Neuroendocrine liver metastases

Assessment of Irinotecan Loading and Releasing Profiles of a Novel Drug-Eluting Microsphere (CalliSpheres) In Vitro

Background: This study investigated irinotecan loading efficiency and release profiles of CalliSpheres in vitro. Materials and Methods: CalliSpheres with size of 50-150, 100-300, and 300-500 μm and irinotecan at different amounts (20, 40, 80, and 100 mg) and concentrations (5 and 10 mg/mL) were prepared for experiments. Dynamic light scattering and Agilent 1260 high-performance liquid chromatography system were used to quantify bead diameters and the efficiency of irinotecan loading and releasing properties, respectively. Results: The diameters of CalliSpheres with all sizes were reduced after being loaded with irinotecan compared with unloaded ones with shrinkage rate ranging from 8.5% to 16.2%. Above 80% irinotecan was incorporated with CalliSpheres with all sizes when being loaded with irinotecan 20, 40, and 80 mg, while loading efficiencies were 70%-80% when being loaded with irinotecan 100 mg. Besides, elevated loading efficiency was observed at a higher concentration of irinotecan solutions (10 mg/mL) compared with a lower concentration (5 mg/mL) for CalliSpheres with all sizes. As to release profiles, irinotecan was released from CalliSpheres very quickly, and irinotecan release rate was elevated in CalliSpheres with smaller size than CalliSpheres with larger size within the first 12 h, whereas it was similar among CalliSpheres with different sizes at 24 and 48 h with maximum release rate ∼100%. In addition, fetal bovine serum seemed to have an effect on the accelerating irinotecan release. Conclusion: CalliSpheres exhibits good physical characteristics, satisfied irinotecan loading efficiency, and acceptable releasing profiles.

Liver Transplant for Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Report of 2 Exceptional Cases and Literature Review

Patients with neuroendocrine tumors with unresec-table liver involvement can benefit from liver transplant. There is a specific set of guidelines for neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis that involve less than 50% of the liver. However, beyond those guidelines, there are reports of exceptional criteria patients who benefited from liver transplant. Here, we present 2 unusual cases of patients with exceptional circumstances and with neuroendocrine tumors who underwent liver transplant. The first case describes a patient with an extremely rare neuroen-docrine tumor of the proximal common bile duct that caused liver biliary cirrhosis. The patient underwent tumor resection and liver transplant concurrently. The second case describes a patient with a neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin with more than 50% hepatic involvement who received a liver transplant after downstaging. In our center, patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from neuroendoc-rine tumors are currently selected for liver transplant based on well-established criteria. However, these 2 cases did not meet the criteria for consideration of liver transplant; thus, multidisciplinary team sessions were held to discuss these 2 cases. After a period of nonsurgical treatment and evaluation of the tumor behavior, we selected the patients as candidates for liver transplant based on the favorable tumor behavior and favorable response to treatment. For both patients, we did not observe any signs of tumor recurrence during follow-up. The outcomes were acceptable, and the patients tolerated treatment well. Considering the favorable tumor pathology (G1 phase and low Ki67 index), we suggest that more studies should be conducted to evaluate the outcomes of patients with low-grade tumors and that the criteria for patients with low-grade tumors could be extended based on such future data.

Is there still a role for the hepatic locoregional treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the era of systemic targeted therapies?

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) frequently present with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and the liver is the most frequent site of spreading. The early identification of metastatic disease represents a major prognostic factor for GEP-NENs patients. Radical surgical resection, which is feasible for a minority of patients, is considered the only curative option, while the best management for patients with unresectable liver metastases is still being debated. In the last few years, a number of locoregional and systemic treatments has become available for GEP-NEN patients metastatic to the liver. However, to date only a few prospective studies have compared those therapies and the optimal management option is based on clinical judgement. Additionally, locoregional treatments appear feasible and safe for disease control for patients with limited liver involvement and effective in symptoms control for patients with diffuse liver metastases. Considering the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing the locoregional treatments of liver metastatic NEN patients, clinical judgment remains key to set the most appropriate therapeutic pathway. Prospective data may ultimately lead to more personalized and optimized treatments. The present review analyzes all the locoregional therapy modalities (i.e., surgery, ablative treatments and transarterial approach) and aims to provide clinicians with a useful algorithm to best treat GEP-NEN patients metastatic to the liver.

