Gender differences in multifidus fatty infiltration, sarcopenia and association with preoperative pain and functional disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Sarcopenia and the management of spinal disease in the elderly

Sarcopenia, generally defined by the loss of skeletal mass and function, may disproportionately affect elderly individuals and heavily influence spinal disease. Muscle atrophy is associated with myriad clinical problems, including thoracic kyphosis, increased sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spinal implant failures, and postoperative complications. As such, the aim of this narrative review is to synthesize pertinent literature detailing the intersection between sarcopenia and the impact of sarcopenia on the management of spine disease. Specifically, we focus on the domains of etiology, diagnosis and assessment, impact on the cervical and lumbar spine, spinal augmentation procedures, neoplastic disease, whiplash injury, and recovery/prevention. A narrative review was conducted by searching the PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to July 12, 2024, for any cohort studies, systematic reviews, or randomized controlled trials. Case studies and conference abstracts were excluded. Diagnosis of sarcopenia relies on the assessment of muscle strength and quantity/quality. Strength may be assessed using clinical tools such as gait speed, timed up and go (TUG) test, or hand grip strength, whereas muscle quantity/quality may be assessed via computed tomography (CT scan), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA scan). Sarcopenia has a generally negative impact on the clinical course of those undergoing cervical and lumbar surgery, and may be predictive of mortality in those with neoplastic spinal disease. In addition, severe acceleration-deceleration (whiplash) injuries may result in cervical extensor muscle atrophy. Intervention and recovery measures include nutrition or exercise therapy, although the evidence for nutritional intervention is lacking. Sarcopenia is a widely prevalent pathology in the advanced-age population, in which the diagnostic criteria, impact on spinal pathology, and recovery/prevention measures remain understudied. However, further understanding of this therapeutically challenging pathology is paramount, as surgical outcome may be heavily influenced by sarcopenia status.

Surgical management of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian: a narrative review

Optimal management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian population are controversial given the higher incidence of comorbidities with concern for poor prognosis and fear of increased complications associated with surgical management. In this narrative review, we aim to detail the complex clinical considerations when approaching odontoid screw fixation/instrumented fusion, spinal decompression, and spinal fusion in the octogenarian. Literature review was conducted via Google Scholar and PubMed databases, with literature selected based on statistical power and clinical relevance to the following pathologies/surgical techniques: odontoid fracture, surgical decompression, and surgical fusion in the octogenarian. The aforementioned pathologies were selected based on prevalence in the advanced-age population in which surgical screening techniques and management remain nonuniform. Preoperative evaluation of the octogenarian patient increasingly includes frailty, sarcopenia, and osteopenia/osteoporosis assessments. In cases of odontoid fracture, conservative management appears to provide beneficial clinical outcomes with lower rates of complication compared to surgery; however, rates of radiographic odontoid fusion are far lower in conservatively managed patients. Regarding surgical decompression and fusion, the presence of comorbidities may be more predictive of outcome rather than age status, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques providing safety and efficacy in the surgical management of this age cohort. Age status may be less pertinent than previously thought in the decision to pursue spinal surgery for odontoid fracture, spinal decompression, or spinal fusion; however, each of these procedures has respective risks and benefits that must be considered within the context of each patient's comorbidity profile.

Three Stages on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lumbar Degenerative Spine

PURPOSES

To propose a new lumbar degenerative staging system using the current radiological classification system.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of retrospective databases between January 2018 and December 2022 was performed. Total of 410 patients for Modic changes, paravertebral muscle fat infiltration, disc degeneration, articular process degeneration, vertebral endplate degeneration and other structures, and disc displacement, Spondylolisthesis, and stenosis, and grouped patients according to stage were assessed. Visual analog scale, Japanese Orthopaedic Association, and Oswestry Disability Index scores were used to assess low back pain strength, neurological function, and quality of life, respectively.

RESULTS

The lumbar degeneration staging system consists of 8 variables, which can be divided into 3 steps: early, middle and late, and the correlation between each variable is strong (P < 0.05). The later the staging, the worse the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, visual analog scale, and Oswestry Disability Index scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with later stages have worse clinical scores. This staging system recommends a uniform classification to assess lumbar degeneration.

