Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

Effect of Coffee Consumption on Postoperative Ileus after Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Postoperative ileus (POI) is an important complication after elective colorectal surgery, which prolongs hospital stay and increases hospital costs. Coffee has been reported to be beneficial for the recovery of gastrointestinal function. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of coffee consumption in the treatment of POI, following elective colorectal surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search for medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, including coffee, caffeine, colon, rectum, and colorectal surgery was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until November 2021. A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes was conducted to assess the effectiveness of coffee consumption on POI after colorectal surgery.

Results

726 articles were identified and six RCTs that captured 416 patients were included. The time to first defecation was reduced with postoperative coffee consumption compared to the control group (mean difference = −15.03 h; 95% confidence interval: -17.79, -12.26; P < 0.00001). There was no difference in time to first flatus, time to tolerance for solid food, length of hospital stay, use of laxatives, reinsertion of nasogastric tube, need for reoperation, postoperative complications, and anastomotic leak between the groups. Coffee did not have any adverse effects.

Conclusion

The current literature revealed that postoperative coffee consumption shortened the time to first defecation following elective colorectal surgery. Large sample and tightly controlled multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to offer a more accurate evaluation of the efficacy of coffee.

Lymphatic Permeation Predicts Systemic Recurrence in Combination with Vascular Involvement in Laparoscopically Resected N0 Colon Cancer

High-risk patient selection is required in N0 colon cancer. Although a number of studies have suggested high-risk clinicopathological predictors, most of these are based on analyses in heterogeous patients in terms of surgical procedures. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is becoming a standard procedure worldwide because of its less invasiveness. Accordingly, we aimed to identify bona fide high-risk factors of recurrence in homogeneous N0 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Two hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic curative resection for N0 colon cancer were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters were tested for their relation to survival. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) was 96.1 per cent. Lymphatic involvement (P < 0.001), vascular involvement (P = 0.007), and size of tumor (P = 0.023) were significantly associated with worse prognosis in the univariate analyses. Lymphatic involvement was the independent prognostic factor associated with RFS in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.013). Importantly, lymphatic involvement predicts detrimental prognosis only when vascular involvement is present. The RFS of the patients with both lymphatic and vascular involvement was 88.9 per cent, whereas it was 100 per cent in the counterpart. Differentiation, vascular involvement preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and CA 19-9 levels were significantly associated with lymphatic involvement in a multivariate logistic regression analyses. The present study concludes that lymphatic involvement in the presence of vascular involvement may be a high risk for systemic recurrence in the laparoscopically resected N0 colon cancer.

Quality of life in the first 6 weeks following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery

OBJECTIVES

Evidence of how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the first 6 weeks of postoperative recovery is needed to inform cost-effectiveness evaluations.

METHODS

Pragmatic prospective cohort study design. Consecutive patients requiring elective colorectal surgery were allocated to either laparoscopic or open surgery by administrative staff in a district general hospital in England, 2006-2007. Patients completed two validated, generic measures of HRQOL at baseline (preoperatively) and on multiple occasions in the first 6 weeks postsurgery using diaries (EuroQol five-dimensional [EQ-5D] questionnaire: 16 times; short-form 36 health survey [SF-36]: 4 times; HRQOL was compared between groups at each time point, and overall using repeated-measures analysis.

RESULTS

Of 201 consecutive patients recruited, 32 (15.1%) were unable to complete diaries. Of the remaining 169 patients, 120 (71%) returned completed diaries at 28 days and 105 (62.1%) at 42 days. There was no difference in preoperative HRQOL scores between surgical groups, but the postoperative EQ-5D questionnaire and SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (EQ-5D questionnaire P = 0.005, SF-36 P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a stoma have worse HRQOL than those without. HRQOL did not differ between the laparoscopic and open stoma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents unique prospective data demonstrating that laparoscopic surgery confers HRQOL benefits for patients in the early recovery period following colorectal surgery, compared with open surgery. Consideration of these data in the context of a cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported separately.

Laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasms in a developing country

AIM

To report the outcome of patients treated for colonic neoplasms using a laparoscopic assisted technique since its introduction at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic assisted colectomy were entered into a prospective database and this data analysed. Data collected included patient demographics, pre-operative diagnosis, operative events, post-operative morbidity and outcome.

