1
|
Fowler NJ, Albalwi MF, Lee S, Hounslow AM, Williamson MP. Improved methodology for protein NMR structure calculation using hydrogen bond restraints and ANSURR validation: The SH2 domain of SH2B1. Structure 2023; 31:975-986.e3. [PMID: 37311460 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Protein structures calculated using NMR data are less accurate and less well-defined than they could be. Here we use the program ANSURR to show that this deficiency is at least in part due to a lack of hydrogen bond restraints. We describe a protocol to introduce hydrogen bond restraints into the structure calculation of the SH2 domain from SH2B1 in a systematic and transparent way and show that the structures generated are more accurate and better defined as a result. We also show that ANSURR can be used as a guide to know when the structure calculation is good enough to stop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Fowler
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, UK.
| | - Marym F Albalwi
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, UK
| | - Subin Lee
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrea M Hounslow
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike P Williamson
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rapid protein assignments and structures from raw NMR spectra with the deep learning technique ARTINA. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6151. [PMID: 36257955 PMCID: PMC9579175 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33879-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a major technique in structural biology with over 11,800 protein structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. NMR can elucidate structures and dynamics of small and medium size proteins in solution, living cells, and solids, but has been limited by the tedious data analysis process. It typically requires weeks or months of manual work of a trained expert to turn NMR measurements into a protein structure. Automation of this process is an open problem, formulated in the field over 30 years ago. We present a solution to this challenge that enables the completely automated analysis of protein NMR data within hours after completing the measurements. Using only NMR spectra and the protein sequence as input, our machine learning-based method, ARTINA, delivers signal positions, resonance assignments, and structures strictly without human intervention. Tested on a 100-protein benchmark comprising 1329 multidimensional NMR spectra, ARTINA demonstrated its ability to solve structures with 1.44 Å median RMSD to the PDB reference and to identify 91.36% correct NMR resonance assignments. ARTINA can be used by non-experts, reducing the effort for a protein assignment or structure determination by NMR essentially to the preparation of the sample and the spectra measurements.
Collapse
|
3
|
Grigas AT, Liu Z, Regan L, O'Hern CS. Core packing of well‐defined X‐ray and
NMR
structures is the same. Protein Sci 2022; 31:e4373. [PMID: 35900019 PMCID: PMC9277709 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Numerous studies have investigated the differences and similarities between protein structures determined by solution NMR spectroscopy and those determined by X-ray crystallography. A fundamental question is whether any observed differences are due to differing methodologies or to differences in the behavior of proteins in solution versus in the crystalline state. Here, we compare the properties of the hydrophobic cores of high-resolution protein crystal structures and those in NMR structures, determined using increasing numbers and types of restraints. Prior studies have reported that many NMR structures have denser cores compared with those of high-resolution X-ray crystal structures. Our current work investigates this result in more detail and finds that these NMR structures tend to violate basic features of protein stereochemistry, such as small non-bonded atomic overlaps and few Ramachandran and sidechain dihedral angle outliers. We find that NMR structures solved with more restraints, and which do not significantly violate stereochemistry, have hydrophobic cores that have a similar size and packing fraction as their counterparts determined by X-ray crystallography at high resolution. These results lead us to conclude that, at least regarding the core packing properties, high-quality structures determined by NMR and X-ray crystallography are the same, and the differences reported earlier are most likely a consequence of methodology, rather than fundamental differences between the protein in the two different environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex T. Grigas
- Graduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Zhuoyi Liu
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Lynne Regan
- Institute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - Corey S. O'Hern
- Graduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Department of Physics Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Department of Applied Physics Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Solution structure of Gaussia Luciferase with five disulfide bonds and identification of a putative coelenterazine binding cavity by heteronuclear NMR. Sci Rep 2020; 10:20069. [PMID: 33208800 PMCID: PMC7674443 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76486-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Gaussia luciferase (GLuc) is a small luciferase (18.2 kDa; 168 residues) and is thus attracting much attention as a reporter protein, but the lack of structural information is hampering further application. Here, we report the first solution structure of a fully active, recombinant GLuc determined by heteronuclear multidimensional NMR. We obtained a natively folded GLuc by bacterial expression and efficient refolding using a Solubility Enhancement Petide (SEP) tag. Almost perfect assignments of GLuc’s 1H, 13C and 15N backbone signals were obtained. GLuc structure was determined using CYANA, which automatically identified over 2500 NOEs of which > 570 were long-range. GLuc is an all-alpha-helix protein made of nine helices. The region spanning residues 10–18, 36–81, 96–145 and containing eight out of the nine helices was determined with a Cα-atom RMSD of 1.39 Å ± 0.39 Å. The structure of GLuc is novel and unique. Two homologous sequential repeats form two anti-parallel bundles made by 4 helices and tied together by three disulfide bonds. The N-terminal helix 1 is grabbed by these 4 helices. Further, we found a hydrophobic cavity where several residues responsible for bioluminescence were identified in previous mutational studies, and we thus hypothesize that this is a catalytic cavity, where the hydrophobic coelenterazine binds and the bioluminescence reaction takes place.
