1
|
Polly D, Mundis G, Eastlack R, Leveque JC, Elder BD, Martin C, Kent R, Snowden R, Kim HJ, Sembrano J, Herzog J, Lieberman I, Matheus V, Buchholz A, Franke J, Lee R, Shaffrey C. Randomized Trial of Augmented Pelvic Fixation in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion for Adult Spine Deformity: Initial Results from a Multicenter Randomized Trial. World Neurosurg 2024; 187:e15-e27. [PMID: 38310950 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal configuration for spinopelvic fixation during multilevel spine fusion surgery for adult spine deformity remains unclear. Postoperative sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, S2AI screw loosening and implant breakage could be related to continued motion of the SI joint with use of only a single point of fixation across the SI joint. METHODS Prospective, international, multicenter randomized controlled trial of 222 patients with adult spine deformity scheduled for multilevel (4 or more levels) spine fusion surgery with pelvic fixation. Subjects were randomized to sacroalar (S2) iliac (S2AI) screws alone for pelvic fixation or S2AI + triangular titanium implants placed cephalad to S2AI screws. Quad rod techniques were not allowed or used. Baseline spinal deformity measures were read by an independent radiologist. Site-reported perioperative adverse events were reviewed by a clinical events committee. Quality of life questionnaires and other clinical outcomes are in process with planned 2-year follow-up. RESULTS One hundred thirteen participants were assigned to S2AI and 109 to S2AI + titanium triangular implants (TTI). 35/222 (16%) of all subjects had a history of SI joint pain or were diagnosed with SI joint pain during preoperative workup. Three-month follow-up was available in all but 4 subjects. TTI placement was successful in 106 of 109 (98%) subjects assigned to TTI. In 2 cases, TTI could not be placed due to anatomical considerations. Three TTI ventral iliac breaches were observed, all of which were managed non-surgically. One TTI subject had a transverse sacral fracture and 1 TTI subject had malposition of the implant requiring removal. CONCLUSIONS SI joint pain is common in patients with adult spinal deformity who are candidates for multilevel spine fusion surgery. Concurrent placement of TTI parallel to S2AI screws during multilevel spine fusion surgery is feasible and safe. Further follow-up will help to determine the clinical value of this approach to augment pelvic fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Polly
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Greg Mundis
- San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Roland Kent
- Axis Spine Center, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, USA
| | - Ryan Snowden
- Tennessee Orthopaedics Associates, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Lee
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hendrickson NR, Haselhuhn JJ, Odland K, Sembrano JN, Martin CT, Jones KE, Polly DW. Sacropelvic Fixation with Porous Fusion/Fixation Screws: A Technical Note and Retrospective Review. World Neurosurg 2024; 190:172-180. [PMID: 38878891 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to analyze our initial experience using a novel porous fusion/fixation screw (PFFS) for pelvic fixation and determine our rate of screw malposition requiring intraoperative repositioning. METHODS We reviewed 83 consecutive patients who underwent sacropelvic fixation with PFFS at our institution from June 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 using intraoperative computed tomography-based computer-assisted navigation via an open posterior approach. Following PFFS insertion, intraoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to assess screw positioning. Demographic data were collected, and operative reports and patient images were reviewed to determine what implants were used and if any PFFS required repositioning. RESULTS Seventy-four patients (26M:48F) were included, and 57 (77.0%) had a prior sacroiliac joint or lumbar spine surgery. A stacked screw configuration was used in 62/74 cases (83.8%). A total of 235 PFFS were used and six (2.6%) were malpositioned. Of 88 cephalic screws placed in stacked configuration, 4 were malpositioned (4.5%) and 1/123 caudal screws were malpositioned (0.8%). One of 24 sacral-alar-iliac screws placed in a stand-alone configuration was malpositioned (4.2%). Malpositions included 4 medial, 1 lateral, and 1 inferior, and all were revised intraoperatively without major sequela. CONCLUSIONS Although PFFSs are larger than traditional sacropelvic fixation screws, stacked sacral-alar-iliac instrumentation can be done safely with computer-assisted navigation. We found a low malposition rate in our initial series of patients, the majority being the cephalad screw in a stacked configuration. This isn't surprising, as these are placed after the caudal screws, which reduces the available corridor size and increases the placement difficulty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan R Hendrickson
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Jason J Haselhuhn
