Essentials of sepsis management

Relationship Between the Expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on T Lymphocytes and the Severity and Prognosis of Sepsis

Purpose

The study aimed to investigate the relationship between the expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on the surface of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets in patients with sepsis and the severity and prognosis of the disease.

Patients and Methods

The study included patients with sepsis who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on T lymphocyte subsets was detected by flow cytometry, and the severity of sepsis was assessed using the SOFA score.

Results

The expression of PD-1 on CD4⁺T cells, PD-1 on Tregs, and CTLA-4 on Tregs increased with the severity of the disease (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PD-1 expression on CD4⁺T cells, CTLA-4 expression on Tregs, and the SOFA score were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis (P<0.05). The area under the curve of the SOFA score combined with the expression of PD-1 on CD4⁺T cells and CTLA-4 on Treg cells was significantly higher than any single indicator (P<0.05). Patients with high expression of PD-1 on CD4⁺T cells (>31.25%) and CTLA-4 on Tregs (>12.64%) had a lower 28-day survival rate (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The increased expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on CD4⁺T cells and Tregs is significantly associated with the severity and prognosis of sepsis patients. The combination of the SOFA score and the expression of PD-1 on CD4⁺T cells and CTLA-4 on Tregs can further improve the prognostic predictive value. These findings may be promising biomarkers for prognostic assessment, risk stratification, and identification of immunosuppression in patients with sepsis.

Management of septic shock and severe infections in migrants and returning travelers requiring critical care

During the past decade, global human movement created a virtually "borderless world". Consequently, the developed world is facing "forgotten" and now imported infectious diseases. Many infections are observed upon travel and migration, and the clinical spectrum is diverse, ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe septic shock. The severity of infection depends on the etiology and timeliness of diagnosis. While assessing the etiology of severe infection in travelers and migrants, it is important to acquire a detailed clinical history; geography, dates of travel, places visited, type of transportation, lay-overs and intermediate stops, potential exposure to exotic diseases, and activities that were undertaken during travelling and prophylaxis and vaccines either taken or not before travel are all important parameters. Tuberculosis, malaria, pneumonia, visceral leishmaniasis, enteric fever and hemorrhagic fever are the most common etiologies in severely infected travelers and migrants. The management of severe sepsis and septic shock in migrants and returning travelers requires a systematic approach in the evaluation of these patients based on travel history. Early and broad-spectrum therapy is recommended for the management of septic shock comprising broad spectrum antibiotics, source control, fluid therapy and hemodynamic support, corticosteroids, tight glycemic control, and organ support and monitoring. We here review the diagnostic and therapeutic routing of severely ill travelers and migrants, stratified by the nature of the infectious agents most often encountered among them.