Is there a place for surgical repair in adults with spondylolysis or grade-I spondylolisthesis-a systematic review and treatment algorithm

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Repair of Spondylolitic Spondylolisthesis Through Direct Pars Repair

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate whether direct pars repair achieves bone healing and symptom relief in patients with spondylolitic spondylolisthesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

While most cases of spondylolysis can be managed nonoperatively, a small percentage of patients require surgical intervention. The outcome of direct pars repair through a standard pedicle-screw with wiring technique is controversial in patients with lumbar spondylolitic spondylolisthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who had undergone an open surgical pars repair were retrospectively reviewed. Standard demographic and surgical parameters were collected. All patients underwent a primary repair of the pars with an autograft or bone morphogenetic protein and instrumentation using a pedicle-screw with spinous process wiring. At 6 to 12 months after the surgery, patient's pain symptoms, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were independently reviewed to assess healing; which was graded as nonunion, partial union, or solid union.

RESULTS

There were 68 patients identified (33 male and 35 female), with an average age of 18.6 years. The mean estimated blood loss was 139 ml, and the mean length of hospital stay was 3.7 days. CT evaluation revealed 35 (52%) solid unions, 21 (31%) partial unions, and 12 (18%) nonunions requiring revisions. Thirty-four (50%) patients had no postoperative pain, 24 (35%) had mild pain, and 10 (15%) had persistent pain. The majority of patients with nonunions on CT had mild or persistent pain. Patients with no or mild pain tended to be younger than those with persistent pain (17.5 vs. 24.6 yr, P =0.163).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a partial or complete union rate of 82% and a postoperative persistent pain rate of 15%. These figures are comparable to the previous study, and this pedicle-screw with wiring technique can be worth trying before interbody fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis to preserve anatomical lumbar motion.

Factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with pedicle screw and lamina hook: a clinical and CT-assessed study

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw and lamina hook (PSLH) technique is an effective and popular method for direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis. There is a lack of studies to explore factors that may influence the healing of spondylolysis after direct pars repair surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with PSLH technique.

METHODS

A total of 55 subjects (average age 21.1 ± 6.3 years, a total of 120 pars defects) diagnosed with symptomatic spondylolysis and underwent pars repair surgery with PSLH were followed up and their clinical data were analyzed. Subjects were divided into a non-fusion group and fusion group according to whether the pars defect had bony fusion at last follow-up assessed by CT. Radiographic data, data related to spondylolysis and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time of the 55 patients was 24.8 ± 12.0 (12-64) months. Among the 120 pars defects, 101 defects were successfully fused and 19 were not fused according to CT. The fusion rate was 84.2%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the factors correlated with non-fusion after pars repair surgery: whether the spondylolysis segment was associated with spina bifida occulta (SBO) (P = 0.001), stage of the defect (P = 0.047), width of the defect (P = 0.002), and disc degeneration (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Direct pars repair by PSHL is a reliable treatment for lumbar spondylolysis with a fusion rate of 84.2%. Association with SBO of the spondylolysis segment, a terminal stage of the defect, a wider defect gap, and grade III disc degeneration may be factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with PLSH. Non-fusion patients after pars repair appear to have worse clinical results compared to fusion patients.

Pars Interarticularis Fractures Treated with Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Literature Review

Recurrent stress on the isthmic pars interarticularis often leads to profound injury and symptom burden. When conservative and medical management fail, there are various operative interventions that can be used. The current review details the common clinical presentation and treatment of pars injury, with a special focus on the emerging minimally invasive procedures used in isthmic pars interarticularis repair. PubMed and Google Scholar database literature reviews were conducted. The keywords and phrases that were searched include but were not limited to; "history of spondylolysis", "pars interarticularis", "pars defect", "conventional surgical repair of pars", and "minimally invasive repair of pars". The natural history, conventional presentation, etiology, risk factors, and management of pars interarticularis injury are discussed by the authors. The surgical interventions described include the Buck's repair, Morscher Screw-Hook repair, Scott's Wiring technique, and additional pedicle screw-based repairs. Minimally invasive techniques are also reviewed, including the Levi technique. Surgical intervention has been proven to be safe and effective in managing pars interarticularis fractures. However, minimally invasive techniques often provide additional benefit to patients such as reducing damage of surrounding structures, decreasing postoperative pain, and limiting the time away from sports and other activities.

