Antimicrobial agents for surgical infections

Antibacterial prophylaxis for gram-positive and gram-negative infections in cranial surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis against gram positive and gram negative infections is considered standard of care in the perioperative management of patients undergoing cranial surgery. The antibiotic regimen which best reduces the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine the effect of various prophylactic antibiotics on infection incidence among patients undergoing cranial surgeries.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through October 2014 for studies that evaluated the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis among patients undergoing cranial surgeries. Pooled effect estimates using both fixed- and random-effect models were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis, with a combined total of 1655 cranial procedures. Among these, 74 cases of SSIs were reported after patients received a single antibiotic or a combination of 2 or more antibiotics (pooled incidence of SSIs=6.00%; 95% CI=4.80%, 7.50%; fixed-effects model; I²=73.7%; P-heterogeneity<0.01). Incidence of SSI was 1.00% (95% CI=0.40%, 2.60%) for non-MRSA gram-positive bacterial infections; 2.70% (95% CI=0.90%, 8.00%) for gram-negative bacterial infections; 6.00% (95% CI=4.50%, 7.80%) for gram negative, and non-MRSA gram-positive bacterial infections; and 11.3% (95% CI=7.20%, 17.4%) for gram negative and MRSA gram-positive bacterial infections. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect modification by drug class (P=0.05) and infection type (P-interaction=0.01). More specifically, lincosamides (2.70%; n=1 group), glycopeptides (2.80%; n=1), third generation cephalosporins (5.30%; n=2), antibiotics combination (4.90%; n=4), and penicillin-family antibiotics (5.90%, n=1) offered better coverage against infections than first generation cephalosporins (22.0%; n=2). A meta-regression analysis on study length was not significant (P=0.13). Random-effect models were not materially different form fixed-effects. No evidence of publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

Lincosamides, glycopeptides, third generation cephalosporins, other combinations of prophylactic antibiotics, or penicillin-family antibiotics alone offer better coverage against SSIs than first generation cephalosporin among cranial surgery patients.

Applying vacuum to accomplish reduced wound infections in laparoscopic pediatric surgery

INTRODUCTION

The prevention of surgical site infections has received little attention in pediatric surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy is used to treat complex wounds. We hypothesized that this principle could reduce wound infection rates following laparoscopic surgery. We tested this in a randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We randomized pediatric patients with an umbilical port site to a standard dressing or a vacuum dressing. The dressings were removed 48h after surgery. A nurse blinded for the treatment inspected the umbilical wound between post-operative days 7-10 for infection. Data comparison was performed using a Fisher exact test with p<0.05 defined as significant.

RESULTS

We recruited 90 patients over 2 years and randomized 44 to the vacuum dressing arm and 42 to the control arm. We observed a 2.8% (n=1/35) infection rate in the vacuum dressing group and 3.3% (n=1/30) in the control group (p=1.0).

DISCUSSION

We ended our study early when an interim analysis showed an impractical number of patients would be required to achieve sufficient power. We did not find a significant difference between the control and vacuum dressings in reducing post-operative wound infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Infections of the nervous system

Glycemic control is an important aspect of patient care in the surgical Infections of the nervous system are among the most difficult infections in terms of the morbidity and mortality posed to patients, and thereby require urgent and accurate diagnosis. Although viral meningitides are more common, it is the bacterial meningitides that have the potential to cause a rapidly deteriorating condition that the physician should be familiar with. Viral encephalitis frequently accompanies viral meningitis, and can produce focal neurologic findings and cognitive difficulties that can mimic other neurologic disorders. Brain abscesses also have the potential to mimic and present like other neurologic disorders, and cause more focal deficits. Finally, other infectious diseases of the central nervous system, such as prion disease and cavernous sinus thrombosis, are explored in this review.