Considering healthcare value and associated risk factors with postoperative urinary retention after elective laminectomy

Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Anesthetics and Surgical Approach

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after lumbar fusion surgery can lead to longer hospital stays and thus increased risk of developing other postoperative complications. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between POUR and (1) surgical approach and (2) anesthetic agents, including sugammadex and glycopyrrolate.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, L4-S1 single-level lumbar fusion surgeries between 2018 and 2021 were identified. A 3:1 propensity match of patients with POUR to those without was conducted, controlling for patient age, sex, diabetes status, body mass index, smoking status, history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the number of levels decompressed. POUR was defined as documented straight catheterization yielding >400 mL. We compared patient demographic, surgical, anesthetic, and postoperative characteristics. A bivariant analysis and backward multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis ( P -value < 0.200) were performed. Significance was set to P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 899 patients identified, 51 met the criteria for POUR and were matched to 153 patients. No notable differences were observed between groups based on demographic or surgical characteristics. On bivariant analysis, patients who developed POUR were more likely to have been given succinylcholine (13.7% vs. 3.92%, P = 0.020) as an induction agent. The independent predictors of POUR identified by multivariable analysis included the use of succinylcholine {odds ratio (OR), 4.37 (confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 16.46), P = 0.022} and reduced postoperative activity (OR, 0.99 [CI, 0.993 to 0.999], P = 0.049). Factors protective against POUR included using sugammadex as a reversal agent (OR, 0.38 [CI, 0.17 to 0.82], P = 0.017). The stepwise regression did not identify an anterior surgical approach as a notable predictor of POUR.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that sugammadex for anesthesia reversal was protective against POUR while succinylcholine and reduced postoperative activity were associated with the development of POUR. In addition, we found no difference between the anterior or posterior approach to spinal fusion in the development of POUR.

Pre-operative prediction of post-operative urinary retention in lumbar surgery: a prospective validation of machine learning model

PURPOSE

Predicting urinary retention is difficult. The aim of this study is to prospectively validate a previously developed model using machine learning techniques.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from pre-operative clinic. Prediction of urinary retention was completed pre-operatively by 4 individuals and compared to ground truth POUR outcomes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with intercorrelation coefficient (2,1).

RESULTS

171 patients were included with age 63 ± 14 years, 58.5% (100/171) male, BMI 30.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.6 ± 0.5, 1.7 ± 1.0 levels, 56% (96/171) fusions. The observed rate of POUR was 25.7%. The model's performance was found to be 0.663 (0.567-0.759). With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, the following predictive power was achieved: specificity 90.6%, sensitivity 22.7%, negative predictive value 77.2%, positive predictive value 45.5%, and accuracy 73.1%. Intercorrelation coefficient for the regression aspect of the model was found to be 0.889 and intercorrelation coefficient for the neural network aspect of the model was found to be 0.874.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirms performance of the prediction model for POUR developed with retrospective data, showing great correlation. This supports the use of machine learning techniques in the prediction of postoperative complications such as urinary retention.

Construction and validation of a predictive model for postoperative urinary retention after lumbar interbody fusion surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urine retention (POUR) after lumbar interbody fusion surgery may lead to recatheterization and prolonged hospitalization. In this study, a predictive model was constructed and validated. The objective was to provide a nomogram for estimating the risk of POUR and then reducing the incidence.

METHODS

A total of 423 cases of lumbar fusion surgery were included; 65 of these cases developed POUR, an incidence of 15.4%. The dataset is divided into a training set and a validation set according to time. 18 candidate variables were selected. The candidate variables were screened through LASSO regression. The stepwise regression and random forest analysis were then conducted to construct the predictive model and draw a nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive effect of the model.

RESULTS

The best lambda value in LASSO was 0.025082; according to this, five significant variables were screened, including age, smoking history, surgical method, operative time, and visual analog scale (VAS) score of postoperative low back pain. A predictive model containing four variables was constructed by stepwise regression. The variables included age (β = 0.047, OR = 1.048), smoking history (β = 1.950, OR = 7.031), operative time (β = 0.022, OR = 1.022), and postoperative VAS score of low back pain (β = 2.554, OR = 12.858). A nomogram was drawn based on the results. The AUC of the ROC curve of the training set was 0.891, the validation set was 0.854 in the stepwise regression model. The calibration curves of the training set and validation set are in good agreement with the actual curves, showing that the stepwise regression model has good prediction ability. The AUC of the training set was 0.996, and that of the verification set was 0.856 in the random forest model.

