Fusion rate of Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 compared with local bone autograft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders

Comparison of Hounsfield Unit, Vertebral Bone Quality, and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry T-Score for Predicting Cage Subsidence After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare Hounsfield unit (HU), vertebral bone quality (VBQ), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score in predicting cage subsidence (CS) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing PLIF and measured L4 HU and VBQ. Baseline characteristics between CS and non-CS groups were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for CS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to explore the predictive value of variables for CS. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with available DEXA results.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were analyzed. The subsidence group was older, with lower L4 HU (92.6 (35.4) vs 130.8 (47.8), P < 0.001) and higher VBQ (3.30 (0.64) vs 2.99 (0.63), P = 0.041) compared to the non-CS group. Low L4 HU (OR 0.979, P = 0.022) was an independent risk factor for subsidence, while VBQ was not. ROC analysis indicated that L4 HU (AUC = 0.733, P < 0.001) exhibited superior predictive performance compared to VBQ (AUC = 0.643, P = 0.032). Subgroup analysis in patients with DEXA showed that the femoral neck T-score (AUC = 0.67, P = 0.037) could differentiate CS, with L4 HU exhibiting the highest predictive ability (AUC = 0.778, P < 0.001), both outperforming VBQ (AUC = 0.645, P = 0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the three BMD parameters, only low L4 HU could be an independent risk factor for CS. Preoperative HU is mandatory in patients at risk for osteoporosis when undergoing spine surgery.

Comparing the osteogenesis outcomes of different lumbar interbody fusions (A/O/X/T/PLIF) by evaluating their mechano-driven fusion processes

BACKGROUND

In lumbar interbody fusion (LIF), achieving proper fusion status requires osteogenesis to occur in the disc space. Current LIF techniques, including anterior, oblique, lateral, transforaminal, and posterior LIF (A/O/X/T/PLIF), may result in varying osteogenesis outcomes due to differences in biomechanical characteristics.

METHODS

A mechano-regulation algorithm was developed to predict the fusion processes of A/O/X/T/PLIF based on finite element modeling and iterative evaluations of the mechanobiological activities of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their differentiated cells (osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts). Fusion occurred in the grafting region, and each differentiated cell type generated the corresponding tissue proportional to its concentration. The corresponding osteogenesis volume was calculated by multiplying the osteoblast concentration by the grafting volume.

RESULTS

TLIF and ALIF achieved markedly greater osteogenesis volumes than did PLIF and O/XLIF (5.46, 5.12, 4.26, and 3.15 cm3, respectively). Grafting volume and cage size were the main factors influencing the osteogenesis outcome in patients treated with LIF. A large grafting volume allowed more osteoblasts (bone tissues) to be accommodated in the disc space. A small cage size reduced the cage/endplate ratio and therefore decreased the stiffness of the LIF. This led to a larger osteogenesis region to promote osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs and osteoblast proliferation (bone regeneration), which subsequently increased the bone fraction in the grafting space.

CONCLUSION

TLIF and ALIF produced more favorable biomechanical environments for osteogenesis than did PLIF and O/XLIF. A small cage and a large grafting volume improve osteogenesis by facilitating osteogenesis-related cell activities driven by mechanical forces.

Diabetes-related Screw Loosening: The Distinction of Surgical Sites and the Relationship among Diabetes, Implant Stabilization and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is correlated with poor clinical outcomes in spinal surgery. However, the effect of it on screw stabilization has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the screw loosening rate and postoperative outcomes in diabetic patients and to identify potential risk factors associated with loosening.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Two hundred and forty-three patients who received cervical or lumbar internal fixation between 2015 and 2019 were enrolled. Screw loosening was assessed on radiography, and clinical outcomes were evaluated by the improvement of visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) or Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The relationship of DM, screw loosening and clinical outcomes were analyzed with chi-square tests and regression analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients (50.2%) with diabetes were included in this study. Diabetes led to the increase of the rate of screw loosening in the lumbar spine, while the loosening rate did not vary significantly in the cervical spine. The occurrence of screw loosening in the lumbar spine was more likely to be associated with clinical outcomes for motor performance including walking and sitting. However, no significant effect on JOA and VAS scores in the cervical spine of screw loosening was found. Moreover, the history of DM affected the outcomes of the patients who underwent spinal surgery.

CONCLUSION

DM had an adverse effect on screw stabilization. The impaired improvement of clinical outcomes in diabetics after spinal surgery was related to screw loosening. In addition to the direct effects on operative wounds and neural function, the impact on the screws due to DM was also worth noting.