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kari Odland
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jonathan N Sembrano
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Christopher T Martin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kristen E Jones
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David W Polly
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rahmani R, Stegelmann SD, Andreshak T. S2 alar-iliac screws are superior to traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform 2024; 12:829-842. [PMID: 38427156 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00834-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Spinopelvic fixation (SPF) using traditional iliac screws has provided biomechanical advantages compared to previous constructs, but common complications include screw prominence and wound complications. The newer S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw may provide a lower profile option with lower rates of complications and revisions for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The purpose of this study was to compare rates of complications and revision following SPF between S2AI and traditional iliac screws in patients with ASD. METHODS A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review was conducted using Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed. Included studies reported primary data on adult patients undergoing S2AI screw fixation or traditional IS fixation for ASD. Primary outcomes of interest were rates of revision and complications, which included screw failure (fracture and loosening), symptomatic screw prominence, wound complications (dehiscence and infection), and L5-S1 pseudarthrosis. RESULTS Fifteen retrospective studies with a total of 1502 patients (iliac screws: 889 [59.2%]; S2AI screws: 613 [40.8%]) were included. Pooled analysis indicated that iliac screws had significantly higher odds of revision (17.1% vs 9.1%, OR = 2.45 [1.25-4.77]), symptomatic screw prominence (9.9% vs 2.2%, OR = 6.26 [2.75-14.27]), and wound complications (20.1% vs 4.4%, OR = 5.94 [1.55-22.79]). S2AI screws also led to a larger preoperative to postoperative decrease in pain (SMD = - 0.26, 95% CI = -0.50, - 0.011). CONCLUSION The findings from this review demonstrate higher rates of revision, symptomatic screw prominence, and wound complications with traditional iliac screws. Current data supports the use of S2AI screws specifically for ASD. PROSPERO ID CRD42022336515. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Rahmani
- Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Samuel D Stegelmann
- HCA Medical City Healthcare UNT-TCU GME (Denton), 3535 S Interstate 35, Denton, TX, 76210, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Panico M, Chande RD, Lindsey DP, Maria Tobia Villa T, Yerby SA, Brayda-Bruno M, Bassani T, Polly DW, Galbusera F. High-Demand Spinal Deformity With Multi-Rod Constructs and Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study. Global Spine J 2024; 14:1328-1336. [PMID: 36421053 PMCID: PMC11289527 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221141874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Basic science (finite element analysis). OBJECTIVES Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) at L5 is an effective treatment for sagittal imbalance, especially in select cases of patients showing kyphosis with the apex at L4-L5 but has been scarcely investigated. The aim of this study was to simulate various "high-demand" instrumentation approaches, including varying numbers of rods and sacropelvic implants, for the stabilization of a PSO at L5. METHODS A finite element model of T10-pelvis was modified to simulate posterior fixation with pedicle screws and rods from T10 to S1, alone or in combination with an L5 PSO. Five additional configurations were then created by employing rods and novel porous fusion/fixation implants across the sacroiliac joints, in varying numbers. All models were loaded using pure moments of 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS The osteotomy resulted in a general increase in motion and stresses in posterior rods and S1 pedicle screws. When the number of rods was varied, three- and four-rod configurations were effective in limiting the maximal rod stresses; values approached those of posterior fixation with no osteotomy. Maximum stresses in the accessory rods were similar to or less than those observed in the primary rods. Multiple sacropelvic implants were effective in reducing range of motion, particularly of the SIJ. CONCLUSIONS Multi-rod constructs and sacropelvic fixation generally reduced maximal implant stresses and motion in comparison with standard posterior fixation, suggesting a reduced risk of rod breakage and increased joint stability, respectively, when a high-demand construct is utilized for the correction of sagittal imbalance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Panico
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Tomaso Maria Tobia Villa
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Tito Bassani