Collapse
|
5
|
Paramonov AS, Kocharovskaya MV, Tsarev AV, Kulbatskii DS, Loktyushov EV, Shulepko MA, Kirpichnikov MP, Lyukmanova EN, Shenkarev ZO. Structural Diversity and Dynamics of Human Three-Finger Proteins Acting on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E7280. [PMID: 33019770 PMCID: PMC7582953 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ly-6/uPAR or three-finger proteins (TFPs) contain a disulfide-stabilized β-structural core and three protruding loops (fingers). In mammals, TFPs have been found in epithelium and the nervous, endocrine, reproductive, and immune systems. Here, using heteronuclear NMR, we determined the three-dimensional (3D) structure and backbone dynamics of the epithelial secreted protein SLURP-1 and soluble domains of GPI-anchored TFPs from the brain (Lynx2, Lypd6, Lypd6b) acting on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Results were compared with the data about human TFPs Lynx1 and SLURP-2 and snake α-neurotoxins WTX and NTII. Two different topologies of the β-structure were revealed: one large antiparallel β-sheet in Lypd6 and Lypd6b, and two β-sheets in other proteins. α-Helical segments were found in the loops I/III of Lynx2, Lypd6, and Lypd6b. Differences in the surface distribution of charged and hydrophobic groups indicated significant differences in a mode of TFPs/nAChR interactions. TFPs showed significant conformational plasticity: the loops were highly mobile at picosecond-nanosecond timescale, while the β-structural regions demonstrated microsecond-millisecond motions. SLURP-1 had the largest plasticity and characterized by the unordered loops II/III and cis-trans isomerization of the Tyr39-Pro40 bond. In conclusion, plasticity could be an important feature of TFPs adapting their structures for optimal interaction with the different conformational states of nAChRs.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/chemistry
- Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics
- Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Antigens, Ly/chemistry
- Antigens, Ly/genetics
- Antigens, Ly/metabolism
- Binding Sites
- Cloning, Molecular
- Elapid Venoms/chemistry
- Elapid Venoms/metabolism
- Escherichia coli/genetics
- Escherichia coli/metabolism
- GPI-Linked Proteins/chemistry
- GPI-Linked Proteins/genetics
- GPI-Linked Proteins/metabolism
- Gene Expression
- Genetic Vectors/chemistry
- Genetic Vectors/metabolism
- Humans
- Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
- Models, Molecular
- Neuropeptides/chemistry
- Neuropeptides/genetics
- Neuropeptides/metabolism
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular
- Protein Binding
- Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical
- Protein Conformation, beta-Strand
- Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs
- Protein Isoforms/chemistry
- Protein Isoforms/genetics
- Protein Isoforms/metabolism
- Receptors, Nicotinic/chemistry
- Receptors, Nicotinic/genetics
- Receptors, Nicotinic/metabolism
- Recombinant Proteins/chemistry
- Recombinant Proteins/genetics
- Recombinant Proteins/metabolism
- Sequence Alignment
- Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
- Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/chemistry
- Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/genetics
- Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S. Paramonov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
| | - Milita V. Kocharovskaya
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
- Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - Andrey V. Tsarev
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
- Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - Dmitrii S. Kulbatskii
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
| | - Eugene V. Loktyushov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
| | - Mikhail A. Shulepko
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
| | - Mikhail P. Kirpichnikov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
- Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina N. Lyukmanova
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
- Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - Zakhar O. Shenkarev
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119997 Moscow, Russia; (A.S.P.); (M.V.K.); (A.V.T.); (D.S.K.); (E.V.L.); (M.A.S.); (M.P.K.)
- Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allain F, Mareuil F, Ménager H, Nilges M, Bardiaux B. ARIAweb: a server for automated NMR structure calculation. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:W41-W47. [PMID: 32383755 PMCID: PMC7319541 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a method of choice to study the dynamics and determine the atomic structure of macromolecules in solution. The standalone program ARIA (Ambiguous Restraints for Iterative Assignment) for automated assignment of nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) data and structure calculation is well established in the NMR community. To ultimately provide a perfectly transparent and easy to use service, we designed an online user interface to ARIA with additional functionalities. Data conversion, structure calculation setup and execution, followed by interactive visualization of the generated 3D structures are all integrated in ARIAweb and freely accessible at https://ariaweb.pasteur.fr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrice Allain
- Structural Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Structural Biology and Chemistry, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| | - Fabien Mareuil
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, Department of Computational Biology, CNRS USR 3756, Institut Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| | - Hervé Ménager
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, Department of Computational Biology, CNRS USR 3756, Institut Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| | - Michael Nilges
- Structural Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Structural Biology and Chemistry, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| | - Benjamin Bardiaux
- Structural Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Structural Biology and Chemistry, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramanujam V, Shen Y, Ying J, Mobli M. Residual Dipolar Couplings for Resolving Cysteine Bridges in Disulfide-Rich Peptides. Front Chem 2020; 7:889. [PMID: 32039137 PMCID: PMC6987419 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Disulfide bridges in proteins are formed by the oxidation of pairs of cysteine residues. These cross-links play a critical role in stabilizing the 3D-structure of small disulfide rich polypeptides such as hormones and venom toxins. The arrangement of the multiple disulfide bonds directs the peptide fold into distinct structural motifs that have evolved for resistance against biochemical and physical insults. These structural scaffolds have, therefore, proven to be very attractive in bioengineering efforts to develop novel biologics with applications in health and agriculture. Structural characterization of small disulfide rich peptides (DRPs) presents unique challenges when using commonly applied biophysical methods. NMR is the most commonly used method for studying such molecules, where the relatively small size of these molecules results in highly precise structural ensembles defined by a large number of distance and dihedral angle restraints per amino acid. However, in NMR the sulfur atoms that are involved in three of the five dihedral angles in a disulfide bond cannot be readily measured. Given the central role of disulfide bonds in the structure of these molecules, it is unclear what the inherent resolution of such NMR structures is when using traditional NMR methods. Here, we use an extensive set of long-range residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) to assess the resolution of the NMR structure of a disulfide-rich peptide. We find that structures based primarily on NOEs, yield ensembles that are equivalent to a crystallographic resolution of 2-3 Å in resolution, and that incorporation of RDCs reduces this to ~1-1.5 Å resolution. At this resolution the sidechain of ordered amino acids can be defined accurately, allowing the geometry of the cysteine bridges to be better defined, and allowing for disulfide-bond connectivities to be determined with high confidence. The observed improvements in resolution when using RDCs is remarkable considering the small size of these peptides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkatraman Ramanujam
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.,Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Yang Shen
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jinfa Ying
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Mehdi Mobli
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beil A, Jurt S, Walser R, Schönhut T, Güntert P, Palacios Ò, Atrian S, Capdevila M, Dallinger R, Zerbe O. The Solution Structure and Dynamics of Cd-Metallothionein from Helix pomatia Reveal Optimization for Binding Cd over Zn. Biochemistry 2019; 58:4570-4581. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Beil
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Jurt
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Reto Walser
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Schönhut
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Güntert
- Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Òscar Palacios
- Departmento de Química, Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Atrian
- Departmento de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Capdevila
- Departmento de Química, Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Reinhard Dallinger
- Institute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Oliver Zerbe
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reckel S, Gehin C, Tardivon D, Georgeon S, Kükenshöner T, Löhr F, Koide A, Buchner L, Panjkovich A, Reynaud A, Pinho S, Gerig B, Svergun D, Pojer F, Güntert P, Dötsch V, Koide S, Gavin AC, Hantschel O. Structural and functional dissection of the DH and PH domains of oncogenic Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase. Nat Commun 2017; 8:2101. [PMID: 29235475 PMCID: PMC5727386 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02313-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The two isoforms of the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase, p210 and p190, are associated with different leukemias and have a dramatically different signaling network, despite similar kinase activity. To provide a molecular rationale for these observations, we study the Dbl-homology (DH) and Pleckstrin-homology (PH) domains of Bcr-Abl p210, which constitute the only structural differences to p190. Here we report high-resolution structures of the DH and PH domains and characterize conformations of the DH-PH unit in solution. Our structural and functional analyses show no evidence that the DH domain acts as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, whereas the PH domain binds to various phosphatidylinositol-phosphates. PH-domain mutants alter subcellular localization and result in decreased interactions with p210-selective interaction partners. Hence, the PH domain, but not the DH domain, plays an important role in the formation of the differential p210 and p190 Bcr-Abl signaling networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Reckel
