Laminoplasty-an underutilized procedure for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Inpatient opioid use varies by construct length among laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion patients

Background

Laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy and fusion (LF) are utilized to achieve decompression in patients with symptomatic degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Comparative analyses aimed at determining outcomes and clarifying indications between these procedures represent an area of active research. Accordingly, we sought to compare inpatient opioid use between LP and LF patients and to determine if opioid use correlated with length of stay.

Methods

Sociodemographic information, surgical and hospitalization data, and medication administration records were abstracted for patients >18 years of age who underwent LP or LF for DCM in the Mass General Brigham (MGB) health system between 2017 and 2019. Specifically, morphine milligram equivalents (MME) of oral and parenteral pain medication given after arrival in the recovery area until discharge from the hospital were collected. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-squared analysis or Fisher exact test when appropriate. Continuous variables were compared using Independent samples t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

One hundred eight patients underwent LF, while 138 patients underwent LP. Total inpatient opioid use was significantly higher in the LF group (312 vs. 260 MME, p=.03); this difference was primarily driven by higher postoperative day 0 pain medication requirements. Furthermore, more LF patients required high dose (>80 MME/day) regimens. While length of stay was significantly different between groups, with LF patients staying approximately 1 additional day, postoperative day 0 MME was not a significant predictor of this difference. When operative levels including C2, T1, and T2 were excluded, the differences in total opioid use and average length of stay lost significance.

Conclusions

Inpatient opioid use and length of stay were significantly greater in LF patients compared to LP patients; however, when constructs including C2, T1, T2 were excluded from analysis, these differences lost significance. Such findings highlight the impact of operative extent between these procedures. Future studies incorporating patient reported outcomes and evaluating long-term pain needs will provide a more complete understanding of postoperative outcomes between these 2 procedures.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Double-Door With Lamina Staple, Single-Door With Miniplate, and Double-Door With Spacer-A 2-Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

There were few studies to compare the outcomes of different types of cervical laminoplasties.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of double-door cervical laminoplasty with lamina staple (double-door staple), single-door cervical laminoplasty with miniplate (single-door miniplate), and double-door cervical laminoplasty with spacer (double-door spacer).

METHODS

The study involved 166 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Fifty-two patients underwent double-door staple, 63 patients underwent single-door miniplate, and 51 patients underwent double-door spacer. The clinical outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in Japanese Orthopedic Association score among the 3 groups ( P > .05). The operation time was significantly shorter in double-door staple and single-door miniplate groups than in the double-door spacer group ( P < .005). The estimated blood loss was significantly more in the single-door miniplate group than in double-door staple and double-door spacer groups ( P < .005). The expansion ratio of cervical intraspinal cross-sectional area decreased in the order of double-door staple > double-door spacer > single-door miniplate. There were no significant differences in the expansion ratio of dural sac cross-sectional area among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Double-door staple, double-door spacer, and single-door miniplate can achieve favorable clinical outcomes for CSM. The blood loss of double-door staple is less than that of single-door miniplate, and the operation time of double-door staple is shorter than that of double-door spacer. The mean expansion ratio of cervical intraspinal cross-sectional area decreased in the order of double-door staple > double-door spacer > single-door miniplate. Overall, double-door staple is a safe and innovative alternative choice for treatment of CSM.

A novel surgical technique for cervical laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A case report and literature review

Cervical laminoplasty is a posterior-based surgical decompression technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) that may improve the preservation of cervical mobility, spinal canal structure, and natural lordosis. Although this procedure is considered to be comparatively safe, with fewer complications than those seen with laminectomy, several postoperative problems have been noted, including axial neck pain, C5 nerve palsy, and failed resolution of radiculopathy. Hence, various modifications have been made to improve the safety and effectiveness of this technique. Here, we report the case of a 74-year-old man with multilevel CSM who underwent posterior cervical laminoplasty in the C3-C7 segments using a novel surgical technique, termed alternating-side cervical laminoplasty. Preoperative and postoperative assessments, including visual analog scale, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, neck disability index scores, and imaging data, were collected and analyzed. The results of a 5-year follow-up indicated that the patient recovered well, with no development of axial neck pain. This is the first report of this modified open-door laminoplasty, which we propose may be a better surgical option for preventing postoperative axial neck pain in patients with multilevel CSM. Additionally, opening the laminae on the alternating sides during laminoplasty could provide a flexible approach to complete decompression on different radiculopathy sides.

Segmental cervical instability does not drive the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT

Kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty (CLP) often leads to unfavorable neurological recovery due to insufficient indirect decompression of the spinal cord. Existing literature has described that segmental cervical instability is a contraindication for CLP because it is a potential risk factor for kyphotic changes after surgery; however, this has never been confirmed in any clinical studies.