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - David W. Polly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Polly DW, Holton KJ, Soriano PO, Sembrano JN, Martin CT, Hendrickson NR, Jones KE. Multiple Points of Pelvic Fixation: Stacked S2-Alar-Iliac Screws (S2AI) or Concurrent S2AI and Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with Triangular Titanium Rod. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2022; 12:e21.00044. [PMID: 36743282 PMCID: PMC9889296 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.st.21.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Sacropelvic fixation is a continually evolving technique in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. The 2 most widely utilized techniques are iliac screw fixation and S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation1-3. The use of these techniques at the base of long fusion constructs, with the goal of providing a solid base to maintain surgical correction, has improved fusion rates and decreased rates of revision4. Description The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia in the prone position and with use of 3D computer navigation based on intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) imaging. A standard open posterior approach with a midline incision and subperiosteal exposure of the proximal spine and sacrum is performed. Standard S2AI screw placement is performed. The S2AI starting point is on the dorsal sacrum 2 to 3 mm above the S2 foramen, aiming as caudal as possible in the teardrop. A navigated awl is utilized to establish the screw trajectory, passing through the sacrum, across the sacroiliac (SI) joint, and into the ilium. The track is serially tapped with use of navigated taps, 6.5 mm followed by 9.5 mm, under power. The screw is then placed under power with use of a navigated screwdriver.Proper placement of the caudal implant is vital as it allows for ample room for subsequent instrumentation. The additional point of pelvic fixation can be an S2AI screw or a triangular titanium rod (TTR). This additional implant is placed cephalad to the trajectory of the S2AI screw. A starting point 2 to 3 mm proximal to the S2AI screw tulip head on the sacral ala provides enough clearance and also helps to keep the implant low enough in the teardrop that it is likely to stay within bone. More proximal starting points should be avoided as they will result in a cephalad breach.For procedures with an additional point of pelvic fixation, the cephalad S2AI screw can be placed using the previously described method. For placement of the TTR, the starting point is marked with a burr. A navigated drill guide is utilized to first pass a drill bit to create a pilot hole, followed by a guide pin proximal to the S2AI screw in the teardrop. Drilling the tip of the guide pin into the distal, lateral iliac cortex prevents pin backout during the subsequent steps. A cannulated drill is then passed over the guide pin, traveling from the sacral ala and breaching the SI joint into the pelvis. A navigated broach is then utilized to create a track for the implant. The flat side of the triangular broach is turned toward the S2AI screw in order to help the implant sit as close as possible to the screw and to allow the implant to be as low as possible in the teardrop. The navigation system is utilized to choose the maximum possible implant length. The TTR is then passed over the guide pin and impacted to the appropriate depth. Multiplanar post-placement fluoroscopic images and an additional intraoperative CT scan of the pelvis are obtained to verify instrumentation position. Alternatives The use of spinopelvic fixation in long constructs is widely accepted, and various techniques have been described in the past1. Alternatives to stacked S2AI screws or S2AI with TTR for SI joint fusion include traditional iliac screw fixation with offset connectors, modified iliac fixation, sacral fixation alone, and single S2AI screw fixation. Rationale The lumbosacral junction is the foundation of long spinal constructs and is known to be a point of high mechanical strain5-7. Although pelvic instrumentation has been utilized to increase construct stiffness and fusion rates, pelvic fixation failure is frequently reported8,9. At our institution, we identified a 5% acute pelvic fixation failure rate over an 18-month period10. In a subsequent multicenter retrospective series, a similar 5% acute pelvic fixation failure rate was also reported11. In response to these findings, our institution changed its pelvic fixation strategies to incorporate multiple points of pelvic fixation. From our experience, utilization of multiple pelvic fixation points has decreased acute failure. In addition to preventing instrumentation failure, S2AI screws are lower-profile, which decreases the complication of implant prominence associated with traditional iliac screws. S2AI screw heads are also more in line with the pedicle screw heads, which decreases the need for excessive rod bending and connectors.The use of the techniques has been described in case reports and imaging studies12-14, but