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Gehin
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Delphine Tardivon
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sandrine Georgeon
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tim Kükenshöner
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Frank Löhr
- Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Akiko Koide
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Lena Buchner
- Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alejandro Panjkovich
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hamburg Outstation, 22607, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Aline Reynaud
- Protein Crystallography Core Facility, School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Pinho
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Gerig
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dmitri Svergun
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hamburg Outstation, 22607, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florence Pojer
- Protein Crystallography Core Facility, School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Peter Güntert
- Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany
- Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland
- Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan
| | - Volker Dötsch
- Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Shohei Koide
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Anne-Claude Gavin
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hantschel
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
NMR-based automated protein structure determination. Arch Biochem Biophys 2017; 628:24-32. [PMID: 28263718 DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2017.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Revised: 02/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
NMR spectra analysis for protein structure determination can now in many cases be performed by automated computational methods. This overview of the computational methods for NMR protein structure analysis presents recent automated methods for signal identification in multidimensional NMR spectra, sequence-specific resonance assignment, collection of conformational restraints, and structure calculation, as implemented in the CYANA software package. These algorithms are sufficiently reliable and integrated into one software package to enable the fully automated structure determination of proteins starting from NMR spectra without manual interventions or corrections at intermediate steps, with an accuracy of 1-2 Å backbone RMSD in comparison with manually solved reference structures.
Collapse
|
11
|
Siu RCF, Smirnova E, Brown CA, Zoidl C, Spray DC, Donaldson LW, Zoidl G. Structural and Functional Consequences of Connexin 36 (Cx36) Interaction with Calmodulin. Front Mol Neurosci 2016; 9:120. [PMID: 27917108 PMCID: PMC5114276 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional plasticity of neuronal gap junctions involves the interaction of the neuronal connexin36 with calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). The important relationship between Cx36 and CaMKII must also be considered in the context of another protein partner, Ca2+ loaded calmodulin, binding an overlapping site in the carboxy-terminus of Cx36. We demonstrate that CaM and CaMKII binding to Cx36 is calcium-dependent, with Cx36 able to engage with CaM outside of the gap junction plaque. Furthermore, Ca2+ loaded calmodulin activates Cx36 channels, which is different to other connexins. The NMR solution structure demonstrates that CaM binds Cx36 in its characteristic compact state with major hydrophobic contributions arising from W277 at anchor position 1 and V284 at position 8 of Cx36. Our results establish Cx36 as a hub binding Ca2+ loaded CaM and they identify this interaction as a critical step with implications for functions preceding the initiation of CaMKII mediated plasticity at electrical synapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Christiane Zoidl
- Biology Program, York University, TorontoON, Canada
- Psychology Program, York University, TorontoON, Canada
| | - David C. Spray
- Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New YorkNY, USA
| | | | - Georg Zoidl
- Biology Program, York University, TorontoON, Canada
- Psychology Program, York University, TorontoON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mechanism of TAp73 inhibition by ΔNp63 and structural basis of p63/p73 hetero-tetramerization. Cell Death Differ 2016; 23:1930-1940. [PMID: 27716744 DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2016.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Members of the p53 tumor-suppressor family are expressed as multiple isoforms. Isoforms with an N-terminal transactivation domain are transcriptionally active, while those ones lacking this domain often inhibit the transcriptional activity of other family members. In squamous cell carcinomas, the high expression level of ΔNp63α inhibits the tumor-suppressor function of TAp73β. This can in principle be due to blocking of the promoter or by direct interaction between both proteins. p63 and p73 can hetero-oligomerize through their tetramerization domains and a hetero-tetramer consisting of two p63 and two p73 molecules is thermodynamically more stable than both homo-tetramers. Here we show that cells expressing both p63 and p73 exist in mouse epidermis and hair follicle and that hetero-tetramer complexes can be detected by immunoprecipitation in differentiating keratinocytes. Through structure determination of the hetero-tetramer, we reveal why this hetero-tetramer is the thermodynamically preferred species. We have created mutants that exclusively form either hetero-tetramers or homo-tetramers, allowing to investigate the function of these p63/p73 hetero-tetramers. Using these tools, we show that inhibition of TAp73β in squamous cell carcinomas is due to promoter squelching and not direct interaction.
