Gastrointestinal stromal tumor surgery and adjuvant therapy

Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): The First Analysis of a Mexican Population

Introduction Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms originating from the interstitial cells of Cajal, pacemaker cells responsible for intestinal motility. Patients with locally advanced GISTs and those with borderline resections due to the proximity of vital anatomical structures, which could result in unacceptable post-surgical morbidity, require special therapeutic consideration. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated significant success in the non-surgical management of metastatic GIST, and its favorable impact on overall survival in the adjuvant setting makes it logical to speculate on the benefit it could provide as a neoadjuvant medication in patients with locally advanced disease. Methods Patients aged 18-90 years with a diagnosis of GIST confirmed by immunohistochemistry (CD117 positivity) who were treated at the Oncology Hospital of Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI in Mexico City from January 2012 to December 2016 were included in the study. It is a retrospective study with a duration of four years. Clinical data were collected from the medical records, which included sex, age, tumor location, initial resectability, reason for unresectability, initial tumor size, and mitotic rate. In the case of unresectable disease, patients who were evaluated by medical oncology and who had received treatment with 400 mg of imatinib daily were evaluated. Results A total of 312 patients diagnosed with GIST were analyzed. One hundred thirty-one were men (42%) with a mean age of 57 years, and 181 were women (58%) with a mean age of 59 years. The most frequent anatomical location was the stomach (n=185, 59.2%). At the time of diagnosis, 210 patients (67.3%) presented with resectable disease, while n=102 patients (32.7%) had unresectable disease. A total of 102 patients with unresectable disease received therapy with 400 mg of imatinib per day. Sixteen patients (15.7%) presented a reduction in tumor dimensions and underwent surgery. Conclusion The study highlights the importance of complete surgical resection and the potential benefit of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in converting unresectable to resectable disease. The results suggest that imatinib can be effective in converting unresectable GISTs to resectable ones, allowing for a complete resection to be performed and obtaining an R0 resection in 93.7% of these cases.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and the First Mutational Analysis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors From Mexico: A Single Institution Experience

Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arise from Cajal's interstitial cell precursors and display a variety of genetic mutations, primarily in the KIT and PDGFRA genes. These mutations are linked to tumor location, prognosis, and response to treatment. This study delves into the mutational patterns of GISTs in a Mexican population and their impact on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Methodology This retrospective study examined 42 GIST cases diagnosed at the Oncology Hospital of the National Medical Center XXI Century between January 2018 and December 2020. Clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical data were gathered, and mutational analysis of KIT and PDGFRA genes was conducted using second-generation sequencing. Results The study group consisted of 52.4% females and 47.6% males, with an average age of 62.6 years. The most common tumor site was the stomach (59.5%), followed by the small intestine (26.2%). KIT mutations were detected in 71.4% of cases, predominantly involving exon 11. PDGFRA mutations were observed in 7.1% of cases. Recurrence was noted in 9.5% of patients, all with high-risk tumors. No significant link was identified between specific mutations and OS or DFS. Conclusions This investigation sheds light on the genetic landscape of GISTs in the Mexican population. While no significant association was established between particular mutations and survival outcomes, the study emphasizes the importance of molecular profiling in treatment decision-making. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are necessary to validate these results and explore their clinical relevance.

The necessarity of treatment for small gastric subepithelial tumors (1-2 cm) originating from muscularis propria: an analysis of 972 tumors

Background and objectives

Up till now, there are still controversies about the specific indication of endoscopic resection for small gastric subepithelial tumors (gSETs) originating from muscularis propria. We aimed to investigate the safety of endoscopic resection and postoperative pathology analysis.

Method

The patients with primary small gSETs originating from muscularis propria, treated by endoscopic resection in the endoscopic center of Shengjing Hospital between January, 2011 and September, 2019 were enrolled. The complete resection rate, adverse events and clinicopathological features were recorded.

Result

A total of 936 patients with 972 gastric SETs ≤ 2 cm originating from muscularis propria were included in our study. All the lesions were successfully treated by endoscopic resection. Nearly half of lesions were proved to be gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [n = 411 (42.3%)] according to postoperative pathology. All the objects were further subdivided into 2 groups, ≤ 1 cm, > 1 and ≤ 2 cm gSETs. The risk of gastric GIST of intermediate/high risk in the group (> 1 and ≤ 2 cm gSETs) is 8.41 times as that of gastric GIST in the group (the size of gastric ≤ 1 cm gSETs) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective treatment for small gSETs. gSETs (1–2 cm) is more risky than gSETs (≤ 1 cm) and should be resected. This should be evaluated by further studies.