MicroRNAs associated with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours and their metastases

Novel molecular analytes are needed in small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (SBNETs) to better determine disease aggressiveness and predict treatment response. In this study, we aimed to profile the global miRNome of SBNETs, and identify microRNAs (miRNAs) involved in tumour progression for use as potential biomarkers. Two independent miRNA profiling experiments were performed (n=90), including primary SBNETs (n=28), adjacent normal small bowel (NSB; n=14), matched lymph node (LN) metastases (n=24), normal LNs (n=7), normal liver (n=2) and liver metastases (n=15). We then evaluated potentially targeted genes by performing integrated computational analyses. We discovered 39 miRNAs significantly deregulated in SBNETs compared with adjacent NSB. The most upregulated (miR-204-5p, miR-7-5p and miR-375) were confirmed by qRT-PCR. Two miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-143-3p) were significantly downregulated in LN and liver metastases compared with primary tumours. Furthermore, we identified upregulated gene targets for miR-1 and miR-143-3p in an existing SBNET dataset, which could contribute to disease progression, and show that these miRNAs directly regulate FOSB and NUAK2 oncogenes. Our study represents the largest global miRNA profiling of SBNETs using matched primary tumour and metastatic samples. We revealed novel miRNAs deregulated during SBNET disease progression, and important miRNA-mRNA interactions. These miRNAs have the potential to act as biomarkers for patient stratification and may also be able to guide treatment decisions. Further experiments to define molecular mechanisms and validate these miRNAs in larger tissue cohorts and in biofluids are now warranted.

Conventional versus Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting bead (DEB) chemoembolization for treatment of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study evaluated 177 transarterial chemoembolization treatments (78 conventional chemoembolization treatments using ethiodized oil-based cisplatin, mitomycin C, and doxorubicin and 99 DEB chemoembolization treatments using doxorubicin-loaded 100-300 μm DEBs) from 2012 to 2015. Hepatic disease distribution was 93% bilobar for both groups with largest lesion size 5.0 cm ± 2.7. No difference was noted in regard to lesion size or distribution, carcinoid syndrome, or pancreastatin production. Clinical outcomes including complications; liver function tests (LFTs); and radiologic (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), biochemical (pancreastatin levels), and symptomatic responses were evaluated at 1-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Higher symptomatic response (complete and partial) was identified with conventional transarterial chemoembolization compared with DEB chemoembolization (47% vs 30%; P < .05). Patients receiving DEB transarterial chemoembolization experienced lower elevation of LFTs (aspartate aminotransferase, 39 U/L vs 122 U/L; alanine aminotransferase, 20 U/L vs 93 U/L; bilirubin, 0.001 mg/dL vs 0.123 mg/dL; P < .05) and less postembolization syndrome (50% vs 67%; P < .05). Patients undergoing first-time DEB transarterial chemoembolization had lower periprocedural octreotide maximum rate requirements (58 μg/h vs 66 μg/h; P < .05). No difference was observed in biochemical (P = .60) or radiologic (P < .20) responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization yields better symptomatic response and may be preferred for patients experiencing carcinoid symptoms. DEB transarterial chemoembolization, with lower LFT elevations and postembolization syndrome incidence, may be preferred for patients with poor liver function.

Quality of life after treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

A large subset of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) is symptomatic at the time of presentation. In addition to improving survival, treatment of NELM seeks to provide palliation of symptoms. However, data on health-related quality of life (QoL) are uncommon. We sought to define patient-reported QoL after treatment of NELM.

METHODS

Patients who underwent treatment of NELM at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1998 and 2013 and who were alive as of March 2014 were identified (n = 125). These patients were invited to complete a QoL survey designed using validated assessment tools, to assess their physical, mental, and general health before treatment, after the most recent treatment and at the time of the study. Clinicopathologic data were collected and correlated with QoL data.