until now has not been visually represented. Here, we provide technical and visual presentation of the placement of stacked S2AI screws or open SI joint fusion with a TTR above an S2AI screw. Expected Outcomes Pelvic fixation provides increased construct stiffness compared with sacral fixation alone15-17 and has shown better rates of fusion4. However, failure rates of up to 35%8,9 have been reported, and our own institution identified a 5% acute pelvic fixation failure rate10. In response to this, the multiple pelvic fixation strategy (stacked S2AI screws or S2AI and TTR for SI joint fusion) has been more widely utilized. In our experience utilizing multiple points of pelvic fixation, we have noticed a decreased rate of pelvic fixation failure and are in the process of reporting these findings18,19. Important Tips The initial trajectory of the caudal S2AI screw needs to be as low as possible within the teardrop, just proximal to the sciatic notch.The starting point for the cephalad implant should be 2 to 3 mm proximal to the S2AI screw tulip head. This placement provides enough clearance and helps to contain the implant in bone.More proximal starting points may result in cephalad breach of the TTR.The use of a reverse-threaded Kirschner wire helps to prevent pin backout while drilling and broaching for TTR placement.If malpositioning of the TTR is found on imaging, removal and redirection is technically feasible. Acronyms and Abbreviations S2AI = S2-alar-iliacTTR = triangular titanium rodCT = computed tomographyAP = anteroposteriorOR = operating roomSI = sacroiliacDRMAS = dual rod multi-axial screwK-wire = Kirschner wireDVT = deep vein thrombosisPE = pulmonary embolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W. Polly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota,Email for corresponding author:
| | - Kenneth J. Holton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Paul O. Soriano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jonathan N. Sembrano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Kristen E. Jones
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berlin C, Patel P, Lieberman I, Shaffrey M, Buchholz A. Robotic Sacroiliac Fixation Technique for Triangular Titanium Implant in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21:E555-E556. [PMID: 34662894 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opab326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Corrective surgery remains a definitive treatment for adult spinal deformity, improving pain and disability. With these cases, instrumentation to the pelvis with iliac fixation is recommended. Whether iliac or S2-Alar-Iliac (S2AI) trajectories are used, sacroiliac joint pain and long-term sacroilitis can be common after long-fusion constructs.1-3 Sacroiliac fusion with triangular titanium implants during fusion can reduce back pain associated with sacroiliac joint degeneration,3 provides reduction in sacroiliac joint motion and stress when added to S2AI screws, and potentially enhances mechanical stability of fusion constructs.4 Here, we present a technique for placing triangular titanium sacroiliac implants (iFuse BedrockTM; SI-BONE Inc, Santa Clara, California) alongside S2AI screws using a robotic platform (Mazor X; Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Medtronic Inc, Dublin, Ireland). Navigated robotics allows reduction in human error with implant placement, and potentially decreased operative time/fluoroscopy.5-7 Key surgical steps include placement of K wires for S2AI and bilateral SI-implants, tapping, replacing SI-implant K wires with guide pins, placing S2AI screws, and finally placing the SI-implant. Final placement is verified with intraoperative fluoroscopy. The patient described is a 61-yr-old woman with worsening adult degenerative scoliosis, lower back pain, left leg radicular pain, and mild right leg pain who failed conservative treatment. Examination revealed diminished strength in both legs. Imaging was significant for moderate sigmoid scoliosis, discogenic disease, and osteoarthritis at all levels. She consented to undergo corrective surgery. Postoperatively, the patient experienced resolution of her leg weakness and pain. Imaging demonstrated appropriate positioning of hardware. Prospective studies on the efficacy of the SI-implant are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Berlin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Parantap Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Mark Shaffrey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Avery Buchholz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Panico M, Chande RD, Lindsey DP, Mesiwala A, Villa TMT, Yerby SA, Gallazzi E, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F. Innovative sacropelvic fixation using iliac screws and triangular titanium implants. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:3763-3770. [PMID: 34562177 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07006-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sacropelvic fixation is frequently used in combination with thoracolumbar instrumentation for the correction of severe spinal deformities. