1
|
Kietaibl S, Ahmed A, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, Aldecoa C, Barauskas G, De Robertis E, Faraoni D, Filipescu DC, Fries D, Godier A, Haas T, Jacob M, Lancé MD, Llau JV, Meier J, Molnar Z, Mora L, Rahe-Meyer N, Samama CM, Scarlatescu E, Schlimp C, Wikkelsø AJ, Zacharowski K. Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:226-304. [PMID: 36855941 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management. DESIGN A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline. RESULTS These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%. DISCUSSION Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibylle Kietaibl
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Evangelical Hospital Vienna and Sigmund Freud Private University Vienna, Austria (SK), Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (AAh), Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, UK (AAh), Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (AAf), Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (AAf), Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, CNRS/TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525/Themas, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France (PA), Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain (CA), Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania (GB), Division of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy (EDR), Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA (DFa), University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Disease, Bucharest, Romania (DCF), Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (DFr), Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France (AG), Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA (TH), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St.-Elisabeth-Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany (MJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical College East Africa, The Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya (MDL), Department of Anaesthesiology & Post-Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain (JVL), Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria (JM), Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (ZM), Department of Anaesthesiology & Post-Surgical Intensive Care, University Trauma Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (LM), Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Franziskus Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany (NRM), Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, GHU AP-HP. Centre - Université Paris Cité - Cochin Hospital, Paris, France (CMS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest and University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania (ES), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, AUVA Trauma Centre Linz and Ludwig Boltzmann-Institute for Traumatology, The Research Centre in Co-operation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria (CS), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark (AW) and Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine & Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (KZ)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sadacharam K, He Z, Edelson MF, McMahon K, Madurski C, Brenn BR. Predictors of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome after scoliosis surgery in adolescents with cerebral palsy: A retrospective analysis. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL (NASSJ) 2022; 11:100135. [PMID: 35846346 PMCID: PMC9283660 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is known to complicate postsurgical intensive care patients. We noticed that roughly half children with cerebral palsy who undergo posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for neuromuscular scoliosis developed SIRS in the intensive care unit. There is a paucity of literature detailing the impact of intraoperative causes of postoperative SIRS and downstream consequences in these patients. Study purpose was to understand the factors associated with SIRS in children who undergo PSF for neuromuscular scoliosis. Methods This retrospective, case control study included children who underwent PSF for neuromuscular scoliosis. Patients with idiopathic scoliosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, and tracheotomy were excluded. Subjects were divided into two study groups based on the diagnosis of SIRS in the intensive care unit. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to identify factors associated with SIRS; a regression analysis was used to further evaluate the independent and significant influence of these factors. Results There was no significant difference in the demographic and other preoperative variables. However, total blood products (ml/kg) administered was significantly higher among the SIRS group compared with the non-SIRS group (54.4±41.0 vs 34.1±21.5 P <0.034). Percent of patients remaining intubated was greater in the SIRS group compared with the non-SIRS group (44.1% vs 7.0%, P < 0.001). The regression model revealed that the odds to develop SIRS in patients who were not extubated were 7.467-fold higher (CI: 1.534-36.347) compared with those who were extubated (p=0.013). Conclusions The incidence of SIRS is significantly higher among the patients who were not extubated at the end of PSF surgery. Further prospective studies are needed to look at the factors that impede the ability to extubate these patients at the end of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kesavan Sadacharam
- Nemours Children's Health, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Corresponding author at: Nemours Children's Health, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA.
| | - Zhaoping He
- Nemours Children's Health, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maureen F. Edelson
- Nemours Children's Health, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA
| | - Kimberly McMahon
- Nemours Children's Health, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA
| | - Catherine Madurski
- Nemours Children's Health, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|