A post-outbreak assessment of exposure proximity and Ebola virus disease-related stigma among community members in Kono District, Sierra Leone: A cross-sectional study

Stigma among ebola disease survivors in Mubende and Kassanda districts, Central Uganda, 2022

Ebola disease survivors often experience stigma in multiple forms, including felt (perceived) stigma, enacted (action-based) stigma, and institutional stigma. On September 20, 2022, Uganda declared a Sudan Virus Disease (species orthoebolavirus sudanense) outbreak after a patient with confirmed Sudan virus (SUDV) infection was identified in Mubende District. The outbreak led to 142 confirmed and 22 probable cases over the next two months. We examined the types of stigma experienced by survivors and their household members and its effect on their well-being. We conducted a qualitative study during January 2023 in Mubende and Kassanda Districts. We conducted in-depth and key informant interviews with ten SUDV disease survivors, ten household members of SUDV disease survivors, and ten key informants (district officials and health workers in the affected communities). Interviews were recorded, translated, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Survivors reported experiencing isolation and rejection by community members and loss of work. They reported being denied purchases at shops or having their money collected in a basket and disinfected (enacted stigma), which led to self-isolation (felt stigma). Educational institutions denied admission to some students from affected homes, while parents of children in some affected families stopped sending children to school due to verbal abuse from students and teachers (structural stigma). Prolonged SUDV disease symptoms and additional attention to survivors from responders (including home visits by health workers, public distribution of support items, and conspicuous transport from home to the survivor's clinic) were perceived as aggravating both felt and enacted stigma. Even after the outbreak had been declared over, survivors felt that they were still considered a threat to the community. Survivors experienced mainly enacted stigma which was aggravated by the outbreak response and control activities such as additional attention to survivors from responders. Strengthening community engagement to counteract stigma, rethinking response activities that aggravate stigma, integrated response interventions by partners, private distribution of support items, and increasing awareness and sensitization could reduce stigma among the Ebola disease survivors in future responses.

Embedding treatment in stronger care systems

A key lesson from the west Africa (2014-16) Ebola disease epidemic was that outbreak responses fail when they respond to patients through a narrow clinical lens without considering the broader community and social context of care. Here, in the second of two Series papers on the modern landscape of Ebola disease, we review progress made in the last decade to improve patient-centred care. Although the biosafety imperatives of treating Ebola disease remain, recent advances show how to mitigate these so that patients are cared for in a safe and dignified manner that encourages early treatment-seeking behaviour and provides support after the return of patients to their communities. We review advances in diagnostics, including faster Ebola disease detection via real-time RT-PCR, and consider design improvements in Ebola disease treatment units that enhance patient safety and dignity. We also review advances in care provision, such as the integration of palliative care and mobile communication into routine care, and address how greater access to research is possible through harmonised clinical trials. Finally, we discuss how strengthened community engagement and psychosocial programmes are addressing stigma and providing holistic support for survivors.

Stigmatization of Ebola virus disease survivors in 2022: A cross-sectional study of survivors in Sierra Leone

BACKGROUND

Evidence has demonstrated a high proportion of Ebola virus disease (EVD) survivors experienced stigma due to the disease. This study sought to understand the longer-term effects of stigma encountered by survivors of the 2014-2016 EVD epidemic living in Sierra Leone.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of 595 EVD survivors and 403 close contacts (n = 998) from Sierra Leone. Assessments were conducted using a three-part survey between November 2021 to March 2022. We explored the socio-demographic factors associated with stigma experienced by EVD survivors.

FINDINGS

50·6 % (n = 301) of EVD survivors reported that they continued to experience at least one aspect of stigma. Females were disproportionately affected by stigma, with 45·2 % of females reporting isolation from friends and family compared to 33·9 % of men (p = 0·005). Multivariable logistic regression models revealed those aged 40-44, living rurally, and reporting an acute infection longer than seven days was associated with EVD-related stigma at the time of survey.

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrates stigma is still prevalent among people who survived EVD in 2022. It also identified socio-demographic factors associated with stigma that can be used for targeting interventions. Importantly, this highlights the continued need for EVD survivors to access mental healthcare and social support systems well after disease recovery.

FUNDING

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Grant no. PJT-175098. JK is funded by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in the Molecular Pathogenesis of Emerging and Re-Emerging Viruses. SS is funded by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Program Science and Global Public Health.

Social distancing, community stigma, and implications for psychological distress in the aftermath of Ebola virus disease

BACKGROUND

The 2013-2016 Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic resulted in more infections and deaths than all prior outbreaks in the 40-year history of this virus combined. This study examines how experiences of EVD infection, and preventive measures such as social distancing, were linked to experiences of stigma and social exclusion among those reintegrating into their communities.

METHODS

Key informant interviews (n = 42) and focus group discussions (n = 27) were conducted in districts with a high prevalence of EVD and representing geographical and ethnic diversity (n = 228 participants). The final sample was composed of adults (52%) and children (48%) who were EVD-infected (46%) and -affected (42%) individuals, and community leaders (12%). Data were coded using a Grounded Theory approach informed by Thematic Content Analysis, and analyzed using NVivo. Interrater reliability was high, with Cohen's κ = 0.80 or higher.

FINDINGS

Participants described two main sources of EVD-related stress: isolation from the community because of social distancing and other prevention measures such as quarantine, and stigma related to infected or affected status. Participants linked experiences of social isolation and stigma to significant distress and feelings of ostracization. These experiences were particularly pronounced among children. Sources of support included community reintegration over time, and formal community efforts to provide education and establish protection bylaws.

INTERPRETATION

This study found that social distancing and EVD-related stigma were each prominent sources of distress among participants. These results suggest that isolation because of infection, and the enduring stigmatization of infected individuals and their families, demand coordinated responses to prevent and mitigate additional psychosocial harm. Such responses should include close engagement with community leaders to combat misinformation and promote community reintegration.