PURPOSE

To confirm whether segmental cervical instability was an independent risk factor for postoperative kyphotic change and to examine whether segmental cervical instability led to poor neurological outcomes after CLP for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent CLP for CSM between January 2013 and January 2021 with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were enrolled.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cervical radiographic measurements including C2-C7 lordosis (C2-7 angle), cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, flexion range of motion (fROM) and extension ROM (eROM) were assessed using neutral and flexion-extension views. Segmental cervical instability was classified into anterolisthesis (AL) of ≥2 mm displacement, retrolisthesis (RL) of ≥2 mm displacement, and translational instability (TI) of ≥3 mm translational motion. The amount of C2-7 angle loss at the follow-up period compared to the preoperative measurements was defined as cervical lordosis loss (CLL). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA-RR).

METHODS

CLL was compared among patients with and without segmental cervical instability. Further, multiple linear regression model for CLL was built for the evaluation with adjustment of the reported risks, including cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, fROM, eROM, and patient age together with AL, RL, and TI, as independent variables. The JOA-RR was also compared between patients with and without segmental cervical instability.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients (mean age, 68.7 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. AL, RL, and TI were found in 12 (8.7%), 33 (23.9%), and 16 (11.6%) patients, respectively. Comparisons among the groups showed that AL led to greater CLL; however, RL and TI did not. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that greater CLL is significantly associated with greater fROM and smaller eROM (regression coefficient [β]=0.328, 95% confidence interval: 0.178 to 0.478, p<.001; β=-0.372, 95% confidence interval: -0.591 to -0.153, p=.001, respectively). However, there were no significant statistical associations in the AL, RL, and TI. Whereas, patients with AL tended to exhibit lower JOA-RR than those without AL (37.8% vs. 52.0%, p=.108).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental cervical instability is not the definitive driver for loss of cervical lordosis after CLP in patients with CSM; thus, is not a contraindication in and of itself. However, it is necessary to consider the indications for CLP, according to individual cases of patients with AL on baseline radiograph, which is a sign of poor neurological recovery.

Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) occurs as heterotopic bone forms in the posterior longitudinal ligament, resulting in neural compression, myelopathy, and radiculopathy. OPLL is most commonly observed in East Asian populations, with prevalence rates of 1.9% to 4.3% reported in Japan. OPLL rates are lower in North American and European patients, with reported prevalence of 0.1% to 1.7%. Patients typically develop symptoms due to OPLL in their cervical spines. The etiology of OPLL is multifactorial, including genetic, metabolic, and anatomic factors. Asymptomatic or symptomatic patients with OPLL can be managed nonsurgically, whereas patients with neurologic symptoms may require surgical decompression from an anterior, posterior, or combined approach. Surgical treatment can provide notable improvement in neurologic function. Surgical decision making accounts for multiple factors, including patient comorbidities, neurologic status, disease morphology, radiographic findings, and procedure complication profiles. In this study, we review OPLL epidemiology and pathophysiology, clinical features, radiographic evaluation, management, and complications.

Cervical Laminoplasty Versus Posterior Laminectomy and Fusion: Trends in Utilization and Evaluation of Complication and Revision Surgery Rates

INTRODUCTION

Cervical laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF) are common operations used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Conflicting data exist regarding which operation provides superior patient outcomes while minimizing the risk of complications. This study evaluates the trends of LP compared with LF over the past decade in patients with cervical myelopathy and examines long-term revision rates and complications between the two procedures.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LP or LF for cervical myelopathy from 2010 to 2019 were identified in the PearlDiver Mariner Database. Patients were grouped independently (LP versus fusion) and assessed for association with common medical and surgical complications. The primary outcome was the incidence of LP versus LF for cervical myelopathy over time. Secondary outcomes were revision rates up to 5 years postoperatively and the development of complications attributable to either surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 1,420 patients underwent LP and 10,440 patients underwent LF. Rates of LP (10.5% to 13.7%) and LF (86.3% to 89.5%) remained stable, although the number of procedures nearly doubled from 865 in 2010 to 1,525 in 2019. On matched analysis, LP exhibited lower rates of wound complications, surgical site infections, spinal cord injury, dysphagia, cervical kyphosis, limb paralysis, incision and drainage/exploration, implant removal, respiratory failure, renal failure, and sepsis. Revision rates for both procedures at were not different at any time point.

CONCLUSION

From 2010 to 2019, rates of LP have not increased and represent less than 15% of posterior-based myelopathy operations. Up to 5 years of follow-up, there were no differences in revision rates for LP compared with LF; however, LP was associated with fewer postoperative complications than LF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective cohort study.

