Stem cell biology needs a theory

Evolution of Telencephalon Anterior-Posterior Patterning through Core Endogenous Network Bifurcation

How did the complex structure of the telencephalon evolve? Existing explanations are based on phenomena and lack a first-principles account. The Darwinian dynamics and endogenous network theory-established decades ago-provides a mathematical and theoretical framework and a general constitutive structure for theory-experiment coupling for answering this question from a first-principles perspective. By revisiting a gene network that explains the anterior-posterior patterning of the vertebrate telencephalon, we found that upon increasing the cooperative effect within this network, fixed points gradually evolve, accompanied by the occurrence of two bifurcations. The dynamic behavior of this network is informed by the knowledge obtained from experiments on telencephalic evolution. Our work provides a quantitative explanation for how telencephalon anterior-posterior patterning evolved from the pre-vertebrate chordate to the vertebrate and provides a series of verifiable predictions from a first-principles perspective.

Potential therapeutic targets of gastric cancer explored under endogenous network modeling of clinical data

Improvement in the survival rate of gastric cancer, a prevalent global malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality calls for more avenues in molecular therapy. This work aims to comprehend drug resistance and explore multiple-drug combinations for enhanced therapeutic treatment. An endogenous network modeling clinic data with core gastric cancer molecules, functional modules, and pathways is constructed, which is then transformed into dynamics equations for in-silicon studies. Principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, and K-means clustering are utilized to map the attractor domains of the stochastic model to the normal and pathological phenotypes identified from the clinical data. The analyses demonstrate gastric cancer as a cluster of stable states emerging within the stochastic dynamics and elucidate the cause of resistance to anti-VEGF monotherapy in cancer treatment as the limitation of the single pathway in preventing cancer progression. The feasibility of multiple objectives of therapy targeting specified molecules and/or pathways is explored. This study verifies the rationality of the platform of endogenous network modeling, which contributes to the development of cross-functional multi-target combinations in clinical trials.

A logic-incorporated gene regulatory network deciphers principles in cell fate decisions

Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.

Quantitative Modelling in Stem Cell Biology and Beyond: How to Make Best Use of It

Purpose of Review

This article gives a broad overview of quantitative modelling approaches in biology and provides guidance on how to employ them to boost stem cell research, by helping to answer biological questions and to predict the outcome of biological processes.

Recent Findings

The twenty-first century has seen a steady increase in the proportion of cell biology publications employing mathematical modelling to aid experimental research. However, quantitative modelling is often used as a rather decorative element to confirm experimental findings, an approach which often yields only marginal added value, and is in many cases scientifically questionable.

Summary

Quantitative modelling can boost biological research in manifold ways, but one has to take some careful considerations before embarking on a modelling campaign, in order to maximise its added value, to avoid pitfalls that may lead to wrong results, and to be aware of its fundamental limitations, imposed by the risks of over-fitting and "universality".