Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The effect of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and transfusion on off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid (TA) on off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

SETTING

Operating room, OPCAB surgery, all surgeries were elective measurements. Searching the following data sources respectively: PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and reference lists of identified articles, we performed a meta-analysis of postoperative 24h blood loss, postoperative allogeneic transfusion, re-operation for massive bleeding, postoperative mortality, and postoperative thrombotic complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Using electronic databases, we selected 15 randomized control trials (RCTs), carried out between 2003 and 2016, with a total of 1250 patients for our review. TA significantly reduced the postoperative 24h blood loss (mean difference -213.32ml, 95% confidence intervals, -247.20ml to -179.43ml; P<0.0001). And, TA also significantly reduced the risk of packed red blood cell (PRBCs) transfusion (risk ratio 0.62; 95% confidence intervals 0.51 to 0.76; P<0.0001) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (0.65; 0.52 to 0.81; P<0.001). There were no statistical significance on platelet transfusion (risk difference -0.00, 95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.02; P=0.73) and re-operation (0.00, -0.02 to 0.02; P=1.00). No association was found between TA and morbility (risk difference -0.00, 95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.02; P=0.99) and thrombotic complications (-0.01, -0.01 to 0.02; P=0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

TA reduced the probability of receiving a PRBCs and FFP transfusion during OPCAB surgery. And no association with postoperative death and thrombotic events was found. However, further trials with an appropriate sample size are required to confirm TA safety in OPCAB surgery.

Comparing short and long term survival of patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass graft with and without coronary endarterectomy

Background and aim

There is some controversy about survival of coronary endarterectomy (CE) patients, so the current study aims to compare short and long term survival of patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) with and without coronary endarterectomy.

Patients and methods

we performed a retrospective analysis of data on patients undergoing OPCAB and CE between 2011 and 2012. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data collected from data bank. Follow-up information was obtained from telephone contact mean time 37.13 ± 23.82 months after surgery. Early and late outcomes were compared by univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Result

OPCAB was performed in 474 patients, which 69 of them had a CE. The mean long term survival was similar between OPCAB (56.28 ± 0.61) and OPCAB + CE (55.54 ± 1.3) groups (p = 0.66). Multiple Cox regression shows that age, gender, BMI, EF and angina were significant predictors of mortality. Patients undergoing CE have a long term intensive care unit (ICU) stay (51.31 ± 5.59 vs 37.23 ± 0.88, P = 0.015) and blood transfusion was higher in CE group (650.62 ± 110 vs. 324.71 ± 22, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The current study demonstrates that results of CE are acceptable with respect to short and long -term survival. Patients undergoing CE required long term ICU stay and higher blood transfusion.

Outcome and graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy

Background

Controversy persists regarding the use of coronary endarterectomy (CE) in patients with severe coronary artery disease. We compared the comorbidities and perioperative characteristics of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with and without CE.

Methods

This study was performed in two private hospitals in Shiraz, Iran from May 2010 to December 2011 on 967 patients who underwent CABG without CE and 84 patients who underwent CABG with CE (the CE+ group). After follow-up at 9.66±3.65 months post-surgery, 28 patients from the CE+ group underwent angiography to evaluate the patency of grafts and native coronary vessels.

Results

Patients in the CE+ group had a more prevalent history of diabetes (48% vs. 36%) and number of diseased vessels (2.88±0.39 vs. 2.70±0.85). The overall hospital mortality was 1.8%, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups. In the 28 patients who underwent reangiography, 113 vessels were bypassed and 29 endarterectomies were performed, mostly on the left anterior descending artery (12 endarterectomies) and the right coronary artery (8 endarterectomies). In the endarterectomized vessels, a 66% patency rate was found in both the grafts and the native vessels. The native coronary vessels were more likely to be patent when the left internal mammary artery was used as a conduit than when a saphenous vein bypass graft was used.

Conclusion

The lack of a significant difference in postoperative complications in patients who underwent CABG with or without CE may indicate that CE does not expose patients to a higher risk of complications. Since most of the endarterectomized vessels were shown to be patent during the follow-up period, we propose that endarterectomy is a viable option for patients with severely diseased vessels.

On pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review

There are two basic ways of performing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG): on pump CABG and off pump CABG. Off pump CABG is relatively a newer procedure to on-pump CABG and does not require the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine. On pump CABG is the more traditional method of performing bypass surgery. However its resultant inflammatory effects cause renal dysfunction, gastrointestinal distress and cardiac abnormalities which have forced the surgeons to look for alternatives to the procedure. An extensive literature search revealed that on pump CABG causes better revascularization as compared to off pump CABG while off pump CABG has a much lower post operative morbidity and mortality especially in high risk patients. We suggest that the technique used should depend on the ease of the surgeon doing the operation as both the methods seem almost equally efficient according to the review.

Effect of antegrade graft cardioplegia combined with passive graft perfusion in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with proximal graft anastomosis were randomly divided into groups that received antegrade cardioplegic infusion only via the aortic root (group A) or antegrade cardioplegic infusion via the aortic root and additional cardioplegia via vein or free arterial grafts after completion of each distal anastomosis (group B). The group B patients also received bypass graft perfusion with warm arterial blood just after removal of the cross-clamp until the proximal graft anastomosis was completed. The need for defibrillation and inotropic support during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and total CPB time were significantly lower in group B than in group A. Group B also had significantly lower peak cardiac troponin I levels 12 h after operation compared with group A and this was more pronounced in subgroups with severe right coronary artery stenosis and poor left ventricular ejection fraction than in the whole population. It is concluded that antegrade graft cardioplegia and graft perfusion with warm blood during proximal graft anastomosis may improve myocardial protection.