Short Esophagus and Esophageal Stricture

Comparative Analysis of Patients with Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repairs with and without Collis Gastroplasty

INTRODUCTION

After extensive mediastinal dissection fails to achieve adequate intra-abdominal esophageal length, a Collis gastroplasty(CG) is recommended to decrease axial tension and reduce hiatal hernia recurrence. However, concerns exist about staple line leak, and long-term symptoms of heartburn and dysphagia due to the acid-producing neoesophagus which lacks peristaltic activity. This study aimed to assess long-term satisfaction and GERD-related quality of life after robotic fundoplication with CG (wedge fundectomy technique) and to compare outcomes to patients who underwent fundoplication without CG. Outcomes studied included patient satisfaction, resumption of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), length of surgery (LOS), hospital stay, and reintervention.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients from January 2017 through December 2018 undergoing elective robotic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. 61 patients were contacted for follow-up, of which 20 responded. Of those 20 patients, 7 had a CG performed during surgery while 13 did not. There was no significant difference in size and type of hiatal hernias in the 2 groups. These patients agreed to give their feedback via a GERD health-related quality of life (GERD HRQL) questionnaire. Their medical records were reviewed for LOS, length of hospital stay (LOH), and reintervention needed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v 25. Satisfaction and need for PPIs were compared between the treatment and control groups using the chi-square test of independence.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed that satisfaction with outcome and PPI resumption was not significantly different between both groups (P > .05). There was a significant difference in the average ranks between the 2 groups for the question on postoperative dysphagia on the follow-up GERD HRQL questionnaire, with the group with CG reporting no dysphagia. There were no significant differences in the average ranks between the 2 groups for the remaining 15 questions (P > .05). The median LOS was longer in patients who had a CG compared to patients who did not (250 vs. 148 min) (P = .01). The LOH stay was not significantly different (P > .05) with a median length of stay of 2 days observed in both groups. There were no leaks in the Collis group and no reoperations, conversions, or blood transfusions needed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Collis gastroplasty is a safe option to utilize for short esophagus noted despite extensive mediastinal mobilization and does not adversely affect the LOH stay, need for reoperation, or patient long-term satisfaction.

Manometric Esophageal Length to Height (MELH) Ratio Predicts Hiatal Hernia Recurrence

INTRODUCTION

The shortened esophagus is poorly defined and is determined intraoperatively, as there exists no objective test to identify a shortened esophagus before surgical hiatal hernia repair. We devised a unique manometric esophageal length to height (MELH) ratio to define the presence of a shortened esophagus and examined the role of esophageal length in hiatal hernia recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review identified 254 patients with hiatal hernia who underwent preoperative esophageal manometry and either an open hernia repair with Collis gastroplasty and fundoplication (with Collis) or laparoscopic repair and fundoplication without Collis gastroplasty (without Collis) from 2005-2016. The MELH ratio was calculated by measuring the upper to lower esophageal sphincter distance divided by the patient's height.

RESULTS

Of 245 patients, 157 underwent repair with Collis, while 97 underwent repair without Collis. The Collis group had a shorter manometric esophageal length (20.2 vs. 22.4 cm, P<0.001) and lower MELH (0.12 vs. 0.13, P<0.001). The Collis group had fewer hernia recurrences (18% vs. 55%, log-rank P<0.001) and fewer reoperations for recurrence (0% vs. 10%, log-rank P<0.001) at 5 years. A 33% decrease in risk of hernia recurrence was seen for every 0.01 U increment in MELH ratio (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.83, P<0.001) while repair without Collis (hazard ratio: 6.1; 95% confidence interval: 3.2-11.7, P<0.001) was associated with increased risk of hernia recurrence.

CONCLUSION

MELH ratio is an objective predictor of a shortened esophagus preoperatively. Lower MELH is associated with increased risk of recurrence and the risk associated with shortened esophagus can be mitigated with an esophageal lengthening procedure such as Collis gastroplasty.

