Palliative chemotherapy for pancreatic malignancies

The role of seed implantation in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using ERCP

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of iodine-125 seed implantation, guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or percutanous ultrasound, in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 101 patients with obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017 in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 50 underwent implantation of iodine-125 seeds under EUS and/or percutaneous ultrasound guidance after receiving a stent via ERCP (treatment group), and 51 received a stent via ERCP without undergoing seed implantation (control group). The clinical data and therapeutic outcomes of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the treatment group obtained significant relief of abdominal pain at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month followup (p < 0.05), with a significantly lower visual analog scale pain score (p < 0.05). The treatment group obtained a longer median survival (8.8 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.02), longer median duration of stent patency (10.8 ± 1.4 vs. 6.9 ± 0.8 months, p = 0.02), and prolonged average time to gastric outlet obstruction (6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.02). Differences between liver function and appetite for the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05 and p = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine-125 seed implantation after relief of obstructive jaundice via ERCP prolongs survival, biliary stent patency, and time to gastric outlet obstruction and improves patient quality of life by relieving pancreatic pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

Radical treatment of stage IV pancreatic cancer by the combination of cryosurgery and iodine-125 seed implantation

AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effect of radical treatment and palliative treatment in stage IV pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS: 81 patients were enrolled in the study. Radical treatment was performed on 51 patients, while 30 patients were put under palliative treatment. The procedural safety and interval survival for stage IV pancreatic cancer (IS-IV) was assessed by almost 2.5 years of follow-ups. The IS-IV of patients under the two kinds of treatment, and the effects of treatment timing and frequency on IS-IV, were compared.

RESULTS: The IS-IV of patients who received radical treatment was significantly longer than those who received palliative treatment (P < 0.001). The IS-IV of patients who received delayed radical or palliative treatment was longer than those who received accordingly timely treatment (P = 0.0034 and 0.0415, respectively). Multiple treatments can play an important role in improving the IS-IV of patients who received radical treatment (P = 0.0389), but not for those who received palliative treatment (P = 0.99).

CONCLUSION: The effect of radical treatment was significantly more obvious than that of palliative treatment, and multiple radical treatments may contribute more to patients than a single radical treatment.

Dual ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition exerts synergistic effect with conventional chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Patient survival in pancreatic cancer remains poor with gemcitabine (GEM)-based regimens. The target specific molecular agent lapatinib, a dual ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown significant activity against ErbB1 and ErbB2-expressing tumors. Since pancreatic tumors frequently overexpress these proteins, we investigated its effects, both alone and in conjunction with 5-FU or GEM. The pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and AsPC were treated with varying doses of lapatinib in vitro. The effects on ErbB1/ErbB2 protein phosphorylation and on the cell survival protein survivin were determined by western blotting. Cytotoxicity was determined by MTT assay and apoptosis was measured using the caspase-3 colorimetric assay. Similar dose-response lapatinib experiments were conducted with varying concentrations of 5-FU or GEM and isobolograms were constructed to evaluate therapeutic synergy. Lapatinib inhibited protein phosphorylation in the range of 4-16 µM, a clinically achievable concentration. The lapatinib-treated cells showed a dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis at the same concentrations that blocked ErbB1/ErbB2 phosphorylation. The addition of 5-FU or GEM to these cells resulted in synergistic effects. The lapatinib-treated cells also demonstrated downregulation of survivin. Simultaneous dual ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition with lapatinib results in significant reduction of pancreatic cancer cell growth and proliferation. These effects occur at clinically achievable concentrations and are synergistic with the effects of 5-FU or GEM. These findings support the potential role of lapatinib in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

ALCAM (CD166) expression and serum levels in pancreatic cancer

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate the expression of the activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) in pancreatic cancer (PAC) and to determine whether or not the ectodomain shedding of ALCAM (s-ALCAM) could serve as a biomarker in the peripheral blood of PAC patients.

Material and Methods

Tissue specimens and blood sera of patients with PAC (n = 264 and n = 116, respectively) and the sera of 115 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) were analyzed via ALCAM immunohistochemistry and s-ALCAM ELISA tests. Results were correlated with clinical, histopathological, and patient survival data (Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, respectively).

Results

ALCAM was expressed in the majority of PAC lesions. Immunohistochemistry and serum ELISA tests revealed no association between ALCAM expression in primary tumors or s-ALCAM and clinical or histopathological data. Neither ALCAM nor s-ALCAM showed a significant impact regarding overall survival (p = 0.261 and p = 0.660, respectively). S-ALCAM serum levels were significantly elevated compared to the sera of CP patients (p<0.001). The sensitivity of s-ALCAM in detecting PAC was 58.6% at a specificity of 73.9% (AUC = 0.69).

Conclusions

ALCAM is expressed in the majority of PAC lesions, but statistical analysis revealed no association with clinical or pathological data. Although significantly elevated in patients with PAC, the sensitivity and specificity of the s-ALCAM serum quantification test was low. Therefore, its potential as a novel diagnostic marker for PAC remains elusive and further investigations are required.

Gemcitabine in combination with dendritic cell-induced immunoeffector cells inhibits the growth of BxPC-3 cells

AIM: To investigate the effect of gemcitabine (GEM) in combination with T lymphocytes activated by BxPC-3 cell whole lysate-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) on the growth of BxPC-3 cells.

METHODS: After T lymphocytes were incubated with monocyte-derived DCs sensitized with whole lysate of BxPC-3 cells, the concentrations of IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10 and TGF-β in cell supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Subsequently, GEM and activated T lymphocytes, alone or in combination, were added into cultured BxPC-3 cells. After incubation for 24 h, BxPC-3 cell proliferation was measured by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay and colony formation assay, and early apoptosis of BxPC-3 cells was detected by flow cytometry.

RESULTS: After stimulation with sensitized DCs, the secretion of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α by T lymphocytes was significantly enhanced (1 379 ng/L ± 307 ng/L vs 370 ng/L ± 64 ng/L, 1 269 ng/L ± 264 ng/L vs 420 ± 114 ng/L, and 1 062 ng/L ± 172 ng/L vs 515 ± 27 ng/L, all P < 0.01), while the production of IL-10 and TGF-β showed no significant changes (both P > 0.05). Compared with the negative control group, activated T lymphocytes and GEM, alone or in combination, could inhibit the growth of BxPC-3 cells. The death rate and apoptosis rate were highest, and the rate of colony formation was lowest in BxPC-3 cells treated with activated T lymphocytes and GEM in combination.

CONCLUSION: DCs sensitized with BxPC-3 cell whole lysate can induce the formation of tumor-killing cytotoxic T cells. Dendritic cell-induced immunoeffector cells in combination with gemcitabine have stronger tumor-killing activity than immunoeffector cells alone.