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of II° lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis: A retrospective cohort study

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is not suitable for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis, whether MIS-TLIF can treat II° lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) is still controversial. This retrospective cohort study compared the clinical efficacy of MIS-TLIF and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OPEN-TLIF) in the treatment of II° lumbar IS. From January 2017 to January 2023, 101 patients with II° lumbar IS were diagnosed in our hospital and underwent surgical treatment, of which 53 received MIS-TLIF surgery and 48 received OPEN-TLIF surgery. The operation time, blood loss and surgical complications were compared between the 2 groups. The pain, function, reduction rate and fusion rate of the patients were evaluated during follow-up. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and postoperative hospital stay in the MIS-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in the OPEN-TLIF group were (P < .01). In the MIS-TLIF group, there were 1 case of dural sac injury and 3 cases of lower limb paralysis. The complication rate of MIS-TLIF was lower than the OPEN-TLIF group (P = .032). In the visual analog scale score of low back pain, the MIS-TLIF group was lower than the OPEN-TLIF group after operation and at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in postoperative leg pain score, slippage rate, and fusion rate between the 2 groups. Compared with OPEN-TLIF, MIS-TLIF has the advantages of better low back pain relief, less trauma, less bleeding and faster recovery, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis repair with various fixation options: A finite element analysis

Objective: This study was designed to compare the biomechanical properties of lumbar spondylolysis repairs using different fixation methods by using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Methods: Five finite element models (A, B, C, D, and E) of L4-S1 vertebral body were reconstructed by CT images of a male patient (A: intact model; B: spondylolysis model; C: spondylolysis model with intrasegmental direct fixation by Buck screw; D: spondylolysis model with intersegmental indirect fixation by pedicle screw system; E: spondylolysis model with hybrid internal fixation). L5-S1 level was defined as the operative level. After the intact model was verified, six physiological motion states were simulated by applying 500 N concentrated force and 10 Nm torque on the upper surface of L4. The biomechanical properties of the three different internal fixation methods were evaluated by comparing the range of motion (ROM), maximum stress, and maximum displacement.

Results: Compared with Model B, the ROM and maximum displacement of Model C, D, and E decreased. The maximum stress on L5/S1 disc in models A, B, and C was much higher than that in Model D and E under extension and lateral bending conditions. Under axial rotation and lateral bending conditions, the maximum stress of interarticular muscle and internal fixation system in Model B and Model C was significantly higher than that in Model D and Model E. In contrast to Model D, the stress in Model E was distributed in two internal fixation systems.

Conclusion: In several mechanical comparisons, hybrid fixation had better biomechanical properties than other fixation methods. The experimental results show that hybrid fixation can stabilize the isthmus and reduce intervertebral disc stress, which making it the preferred treatment for lumbar spondylolysis.

Surgical Reduction and Direct Repair Using Pedicle Screw-Rod-Hook Fixation in Adult Patients with Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

Background

Although direct pars repair using a pedicle screw-rod-hook system has achieved satisfactory results in patients with spondylolysis, its application in adults with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis is rarely reported.

Objective

To assess the surgical effect of reduction and direct repair surgery with a pedicle screw-rod-hook system combined with autogenous bone grafts in adult patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Methods

Sixty-four adult patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent reduction and direct repair using a pedicle screw-rod-hook system in our department from September 2009 to April 2018. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by clinical and radiological assessments.

Results

The average follow-up was 52.15 ± 9.96 months. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores (VAS-lumbar and VAS-leg) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the final follow-up (FFU) were significantly lower than the preoperative levels (P < 0.05). The modified Prolo score was “excellent” for 60 patients (93.75%) and “good” for 4 patients (6.25%). The slip distance and slipping percentage showed significant decreases postoperatively and FFU compared to preoperatively (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the disc height, slip angle, and range of motion of the surgical intervertebral space or upper intervertebral space between preoperation and FFU (P < 0.05). Successful bony fusion had a 96.86% success rate.

Conclusion

Reduction of slip and direct repair using pedicle screw-rod-hook fixation combined with autogenous iliac bone grafting in adult patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis is a safe and effective technique.