CONCLUSION

This study developed and internally validated a new nomogram and a random forest model for predicting the risk of POUR after lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Both of the nomogram and the random forest model have high accuracy in this study.

Preventing Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR) in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is associated with significant morbidity. Our institution's POUR rate was elevated among patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery. We sought to demonstrate that our quality improvement (QI) intervention would significantly lower our POUR rate and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A resident-led QI intervention was implemented from October 2017 to 2018 on 422 patients in an academically affiliated community teaching hospital. This consisted of standardized intraoperative indwelling catheter utilization, postoperative catheterization protocol, prophylactic tamsulosin, and early ambulation after surgery. Baseline data on 277 patients were collected retrospectively from October 2015 to September 2016. Primary outcomes were POUR and LOS. The focus, analyze, develop, execute, and evaluate (FADE) model was used. Multivariable analyses were used. P value <.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

We analyzed 699 patients (277 pre-intervention vs 422 post-intervention). The POUR rate (6.9% vs 2.6%, Δ confidence interval [CI] 1.15-8.08, P = .007) and mean LOS (2.94 ± 1.87 days vs 2.56 ± 2.2 days, Δ CI 0.066-0.68, P = .017) were significantly improved following our intervention. Logistic regression demonstrated that the intervention was independently associated with significantly decreased odds for developing POUR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, CI 0.17-0.83, P = .015). Diabetes (OR = 2.25, CI 1.03-4.92, P = .04) and longer surgery duration (OR = 1.006, CI 1.002-1.01, P = .002) were independently associated with increased odds of developing POUR.

CONCLUSIONS

After implementing our POUR QI project for patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, the institutional POUR rate significantly decreased by 4.3% (62% reduction) and LOS, by 0.37 days. We demonstrated that a standardized POUR care bundle was independently associated with a significant decrease in the odds of developing POUR.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Literature and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery (LSS) and timely recognition is imperative to avoid long-term consequences. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to systematically review the literature in order to identify risk factors associated with POUR after LSS.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed using Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE database for articles on POUR following LSS. A meta-analysis was performed comparing patients with and without POUR; and the factors associated with this adverse event were analyzed. The pooled data were reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI; P < .05). Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 10 studies compromised of 30,300 patients. Based on our analysis, patients who were male, were older in age, underwent instrumented fusion, had diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, or benign prostatic hypertrophy had significantly higher risk of developing POUR. Additionally, patients in who developed POUR had significantly longer surgical times and higher volumes of intra-operative fluid administration, as compared with non-POUR patients. The POUR patients also had a significantly higher association with urinary tract infection. Prior surgery, BMI, length of stay, and smoking status did not reveal any statistical association with POUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors associated with POUR following LSS include male gender, older age, longer surgical times, fusion procedures, larger volumes of intraoperative infusions, and associated comorbidities like DM, CAD, and BPH.

Assessing the impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative urinary retention in elective spinal surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and vexing complication in elective spine surgery. Efficacious prevention strategies are still lacking, and existing studies focus primarily on identifying risk factors. Spinal anesthesia has become an attractive alternative to general anesthesia in elective lumbar surgery, with the potential of having a differential impact on POUR.

METHODS

422 spinal anesthesia procedures were prospectively collected between 2017 and 2021 and compared to 416 general anesthesia procedures retrospectively collected between 2014 and 2017, at a single academic center by the same senior neurosurgeon. The main outcome was POUR, defined as the need for straight bladder catheterization or indwelling bladder catheter placement after surgery due to failure to void. A power calculation was performed prior to data collection.

RESULTS

The general anesthesia group had a higher rate of POUR (9.1 %) compared with the spinal anesthesia group (4.3 %), p = 0.005. At baseline, the spinal anesthesia cohort had an older average age and fewer patients with a history of previous spine surgery. Other comorbid conditions were comparable between the groups. For perioperative characteristics, spinal anesthesia patients had higher ASA scores, shorter operative times, shorter lengths of hospital stay, less operative levels, and zero use of intraoperative bladder catheterization. Acute pain service consult was similar between the groups. A multivariable logistic regression revealed that spinal anesthesia was associated with a significantly lower rate of urinary retention in the spinal anesthesia group (p = 0.0130), after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Other statistically significant risk factors for POUR included diabetes, (p = 0.003), BPH (p = 0.014), operative time (p = 4.94e-06), and ASA score (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

We collect and analyze one of the largest available cohorts of patients undergoing simple and complex surgeries under spinal and general anesthesia, finding that spinal anesthesia is independently associated with a lower incidence of POUR compared to general anesthesia, even when adjusted for potentially confounding risk factors. Further prospective trials are needed to explore this finding.

