

At the time of surgery, baseline MEPs were reported monitorable from all targeted muscles in 86.8% and 83.0% of cervical and lumbar procedures, respectively, for the TIVA cohort, but were reported monitorable in just 59.3% and 61.0% of cervical and lumbar procedures, respectively, in the Balanced cohort, yielding disparities of 27.5% and 22.0%, respectively. The model-adjusted monitorability disparity between cohorts for a given muscle MEP ranged from 0.2% to 16.6% but was smallest for distal intrinsic hand and foot muscle MEPs (0.2%-1.1%) and was largest for proximal muscle MEPs (deltoid: 10.8%, biceps brachii: 8.8%, triceps: 13.0%, quadriceps: 16.6%, gastrocnemius: 7.8%, and tibialis anterior: 3.7%) where the monitorability was significantly decreased in the Balanced cohort relative to the TIVA cohort (p<.0001). Relative to the TIVA cohort, the model-adjusted amplitude of an MEP in the Balanced cohort was smaller for all muscles measured, ranging from 27.5% to 78.0% smaller. Relative to the TIVA cohort, the model-adjusted amplitude of an MEP was significantly decreased (p<.01) in the Balanced cohort for the most proximal muscles (Percent smaller: deltoid: 74.3%, biceps: 78.0%, triceps: 54.9%, quadriceps: 54.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA is the preferred anesthetic regimen for optimizing MEP monitoring during spine surgery. Inhalational agents significantly decrease MEP monitorability and amplitudes for most muscles, and this effect is especially pronounced for proximal limb muscles such as the deltoid, biceps, triceps, and quadriceps.

Utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring and outcomes of neurological complication in lower cervical and upper thoracic posterior-based three-column osteotomies for cervical deformity

OBJECTIVE

For severe and rigid adult cervical deformity, posterior-based three-column osteotomies (3COs) are warranted, but neurological complications are relatively high with such procedures. The performance measures of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during cervicothoracic 3CO have yet to be studied, and there remains a paucity of literature regarding the topic. Therefore, the authors of this study examined the performance of IONM in predicting new neurological weakness following lower cervical and upper thoracic 3CO. In addition, they report the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes of patients who experienced new postoperative weakness.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience from 2011 to 2018 with all patients who had undergone posterior-based 3CO in the lower cervical (C7) or upper thoracic (T1-4) spine. Medical and neuromonitoring records were independently reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were included in the analysis, 38 of whom had undergone pedicle subtraction osteotomy and 18 of whom had undergone vertebral column resection. The mean age was 61.6 years, and 41.1% of the patients were male. Among the study cohort, 66.1% were myelopathic and 33.9% had preoperative weakness. Mean blood loss was 1565.0 ml, and length of surgery was 315.9 minutes. Preoperative and postoperative measures assessed were cervical sagittal vertical axis (6.5 and 3.8 cm, respectively; p < 0.001), cervical lordosis (2.3° and -6.7°, p = 0.042), and T1 slope (48.6° and 35.8°, p < 0.001). The complication rate was 49.0%, and the new neurological deficit rate was 17.9%. When stratifying by osteotomy level, there were significantly higher rates of neurological deficits at C7 and T1: C7 (37.5%), T1 (44.4%), T2 (16.7%), T3 (14.3%), and T4 (0.0%; p = 0.042). Most new neurological weakness was the nerve root pattern rather than the spinal cord pattern. Overall, there were 16 IONM changes at any threshold: 14 at 50%, 8 at 75%, and 13 if only counting patients who did not return to baseline (RTB). Performance measures for the various thresholds were accuracy (73.2% to 77.8%), positive predictive value (25.0% to 46.2%), negative predictive value (81.3% to 88.1%), sensitivity (18.2% to 54.5%), and specificity (77.8% to 86.7%). Sensitivity to detect a spinal cord pattern of weakness was 100% and 28.6% for a nerve root pattern of weakness. In patients with a new postoperative deficit, 22.2% were unchanged, 44.4% improved, and 33.3% had a RTB at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates are high following posterior 3CO for cervical deformity. 3CO at C7 and T1 has the highest rates of neurological deficit. Current IONM modalities have modest performance in predicting postoperative deficits, especially for nerve root neuropraxia. A large prospective multicenter study is warranted.