RESULTS

Over the thirty-six months period July 1, 2005-December 31, 2005 and July 1, 2006-December 31, 2008, thirty patients each underwent laparoscopic assisted colectomy for a colonic neoplasm. Their mean age was 63 years with M: F ratio of 1:2. Seventy-four per cent of the patients had carcinomas which was located on the right and sigmoid colon in 17 and 10 patients respectively. Mean operative time was 98 min for patients with right-sided lesions and blood loss for the entire group was minimal. Two patients were converted to open resections. Median duration of hospitalization was five days. There was no mortality but three patients had complications. After median follow-up of 30 months, there was no local or systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately selected patients with colonic neoplasms can be safely subjected to a laparoscopic assisted resection and expect to enjoy the advantages of this technique even in a developing country setting. The outcome of thirty consecutive laparoscopic assisted colectomies is reported demonstrating that this technique can be safely applied to selected patients with colonic carcinomas in developing countries.

Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China

BACKGROUND

The long-term survival and safety of laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer remain unclear. The aim of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS

We undertook a randomized, controlled trial in 343 patients with rectal cancer between May 2004 and April 2008. One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic surgery and 174 patients to open surgery. The main endpoint was 3-year survival. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic surgery was associated with earlier recovery of bowel movement compared with open surgery. The average time to first discharge, bowel movement, resumption of fluid intake, and activity out of bed in laparoscopic surgery were shorter by 0.63, 0.32, 0.33, and 0.63 day, respectively (P < .001). The incidences of postoperative morbidities such as infectious complications, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and deep vein thrombosis have no differences. No differences were found in the comparison of long-term survival.

INTERPRETATION

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is as safe and effective as open surgery in terms of oncology outcomes. Long-term survival for patients with rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery were similar to those undergoing conventional open surgery, thus supporting the continued use of laparoscopic surgery in Chinese patients with rectal cancer.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy

Esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) might theoretically decrease this rate. We reviewed the current literature on MIE, with a focus on the available techniques, outcomes and comparison with open surgery. This review shows that the available literature on MIE is still crowded with heterogeneous studies with different techniques. There are no controlled and randomized trials, and the few retrospective comparative cohort studies are limited by small numbers of patients and biased by historical controls of open surgery. Based on the available literature, there is no evidence that MIE brings clear benefits compared to conventional esophagectomy. Increasing experience and the report of larger series might change this scenario.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy

Esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) might theoretically decrease this rate. We reviewed the current literature on MIE, with a focus on the available techniques, outcomes and comparison with open surgery. This review shows that the available literature on MIE is still crowded with heterogeneous studies with different techniques. There are no controlled and randomized trials, and the few retrospective comparative cohort studies are limited by small numbers of patients and biased by historical controls of open surgery. Based on the available literature, there is no evidence that MIE brings clear benefits compared to conventional esophagectomy. Increasing experience and the report of larger series might change this scenario.

Is gum chewing useful for ileus after elective colorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the usefulness of gum chewing for postoperative ileus has given inconclusive results. We evaluated the efficacy of gum chewing in the treatment of ileus after elective colorectal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing the effect of gum chewing+standard treatment vs. standard treatment on ileus after colorectal surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched until August 2008. Primary outcomes were time to first flatus, time to first passage of feces, and length of hospital stay. The mean difference (MD) in hours was calculated with the random effects model to assess the effect of gum chewing on the outcomes.

RESULTS

Six trials including 244 patients were analyzed. Time to first flatus was significantly reduced with gum chewing+standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone (MD -14 h, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] -23.5 to -4.6). Time to first passage of feces was significantly reduced (MD -25 h, 95%CI -42.3 to -7.7), but the length of hospital stay was only marginally reduced (MD -26.2 h, 95%CI -57.5 to 5.2) with gum chewing.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ileus after colonic surgery, gum chewing in addition to standard treatment significantly reduces the time to first flatus and the time to first passage of feces when compared to standard treatment alone. There is also a trend to reduce the length of hospital stay. Gum chewing should be added to the standard treatment of these patients.

Systematic Review of Quality of Life following Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to Quorum guidelines. Prospective studies comparing the HRQoL of patients after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery were identified. The primary outcome measure was postoperative quality of life; performance status and cosmesis were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

23 studies were identified that satisfied the inclusion criteria; 18 assessed HRQoL, 4 performance status, and 3 cosmesis. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis due to study heterogeneity. The studies reported outcomes for 2946 patients. The most frequent HRQoL instruments employed were SF-36, EORTC, and GIQLI. 6 studies, using a total of 12 separate measures, evaluated QoL during the first 3 post-operative months: 10 of these measures showed no significant difference, and 2 showed an improved HRQoL with laparoscopy. Twelve further studies evaluated HRQoL up to 5 years post-operatively: 9 showed no difference between the 2 groups, and 3 demonstrated a benefit for laparoscopy. Three of 4 studies assessing performance status on discharge, and all 3 studies assessing cosmesis, reported benefits with the laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests there is no significant difference in HRQoL following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery, although there is a lack of good quality data. There is a trend towards improved quality of life outcomes and performance status with laparoscopy in the early post-operative period. There is a need for further research, particularly assessing quality of life in the early post-operative period.