RESULTS

The response rate was 68.0% (n = 85). Median patient age was 55 y and most were male (59.2%). Most patients had a pancreatic (24.7%) or a small bowel (37.7%) primary tumor; the overwhelming majority had multiple NELM (83.5%). Patient-reported symptoms before any treatment included diarrhea (41.1%), flushing (34.1%), fatigue (36.5%), and osteoarticular pain (18.8%). Initial treatment of NELM consisted of surgery in 55 patients (64.7%) and nonsurgical treatment in 30 patients (35.3%). Many patients reported an overall improvement in physical health and mental health. Specifically, the proportion of patients reporting diarrhea (before any treatment, 41.1% versus currently, 25.9%; P = 0.019) and flushing (before any treatment, 34.1% versus currently, 10.5%; P < 0.001) tended to decrease over time and a lower proportion of patients reported to be currently sad about being ill (before any treatment, 31.8% versus currently, 23.2%; P = 0.009). Patients with a very poor QoL at the time of the diagnosis were more likely to experience an improvement in QoL after treatment. Interestingly, there was no difference in the improvement in overall QoL whether the initial treatment for NELM was surgical or nonsurgical; however, a lower proportion of patients were dissatisfied with surgery versus nonsurgical therapy (5.4% versus 9.4%; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than one-fourth of patients experienced a significant improvement in QoL after treatment of NELM. The patients who benefit the most of treatment were those who were more symptomatic before any treatment.

Determinants of surgical resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) include functioning and non-functional tumors. Functioning tumors consist of tumors that produce a variety of hormones and their clinical effects. Therefore, determinants of resection of pNETs should be discussed for each group of tumors. Less than 10% of insulinomas are malignant, therefore more than 90% of the cases can be cured by surgical resection. Lymphadenectomy is generally not necessary in insulinoma operation. If preoperative localization of the insulinoma is completed, enucleation from the pancreatic body or tail, and distal pancreatectomy can be performed safely by laparoscopy. When preoperative localization of a sporadic insulinoma is not confirmed, surgical exploration is needed. Intraoperative localization of a tumor, intraoperative insulin sampling and frozen section are required. The crucial purpose of surgical resection is to control inappropriate insulin secretion by removing all insulinomas. Gastrinomas are usually located in the duodenum or pancreas, which secrete gastrin and cause Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Duodenal gastrinomas are usually small, therefore they are not seen on preoperative imaging studies or endoscopic ultrasound, and can be found only at surgery if a duodenotomy is performed. In addition, lymph node metastasis is found in 40-60% of cases. Therefore, the experienced surgeons should direct operation for gastrinomas. Surgical exploration with duodenotomy should be performed at a laparotomy. Other functioning pNETs can occur in the pancreas or in other locations. Curative resection is always recommended whenever possible after optimal symptomatic control of the clinical syndrome by medical treatment. Indications for surgery depend on clinical symptom control, tumor size, location, extent, malignancy and presence of metastasis. A lot of non-functioning pNETs are found incidentally according to the quality improvement of imaging techniques. Localized, small, malignant non-functioning pNETs should be operated on aggressively, while in possibly benign tumors smaller than 2 cm the surgical risk-benefit ratio should be carefully weighted. Surgical liver resection is generally proposed in curative intent to all patients with operable metastases from G1 or G2 pNET. The benefits of surgical resection of liver metastases have been demonstrated in terms of overall survival and quality of life. Complete resection is associated with better long-term survival.

Efficacy of somatostatin analogues in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours based on the results of recent clinical trials

Due to their inhibitory effects on hormone secretion, somatostatin analogues are of pivotal importance in the symptomatic treatment of hormone-secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Although several earlier clinical observations supported the view that these biological agents are capable of inhibiting the growth of neuroendocrine tumours, the PROMID study published in 2009 was the first to confirm the inhibitory effect of octreotide on tumour growth and demonstrated the prolongation of progression free survival. These findings have been confirmed and extended by the most recent CLARINET trial with lanreotide published in 2014. Somatostatin analogues are capable of inhibiting tumour growth and stabilizing disease irrespective of the hormonal activity of the tumour and, therefore, their applicability is expected to be extended to the treatment of hormonally inactive neuroendocrine tumours, as well. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(48), 1908–1912.

Therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are frequently malignant (50-80%, except for insulinoma) and may show an aggressive course with metastases to the liver as well as more distant sites. These heterogeneous neoplasms include functioning tumors, which secrete a variety of peptide hormones, and non-functioning tumors (up to 90% of pNETs), which often show metastases at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for English-language publications from 1995 through December 2012. Reference lists from studies selected were manually searched to identify further relevant reports. Manuscripts comparing different therapeutic options and advances for metastatic pNETs were selected.

RESULTS

The therapeutic options for metastatic pNETs are expanding and include surgery, which remains the only curative approach, liver-directed therapies, and medical therapy. In selected cases also liver transplantation (OLT) may be considered. The option of OLT for metastatic disease is unique to neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, novel promising targeted therapies have been proposed for progressive well-differentiated pNETs.

CONCLUSIONS

The best therapeutic approach for pNETs is still matter of debating. However, since pNETs often show a more indolent behavior compared to other malignancies, the preservation of the quality of life of the patient and the personalization of the therapy according to tumor's and patient's features are mandatory.

Long-term outcomes following microwave ablation for liver malignancies

BACKGROUND

Microwave ablation has emerged as a promising treatment for liver malignancies, but there are scant long-term follow-up data. This study evaluated long-term outcomes, with a comparison of 915-MHz and 2.4-GHz ablation systems.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with malignant liver tumours undergoing operative microwave ablation with or without liver resection between 2008 and 2013. Regional or systemic (neo)adjuvant therapy was given selectively. Local recurrence was analysed using competing-risk methods with clustering, and overall survival was determined from Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients with 416 tumours were analysed. Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) comprised 81.0 per cent of tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma 8.4 per cent, primary biliary cancer 1.7 per cent and non-CRLM 8.9 per cent. Median follow-up was 20.5 months. Local recurrence developed after treatment of 33 tumours (7.9 per cent) in 31 patients (17.6 per cent). Recurrence rates increased with tumour size, and were 1.0, 9.3 and 33 per cent for lesions smaller than 1 cm, 1-3 cm and larger than 3 cm respectively. On univariable analysis, the local recurrence rate was higher after ablation of larger tumours (hazard ratio (HR) 2.05 per cm; P < 0.001), in those with a perivascular (HR 3.71; P = 0.001) or subcapsular (HR 2.71; P = 0.008) location, or biliary or non-CRLM histology (HR 2.47; P = 0.036), and with use of the 2.4-GHz ablation system (HR 3.79; P = 0.001). Tumour size (P < 0.001) and perivascular position (P = 0.045) remained significant independent predictors on multivariable analysis. Regional chemotherapy was associated with decreased local recurrence (HR 0.49; P = 0.049). Overall survival at 4 years was 58.3 per cent for CRLM and 79.4 per cent for other pathology (P = 0.360).

CONCLUSION

Microwave ablation of liver malignancies, either combined or not combined with liver resection, and selective regional and systemic therapy resulted in good long-term survival. Local recurrence rates were low after treatment of tumours smaller than 3 cm in diameter, and those remote from vessels.

Advancements in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have increased in incidence in the USA over the last 20 years. Although PanNETs are often misconceived as being indolent tumors as they have a far more favorable prognosis over pancreatic adenocarcinoma, roughly 60-70% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis due to presentation late in the disease process. While improvements in imaging modalities allow for early detection and better tumor localization, recent advancements in basic science, as well as surgical and medical management of PanNETs have further improved the prognosis. The mainstay of therapy for localized PanNETs is surgical intervention, which has become safer and is slowly shifting towards a more minimally invasive approach. However, the prognosis still remains relatively bleak for patients with unresectable disease. Fortunately, novel molecular targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, have recently come into the limelight and have shown significant promise for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic disease.

Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) [carcinoids, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs)] are becoming an increasing clinical problem because not only are they increasing in frequency, but they can frequently present with advanced disease that requires diagnostic and treatment approaches different from those used in the neoplasms that most physicians are used to seeing and treating. In the past few years there have been numerous advances in all aspects of NETs including: an understanding of their unique pathogenesis; specific classification systems developed which have prognostic value; novel methods of tumor localization developed; and novel treatment approaches described. In patients with advanced metastatic disease these include the use of newer chemotherapeutic approaches, an increased understanding of the role of surgery and cytoreductive methods, the development of methods for targeted delivery of cytotoxic agents, and the development of targeted medical therapies (everolimus, sunitinib) based on an increased understanding of the disease biology. Although pNETs and gastrointestinal NETs share many features, recent studies show they differ in pathogenesis and in many aspects of diagnosis and treatment, including their responsiveness to different therapies. Because of limited space, this review will be limited to the advances made in the management and treatment of patients with advanced metastatic pNETs over the past 5 years.

Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) most commonly metastasize to the liver. Hepatic resection of NET hepatic metastases (NETHM) has been shown to improve symptomology and survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies before September 2010 was performed to examine the efficacy of hepatic resection for NETHM. As a secondary end-point, the impact of treatment on safety and symptomology were determined and prognostic variables were identified. The quality of each study was also assessed using predefined criteria incorporating 9 characteristics. Clinical outcome was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine included reported survival outcomes with a median 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival of 83% (range, 63-100%), 70.5% (range, 31-100%), and 42% (range, 0-100%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months (range, 13-46 months) and median 1-,3-,5- and 10-year PFS of 63% (range, 50-80 %), 32% (range, 24-69%), 29% (range, 6-66%) and 1% (range, 0-11%), respectively. Poor histologic grade, extra-hepatic disease and a macroscopically incomplete resection were associated with a poor prognosis. Studies reported a median rate of symptomatic relief from surgery in 95% of patients (range, 50-100%).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection for NETHM provides symptomatic benefit and is associated with favourable survival outcomes although the majority of patients invariably develop disease progression.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare tumors, with an incidence of one per 100, 000 individuals per year, and they account for 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. PNETs are a heterogeneous group with varying clinical presentation, tumor biology and prognosis. This article reviews the current diagnostic strategy and treatment armamentarium for PNETs. Special attention is paid to recent and ongoing developments in treatment, particularly with regards to multimodality treatment and newer systemic therapies for unresectable disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been significant progress in the genetic understanding of hereditary syndromes in regards to PNETs, as well as in the diagnosis and treatment of resectable and nonresectable PNETs. Whereas surgical therapy remains the most advisable therapy for resectable neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas, there have been significant recent advances in systemic therapy for those with unresectable disease. Results from recent clinical trials examining mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for unresectable disease are promising in expanding treatment options for metastatic PNETs.

SUMMARY

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying clinical presentation, tumor biology and prognosis. Clinicians must be aware of the variety of manifestations of this disease, as well as the role of systemic chemotherapy in treatment of unresectable disease.

Surgical treatment of liver metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a distinctive entity, and nearly 10% of patients already have liver metastases at presentation. The management of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NEN-LM) is complex with differing patterns of metastatic presentation. An aggressive approach should be used to resect the primary tumor, to remove regional lymph nodes, and to resect or treat appropriate distant metastases (including liver tumors). Despite having an indolent course, NENs have a significantly reduced survival when liver metastases are untreated. Though a wide range of therapies are now available with a multimodal approach to the treatment, surgical treatment offers the only chance for a significant survival prolongation and/or improvement of symptoms and quality of life. A review of the existing surgical modalities for NEN-LM is discussed in this paper.

Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases

Management of Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is challenging. The presence of NELM worsens survival outcome and almost 10% of all liver metastases are neuroendocrine in origin. There is no firm consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for NELM. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed from 1995-2010, to collate the current evidence and formulate a sound management algorithm. There are 22 case series with a total of 793 patients who had undergone surgery for NELM. The overall survival ranges from 46-86% at 5 years, 35-79% at 10 years, and the median survival ranges from 52-123 months. After successful cytoreductive surgery, the mean duration of symptom reduction is between 16-26 months, and the 5-year recurrence/progression rate ranges from 59-76%. Five studies evaluated the efficacy of a combination cytoreductive strategy reporting survival rate of ranging from 83% at 3 years to 50% at 10 years. To date, there is no level 1 evidence comparing surgery versus other liver-directed treatment options for NELM. An aggressive surgical approach, including combination with additional liver-directed procedures is recommended as it leads to long-term survival, significant long-term palliation, and a good quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach should be established as the platform for decision making.

Hepatic arterial embolization for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a high predilection for metastasizing to the liver and can cause severe debilitating symptoms adversely affecting quality of life. Although surgery remains the treatment of choice, many liver metastases are inoperable at presentation. Hepatic arterial embolization procedures take advantage of the arterial supply of NET metastases. The goals of these therapies are twofold: to increase overall survival by stabilizing tumor growth, and to reduce the morbidity in symptomatic patients. Patients treated with hepatic arterial embolization demonstrate longer progression-free survival and have 5-year survival rates of nearly 30%. The safety of repeat embolizations has also been proven in the setting of recurrent symptoms or progression of the disease. Despite not being curative, hepatic arterial embolization should be used in the management of NETs with liver metastases. Long-term survival is not uncommon, making aggressive palliation of symptoms an important component of treatment.

Liver-directed therapy for neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastasis prolongs survival following progression after initial surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgery confers the best chance of long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastases (NENHM). Disease progression invariably occurs in the majority of patients. No previous study has addressed the outcomes after treatment of hepatic disease progression in patients who initially underwent surgical extirpation of NENHM. This was the principal aim of the current study.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with NENHM underwent surgery for NENHM between December 1992 and December 2009. Of these, 50 patients developed disease progression in the liver. These patients were then treated with specific liver-directed therapies according to consensus of a multidisciplinary team. The current study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following treatment of hepatic disease progression with specific liver-directed therapies.

RESULTS

No patient was lost to follow up. The median follow-up after treatment of progression was 29 months (range = 2-137). The median PFS and OS after diagnosis of disease progression were 15 and 48 months, respectively. Specific liver-directed therapies included surgery in 10 patients, radioembolization in 15, cytotoxic chemotherapy in 14, and conservative therapy in 11. Four independent factors associated with PFS and OS were identified through a multivariate analysis. These were initial progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.006, HR= 0.32), extra-hepatic disease (OS, P = 0.029, HR = 4.04; PFS, P = 0.004, HR = 4.03), histological grade (PFS, P = 0.006, HR = 4.08), and type of secondary intervention (PFS, P = 0.024, HR = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

A multimodality approach towards treatment of disease progression as shown in this study that includes repeat surgery or radioembolization has been shown to achieve a superior outcome in the setting of disease progression/recurrence.

Treatment of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a comprehensive review

Patients diagnosed with Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) often are also diagnosed with Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases (NLM) during the course of their disease. NLM can cause significant morbidity and mortality, oftentimes much more than compared to patients with NET. Treatment options have been limited in the past, focusing on surgical resections, for which only a minority of patients are candidates. However, developments of new treatment modalities have progressed rapidly and patients with NLM now have significantly more options, including surgical-directed therapies; liver-directed therapies; and nonsurgical, non-liver-directed therapies. This review provides information about the roles of hepatic resection, orthotopic liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, hepatic artery embolization and hepatic artery chemoembolization, hepatic artery radioembolization and selective internal radiation therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, systemic chemotherapy, biotherapies including somatostatin analogs and interferon-α, vascular endothelial growth factor and mTOR targets, and microRNA-regulated pathways. Given these new options, the clinician can tailor therapy specific to the patient diagnosed with NLM, thereby giving the patient the best possible chance of prolonged survival.