Incidence of peripheral nerve injury in revision total shoulder arthroplasty: an intraoperative nerve monitoring study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of nerve injuries in revision total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is not well defined in the literature and may be higher than that in primary procedures, with 1 study reporting a complication rate of 50% for shoulder revisions. Given that continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) can be an effective tool in diagnosing evolving neurologic dysfunction and preventing postoperative injuries, the purpose of this study was to report on IONM data and nerve injury rates in a series of revision TSAs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review of consecutive patients who underwent revision TSA was performed from January 2016 to March 2020. Indications for revision included infection (n = 7); failed total arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty secondary to pain, dysfunction, and/or loose components (n = 36); and periprosthetic fracture (n = 1). Of the shoulders, 32 underwent revision to a reverse TSA, 6 underwent revision to an anatomic TSA, and 6 underwent spacer placement. IONM data included transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (MEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-run electromyography. The motor alert threshold was set at ≥80% signal attenuation in any peripheral nerve. Patients were screened for neurologic deficits immediately following surgery, prior to administration of an interscalene nerve block, and during the first 2 postoperative visits. Additional data collection included surgical indication, sex, laterality, age at surgery, procedure performed, body mass index, history of tobacco use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, medical history, and preoperative range of motion.

RESULTS

A total of 44 shoulders in 38 patients were included, with a mean age of 63.2 years (standard deviation, 13.0 years). Of the procedures, 22.4% (n = 10) had an MEP alert, with 8 isolated to a single nerve (7 axillary and 1 radial) and 1 isolated to the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves. Only 1 patient experienced a major brachial plexus alert involving axillary, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, and median nerve MEP alerts, as well as ulnar and median nerve somatosensory evoked potential alerts. Age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative range of motion were not found to be significantly different between cases in which an MEP alert occurred and cases with no MEP alerts. In the postoperative period, no minor or major nerve injuries were found whereas distal peripheral neuropathy developed in 4 patients (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

Among 44 surgical procedures, no patients (0%) had a major or minor nerve injury postoperatively and 4 patients (9.1%) complained of distal peripheral neuropathy postoperatively. In this study, we have shown that through the use of IONM, the rate of minor and major nerve injuries can be minimized in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Lumbar Spinal Instrumentation: Indications and Utility

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) can be utilized as an adjunct to lumbar spinal instrumentation in order to aid with avoidance of neurologic complications. The most commonly utilized modalities include somatosensory-evoked potentials, motor-evoked potentials, and electromyography. Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) allow for continuous assessment of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord and are therefore most useful during procedures with a posterior approach to the cervical and thoracic spine. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography (EMG) can be applied intermittently to assess motor nerve function. The utility of each individual modality can be largely dependent on the surgical approach. Approaches to lumbar spinal instrumentation can be generally categorized as anterior, lateral, and posterior. For lateral approaches, electromyography can be helpful in identifying neural structures crossing the surgical field to prevent injury. In posterior and anterior approaches, somatosensory-evoked potentials and motor-evoked potentials can be used to assess nerve injury during and after maneuvers for decompression and instrumentation. Additionally, during the placement of pedicle screws, direct stimulation with triggered electromyography can be used to detect the pedicle cortex's breach. The efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring is dependent on prompt and accurate recognition of changes in signals. This is then followed by accurate recognition of the cause for these changes and appropriate responses by the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and monitoring personnel to correct the change.