The Pre-Operative Duration of Symptoms: The Most Important Predictor of Post-Operative Efficacy in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Objective. To explore the most important predictors of post-operative efficacy in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Methods. From January 2013 to January 2019, 284 patients with DCM were enrolled. They were categorized based on the different surgical methods used: single anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) (n = 80), double ACDF (n = 56), three ACDF (n = 13), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) (n = 63), anterior cervical hybrid decompression and fusion (ACHDF) (n = 25), laminoplasty (n = 38) and laminectomy and fusion (n = 9). The follow-up time was 2 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the mJOA recovery rate at the last follow-up: Group A (the excellent improvement group, mJOA recovery rate >50%, n = 213) and Group B (the poor improvement group, mJOA recovery rate ≤50%, n = 71). The evaluated data included age, gender, BMI, duration of symptoms (months), smoking, drinking, number of lesion segments, surgical methods, surgical time, blood loss, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), CCI classification, imaging parameters (CL, T1S, C2-7SVA, CL (F), T1S (F), C2-7SVA (F), CL (E), T1S (E), C2-7SVA (E), CL (ROM), T1S (ROM) and C2-7SVA (ROM)), maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC), maximum canal compromise (MCC), Transverse area (TA), Transverse area ratio (TAR), compression ratio (CR) and the Coefficient compression ratio (CCR). The visual analog score (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) and mJOA recovery rate were used to assess cervical spinal function and quality of life. Results. We found that there was no significant difference in the baseline data among the different surgical groups and that there were only significant differences in the number of lesion segments, C2−7SVA, T1S (F), T1S (ROM), TA, CR, surgical time and blood loss. Therefore, there was comparability of the post-operative recovery among the different surgical groups, and we found that there were significant differences in age, the duration of symptoms, CL and pre-mJOA between Group A and Group B. A binary logistic regression analysis showed that the duration of the symptoms was an independent risk factor for post-operative efficacy in patients with DCM. Meanwhile, when the duration of symptoms was ≥6.5 months, the prognosis of patients was more likely to be poor, and the probability of a poor prognosis increased by 0.196 times for each additional month of symptom duration (p < 0.001, OR = 1.196). Conclusion. For patients with DCM (regardless of the number of lesion segments and the proposed surgical methods), the duration of symptoms was an independent risk factor for the post-operative efficacy. When the duration of symptoms was ≥6.5 months, the prognosis of patients was more likely to be poor, and the probability of a poor prognosis increased by 0.196 times for each additional month of symptom duration (p < 0.001, OR = 1.196).

Simulated bundled payments for four common surgical approaches to treat degenerative cervical myelopathy: a consideration to break the clinical equipoise

OBJECTIVE

In degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) pathologies in which there exists a clinical equipoise in approach selection, a randomized controlled trial found that an anterior approach did not significantly improve patient-reported outcomes compared with posterior approaches. In this era of value and bundled payment initiatives, the cost profiles of various surgical approaches will form an important consideration in decision-making. The objective of this study was to compare 90-day and 2-year reimbursements for ≥ 2-level (multilevel) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (mACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (LF), and cervical laminoplasty (LP) performed for DCM.

METHODS

The IBM MarketScan research database (2005-2018) was used to study beneficiaries 30-75 years old who underwent surgery using four approaches (mACDF, ACCF, LF, or LP) for DCM. Demographics, index surgery length of stay (LOS), complications, and discharge disposition were compared. Index admission (surgeon, hospital services, operating room) and postdischarge inpatient (readmission, revision surgery, inpatient rehabilitation), outpatient (imaging, emergency department, office visits, physical therapy), and medication-related payments were described. Ninety-day and 2-year bundled payment amounts were simulated for each procedure. All payments are reported as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs; Q1-Q3) and were adjusted to 2018 US dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 10,834 patients, with a median age of 54 years, were included. The median 90-day payment was $46,094 (IQR $34,243-$65,841) for all procedures, with LF being the highest ($64,542) and LP the lowest ($37,867). Index hospital payment was 62.4% (surgery/operating room 46.6%) and surgeon payments were 17.5% of the average 90-day bundle. There were significant differences in the index, 90-day, and 2-year reimbursements and their distribution among procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In a national cohort of patients undergoing surgery for DCM, LP had the lowest complication rate and simulated bundled reimbursements at 90 days and 2 years postoperatively. The lowest quartile 90-day payment for LF was more expensive than median amounts for mACDF, ACCF, and LP. If surgeons encounter scenarios of clinical equipoise in practice, LP is likely to result in maximum value because it is 70% less expensive on average than LF over 90 days.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Anterior Cervical Decompression versus Segmental Fusion and Posterior Expansive Canal Plasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anterior cervical decompression and segmental fusion and posterior expansive canal plasty in the treatment of multisegment cervical myelopathy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed of 56 cases of multisegment cervical myelopathy patients admitted from July 2018 to June 2021, 32 male patients and 24 females, aged 56.9 ± 12.8 years with an average duration of 10.6 ± 3.2 years. All patients' preoperative imaging examination revealed multiple-segmented cervical disc herniation and had clinical manifestations of cervical myelopathy.

