Inpatient migration patterns in persons with spinal cord injury: A registry study with hospital discharge data

First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?

Background

Although general practitioners (GPs) are generally considered as the first point of contact for care, this may be different for persons with complex conditions, such as those with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study is to understand the differences in long-term care provision by GPs and SCI-specialists, by examining (1) the first contact of care for SCI health problems, (2) the morbidity profile and use of health-care services in relation to first contact, and (3) the factors associated with the choice of first contact.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study based on data derived from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Community Survey 2017, the main outcome measure was the reported first contact for SCI-specific care. This information was analysed using the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis of groups based on patient characteristics, use of health-care services and secondary health conditions assessed using the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS).

Results

Out of 1294 respondents, 1095 reported their first contact for SCI-specific care; 56% indicated SCI-specialists and 44% specified GPs. On average, participants who first contacted a GP reported higher number of GP consultations (5.1 ± 5.2 vs. 3.9 ± 7.2), planned visits to ambulatory clinics (3.7 ± 7.3 vs. 3.6 ± 6.7) and hospital admissions (GP, 1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3), but lower number of visits to SCI-specialists (1.7 ± 1.8 vs. 2.6 ± 1.7) and of hospital days (22.8 ± 43.2 vs. 31.0 ± 42.8). The likelihood to contact a GP first was significantly higher in persons ≥75 years old (OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 1.85–10.69), Italian speakers (OR = 5.06, 95% CI = 2.44–10.47), had incomplete lesions (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.71–3.35), experiencing pain (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.04–2.09) or diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.05–3.27), but lower for those situated closer to SCI centres (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51–0.93) or had higher SCI-SCS scores (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86–0.99).

Conclusion

Age, language region, travel distance to SCI centres, lesion completeness, and occurrence of secondary conditions play a significant role in determining the choice of first contact of care, however there is still some unwarranted variation that remains unclear and requires further research.

Factors influencing specialized health care utilization by individuals with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional survey

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study using data from the second community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (Survey 2017) conducted between 03/2017 and 03/2018.

OBJECTIVES

To identify facilitators of and barriers to utilizing SCI-specialized outpatient clinic and inpatient care by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Community.

METHODS

Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing (1) the attendance at annual check-ups at SCI-specialized treatment facilities, (2) the utilization of SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care by those who utilized any outpatient clinic care, and (3) the utilization of SCI-specialized inpatient care by those who were hospitalized. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data.

RESULTS

Out of 3959 eligible individuals, 1294 completed the questionnaire (response rate 33%). In the last 12 months, 51% of study participants attended the annual check-up, 33% of outpatient clinic care users utilized SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care, and 44% of those who were hospitalized were hospitalized at a SCI center. Annual check-ups were attended less by women, the elderly, and those with nontraumatic SCI. SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care was less likely to be utilized when individuals with SCI were living with cancer, lived farther away from SCI-specialized treatment facilities or in a minority language region. Specialized inpatient care was less likely to be utilized by women and those with incomplete lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care must be provided near the residence of individuals with SCI, otherwise non-specialized care is utilized. The reasons why women utilize SCI-specialized care less frequently than men merits further investigation.

Satisfaction with access and quality of healthcare services for people with spinal cord injury living in the community

Objective: To identify barriers to access healthcare services and reveal determinants of satisfaction with healthcare services in people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).Design: Cross-sectional survey.Setting: Community setting in Switzerland.Participants: People with chronic SCI.Interventions: Non-applicable.Outcome Measures: Questionnaire-based evaluation of availability and quality of healthcare services for secondary health conditions, satisfaction with fulfillment of healthcare needs, and preference for care from a hypothetical service provider with limited specialized SCI care expertise but in close proximity over comprehensive care from an existing specialized SCI center located at a greater distance.Results: Close to three-quarter of participants (70%) indicated satisfaction with healthcare services received for SCI related health conditions. Elderly individuals (61+ years old) rated the availability and quality of healthcare 6% to 11% higher than younger individuals. The perceived fulfillment of healthcare needs was lower in people with incomplete paraplegia (odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95%-credibility interval (CI) 1.18-3.84), chronic pain (OR 1.85, CI 1.12-3.08), insufficient access to long distance transportation (OR 5.81, CI 2.74-12.82), and longer travel distances to specialized SCI centers.Conclusion: Perceived inadequateness of access to healthcare services was partly related to transportation barriers, suggesting that outreach services or support with transportation are possible solutions. People with incomplete paralysis and pain consistently rated the fulfillment of care needs associated with SCI less favorably, pointing to the need for enhanced advocacy for this vulnerable groups.

Poor adherence to influenza vaccination guidelines in spinal cord injury: results from a community-based survey in Switzerland

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the annual influenza vaccination coverage rate (IVCR) among community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

SCI community in Switzerland.

METHODS

Participants were responders to the influenza vaccination question (n = 492) in the 2012 community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury (SwiSCI) cohort study. IVCR of SwiSCI participants were compared to the normative Swiss population, sampled in the Swiss Health Survey of 2012 using direct standardization, logistic regression standardization, and a genetic matching approach to control for differences in age, sex, and quarterly period of survey response.

