Cost-effectiveness studies of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review

Trends and Themes in the Study of Value in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background

The study of value in orthopedic surgery aims to maximize health outcomes gained per unit cost through various health economic tools but is fragmented across various subspecialties and geographies. Therefore, it is difficult to ascertain whether this research methodology is being used to its full potential across all orthopedic subspecialties and geographies.

Purpose

We sought to assess the distribution of prior health economics literature in orthopedic surgery across subspecialties and geographies. The secondary aim was to identify pertinent methodologic trends that may affect the conclusions drawn.

Methods

A systematic review utilizing 3 electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) was performed. Inclusion criteria included prior systematic reviews assessing economic analyses across all orthopedic surgery subspecialities published between 2010 and April 24, 2021. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review tool. Data were qualitatively analyzed.

Results

In the 44 studies included, arthroplasty (36.4%) and spine (31.8%) were the most represented subspecialties. Almost half of studies originated from the United States (45.5%), followed by the United Kingdom (18.2%). Health economic models were most commonly from the perspective of the health care or hospital system (40.5%), followed by the societal perspective (23.5%), and the payer perspective (14.8%).

Conclusions

The study of value in orthopedic surgery is not uniformly leveraged across all subspecialties and geographies. Methodologically, the societal perspective was inadequately represented, despite orthopedic pathologies often incurring significant indirect costs (eg, time off work, rehabilitation expenses).

Early prediction of functional impairment at hospital discharge in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a machine learning approach

Although conservative treatment is commonly used for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF), some patients experience functional disability following OVF. This study aimed to develop prediction models for new-onset functional impairment following admission for OVF using machine learning approaches and compare their performance. Our study consisted of patients aged 65 years or older admitted for OVF using a large hospital-based database between April 2014 and December 2021. As the primary outcome, we defined new-onset functional impairment as a Barthel Index ≤ 60 at discharge. In the training dataset, we developed three machine learning models (random forest [RF], gradient-boosting decision tree [GBDT], and deep neural network [DNN]) and one conventional model (logistic regression [LR]). In the test dataset, we compared the predictive performance of these models. A total of 31,306 patients were identified as the study cohort. In the test dataset, all models showed good discriminatory ability, with an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.7. GBDT (AUC = 0.761) outperformed LR (0.756), followed by DNN (0.755), and RF (0.753). We successfully developed prediction models for new-onset functional impairment following admission for OVF. Our findings will contribute to effective treatment planning in this era of increasing prevalence of OVF.

Short Fixation Using Upward/Downward Penetrating Endplate Screws and Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Introduction

Percutaneous vertebral augmentation techniques, such as balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) and vertebral body stenting (VBS), are commonly used for surgical intervention in osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). However, markedly unstable OVF cases require additional fixation procedures, prompting the exploration of combined percutaneous vertebral augmentation and posterior fixation. A novel surgical approach involving percutaneous vertebral augmentation with upward penetrating endplate screws (PES) and downward PES, complemented by a short fusion of one above one below, was developed. This study aimed to introduce and report the preliminary outcomes of this technique based on a retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive cases in the short and medium term.

Methods

Surgical indications are a vertebral wedge angle difference of 10° or more, vertebral pedicle fractures, posterior wall fractures, and diffuse low-signal changes exceeding 50% on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The procedure is reserved for highly unstable cases following a comprehensive health assessment. The surgical technique involves prone positioning, fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous vertebral augmentation, and the use of downward PES in the cranial vertebral body and upward PES for the caudal vertebral body by percutaneous technique. The fixation range is one above and one below.

Results

The case series of 20 patients, with an average follow-up period of 146.9 days, demonstrates a mean surgical time of 57 min and minimal complications. The advantages of the technique are as follows: ease of performance, minimal fixation range, and time efficiency. Risks, such as potential screw loosening and the need for prolonged follow-up, are acknowledged.

Discussion

The technique represents a promising surgical approach that balances the requirements of minimally invasive intervention and relatively robust initial fixation for elderly osteoporotic patients with unstable OVFs. While short- and medium-term results are favorable, long-term observations are needed to further assess its efficacy. This novel technique has a potential to be a valuable surgical option for unstable OVFs.

The study findings demonstrated a significant association between C-reactive protein levels and trabecular bone score : NHANES 2005-2008

OBJECTIVES

The association between C-reactive protein and bone density has been primarily investigated in previous studies, with little to no research investigating its relationship with total bone trabecular score.

METHODS

Data from the NHANES database (500 males and 633 females) were utilized in this study to perform a multiple weighted linear regression analysis to estimate this relationship of CRP and TBS. Subsequently, population characterization, univariate logistic regression analysis, subgroup and interaction analysis were in progress.

RESULTS

Upon covariate adjustment, the analysis revealed a notable negative correlation between CRP and TBS(β=-0.0081,95% CI (-0.0142, -0.0019), P = 0.009). Furthermore, no interactions were detected within any subgroups.