Neurofibromatosis Type I and Stromal Tumor with a Multiple Digestive Localization

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is also known as von Recklinghausen disease. It is a genetic disorder that affects the growth and development of nerve cell tissue, which is characterized by a multisystem disorder and an increased risk for cancer. The incidence of gastroduodenal stromal tumor during Recklinghausen disease can reach 35% in autopsies and 5% in clinical cases. In our case, the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type I was made in a middle-aged women initially diagnosed with a pancreaticoduodenal tumor.

Expression of DOG1 in peripheral blood cells of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The diagnosis and surveillance of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) rely on pathology and immunochemistry (IHC), making it complicated and invasive. Noninvasive and convenient biomarkers of this disease need to be explored. The high specificity and sensitivity of IHC in detecting GIST 1 (DOG1) in biopsy indicate that it is also expressed in circulating tumor cells of the blood and may be an ideal biomarker for GIST. This aimed to detect the expression of DOG1 in peripheral blood cells (PBCs) and determine the relationship between DOG1 expression and clinical factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients with GIST and 46 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between December 2015 and June 2018. PBCs were isolated from peripheral venous blood by density gradient centrifugation. RNA was extracted from PBCs, and DOG1 mRNA was detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. DOG1 mRNA expression between GIST and HC was compared, and the relationship between clinical factors and DOG1 was also analyzed.

RESULTS

DOG1 mRNA expression in PBCs was significantly higher in patients with GIST than that in HCs (3.326 [1.942-5.328] versus 0.744 [0.269-1.087], p < 0.01). The specificity and sensitivity were 88.9% and 89.1%, respectively (AUC = 0.912). Tumor diameter and risk of aggressive behavior were correlated with DOG1 expression, and other clinical factors (sex, age, location, number of phase-splitting cells, Ki-67 index, metastatic status) did not show any relationship with DOG1 expression. However, clinical factors, including tumor diameter and risk grade, were not independent factors in DOG1 expression when multivariate analysis was conducted.

CONCLUSION

DOG1 expressions were significantly higher in patients with GIST than that in HCs. Tumor diameter and risk classification correlated with DOG1 expression but were not independent factors. DOG1 in PBCs is a promising noninvasive biomarker for GIST.

Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors affecting the recurrence and disease-free survival following surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors effecting recurrence risk and disease-free survival of the patients who were diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor after complete resection of the tumor with or without adjuvant therapy.

Material and Methods

Between the years 2005 and 2013, data of 71 patients including clinical and demographic features, tumor localizations, pathologic examinations, survival and recurrence rates were enrolled into this retrospective study.

Results

Male/female ratio was 1.71, and mean age was 60.27 ± 14.65 years. Forty-two (59.2%) patients had tumor in stomach, 16 (22.5%) in small bowel, whereas 12 (16.9%) had extra-gastrointestinal system and one patient (%1.4) had rectal localization. Modified NIH risk stratification scheme categorized 9 (12.68%) patients in very low-, 12 (16.90%) in low-, 21 (29.58%) patients in moderate-and 29 (40.85%) patients in high-risk group. Twenty-four (33.8%) patients had a metastatic disease at follow-up while 13 (18.3%) patients were metastatic at admission. R0 resection was successfully performed in 51 (71.8%) patients, while R1 resection in 9 (12.7%) and R2 resection in 11 (15.5%) were achieved. Mean follow-up time was 47.12 ± 33.52 months (range, 1-171 months). Nineteen (26.8%) patients demonstrated recurrence with a mean time of 22.16 ± 15.89 months (range, 3-57 months). During follow-up 17 (23.9%) patients were deceased. In univariate analysis, high-risk group, small bowel and extra-gastrointestinal system localization, R1-2 resection, necrosis, positive resection margin and invasion of surrounding tissues, metastatic disease and adjuvant therapy were statistically significant in terms of recurrence. Multivariate analysis presented small bowel and extra-gastrointestinal system localization, R2 resection, mitoses count, invasion and adjuvant therapy as independent prognostic risk factors affecting disease-free survival rates. The 1, 3 and 5 years of disease-free survival rates of the patients were 89.6%, 75.4%, 64.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

As mentioned in the literature, the mainstay of curative therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor is surgery. In our study, not only small bowel, extra-gastrointestinal system localization and invasion of surrounding tissues by tumor, but also R2 resection that complicate the local control of the disease were represented as independent adverse prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Unfavourable clinical outcomes of adjuvant therapy over the disease-free survival was linked to higher tumor stage with metastatic disease and emphasized that prospective trials with more cases should be practiced.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour masquerading as a diverticular bleed

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) only account for a small percentage of gastrointestinal malignancies with a wide range of clinical presentations depending on the location and size of the tumour. Herein, we present the case of a 55-year-old woman with occult gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) despite imaging and two separate oesophagogastroduodenoscopy colonoscopies. On double-balloon enteroscopy, an oozing diverticular-appearing lesion in the ileum was identified which on laparoscopy was connected to a large pelvic GIST. This case highlights the importance of considering GISTs in patients with occult GIB, as a high index of suspicion is required for diagnosis.