Preoperative Multifidus Muscle Quality is Associated With Patient Reported Outcomes After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) commonly involves a transpsoas approach. Despite the association between LLIF, postoperative iliopsoas weakness, and iatrogenic neuropraxia, no study has yet examined the effect of psoas or multifidus muscle quality on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LLIF with 1-year minimum follow-up. Psoas and multifidus muscle qualities were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging using two validated classification systems for muscle atrophy. Average muscle quality was calculated as the mean score from all levels (L1-2 through L5-S1). Univariate and multivariate statistics were utilized to investigate the relationship between psoas/multifidus muscle quality and preoperative, 6-weeks postoperative, and final postoperative PROs.

RESULTS

74 patients (110 levels) with a mean follow-up of 18.71 ± 8.02 months were included for analysis. Greater multifidus atrophy was associated with less improvement on ODI, SF12, and VR12 (P < .05) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, worse multifidus atrophy predicted less improvement on SF12 and VR12 (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Despite the direct manipulation of the psoas muscle inherent to LLIF, preoperative psoas muscle quality did not affect postoperative outcomes. Rather, the extent of preoperative multifidus fatty infiltration and atrophy was more likely to predict postoperative pain and disability. These findings suggest that multifidus atrophy may be more pertinent than psoas atrophy in its association with patient-reported outcome measures after LLIF.

Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?-A Prospective Single Center Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to assess the amount of reduction in lean muscle mass (LMM) of multifidus muscle (MFM) between conventional open Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (CO-TLIF) as compared to Minimally invasive spine Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

METHODS

This study was conducted between 2017 and 2020. It included 100 patients divided into two groups, 50 patients treated with CO-TLIF, 50 treated with MIS-TLIF. Only patients undergoing single level, primary lumbar fusion at L4-5 or L5-S1 level for degenerative pathologies were included. All patients were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1-year post surgery. Measurements were performed using ImageJ image processing program.

RESULTS

Mean percentage reduction in LMM in CO-TLIF group was 45.52 ± 12.36% and MIS-TLIF group was 25.83 ± 9.64% [statistically significant (t = 8.78, P < .001)]. Mean percentage reduction in LMM on side of cage insertion was 39.63 ± 15.96% and opposite side was 31.40 ± 15.01% [statistically significant (t = 9.06, P < .001)]. Mean reduction of LMM among males was 29.38 ± 15.23% and females was 40.42 ± 12.67% [statistically significant (t = -3.95, P < .001)].We observed significant but weak degree of correlation between age and percentage reduction of LMM (r = .22, P = .028).

CONCLUSION

Mean reduction in LMM was greater in CO-TLIF group as compared to MIS-TLIF. There was greater reduction in LMM in females and on side of cage insertion. We also found greater reduction in LMM with increasing age in both groups.

Lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology is associated with spinal degeneration in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been reported to induce changes in paraspinal muscle morphology, but objective physical function and degenerative spine conditions are rarely assessed.

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with paraspinal muscle morphology using objective physical and degenerative spine assessments in patients with LSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Cross-sectional design.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Seventy patients with neurogenic claudication caused by LSS, receiving outpatient physical therapy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cross-sectional area (CSA) and functional CSA (FCSA) of the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles, the severity of stenosis, disc degeneration, and endplate abnormalities were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, as well as sagittal spinopelvic alignment by X-ray. Objective physical assessments included pedometry and claudication distance. Patient-reported outcomes included the numerical rating scale of low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness, and the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire.