CONCLUSION

This finding enhances our comprehension of the relationship in inflammation and bone health, offering the novel research outlook for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.

Unchanged incidence of major adverse events amidst rising surgical interventions for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, 2015-2021

This study investigated treatment trends and major adverse events in patients hospitalized for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). The frequency of surgical interventions for OVF increased significantly, but this did not decrease major adverse events. The findings underscore the necessity for reevaluating OVF management strategies.

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is a common condition in the aging population, often leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Here, we analyzed treatment trends and incidence of major adverse events in patients hospitalized for OVF.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study, using a large Japanese hospital administrative database. The cohort included hospitalized patients aged 65 years or older, admitted for OVF from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcomes were the trend in the proportion of the patients undergoing surgery for OVF and the incidence of major adverse events within 30 days of admission. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the trend in hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 14,714 patients, with a mean age of 82.4 years. There was a significant increase in surgical interventions for OVF, from 3.7% of patients in 2015 to 9.8% in 2021 (p < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse events remained unchanged, with a risk ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.35) in 2021 compared to 2015. Average hospitalization costs increased significantly, from $7,570.6 (SD 6,047.0) in 2015 to $9,502.9 (SD 7,231.5) in 2021 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite a significant increase in the proportion of surgical intervention for OVF, no reduction in the risk of major adverse events was observed between 2015 and 2021. Surgeons and policy makers need to interpret these findings and work towards an optimized approach to the management of OVF in the aging population.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Zoledronate and Denosumab in Patients with Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The comparison of the efficacy of zoledronate and denosumab for treating osteoporosis is controversial, and few randomized controlled trials have compared these two drugs in practical patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). We conducted a randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of zoledronate and denosumab in patients with acute OVCF, with a focus on the occurrence of new OVCF. Methods: We enrolled 206 subjects who had their first acute OVCF, without any previous history of osteoporosis medication. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous zoledronate once a year or subcutaneous denosumab twice a year. We investigated the OVCF recurrence, clinical outcome, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers over 12 months. Results: The final cohort comprised 89 participants (mean age of 75.82 ± 9.34 years, including 74 women [83.15%]) in the zoledronate group and 86 patients (mean age of 75.53 ± 10.23 years, including 71 women [82.56%]) in the denosumab group. New OVCFs occurred in 8 patients (8.89%) in the zoledronate group and 11 patients (12.79%) in the denosumab group (odds ratio, 1.485 [95% confidence interval, 0.567-3.891], p = 0.419). No significant difference was observed in the survival analysis between the two groups (p = 0.407). The clinical outcome, including the visual analog scale score for pain and simple radiographic findings, did not differ between the two groups. The changes in BMD and bone turnover markers were also not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, drug-related adverse events did not differ between the groups in terms of safety. Conclusions: The efficacy of zoledronate was comparable to that of denosumab in terms of the occurrence of new OVCFs, as well as of the overall clinical course in patients with their first acute OVCF. Notably, this study represents the first comparison of these two drugs in patients with acute OVCF. However, further research with large-scale and long-term follow-up is necessary.

Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Osteoporotic Patients Who Were Treated with Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Refracture After Vertebral Augmentation

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze prognostic factors in osteoporotic patients who treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty for refracture after vertebral augmentation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 61 patients with refractures after vertebral augmentation who received percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment again from January 2019 to December 2021. Based on the presence of back pain at the last follow-up, 17 patients were placed in the pain group, and 44 patients were placed in the pain-free group. The following covariates were reviewed: age; bone mineral density; bone cement dosage; bone cement leakage; body mass index; and rate of anterior vertebral height (AVH) loss in the target before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and at last follow-up. Patients were assessed using visual analogue scale score and Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the rate of AVH loss after surgery was associated with postoperative back pain. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of AVH loss rate at 1 week after surgery was 0.6845, and the cutoff value was 0.18; the area under the curve of AVH loss rate at the last follow-up was 0.7306, and the cutoff value was 0.2815. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with lower AVH loss rates had lower incidence of postoperative back pain and better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence of postoperative back pain was strongly associated with AVH loss after surgery. Patients with a lower rate of AVH loss had a lower incidence of postoperative back pain and a better prognosis.

Analysis of Long-Term Medical Expenses in Vertebral Fracture Patients

Background

The objective of this study was to analyze the direct medical expenses of a vertebral fracture cohort (VC) and a matched cohort (MC) over 5 years preceding and following the fracture, analyze the duration of the rise in medical expenses due to the fracture, and examine whether the expenses vary with age group, utilizing a national claims database.