Multiple intestinal stromal tumors in a young patient with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Acute small intestinal bleeding in clinical diagnosis and treatment is not specific, and the diagnosis of small intestinal bleeding is still a major clinical challenge because of its high mobility, tortuosity, and difficulty in endoscopic examination.

CASE SUMMARY

This case is a young patient with multiple stromal tumors of the small intestine complicated with acute massive hemorrhage of the digestive tract. After correction of shock, abdominal computed tomography (CT) and emergency enteroscopy were performed, followed by multi-disciplinary team discussion to develop a reasonable and standardized treatment plan and subsequent therapy to save the patient¡¯s life and maximize the benefits of the patient.

CONCLUSION

Small intestinal stromal tumor has an insidious onset and lacks specific clinical manifestations. According to the characteristics of this disease, B-mode ultrasound, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, gastrointestinal endoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and other examinations should be used to make a preoperative diagnosis and conduct accurate clinical staging. Multidisciplinary discussion is helpful to develop standardized treatment options to improve the prognosis of patients.

Treatment recommendations for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: positive endoscopic resection

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection and discuss the treatment strategy of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) less than 2 cm. Material and methods: The data of 713 patients, who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), were retrospectively analyzed. We investigated the clinicopathological features and analyzed the risk potential of small gastric GISTs, and documented therapeutic and follow-up outcomes. We also compared the follow-up results between operated patients and 58 patients who were suspected of small gastric GISTs and underwent regular surveillance under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the same period. Results: GISTs were the most common gastric SMTs (289 cases, 40.5%), of which small GISTs were found in 250 cases. The mitotic index was less than 5 in all cases. However, 122 out of 250 cases (48.8%) had adverse factors under EUS, which were related to tumor size (p < .01). ESD was successfully performed in all patients, and no serious complication or perioperative death occurred. The follow-up period for 42.07 ± 22.49 months revealed improvement of symptoms in 80.2% patients and showed no recurrence or metastasis. Of the 58 patients selected for EUS surveillance, 48 (82.8%) presented with gastrointestinal symptoms and 41 out of 48 (85.4%) were not relieved during follow-up and 16 (27.6%) with severe psychological problems. Conclusions: ESD is a safe and effective treatment for small GISTs, which helps to confirm the diagnosis, improve symptoms and reduce the psychological pressure. Thus, we recommend endoscopic resection is a good option for small gastric GISTs once diagnosed.

Retrospective analysis of 85 cases of intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Background & Aims

A significant benefit of imatinib adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been confirmed. However, the effect of imatinib adjuvant therapy for intermediate-risk GIST has not been well studied. In this article, we compare differences of recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates between patients with intermediate-risk GIST who accepted imatinib adjuvant therapy and those who did not.

Method

A retrospective study of intermediate-risk GIST was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China. The pathology reports of 112 patients who had been treated by surgery showed intermediate-risk GIST. The treatment and control groups were designed according to the administration of imatinib adjuvant therapy (≥1 year). Survival and recurrence data were collected and RFS of each group was calculated.

Results

Eighty fivepatients with intermediate-risk GIST were followed up. Thirty of them (treatment group) accepted imatinib adjuvant therapy over 1 year. Through comparing the RFS of the two groups, we established that there was no statistically significant difference in RFS rates (P=0.940).

Conclusion

There is no significant benefit for patients with intermediate-risk GIST to accept imatinib adjuvant treatment.

Pancreatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis

GOALS

The present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of pancreatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

BACKGROUND

Reports on clinicopathologic features and prognosis of pancreatic GIST are limited due to the extremely rare incidence.

STUDY

One case of pancreatic GIST from our center and 44 cases reported in MEDLINE were enrolled in this study. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of pancreatic GISTs were analyzed and compared with 297 gastric GISTs from our center.