Herniorrafia hiatal y fundoplicatura laparoscópica de Toupet en un paciente con esófago corto

El esófago corto es una complicación infrecuente del reflujo gastroesofágico, polémico para algunos autores. Su diagnóstico se hace de manera intraoperatoria, ante la imposibilidad de conservar un esofago intrabdominal mayor a tres centímetros desde el hiato diafragmático. Algunos expertos niegan la existencia de esta entidad, argumentando que se debe a una mala disección del esófago. En este artículo, se presenta el caso de un paciente sometido a herniorrafia hiatal con colocación de malla, con gran dificultad para conservar una adecuada longitud del esófago abdominal, y que no requirió gastroplastia.

Giant hiatal hernia

A giant hiatal hernia (HH) is a hernia that includes at least 30% of the stomach in the chest, although a uniform definition does not exist; most commonly, a giant HH is a type III hernia with a sliding and paraesophageal component. The etiology of giant HH is not entirely clear, and two potential mechanisms exist: (1) gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) leads to esophageal scarring and shortening with resulting traction on the gastroesophageal junction and gastric herniation; and (2) chronic positive pressure on the diaphragmatic hiatus combined with a propensity to herniation leads to gastric displacement into the chest, resulting in GERD. The short esophagus and GERD are key concepts to understanding the pathophysiology of giant HH, and these concepts are critical to address this problem appropriately. A successful repair of giant HH requires adherence to basic hernia repair principles (ie, hernia sac excision, tension-free repair), recognition and correction of a short esophagus, and a well-performed antireflux procedure. Recurrence rates for open giant HH repairs in expert hands range between 2% and 12%; large series have demonstrated that meticulous laparoscopic surgical technique can emulate the results of open giant HH repair.

When did the esophagus start shrinking? The history of the short esophagus

Even though the history of this condition extends for almost 100 years, the short esophagus (SE) is still one of the most controversial topics in esophageal surgery with its existence still denied by some distinguished surgeons. We reviewed the evolution behind the diagnosis and treatment of the SE and the persons who wrote its history, from the first descriptions by radiologists, endoscopists, and surgeons to modern treatment.

Current controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair

The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has become one of the most widely debated and controversial areas in surgery. PEHs are relatively uncommon, often presenting in patients entering their seventh or eighth decades of life. Patients who have PEH often bear complicating medical comorbidities making them potentially poor operative candidates. Taking this into account makes surgical management of these patients all the more complex. Many considerations must be taken into account in formulating a management strategy for patients who have PEHs, and these considerations have led surgeons into ongoing debates in recent decades.

Wedge gastroplasty and reinforced crural repair: Important components of laparoscopic giant or recurrent hiatal hernia repair

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic repair of a giant hiatal hernia (>50% of the stomach above the diaphragm) is associated with short-term recurrence rates of 12% to 42%. Recurrent hiatal hernias often have significantly altered anatomy, making laparoscopic repair challenging. We hypothesized that increasing intra-abdominal esophageal length by means of Collis wedge gastroplasty, complete fat-pad dissection, hernia-sac excision, and primary reinforced crural repair would minimize short-term recurrence and provide adequate symptomatic relief.

METHODS

From January 1, 2001, though May 1, 2005, 61 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of a giant or recurrent hiatal hernia with a Collis wedge gastroplasty and Nissen fundoplication. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed with a validated questionnaire (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life). We obtained postoperative radiographic imaging to objectively assess anatomic results at a median of 1.13 years.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients, 12 (20%) were referred to our institution after previous repairs. Operating time averaged 308 +/- 103 minutes. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 (8.2%) patients. One (1.6%) patient died of cardiac complications. Postoperatively, 52 (85%) patients completed the questionnaire with mean a Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire score of 1.15 +/- 2.78 (scale, 0-45; 0 = asymptomatic). Overall, 51 (98%) of the 52 respondents were satisfied with their surgical outcome. Postoperative radiographic data were available for 54 (89%) patients. We identified no recurrences at 1-month follow-up, and only 4.7% (2/42) had evidence of radiographic recurrence at 1 year or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent use of a Collis wedge gastroplasty with reinforced crural repair minimizes short-term recurrence after minimally invasive giant hiatal hernia repair. Symptomatic results are excellent in most patients.