Does tamsulosin decrease postoperative urinary retention in spine surgery? A double-blind, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The authors' objective was to determine whether preoperative administration of tamsulosin decreases postoperative urinary retention after spine surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial performed at a single institution between 2016 and 2019, eligible males aged 50 to 85 years were administered tamsulosin or placebo for 5 days prior to elective spine surgery. Patients were excluded if they were taking alpha adrenergic blocking drugs; were allergic to tamsulosin, lactose, or sulfa drugs; had a preexisting indwelling urinary catheter, orthostatic hypotension, history of urological surgery, or renal failure; or were scheduled for cataract surgery within 2 weeks. Screening identified 1051 eligible patients (140 declined participation, 150 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 151 did not enroll for other reasons). A total of 610 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.4 mg oral tamsulosin or an identical placebo capsule for 5 days preoperatively and 2 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 497 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. The overall rate of postoperative urinary retention was 9.7%, and tamsulosin had no observed effect on reducing the rate of postoperative urinary retention as compared with placebo (9.4% vs 9.9%, p = 0.96). There were no significant differences in the reported adverse events between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to model the effects of patient, surgical, and anesthetic factors on postoperative urinary retention, and the study drug remained an insignificant factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not detect an effect of perioperative tamsulosin on reducing the rate of postoperative urinary retention in male patients aged 50 to 85 years who underwent elective spine surgery. This study does not support the routine use of tamsulosin to reduce postoperative urinary retention in patients without a previous prescription. It is unknown if subpopulations exist for which prophylactic tamsulosin may reduce postoperative urinary retention.

Effects of delayed postoperative void and preoperative urologic symptoms on delay in time of discharge for elective lumbar decompression surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Almost half of all patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery have preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). These symptoms could affect postoperative voiding and subsequently length of stay.

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between preoperative LUTS and time to first void and between time to first void and time to discharge among patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data among patients at a single academic medical center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All patients ≥18 years of age undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery between July 2017 and March 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The physiologic measure of a delayed time to first void was defined as an initial postoperative void of > 4 hours after anesthesia stop time. The outcome of prolonged time to discharge was defined as a stay of >24 hours after anesthesia stop time.

METHODS

At their preoperative visit, patients completed the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (range, 0-35 points), which is applicable for LUTS assessment in both sexes. Clinically relevant LUTS are defined as an IPSS score of ≥8. Patients were followed from their preoperative visit to surgery admission discharge. Association of LUTS with time to first void and time to first void with admission discharge were estimated using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from a multivariable Poisson regression with a robust variance estimate adjusted for potential confounding variables including age, sex, IPSS, and intraoperative Foley catheter use.

RESULTS

The analytic cohort included 170 patients with an average age of 57 years and 103 (61%) were men. Preoperative LUTS prevalence was 45%, and 111 (65%) of patients voided within 4 hours after surgery. For patients with preoperative LUTS, the unadjusted RR for a first void of >4 hours was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.82-1.32) (p=.77). Adjustment for age, sex, intraoperative Foley catheter use, revision surgery, previous spine surgery, single versus multiple levels, and lumbar location did not materially alter the risk: the multivariable RR was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.82-1.31) (p=.74). The unadjusted RR for a discharge of > 24 hours for patients with a time to first void of > 4 hours was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.51-3.10) (p<.001). After adjusting for age, sex, intraoperative Foley catheter use, IPSS, revision surgery, previous spine surgery, single versus multiple levels, and lumbar location, the multivariable RR was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.22-2.41) (p=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of preoperative LUTS status, an initial first void of >4 hours after surgery is associated with a longer time to discharge among patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery. Future studies are needed to determine if encouraging early postoperative voiding results in timely discharge and shorter length of stay.