RESULTS

The most common location was head of pancreas (38.5%). The majority of pancreatic GISTs exceeded 5 cm (74.4%), displayed cystic or mixed imaging features (56.4%), and were high risk (85.7%). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival rates were 66.1% and 95.8%, respectively. Mitotic index was the only risk factor for DFS of pancreatic GISTs. The distribution of tumor size, histologic type and National Institutes of Health risk category were significantly different between pancreatic and gastric GISTs. The 5-year DFS rate of pancreatic GISTs was significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs. Multivariate analysis showed that location was an independent prognostic factor for DFS between pancreatic and gastric GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common location was head of pancreas. The majority of pancreatic GISTs were large and highly malignant. Pancreatic GISTs differed significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathologic features. The DFS of pancreatic GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: evaluation of a pooled case series

Background

Due to the extremely rare incidence, data about colonic GISTs are limited. Therefore, aim of the present study was to explore clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colonic GISTs.

Patients and Methods

Colonic GISTs cases were obtained from our center and from case report and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathological features and survivals were analyzed.

Results

There were 79 colonic GISTs patients with a female predominance. The median age was 66 years (range 0.17-84). The median tumor size was 5.8 cm (range 0.5-29). The most common location was sigmoid colon (45.8%), followed by transverse colon (19.5%). The majority of colonic GISTs were high risk (70.8%). Mitotic index was correlated with gender (P = 0.002) and tumor size (P = 0.005), and tumor location was correlated with age (P = 0.017). The five year DFS and DSS were 57.4% and 61.6%, respectively. Mitotic index and NIH risk classification were associated with prognosis of colonic GISTs. However, mitotic index was the only independent risk factor. The distribution of tumor size and NIH risk classification were significantly different between colonic and gastric GISTs (both P = 0.000). The DFS and DSS of colonic GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs (P = 0.012 and P = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

The most common location for colonic GISTs was sigmoid colon. Most tumors were high risk. Mitotic index was the only independent risk factor for prognosis of colonic GISTs. Colonic GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathological features. The prognosis of colonic GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs.

Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series

Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in esophagus are limited, because of the relatively rare incidence of esophageal GISTs. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of esophageal GISTs, and to investigate the potential factors that may predict prognosis.Esophageal GIST cases were obtained from our center and from case reports and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathologic features and survivals were analyzed and compared with gastric GISTs from our center.The most common location was lower esophagus (86.84%), followed by middle and upper esophagus (11.40% and 1.76%). The majority of esophageal GISTs were classified as high-risk category (70.83%). Mitotic index was correlated with histologic type, mutational status, and tumor size. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 65.1% and 65.9%, respectively. Tumor size, mitotic index, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were associated with prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Only tumor size, however, was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. In comparison to gastric GISTs, the distribution of tumor size, histologic type, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were significantly different between esophageal GISTs and gastric GISTs. The disease-free survival and disease-specific survival of esophageal GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs.The most common location for esophageal GISTs was lower esophagus, and most of the esophageal GISTs are high-risk category. Tumor size was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Esophageal GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathologic features. The prognosis of esophageal GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs.

Frequence, spectrum and prognostic impact of additional malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Currently available data on prognostic implication of additional neoplasms in GIST miss comprehensive information on patient outcome with regard to overall or disease specific and disease free survival. Registry data of GIST patients with and without additional neoplasm were compared in retrospective case series. We investigated a total of 836 patients from the multi-center Ulmer GIST registry. Additionally, a second cohort encompassing 143 consecutively recruited patients of a single oncology center were analyzed. The frequency of additional malignant neoplasms in GIST patients was 31.9% and 42.0% in both cohorts with a mean follow-up time of 54 and 65 months (median 48 and 60 months), respectively. The spectrum of additional neoplasms in both cohorts encompasses gastrointestinal tumors (43.5%), uro-genital and breast cancers (34.1%), hematological malignancies (7.3%), skin cancer (7.3%) and others. Additional neoplasms have had a significant impact on patient outcome. The five year overall survival in GIST with additional malignant neoplasms (n = 267) was 62.8% compared to 83.4% in patients without other tumors (n = 569) (P < .001, HR=0.397, 95% CI: 0.298-0.530). Five-year disease specific survival was not different between both groups (90.8% versus 90.9%). 34.2% of all deaths (n = 66 of n = 193) were GIST-related. The presented data suggest a close association between the duration of follow-up and the rate of additional malignancies in GIST patients. Moreover the data indicate a strong impact of additional malignant neoplasms in GIST on patient outcome. A comprehensive follow-up strategy of GIST patients appears to be warranted.

Initial presentation of a giant gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the stomach with recurrent spontaneous intra-peritoneal haemorrhage

•

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are rare tumours of the digestive tract.

•

Only reported gastric GIST with chronic spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage.

•

GIST recurrence after surgery is associated with a high tumour mitotic rate.

•

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment.