Methods

Subjects with vertebral fractures and matched subjects were chosen from the National Health Insurance Service Sample cohort (NHIS-Sample) of South Korea. Patients with vertebral fractures were either primarily admitted to acute care hospitals (index admissions) or those who received kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty during the follow-up period (2002-2015). A risk-set matching was performed using 1 : 5 random sampling to simulate a real-world situation. Individual-level direct medical expenses per quarter were calculated for 5 years prior and subsequent to the vertebral fracture. In this analysis using a comparative interrupted time series design, we examined the direct medical expenses of a VC and an MC.

Results

A total of 3,923 incident vertebral fracture patients and 19,615 matched subjects were included in this study. The mean age was 75.5 ± 7.4 years, and 69.5% were women. The mean difference in medical expenses between the two groups increased steadily before the fracture. The medical expenses of the VC peaked in the first quarter following the fracture. The cost changes were 1.82 times higher for the VC than for the MC (95% confidence interval, 1.62-2.04; p < 0.001) in the first year. Subsequently, there were no differential changes in medical expenses between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the < 70-year subgroup, there were no differential changes in medical expenses between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, in the ≥ 80-year subgroup, the cost changes for the VC were higher than those for the MC up to 5 years after time zero.

Conclusions

Based on our study results, we suggest that health and medical policies for vertebral fractures should be designed to last up to approximately 1 year after the fracture. Health policies should be differentiated according to age group.

Demonstrating the Value of Interventional Radiology

While national healthcare expenditures per capita in the United States exceed those in all other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, measures of health outcomes in the United States lag behind those in peer nations. This combination of high healthcare spending and relatively poor health has led to attempts to identify high- and low-value healthcare services and to develop mechanisms to reimburse health care providers based on the value of the care delivered. This article investigates the meaning of value in healthcare and identifies specific services delivered by interventional radiologists that have accrued evidence that they meet criteria for high-value services. Recognizing the shift in reimbursement to high-value care, it is imperative that interventional radiology (IR) develop the evidence needed to articulate to all relevant stakeholders how IR contributes value to the system.

Cost-effectiveness and willing-to-pay thresholds for vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, what are they based on: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Although there is substantial clinical evidence on the safety and effectiveness of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, cost-effectiveness is less well known. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies and policy-based willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds for different vertebral augmentation (VA) procedures, vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BK), for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs).

DESIGN

A systematic review targeting cost-effectiveness studies of VA procedures for OVFs.

DATA SOURCES

Six bibliographic databases were searched from inception up to May 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION

Studies were eligible if meeting all predefined criteria: (1) VP or BK intervention, (2) OVFs and (3) cost-effectiveness study. Articles not written in English, abstracts, editorials, reviews and those reporting only cost data were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Information was extracted on study characteristics, cost-effective estimates, summary decisions and payer WTP thresholds. Incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) was the main outcome measure. Studies were summarised by a structured narrative synthesis organised by comparisons with conservative management (CM). Two independent reviewers assessed the quality (risk of bias) of the systematic review and cost-effectiveness studies by peer-reviewed checklists.

RESULTS

We identified 520 references through database searching and 501 were excluded as ineligible by titles and abstract. Ten reports were identified as eligible from 19 full-text reviews. ICER for VP versus CM evaluated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) ranged from €22 685 (*US$33 395) in Netherlands to £-2240 (*US$-3273), a cost-saving in the UK. ICERs for BK versus CM ranged from £2706 (*US$3954) in UK to kr600 000 (*US$90 910) in Sweden. ICERs were within payer WTP thresholds for a QALY based on historical benchmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VP and BK were judged cost-effective alternatives to CM for OVFs in economic studies and were within WTP thresholds in multiple healthcare settings.

Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022

A vertebral fracture is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) cause a variety of morbidities and deaths. There are currently few "gold standard treatments" outlined for the management of OVFs in terms of quantity and quality. Conservative treatment is the primary treatment option for OVFs. The treatment of pain includes short-term bed rest, analgesic medication, anti-osteoporotic medications, exercise, and a brace. Numerous reports have been made on studies for vertebral augmentation (VA), including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. There is still debate and controversy about the effectiveness of VA in comparison with conservative treatment. Until more robust data are available, current evidence does not support the routine use of VA for OVF. Despite the fact that the majority of OVFs heal without surgery, 15%-35% of patients with an unstable fracture, persistent intractable back pain, or severely collapsed vertebra that causes a neurologic deficit, kyphosis, or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Because no single approach can guarantee the best surgical outcomes, customized surgical techniques are required. Surgeons must stay current on developments in the osteoporotic spine field and be open to new treatment options. Osteoporosis management and prevention are critical to lowering the risk of future OVFs. Clinical studies on bisphosphonate's effects on fracture healing are lacking. Teriparatide was intermittently administered, which dramatically improved spinal fusion and fracture healing while lowering mortality risk. According to the available literature, there are no standard management methods for OVFs. More multimodal approaches, including conservative and surgical treatment, VA, and medications that treat osteoporosis and promote fracture healing, are required to improve the quality of the majority of guidelines.