Roadmap for Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Monitoring for Patients Undergoing Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Procedures

MEPs are recommended for patients undergoing lumbar and lumbosacral procedures in which intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is being utilized. While electromyography (EMG) provides critical nerve root proximity information, spontaneous EMG discharges are relatively poor at reliably diagnosing spinal nerve root dysfunction. In contrast, research indicates that MEPs are both sensitive and specific in diagnosing evolving spinal nerve root dysfunction. There is conflicting evidence, however, and it must be emphasized that the value of adding MEPs is only realized when practices and techniques are optimized. The ideal anesthetic plan is an optimized total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) regimen. Selection of appropriate anesthetics and dosing is important for optimizing baseline response amplitudes and promoting diagnostic confidence in analyzing signal changes. An adaptive set of alert criteria that account for baseline amplitude and morphology fluctuations should guide the determination of significant signal change. The therapeutic impact of accurate diagnostic information depends on the timeliness of diagnosis and intervention. Prior to the start of surgery, a plan to obtain MEPs at least once every 10 minutes during the active part of the procedure and after every significant surgical maneuver should be agreed upon, and the intervention plan should include but not be limited to possible removal of hardware and release of retraction or distractive forces. In summary, MEPs can improve monitoring of at-risk nerve root function, but the accuracy and therapeutic impact of such monitoring depend on perioperative planning and communication that optimize use of this modality.

What is the predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for postoperative neurological deficit in cervical spine surgery?-a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical decompression and fusion surgery remains a mainstay of treatment for a variety of cervical pathologies. Potential intraoperative injury to the spinal cord and nerve roots poses nontrivial risk for consequent postoperative neurologic deficits. Although neuromonitoring with intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) is often used in cervical spine surgery, its therapeutic value remains controversial.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether significant SSEP changes can predict postoperative neurologic complications in cervical spine surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the predictive power of SSEP changes in both anterior and posterior approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

The present study was a meta-analysis of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase to identify prospective/retrospective studies with outcomes of patients who underwent cervical spine surgeries with intraoperative SSEP monitoring.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The total cohort consisted of 7,747 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery with intraoperative SSEP monitoring.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for study selection were as follows: (1) prospective or retrospective cohort studies, (2) studies conducted in patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery not due to aneurysm, tumor, or trauma with intraoperative SSEP monitoring, (3) studies that reported postoperative neurologic outcomes, (4) studies conducted with a sample size ≥20 patients, (5) studies with only adult patients ≥18 years of age, (6) studies published in English, (7) studies inclusive of an abstract.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and likelihood ratios of overall SSEP changes, reversible SSEP changes, irreversible SSEP changes, and SSEP loss for predicting postoperative neurological deficit were calculated.

RESULTS

The total rate of postoperative neurological deficits was 2.50% (194/7,747) and the total rate of SSEP changes was 7.36% (570/7,747). The incidence of postoperative neurological deficit in patients with intraoperative SSEP changes was 16.49% (94/570) while only 1.39% (100/7,177) in patients without. All significant intraoperative SSEP changes had a sensitivity of 46.0% and specificity of 96.7% with a DOR of 27.32. Reversible and irreversible SSEP changes had sensitivities of 17.7% and 37.1% and specificities of 97.5% and 99.5%, respectively. The DORs for reversible and irreversible SSEP changes were 9.01 and 167.90, respectively. SSEP loss had a DOR of 51.39, sensitivity of 17.3% and specificity 99.6%. In anterior procedures, SSEP changes had a DOR of 9.60, sensitivity of 34.2%, and specificity of 94.7%. In posterior procedures, SSEP changes had a DOR of 13.27, sensitivity of 42.6%, and specificity of 94.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

SSEP monitoring is highly specific but weakly sensitive for postoperative neurological deficit following cervical spine surgery. The analysis found that patients with new postoperative neurological deficits were nearly 27 times more likely to have had significant intraoperative SSEP change. Loss of SSEP signals and irreversible SSEP changes seem to indicate a much higher risk of injury than reversible SSEP changes.