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of the triangular titanium implants on the iliac screw fixation. Our hypothesis was that the use of triangular titanium implants can increase the stability of the iliac screw fixation. METHODS Three T10-pelvis instrumented models were created: pedicle screws and rods in T10-S1, and bilateral iliac screws (IL); posterior fixation and bilateral iliac screws and triangular implants inserted bilaterally in a sacro-alar-iliac trajectory (IL-Tri-SAI); posterior fixation and bilateral iliac screws and two bilateral triangular titanium implants inserted in a lateral trajectory (IL-Tri-Lat). Outputs of these models, such as hardware stresses, were compared against a model with pedicle screws and rods in T10-S1 (PED). RESULTS Sacropelvic fixation decreased the L5-S1 motion by 75-90%. The motion of the SIJ was reduced by 55-80% after iliac fixation; the addition of triangular titanium implants further reduced it. IL, IL-Tri-SAI and IL-Tri-Lat demonstrated lower S1 pedicle stresses with respect to PED. Triangular implants had a protective effect on the iliac screw stresses. CONCLUSION Sacropelvic fixation decreased L5-S1 range of motion suggesting increased stability of the joint. The combination of triangular titanium implants and iliac screws reduced the residual flexibility of the sacroiliac joint, and resulted in a protective effect on the S1 pedicle screws and iliac screws themselves. Clinical studies may be performed to demonstrate applicability of these FEA results to patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Panico
- Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, 20133, Milan, Italy. .,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | - Ali Mesiwala
- Southern California Center for Neuroscience and Spine, Pomona, CA, USA
| | - Tomaso Maria Tobia Villa
- Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, 20133, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Gallazzi
- ASST Gaetano Pini: Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Andrada Pereira B, Wangsawatwong P, Lehrman JN, Sawa AGU, Lindsey DP, Yerby SA, Godzik J, Waguespack AM, Uribe JS, Kelly BP. Biomechanics of a laterally placed sacroiliac joint fusion device supplemental to S2 alar-iliac fixation in a long-segment adult spinal deformity construct: a cadaveric study of stability and strain distribution. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36:42-52. [PMID: 34534964 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.spine202175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation effectively enhances stability in long-segment constructs. Although S2AI fixation provides a single transarticular sacroiliac joint fixation (SIJF) point, additional fixation points may provide greater stability and attenuate screw and rod strain. The objectives of this study were to evaluate changes in stability and pedicle screw and rod strain with extended distal S2AI fixation and with supplemental bilateral integration of two sacroiliac joint fusion devices implanted using a traditional minimally invasive surgical approach. METHODS Eight L1-pelvis human cadaveric specimens underwent pure moment (7.5 Nm) and compression (400 N) tests under 4 conditions: 1) intact (pure moment loading only); 2) L2-S1 pedicle screw and rod with L5-S1 interbody fusion; 3) added S2AI screws; and 4) added bilateral laterally placed SIJF. Range of motion (ROM), rod strain, and screw-bending moment (S1 and S2AI) were analyzed. RESULTS Compared with S1 fixation, S2AI fixation significantly reduced L5-S1 ROM in right lateral bending by 50% (0.11°, p = 0.049) and in compression by 39% (0.22°, p = 0.003). Compared with fixation ending at S1, extending fixation with S2AI significantly decreased sacroiliac joint ROM by 52% (0.28°, p = 0.02) in flexion, by 65% (0.48°, p = 0.04) in extension, by 59% (0.76°, p = 0.02) in combined flexion-extension, and by 36% (0.09°, p = 0.02) in left axial rotation. The addition of S2AI screws reduced S1 screw-bending moment during flexion (0.106 Nm [43%], p = 0.046). With S2AI fixation, posterior L5-S1 primary rod strain increased by 124% (159 μE, p = 0.002) in flexion, by 149% (285 μE, p = 0.02) in left axial rotation, and by 99% (254 μE, p = 0.04) in right axial rotation. Compared with S2AI fixation, the addition of SIJF reduced L5-S1 strain during right axial rotation by 6% (28 μE, p = 0.04) and increased L5-S1 strain in extension by 6% (28 μE, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Long-segment constructs ending with S2AI screws created a more stable construct than those ending with S1 screws, reducing lumbosacral and sacroiliac joint motion and S1 screw-bending moment in flexion. These benefits, however, were paired with increased rod strain at the lumbosacral junction. The addition of SIJF to constructs ending at S2AI did not significantly change SI joint ROM or S1 screw bending and reduced S2AI screw bending in compression. SIJF further decreased L5-S1 rod strain in axial rotation and increased it in extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo de Andrada Pereira
