Becoming a 'pharmaceutical person': Medication use trajectories from age 26 to 38 in a representative birth cohort from Dunedin, New Zealand

Exploring medication self-management in community-dwelling adults with chronic medication experience: A concept mapping study

BACKGROUND

People who take medications often experience challenges including making decisions about risks versus benefits and integrating medication management with all aspects of life (e.g., social and work responsibilities). Existing medication self-management frameworks are primarily adherence-focused and lack integrating holistic perspectives.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the priorities of people with chronic medication experience (i.e., take at least 1 medication daily for at least 3 months) and what they can contribute to the understanding of medication self-management.

METHODS

Concept mapping is a participatory, mixed-methods approach with 3 stages: brainstorming, sorting/rating, and mapping. Group brainstorming discussions were held with participants who generated statements about what mattered to them regarding medications in their everyday lives. In sorting/rating, individual participants grouped statements into thematic piles and rated their importance and feasibility. During mapping, a subset of participants discussed and agreed on a visual map and named the statement clusters. Following mapping, the researchers analyzed rating results, stratified by participant characteristics (gender, age, duration of medication use, number of medications, and chronic conditions).

RESULTS

Sixty-three participants generated 1044 statements during 8 brainstorming sessions, which the researchers synthesized into 94 statements. Fifty-four participants individually sorted and rated the statements. Most statements were rated highly on both importance and feasibility, regardless of participant characteristics. Eight participants attended the mapping session. The final map had 9 thematic clusters, which were named by participants as: 1) researching and becoming educated about medications; 2) social support; 3) effectiveness of medication; 4) self-ownership of medication; 5) ease of use; 6) convenience and accessibility; 7) information provided by healthcare provider; 8) personal interactions with healthcare provider; and 9) patient involvement and trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Results enhance existing medication management frameworks by providing a more comprehensive perspective. Understanding medication self-management requires more research that incorporates and prioritizes the perspectives of individuals who manage their medications.

Pharmaceutical Side Effects and Mental Health Paradoxes among Racial-Ethnic Minorities

Sociologists have long struggled to explain the minority mental health paradox: that racial-ethnic minorities often report better mental health than non-Hispanic whites despite social environments that seem less conducive to well-being. Using data from the 2008-2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), this study provides a partial explanation for the paradox rooted in a very different disparity. Evidence from MEPS indicates that non-Hispanic whites consume more pharmaceuticals than racial-ethnic minorities for a wide variety of medical conditions. Moreover, non-Hispanic whites consume more pharmaceuticals that although effective in treating their focal indication, include depression or suicide as a side effect. In models that adjust for the use of such medications, the minority advantage in significant distress is reduced, in some instances to statistical nonsignificance. Although a significant black and Hispanic advantage in a continuous measure of distress remains, the magnitude of the difference is reduced considerably. The relationship between the use of medications with suicide as a side effect and significant distress is especially large, exceeding, for instance, the relationship between poverty and significant distress. For some minority groups, the less frequent use of such medications is driven by better health (as in the case of Asians), whereas for others, it reflects a treatment disparity (as in the case of blacks), although the consequences for the mental health paradox are the same. The implications of the results are discussed, especially with respect to the neglect of psychological side effects in the treatment of physical disease as well as the problem of multiple morbidities.