RESULTS

Individuals with SCI showed higher crude (26%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 22-30%) and age- and sex-standardized (24%, CI: 23-24%) IVCR than observed in the general population (15% CI, 14-15%). The adjustment for age and sex as well as quarterly period of survey response showed that the standardized IVCR of individuals with SCI (17%; CI: 12-23%) approached that of the general population. Low IVCR of about 10% were found among individuals with SCI younger than 45 years. IVCR were similar between men and women and between individuals with incomplete and complete paraplegia and tetraplegia.

CONCLUSION

The IVCR in individuals with chronic SCI was not higher than in the general population and much lower than guidelines recommend. The improvement of the IVCR is an important target of health policy in SCI in Switzerland as to reduce the evidenced excess burden in respiratory-disease related morbidity and mortality.

Residential location of people with chronic spinal cord injury: the importance of local health care infrastructure

Background

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from complex secondary health conditions and rely on specialized health care services, which are often centralized and difficult to reach for individuals living in remote areas. As a consequence, they might move to regions where they expect better access to care. The aims of this study were: 1) to identify regions where people with SCI live compared with the general population, 2) to examine whether their choice of residence is related to the availability of local health care infrastructure, and 3) to ascertain determinants of their consideration to change residence when aging.

Methods

This study used information from a nationwide Swiss SCI cohort and inpatient hospital discharge data. To detect clusters in the distribution of people with chronic SCI in Switzerland, a spatial cluster detection test was conducted using the normative population of a region as offset. To identify associations between the residential location of people with SCI and infrastructure variables, a negative binomial model was set up at a regional level with the frequency of people with SCI as outcome, geographical indicators as explanatory variables, and the normative population as offset. Determinants of the consideration to change residence when aging were investigated using logistic regression models.

Results

People with SCI were not living equally distributed among the normative population, but clustered in specific areas. They were more likely than the general population to reside close to specialized SCI centers, in areas with a high density of outpatient physicians, and in urban regions. People with SCI living in rural areas were more likely to consider relocating when aging than those living in urban areas. However, only a few people with SCI considered moving closer to specialized centers when such a move required crossing language barriers.

Conclusions

Good access to appropriate health care services and amenities of daily life seems to play such an important role in the lives of people with SCI that they are willing to choose their residential location based on local availability of appropriate health care services.

Place of residence & financial hardship: the situation of people with spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Even with universal health coverage, people with long-term medical conditions can face financial hardship. However, financial hardship can be not only the result of an increase in health care costs; it has other socio-economic determinants that can cause social inequalities in terms of health. This study aims to estimate the impact of the place of residence on the financial hardship of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. Switzerland is an interesting case to analyze because of its political system, where each of the 26 cantons is autonomous and responsible for raising its own income (through taxes) and providing public services.

METHODS

Using cross-sectional data from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI), this paper estimates the probability of financial hardship by place of residence. The data set, recorded between 2011 and 2013, comprises information from 1549 participants aged 16 years and older, living with SCI.

RESULTS

The results show that people face different probabilities of financial hardship, depending on their place of residence. In general, people in the French-speaking cantons have a higher probability of financial hardship compared with people living in the German- or Italian-speaking cantons. People in the cantons of Geneva and Graubünden have almost five times the probability of financial hardship, compared with people in the canton with the lowest probability of financial hardship, Zug.

CONCLUSIONS

The place of residence is a determinant of the financial situation of a household where a member deals with a long-term health condition. The differences might arise due to variations in health care costs, the tax burden and social support system, which are regulated and administered by each canton.

Health care utilization in persons with spinal cord injury: part 2-determinants, geographic variation and comparison with the general population

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate annual rates and geographic variation of health care utilization in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify factors associated with health care utilization.

SETTING

Community setting, entire country of Switzerland.

METHODS

Annual rates of planned and emergency visits to the general practitioner (GP), planned and emergency outpatient clinic visits and in-patient hospitalizations were compared between individuals with chronic SCI, over 16 years of age residing in Switzerland between late 2011 and early 2013 and a population sample (2012) of the Swiss general population. Risk factors for increased health service utilization were identified by means of regression models adjusted for spatial variation.

RESULTS

Of 492 participants (86.2% response rate), 94.1% visited a health care provider in the preceding year, with most persons visiting GPs (88.4%) followed by outpatient clinics (53.1%) and in-patient hospitals (35.9%). The increase in utilization as compared with the general population was 1.3-, 4.0- and 2.9-fold for GP, outpatient clinic and in-patient hospital visit, respectively. GP utilization was highest in persons with low income (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.85) and old age (IRR 2.62). In the first 2 years post injury, health service visits were 1.7 (GP visits) to 5.8 times (emergency outpatient clinic visits) more likely compared with those later post injury.

CONCLUSIONS

People with SCI more frequently use health services as compared with the general population, across all types of medical service institutions. GP services were used most often in areas where availability of specialized outpatient clinic services was low.