Collapse
|
13
|
Atomic-resolution structure of a disease-relevant Aβ(1-42) amyloid fibril. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:E4976-84. [PMID: 27469165 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1600749113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 621] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Amyloid-β (Aβ) is present in humans as a 39- to 42-amino acid residue metabolic product of the amyloid precursor protein. Although the two predominant forms, Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42), differ in only two residues, they display different biophysical, biological, and clinical behavior. Aβ(1-42) is the more neurotoxic species, aggregates much faster, and dominates in senile plaque of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Although small Aβ oligomers are believed to be the neurotoxic species, Aβ amyloid fibrils are, because of their presence in plaques, a pathological hallmark of AD and appear to play an important role in disease progression through cell-to-cell transmissibility. Here, we solved the 3D structure of a disease-relevant Aβ(1-42) fibril polymorph, combining data from solid-state NMR spectroscopy and mass-per-length measurements from EM. The 3D structure is composed of two molecules per fibril layer, with residues 15-42 forming a double-horseshoe-like cross-β-sheet entity with maximally buried hydrophobic side chains. Residues 1-14 are partially ordered and in a β-strand conformation, but do not display unambiguous distance restraints to the remainder of the core structure.
Collapse
|
14
|
Veit S, Nagadoi A, Rögner M, Rexroth S, Stoll R, Ikegami T. The cyanobacterial cytochrome b6f subunit PetP adopts an SH3 fold in solution. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS 2016; 1857:705-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Revised: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
15
|
Dashti H, Tonelli M, Lee W, Westler WM, Cornilescu G, Ulrich EL, Markley JL. Probabilistic validation of protein NMR chemical shift assignments. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2016; 64:17-25. [PMID: 26724815 PMCID: PMC4744101 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-0007-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/20/2015] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Data validation plays an important role in ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of studies. NMR investigations of the functional properties, dynamics, chemical kinetics, and structures of proteins depend critically on the correctness of chemical shift assignments. We present a novel probabilistic method named ARECA for validating chemical shift assignments that relies on the nuclear Overhauser effect data . ARECA has been evaluated through its application to 26 case studies and has been shown to be complementary to, and usually more reliable than, approaches based on chemical shift databases. ARECA is available online at http://areca.nmrfam.wisc.edu/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesam Dashti
- Graduate Program in Biophysics, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Biochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Marco Tonelli
- Biochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Woonghee Lee
- Biochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - William M Westler
- Biochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Gabriel Cornilescu
- Biochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Eldon L Ulrich
- BioMagResBank, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - John L Markley
- Biochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
- BioMagResBank, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The precision of an NMR structure may be manipulated by calculation parameters such as calibration factors. Its accuracy is, however, a different issue. In this issue of Structure, Buchner and Güntert present "consensus structure bundles," where precision analysis allows estimation of accuracy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Everett JK, Tejero R, Murthy SBK, Acton TB, Aramini JM, Baran MC, Benach J, Cort JR, Eletsky A, Forouhar F, Guan R, Kuzin AP, Lee HW, Liu G, Mani R, Mao B, Mills JL, Montelione AF, Pederson K, Powers R, Ramelot T, Rossi P, Seetharaman J, Snyder D, Swapna GVT, Vorobiev SM, Wu Y, Xiao R, Yang Y, Arrowsmith CH, Hunt JF, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH, Szyperski T, Tong L, Montelione GT. A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs. Protein Sci 2015; 25:30-45. [PMID: 26293815 DOI: 10.1002/pro.2774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
We have developed an online NMR / X-ray Structure Pair Data Repository. The NIGMS Protein Structure Initiative (PSI) has provided many valuable reagents, 3D structures, and technologies for structural biology. The Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium was one of several PSI centers. NESG used both X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy for protein structure determination. A key goal of the PSI was to provide experimental structures for at least one representative of each of hundreds of targeted protein domain families. In some cases, structures for identical (or nearly identical) constructs were determined by both NMR and X-ray crystallography. NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction data for 41 of these "NMR / X-ray" structure pairs determined using conventional triple-resonance NMR methods with extensive sidechain resonance assignments have been organized in an online NMR / X-ray Structure Pair Data Repository. In addition, several NMR data sets for perdeuterated, methyl-protonated protein samples are included in this repository. As an example of the utility of this repository, these data were used to revisit questions about the precision and accuracy of protein NMR structures first outlined by Levy and coworkers several years ago (Andrec et al., Proteins 2007;69:449-465). These results demonstrate that the agreement between NMR and X-ray crystal structures is improved using modern methods of protein NMR spectroscopy. The NMR / X-ray Structure Pair Data Repository will provide a valuable resource for new computational NMR methods development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Everett
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Roberto Tejero