Results

No neurovascular complications occurred in both groups, and 24 to 36 months of follow-up (mean 28.6 months) were obtained. The height of the cervical spondylosis segment was higher than that 2 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05), and the curvature of the cervical spine was significantly lower than that before surgery. There was no statistical significance in the height of the anterior column and curvature of the cervical vertebra at 2 weeks after surgery and at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in anterior curvature of the cervical spine between the two groups at 2 weeks after surgery and the last follow-up (p < 0.05). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores in both groups recovered significantly after surgery. At 3 months and the last follow-up, the improvement rate of JOA score in the anterior approach group was significantly higher than that in the posterior approach group (p < 0.05), and the improvement rate of JOA score in the anterior approach group was also better than that in the posterior approach group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

This segmented anterior fusion procedure can effectively restore the anterior cervical column height and can significantly improve spinal cord function compared with posterior spinal canal enlargement plasty, thus could be considered an effective option for the treatment of multisegment cervical myelopathy.

Simulated Bundled Payments for 4 Common Surgical Approaches to Treat Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Consideration to Break the Clinical Equipoise

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare 90-day and 2-year reimbursements for ≥2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (mACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), posterior laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) done for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In DCM pathologies where there exists a clinical equipoise in approach selection, a randomized controlled trial found that an anterior approach did not significantly improve patient-reported outcomes over posterior approaches. In the era of value and bundled payments initiatives, cost profile of various approaches will form an important consideration for decision making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IBM MarketScan Research Database (2005-2018) was used to study beneficiaries (30-75 y) who underwent surgery (mACDF, ACCF, LF, LP) for DCM. Index hospital stay (operating room, surgeon, hospital services) and postdischarge inpatient, outpatient and prescription medication payments have been used to simulate 90-day and 2-year bundled payment amounts, along with their distribution for each procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 10,834 patients with median age of 54 years were included. The median 90-day payment was $46,094 (interquartile range: $34,243-$65,841) for all procedures, with LF being the highest ($64,542) and LP the lowest ($37,867). Index hospital was 62.4% (operating room: 46.6) and surgeon payments were 17.5% of the average 90-day bundle. There was significant difference in the index, 90-day and 2-year reimbursements and their distribution among procedures.

CONCLUSION

In a national cohort of patients undergoing surgery for DCM, LP had the lowest complication rate, and simulated bundled reimbursements at 90 days and 2 years postoperatively. The lowest quartile 90-day payment for LF was more expensive than median amounts for mACDF, ACCF, and LP. If surgeons encounter scenarios of clinical equipoise in practice, LP is likely to result in maximum value as it is on an average 70% less expensive than LF over 90 days.

Compensatory mechanisms recruited against proximal junctional kyphosis by patients instrumented from the thoracolumbar junction to the iliac

PURPOSE

The compensatory mechanisms recruited by un-instrumented patients against sagittal imbalance are well documented. However, there is a lack of information regarding instrumented patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively in a multicenter adult spinal deformity database. We included patients suffering PJK/PJF after (T8-L2) to iliac instrumentation with minimum two-year follow-up. We measured quantitative sagittal spinopelvic and qualitative sagittal distribution parameters in the immediate postoperative period (6w) and at the time of PJK/PJF appearance. We analyzed how these parameters changed comparing these two time points with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were included. Two different patterns at PJK/PJF were found: 36 patients activated compensation (defined as an increase in pelvic retroversion (ΔRPV > 5º), and 33 did not (ΔRPV < 5º). The difference in behavior relied mostly on the amount of not surgically restored pelvic rotation at 6w (OR: 0.6; CI95%: 0.4-9.2; P = 0.017). Non-compensators had less rotation reserve (PTx100/PI = 33.9% vs 47.8%;P < 0.001) associated with worse 6w relative pelvic version and lower lumbar arc restoration, worse 6w relative sagittal alignment and GAP-score, compared with compensators (P < 0.001). Compensators' response was based on pelvic retroversion, causing lower lumbar arc decrease, lumbar apex caudal migration, and upper lumbar arc posterior inclination. Despite compensation, a thoracic kyphosis increase in both upper and lower arches gradually evolved into a PJK/PJF. Non-compensators did not react to PJK/PJF, which forced them into kyphosis from the lumbar apex and extending cranially, mainly throughout the upper thoracic arc.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients fused from the TL junction to the iliac, those having greater postoperative pelvic rotation reserve showed greater capacity to recruit compensatory mechanisms against PJK/PJF.