METHODS

To assess the impact of LSS on paraspinal muscles, FCSA and FCSA/CSA were compared between the dominant and nondominant sides based on the patients' neurogenic symptoms, and multivariable regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, height, and weight were performed; p<.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were analyzed. At one level below the maximum stenotic level, erector spinae FCSA on the dominant side was significantly lower than that on the nondominant side. In the multivariable regression analyses, at one level below the symptomatic level, disc degeneration, endplate abnormalities, and lumbar spinopelvic alignment, such as decreased lumbar lordosis and increased pelvic tilt, were negatively associated with multifidus FCSA and FCSA/CSA ratio. A significant association was observed between dural sac CSA and erector spinae FCSA. Throughout L1/2 to L5/S, disc degeneration, endplate abnormalities, and lumbar spinopelvic alignment were negatively associated with multifidus and erector spinae FCSA or FCSA/CSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar paraspinal muscle asymmetry caused by LSS was observed only in erector spinae. Disc degeneration, endplate abnormalities, and lumbar spinopelvic alignment, rather than spinal stenosis and LSS symptoms, were more associated with paraspinal muscle atrophy or fat infiltration.

Fatty infiltration of the cervical multifidus musculature and its clinical correlation to cervical spondylosis

PURPOSE

Fat infiltration (FI) of the deep neck extensor muscles has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in cervical injury, mechanical neck pain, and axial symptoms after cervical spine surgery. However, information is scarce on the severity of FI in cervical extensors associated with different clinical syndromes in patients with cervical spondylosis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the severity of FI in the cervical multifidus musculature and its clinical correlates in the syndromes and sagittal alignment of patients with cervical spondylosis.

METHODS

This study was conducted as a retrospective study of twenty-eight healthy volunteers (HV) together with sixty-six patients who underwent cervical radiculopathy (CR), degenerative myelopathy (DM), and axial joint pain (AJP) from January 2020 to March 2022. MRI was used to measure the fat cross-sectional area (FCSA), functional muscle cross-sectional area (FMCSA), total muscle cross-sectional area (TMCSA), FI ratio of the cervical multifidus musculature at each cervical level from the C3 to C6 segments and the cervical lordosis angle in the included subjects.

RESULTS

The difference in the FCSA and FI ratio in patient groups with cervical spondylosis was significantly greater than that of the HV group (P < 0.05), and the Cobb angle of the DM group, AJP group and HV group was significantly greater than that of the CR group (P < 0.05). The FI ratio comparison showed no significant difference by sex, and the comparison of FCSA, FMCSA, TMCSA and FI ratio showed no significant difference by age range from 35 to 69 in the included subjects. The FCSA and TMCSA in patients with cervical spondylosis were positively related to the Cobb angle (r_s= 0.336, P = 0.006, r_s =0.319, P = 0.009, respectively), and the FI ratio was inversely correlated with the Cobb angle (r_s= -0.285, P = 0.020) and positively correlated with age (r_s =0.261, P = 0.034). In the HV group, FMCSA was inversely correlated with age (r_s= -0.400, P = 0.035), while the FI ratio had a positive correlation with age (r_s= -0.423, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Compared with healthy subjects, a more severe degree of FI in the multifidus musculature and sagittal imbalance were found in patients with cervical spondylosis. These two imaging features are considered to be important concomitant phenomena of cervical spondylosis, and the more severe FI is, the worse the sagittal imbalance. However, each syndrome had no obvious difference in FI in the multifidus musculature.

Facet overhang: A novel parameter in the pathophysiology of multifidus muscle atrophy

The relationship between degenerative zygapophysial joint (facet) arthropathy and multifidus muscle atrophy has not been rigorously evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine if specific morphological features of degenerative facet arthropathy are correlated with multifidus muscle atrophy. We retrospectively reviewed medical records and imaging studies of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Facet overhang, bridging osteophyte formation, facet effusion, and facet angles were evaluated by univariable and multivariable regression to identify independent associations with deep and superficial parts of the multifidus total cross-sectional area (tCSA), functional cross-sectional area (fnCSA), and fatty infiltration (FI). Facet overhang was classified as severe in 50 females (53.2%) versus 56 males (36.9%) (p = 0.030). Severity of facet overhang and female sex were independently associated with smaller deep part of the multifidus tCSA and fnCSA as well as higher FI, reflecting greater atrophy of the deep region compared to total muscle mass. In comparison, severe facet overhang (p < 0.001; OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 2.13-5.66) and female sex (p < 0.001; OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 2.58-6.79) were independently associated only with higher superficial part of the multifidus FI, reflecting muscle steatosis without significant lean muscle atrophy. In patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, facet overhang is an independent risk factor for deep part of the multifidus atrophy. Bridging osteophyte formation, facet effusion, and facet angles were not independently associated with deep part of the multifidus atrophy.

Predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in patients with lumbar stenosis after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery

Background

To explore the predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 82 LSS patients with sagittal malalignment (SVA ≥ 50 mm or PT ≥ 20° or PI-LL ≥ 20°) who underwent short-segment decompression and fusion surgery between January 2019 and March 2021. Patients’ characteristic, radiographic and paravertebral muscle parameters were assessed. The patients were divided into group A (postoperative malalignment) and B (postoperative alignment) according to whether the postoperative restoration of the sagittal alignment was achieved.

Results

There existed more males in group B than in group A (p = 0.002). The age of group A (73.36 ± 8.02) was greater than that of group B (69.08 ± 6.07, p = 0.009). Preoperative PT in group A (27.40 ± 5.82) was greater than that in group B (19.30 ± 7.32, p < 0.001). The functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) in group A (28.73 ± 4.23) was lower than that in group B (36.94 ± 7.81, p < 0.001). And the fatty infiltration rate (FI) of group A (27.16% ± 5.58%) was higher than that of group B (22.61% ± 5.81%, p = 0.001). The fCSA was negatively correlated with the postoperative PT and PTr (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Stronger lumbar paravertebral muscles, smaller preoperative PI, PT or PI-LL, male and younger age are the predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in the elderly LSS patients after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.

[Impact of sarcopenia on effectiveness of lumbar decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of sarcopenia on effectiveness of lumbar decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 50 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who met the selection criteria between August 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the diagnostic criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), based on the calculation of the skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the L ₃ level, SMI<45.4 cm ²/m ² (men) and SMI<34.4 cm ²/m ² (women) were used as the diagnostic threshold, the patients were divided into sarcopenia group (25 cases) and non-sarcopenia group (25 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, level of lumbar spinal stenosis, surgical fusion level, and comorbidity between the two groups ( P>0.05); the body mass index in sarcopenia group was significantly lower than that in non-sarcopenia group ( t=-3.198, P=0.002). Clinical data of the two groups were recorded and compared, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospitalization stay, and complications. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and sciatica and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were recorded preoperatively and at last follow-up. The effectiveness was evaluated according to modified MacNab standard.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume ( P>0.05). However, the hospitalization stay in sarcopenia group was significantly longer than that in non-sarcopenia group ( t=2.105, P=0.044). The patients were followed up 7-36 months (mean, 29.7 months). In sarcopenia group, 1 case of dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred during operation, as well as 1 case of internal fixator loosening during follow-up; 1 case of incision exudation and poor healing occurred in each of the two groups, and no adjacent segment degeneration and deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity occurred in the two groups during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (12% vs. 4%) between the two groups ( χ ²=1.333, P=0.513). VAS scores in low back pain and sciatica as well as ODI scores in two groups significantly improved when compared with preoperative results at last follow-up ( P<0.05). The differences of VAS scores in low back pain and ODI scores before and after operation in sarcopenia group were significantly lower than that in non-sarcopenia group ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference of that in VAS scores of sciatica between the two groups ( t=-1.494, P=0.144). According to the modified MacNab standard, the excellent and good rate of the sarcopenia group was 92%, and that of the non-sarcopenia group was 96%, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( χ ² =1.201, P=0.753).

CONCLUSION

Patients with sarcopenia and lumbar spinal stenosis may have longer postoperative recovery time, and the effectiveness is worse than that of non-sarcopenic patients. Therefore, for elderly patients with lumbar spine disease, it is suggested to improve preoperative assessment of sarcopenia, which can help to identify patients with sarcopenia at risk of poor surgical prognosis in advance, so as to provide rehabilitation guidance and nutritional intervention in the perioperative period.