Effect of types of resection and manipulation on trocar site contamination after laparoscopic colectomy: An experimental study in rats with intraluminal radiotracer application

BACKGROUND

The etiology and incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer remain unknown. The purpose of this experimental study was to detect and quantify the amount of contamination at the port-site by means of a method utilizing radiolabelled colloid particles following extra- or intracorporeal laporoscopic resection of cecum.

METHODS

Prior to experimental surgery, we obtained a high concentration of luminal colonic radiotracer activity by per anum application of sulphur colloid molecules labelled with Tc-99m pertechnetate. In three main groups of rats, we either resected a portion of cecum extracorporeally or intracorporeally, or did no resection. Each main group was further divided into two subgroups, in which the manipulations were either autraumatic or traumatic. We excised trocar sites as 2 cm doughnuts after completion of the surgical procedure. We used gamma camera imaging to quantify the amount of radioactive contamination at trocar sites. The background corrected trocar site activity for each rat was calculated. Activities exceeding the maximum background activity were accepted as trocar site contamination.

RESULTS

We detected an overall incidence of contamination in 44% of rats. This rate were 71% and 17% in traumatic and atraumatic subgroups. The resection itself increased the rate and intensity of contamination, as well (p = 0.04). The most intensive contamination was detected in the intracorporeal resection with traumatic manipulation subgroup (p = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the presence of resection and manipulative trauma seemed to be increasing the rate and intensity of the radioactive activity at the trocar site. When traumatic manipulatiun was exercised, the contamination was so intense that the type of resection did not differ. We concluded that our scintigraphic method would be useful in the intraoperative detection of port site contamination by the tumor cells, and that surgeons would take some preventive measures to prevent future port-site metastases.

The use of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler (BSG "Seamguard") in colorectal surgery: initial experience

Of all the complications associated with colorectal surgery, the most devastating and constant, despite all techniques being performed properly is anastomotic leakage, especially in left colon and rectal resections with rates as high as 50% when the rectum is involved. In 2005, our center published the preliminary experience with the use of linear staple line reinforcement for colon surgery. The purpose of this paper is to present a series of cases using a new conformation of bioabsorbable reinforcement for circular staplers in 5 patients, 2 patients with rectal cancer, 2 patients with diverticular disease, and 1 patient with sigmoid cancer. These initial data are very promising and has encouraged us to continue using this device on further patients.

The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine whether multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images can improve the accuracy of MDCT-based colorectal cancer preoperative staging by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Fifty-five patients with colorectal cancer underwent contrast-enhanced CT colonography using an 8- or 16-row scanner. Two separate interval reviews of the axial MDCT datasets with/without MPR images (coronal and sagittal) were performed independently by two radiologists blinded to both the colonoscopic and histopathologic results. At each review session, the radiologists were asked to determine the colorectal cancer TNM stage within the context of differentiating < or =T3 from T4, N0 from > or =N1 and M0 from M1 using a five-point confidence scale. The radiologists' performance for staging the colorectal cancer using axial CT datasets with/without MPR images was evaluated using ROC analysis. Sensitivities, specificities and interobserver agreement were assessed. When MPR images were added, significant improvement was achieved by both radiologists for differentiating N0 from > or =N1 in terms of both A(Z) (0.651 to 0.769; 0.573 to 0.713) and specificity (26.7 to 69.2%; 23.1 to 76.9%) (P<0.05). For T staging, ROC analysis failed to show a significant improvement in terms of differentiating < or =T3 from T4 for either radiologist (P>0.05), but a significant improvement in the specificity (70 to 90%; 80 to 92%) was achieved by one radiologist (P<0.05). In terms of the M staging, a significant improvement in the Az (0.844 to 0.996) was observed for the combined interpretation of the axial and MPR images by one radiologist (P<0.05). Furthermore, substantial or almost perfect interobserver agreement was achieved for all TNM stagings for the combined interpretations (kappa=0.641-0.866), whereas only fair to substantial agreement was achieved for the axial images alone (kappa=0.337-0.707). In conclusion, the combined interpretation of the axial and MPR MDCT images significantly improved the local staging of colorectal cancer compared with assessments based on axial images alone.