- Departamento De Química Física, Universidad De Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Sarath B K Murthy
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Thomas B Acton
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - James M Aramini
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Michael C Baran
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Jordi Benach
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - John R Cort
- Fundamental and Computational Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99354, USA
| | - Alexander Eletsky
- Department of Chemistry, The State University of New York at Buffalo, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Buffalo, New York, 14260, USA
| | - Farhad Forouhar
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Rongjin Guan
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Alexandre P Kuzin
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Hsiau-Wei Lee
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
| | - Gaohua Liu
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Rajeswari Mani
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Binchen Mao
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Mills
- Department of Chemistry, The State University of New York at Buffalo, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Buffalo, New York, 14260, USA
| | - Alexander F Montelione
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Kari Pederson
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
| | - Robert Powers
- Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, USA
| | - Theresa Ramelot
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 45056, USA
| | - Paolo Rossi
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Jayaraman Seetharaman
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - David Snyder
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Health, William Paterson University of NJ, Wayne, New Jersey, 07470, USA
| | - G V T Swapna
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Sergey M Vorobiev
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Yibing Wu
- Department of Chemistry, The State University of New York at Buffalo, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Buffalo, New York, 14260, USA
| | - Rong Xiao
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| | - Yunhuang Yang
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 45056, USA
| | - Cheryl H Arrowsmith
- Cancer Genomics & Proteomics, Department of Medical Biophysics, Ontario Cancer Institute, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - John F Hunt
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Michael A Kennedy
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 45056, USA
| | - James H Prestegard
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
| | - Thomas Szyperski
- Department of Chemistry, The State University of New York at Buffalo, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Buffalo, New York, 14260, USA
| | - Liang Tong
- Department of Biological Sciences and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Gaetano T Montelione
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA.,Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rosato A, Vranken W, Fogh RH, Ragan TJ, Tejero R, Pederson K, Lee HW, Prestegard JH, Yee A, Wu B, Lemak A, Houliston S, Arrowsmith CH, Kennedy M, Acton TB, Xiao R, Liu G, Montelione GT, Vuister GW. The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2015; 62:413-24. [PMID: 26071966 PMCID: PMC4569658 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/28/2015] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The second round of the community-wide initiative Critical Assessment of automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR (CASD-NMR-2013) comprised ten blind target datasets, consisting of unprocessed spectral data, assigned chemical shift lists and unassigned NOESY peak and RDC lists, that were made available in both curated (i.e. manually refined) or un-curated (i.e. automatically generated) form. Ten structure calculation programs, using fully automated protocols only, generated a total of 164 three-dimensional structures (entries) for the ten targets, sometimes using both curated and un-curated lists to generate multiple entries for a single target. The accuracy of the entries could be established by comparing them to the corresponding manually solved structure of each target, which was not available at the time the data were provided. Across the entire data set, 71 % of all entries submitted achieved an accuracy relative to the reference NMR structure better than 1.5 Å. Methods based on NOESY peak lists achieved even better results with up to 100% of the entries within the 1.5 Å threshold for some programs. However, some methods did not converge for some targets using un-curated NOESY peak lists. Over 90% of the entries achieved an accuracy better than the more relaxed threshold of 2.5 Å that was used in the previous CASD-NMR-2010 round. Comparisons between entries generated with un-curated versus curated peaks show only marginal improvements for the latter in those cases where both calculations converged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Rosato
- Department of Chemistry and Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Wim Vranken
- Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
- (IB)2 Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, ULB-VUB, Triomflaan, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rasmus H Fogh
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Timothy J Ragan
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Roberto Tejero
- Departamento de Química Física, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Dr. Moliner 50, 46100, Burjassot (Valencia), Spain
| | - Kari Pederson
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Hsiau-Wei Lee
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - James H Prestegard
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Adelinda Yee
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Alexander Lemak
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Scott Houliston
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Cheryl H Arrowsmith
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Michael Kennedy
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA
| | - Thomas B Acton
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Rong Xiao