Preoperative prediction of postoperative urinary retention in lumbar surgery: a comparison of regression to multilayer neural network

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spine surgery and is associated with prolongation of hospital stay, increased hospital cost, increased rate of urinary tract infection, bladder overdistention, and autonomic dysregulation. POUR incidence following spine surgery ranges between 5.6% and 38%; no reliable prediction tool to identify those at higher risk is available, and that constitutes an important gap in the literature. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk model to predict the occurrence of POUR following routine elective spine surgery.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive adults who underwent lumbar spine surgery between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2019. Patient characteristics, preexisting ICD-10 codes, preoperative pain and opioid use, preoperative alpha-1 blocker use, details of surgical planning, development of POUR, and management strategies were abstracted from electronic medical records. A binomial logistic model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) were optimized using training and validation sets. The models' performance was then evaluated on model-naïve patients (not a part of either cohort). The models were then stacked to take advantage of each model's strengths and to avoid their weaknesses. Four additional models were developed from previously published models adjusted to include only relevant factors (i.e., factors known preoperatively and applied to the lumbar spine).

RESULTS

Overall, 891 patients were included in the cohort, with a mean of 59.6 ± 15.5 years of age, 52.7% male, BMI 30.4 ± 6.4, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.8 ± 0.6, and a mean of 5.6 ± 5.7 comorbidities. The rate of POUR was found to be 25.9%. The two models were comparable, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.737 for the regression model and 0.735 for the neural network. By combining the two models, an AUC of 0.753 was achieved. With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, maximal sensitivity and specificity were achieved, with specificity 68.2%, sensitivity 72.9%, negative predictive value 88.2%, and positive predictive value 43.4%. Both models individually outperformed previously published models (AUC 0.516-0.645) when applied to the current data set.

CONCLUSIONS

This predictive model can be a powerful preoperative tool in predicting patients who will be likely to develop POUR. By using a combination of regression and neural network modeling, good sensitivity, specificity, and NPV are achieved.

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Limited studies have investigated risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following elective spine surgery. Furthermore, some discrepancies have been found in the results of existing observational studies.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to review the available literature on risk factors associated with POUR following elective spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 31,251 patients (POUR=2,858, no POUR=28,393) were included in the meta-analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographics, type of elective spine surgery, country, definition of POUR, and potential risk factors for POUR were evaluated.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR). Weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were used for meta-analysis of continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (2 prospective and 9 retrospective) were included in the analysis. Patients with POUR were older than those without POUR (WMD, 7.13; 95% CI, 4.50-9.76). Male patients were found to have an increased risk of POUR (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64). The following variables were also identified as significant risk factors for POUR: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.89-7.62), diabetes mellitus (DM; OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17-1.93), and previous urinary tract infection (UTI; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28-2.24). Moreover, longer operative time (WMD, 19.88; 95% CI, 5.01-34.75) and increased intraoperative fluid support (SMD, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.52) were observed in patients with POUR. In contrast, spine surgical procedures involving fewer levels (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86), and ambulation on the same day as surgery (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81) were associated with a decreased risk of POUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analysis, older age, male gender, BPH, DM, and a history of UTI are risk factors for POUR following elective spine surgery. We also found that longer operative time and increased intravenous fluid support would increase the risk of POUR. Additionally, multi-level spine surgery may have a negative effect on postoperative voiding.

Effect Observation on Modified Zishen Tongguan Decoction Combined with Acupuncture in Treatment of Urinary Retention after Cervical Cancer Surgery and Its Influence on the Incidence of Adverse Reactions

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect observation on modified Zishen Tongguan decoction combined with acupuncture in the treatment of urinary retention after cervical cancer surgery and its influence on the incidence of adverse reactions.

METHODS

The clinical data of 84 patients suffered from urinary retention after radical resection of cervical cancer (December 2018-December 2019) in the oncology department of Jinan Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected for retrospective analysis. According to the order of admission, they were divided into group A (n = 42), treated with conventional therapy, modified Zishen Tongguan decoction, and acupuncture, and group B (n = 42), treated with conventional therapy. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed, the urination function indexes after therapy were recorded, and the clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed.

RESULTS

After therapy, compared with group B, the average urinary flow rate, maximum urinary flow rate, bladder compliance (BC) level value, and the number of patients with good recovery of bladder function of group A were obviously higher (P < 0.05), and the urination time and detrusor pressure were obviously lower (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average scoring of overactive bladder syndrome score (OABSS) between the two groups at 7 days of therapy (p > 0.05). The average OABSS of group A at 14 days of therapy was obviously lower than that of group B (P < 0.001). Compared with group B, the total clinical effective rate of group A was obviously higher (P < 0.05), while the total incidence of adverse reactions was obviously lower (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Modified Zishen Tongguan decoction combined with acupuncture is a reliable method to treat urinary retention after cervical cancer surgery, which greatly improves the urination function of patients, as well as the clinical efficacy. Further research will help create a better solution for patients with urinary retention after cervical cancer surgery.