- 1Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Piyanat Wangsawatwong
- 1Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jennifer N Lehrman
- 1Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Anna G U Sawa
- 1Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Jakub Godzik
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and
| | | | - Juan S Uribe
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and
| | - Brian P Kelly
- 1Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Caprara S, Carrillo F, Snedeker JG, Farshad M, Senteler M. Automated Pipeline to Generate Anatomically Accurate Patient-Specific Biomechanical Models of Healthy and Pathological FSUs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9:636953. [PMID: 33585436 PMCID: PMC7876284 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.636953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
State-of-the-art preoperative biomechanical analysis for the planning of spinal surgery not only requires the generation of three-dimensional patient-specific models but also the accurate biomechanical representation of vertebral joints. The benefits offered by computational models suitable for such purposes are still outweighed by the time and effort required for their generation, thus compromising their applicability in a clinical environment. In this work, we aim to ease the integration of computerized methods into patient-specific planning of spinal surgery. We present the first pipeline combining deep learning and finite element methods that allows a completely automated model generation of functional spine units (FSUs) of the lumbar spine for patient-specific FE simulations (FEBio). The pipeline consists of three steps: (a) multiclass segmentation of cropped 3D CT images containing lumbar vertebrae using the DenseVNet network, (b) automatic landmark-based mesh fitting of statistical shape models onto 3D semantic segmented meshes of the vertebral models, and (c) automatic generation of patient-specific FE models of lumbar segments for the simulation of flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation movements. The automatic segmentation of FSUs was evaluated against the gold standard (manual segmentation) using 10-fold cross-validation. The obtained Dice coefficient was 93.7% on average, with a mean surface distance of 0.88 mm and a mean Hausdorff distance of 11.16 mm (N = 150). Automatic generation of finite element models to simulate the range of motion (ROM) was successfully performed for five healthy and five pathological FSUs. The results of the simulations were evaluated against the literature and showed comparable ROMs in both healthy and pathological cases, including the alteration of ROM typically observed in severely degenerated FSUs. The major intent of this work is to automate the creation of anatomically accurate patient-specific models by a single pipeline allowing functional modeling of spinal motion in healthy and pathological FSUs. Our approach reduces manual efforts to a minimum and the execution of the entire pipeline including simulations takes approximately 2 h. The automation, time-efficiency and robustness level of the pipeline represents a first step toward its clinical integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Caprara
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Biomechanics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Carrillo
- Institute for Biomechanics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland
- Research in Orthopedic Computer Science, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jess G. Snedeker
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Biomechanics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mazda Farshad
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marco Senteler
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Biomechanics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lorio M, Kube R, Araghi A. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:860-895. [PMID: 33560247 DOI: 10.14444/7156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The index 2014 International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy Statement-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion-was generated out of necessity to provide an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)-based background and emphasize tools to ensure correct diagnosis. A timely ICD-10-based 2016 update provided a granular threshold selection with improved level of evidence and a more robust and relevant database (Appendix Table A1). As procedures and treatment options have evolved, this 2020 update reviews and analyzes the expanding evidence base and provides guidance relating to differences between the lateral and dorsal surgical procedures for minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Lorio
- Advanced Orthopedics, Altamonte Springs, Florida
| | - Richard Kube
- Prairie Spine & Pain Institute, Peoria, Illinois
| | - Ali Araghi
- The CORE Institute, Sun City West, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|