•

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are associated with higher survival rates.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours are a rare group of tumours of the digestive tract. In the majority of cases, at the time of the diagnosis, tumours are usually small and patients are asymptomatic or have non-specific symptoms. The occurrence of digestive haemorrhage is relatively common; however, the manifestation with a spontaneous hemoperitoneum is extremely rare, specially if chronic and non-emergent.

Case report

We report an unusual case of a 65-year-old man with a history of alcohol abuse, presenting with abdominal distension due to ascites and a constitutional syndrome. He was found to have a gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of the stomach associated with a chronic hemoperitoneum, due to recurrent spontaneous haemorrhage. In an elective setting, the lesion was resected completely without rupturing the tumour pseudo-capsule and the patient had an uneventful postoperative course. The tumour was classified as a moderate-risk lesion for aggressive biological behaviour, and imatinib mesylate was initiated as an adjuvant to treatment. No evidence of disease recurrence after one year was noted.

Discussion and conclusion

GISTs are uncommon and rarely present with spontaneous intra-peritoneal haemorrhage, which may be life threatening. In our understanding, this is the first reported case of the reviewed literature presenting with a chronic hemoperitoneum, due to recurrent brisk episodes of tumour haemorrhage. Tumour rupture and large tumour size are two poor independent prognostic tumour factors for recurrence. Despite this, the patient remains free of disease after surgery and instituted adjuvant imatinib mesylate.

Rare tumors of the rectum. Narrative review

Most rectal neoplasms are adenocarcinomas, but there is a small percentage of tumors which are of other histological cell lines such as neuroendocrine tumors, sarcomas, lymphomas and squamous cell carcinomas, which have special characteristics and different treatments. We have reviewed these rare tumors of the rectum from a clinical and surgical point of view.

Ten-year review of gastrointestinal stromal tumours at a tertiary referral hospital in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and make up 1-2% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Traditionally, the treatment of choice for primary disease is surgical resection; however, no single surgeon or institution gets extensive exposure to these patients so appropriate decision-making is difficult, particularly since the introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib, which has become an important additional management tool.

METHOD

All patients were diagnosed and treated for GISTs in Christchurch Hospital (Christchurch, New Zealand) between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010. We maintain a prospective database of all patients with GISTs. Data on clinical and histopathological variables, management and survival outcomes were recorded. These were then reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 93 patients in this study. Fifty were women. Median age was 69 (interquartile range (IQR) 59-76) years. Fifty-one tumours were located in the stomach, 27 in the small bowel, six in the colon, three in the oesophagus, one in the rectum and five were extra-gastrointestinal. In total, 22 patients received imatinib therapy; four patients with metastatic disease had imatinib as sole therapy. The median follow-up was 58 (IQR 30-90) months. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) for the entire study population was 69% and 64%, respectively. The 5-year DFS was higher for all patients who have localized disease when compared with those who have metastatic disease (76% versus 28%, P-value 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgery aiming at an R0 resection remains the mainstay of treatment. We propose the most effective way to grow the knowledge base in New Zealand is the establishment of a national register, thereby allowing better clinical decision-making by interpretation of a larger data set.

Surgical resection should be taken into consideration for the treatment of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends conservative follow-up for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) less than 2 cm. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical and pathological features of small gastric GISTs, re-evaluate the risk potential, and discuss the treatment strategy of small gastric GISTs.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 63 cases of small gastric GISTs (less than 2 cm) were resected surgically from May 2010 to March 2013 in our department. Clinicopathological factors were collected and the malignant potential of small gastric GISTs was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mitotic index of 14 out of 63 cases (22.22%) exceeded 5. The malignant potential of small gastric GISTs was related to tumor location (P = 0.0218). The mitotic index of 4 out of 8 GISTs (50%) located in gastric cardia exceeded 5, 8 out 28 GISTs (28.57%) located in the gastric fundus exceeded 5, and only 2 out of 27 GISTs (7.41%) located in the gastric body exceeded 5. We also discovered a good consistency between mitotic index and Ki-67 expression of small gastric GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric GISTs less than 2 cm also have malignant potential. Thus, we recommended surgical resection of all small gastric GISTs once diagnosed.

Clinical features and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Recent advances

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors. The development of molecular biology, pathology and clinical medicine in recent years has deepened our understanding of GISTs. The combination of traditional surgery and molecular targeted drugs is particularly important for the treatment of GISTs. Multi-target and multi-kinase inhibitors such as imatinib and sunitinib have been used for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent GISTs. This paper provides a brief review of gene analysis, pathological characteristics, operational and adjuvant therapy of GISTs.