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Gaohua Liu
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Gaetano T Montelione
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
| | - Geerten W Vuister
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Güntert P, Buchner L. Combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2015; 62:453-71. [PMID: 25801209 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-9924-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The automated assignment of NOESY cross peaks has become a fundamental technique for NMR protein structure analysis. A widely used algorithm for this purpose is implemented in the program CYANA. It has been used for a large number of structure determinations of proteins in solution but was so far not described in full detail. In this paper we present a complete description of the CYANA implementation of automated NOESY assignment, which differs extensively from its predecessor CANDID by the use of a consistent probabilistic treatment, and we discuss its performance in the second round of the critical assessment of structure determination by NMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Güntert
- Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Lena Buchner
- Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mareuil F, Malliavin TE, Nilges M, Bardiaux B. Improved reliability, accuracy and quality in automated NMR structure calculation with ARIA. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2015; 62:425-438. [PMID: 25861734 PMCID: PMC4569677 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-9928-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
In biological NMR, assignment of NOE cross-peaks and calculation of atomic conformations are critical steps in the determination of reliable high-resolution structures. ARIA is an automated approach that performs NOE assignment and structure calculation in a concomitant manner in an iterative procedure. The log-harmonic shape for distance restraint potential and the Bayesian weighting of distance restraints, recently introduced in ARIA, were shown to significantly improve the quality and the accuracy of determined structures. In this paper, we propose two modifications of the ARIA protocol: (1) the softening of the force field together with adapted hydrogen radii, which is meaningful in the context of the log-harmonic potential with Bayesian weighting, (2) a procedure that automatically adjusts the violation tolerance used in the selection of active restraints, based on the fitting of the structure to the input data sets. The new ARIA protocols were fine-tuned on a set of eight protein targets from the CASD-NMR initiative. As a result, the convergence problems previously observed for some targets was resolved and the obtained structures exhibited better quality. In addition, the new ARIA protocols were applied for the structure calculation of ten new CASD-NMR targets in a blind fashion, i.e. without knowing the actual solution. Even though optimisation of parameters and pre-filtering of unrefined NOE peak lists were necessary for half of the targets, ARIA consistently and reliably determined very precise and highly accurate structures for all cases. In the context of integrative structural biology, an increasing number of experimental methods are used that produce distance data for the determination of 3D structures of macromolecules, stressing the importance of methods that successfully make use of ambiguous and noisy distance data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Mareuil
- Unité de Bioinformatique Structurale, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France
- Cellule d'Informatique pour la Biologie, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France
| | - Thérèse E Malliavin
- Unité de Bioinformatique Structurale, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France
| | - Michael Nilges
- Unité de Bioinformatique Structurale, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France
| | - Benjamin Bardiaux
- Unité de Bioinformatique Structurale, CNRS UMR 3528, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ragan TJ, Fogh RH, Tejero R, Vranken W, Montelione GT, Rosato A, Vuister GW. Analysis of the structural quality of the CASD-NMR 2013 entries. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2015; 62:527-40. [PMID: 26032236 PMCID: PMC4569653 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-9949-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
We performed a comprehensive structure validation of both automated and manually generated structures of the 10 targets of the CASD-NMR-2013 effort. We established that automated structure determination protocols are capable of reliably producing structures of comparable accuracy and quality to those generated by a skilled researcher, at least for small, single domain proteins such as the ten targets tested. The most robust results appear to be obtained when NOESY peak lists are used either as the primary input data or to augment chemical shift data without the need to manually filter such lists. A detailed analysis of the long-range NOE restraints generated by the different programs from the same data showed a surprisingly low degree of overlap. Additionally, we found that there was no significant correlation between the extent of the NOE restraint overlap and the accuracy of the structure. This result was surprising given the importance of NOE data in producing good quality structures. We suggest that this could be explained by the information redundancy present in NOEs between atoms contained within a fixed covalent network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Ragan
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Rasmus H Fogh
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Roberto Tejero
- Departamento de Química Física, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Dr. Moliner 50, 46100, Burjassot (Valencia), Spain
| | - Wim Vranken
- Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, Belgium
- (IB)2 Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, ULB-VUB, Triomflaan, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaetano T Montelione
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Antonio Rosato
- Magnetic Resonance Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Geerten W Vuister
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|