Management of Early Stage Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Malignancies

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated With Decreased Survival in Early-Stage Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although randomized controlled trials on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer have included some T1-staged tumors, overall survival (OS) has not been analyzed for this subset. Due to the low negative predictive value of clinical staging and the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced disease, identifying patient groups with early-stage gastric cancer that may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of merit.

AIMS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between OS and sequence of surgical therapy for clinical T1 gastric cancer.

METHODS

The 2017 National Cancer Database was used to compare patients who had surgery-first and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for T1-stage gastric cancer. OS was analyzed using a parametric regression survival-time model adjusted for covariates. The effects of these covariates on OS based on surgical sequence were examined.

RESULTS

11,219 patients were included, of which 10,191 underwent surgery as their first or only treatment. When adjusted for covariates, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative-intent surgery was significantly associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.31, P = .030). In multivariate analysis, clinical N0 stage, non-minorities, and patients with high socioeconomic status had improved OS if they did not have neoadjuvant chemotherapy and instead had upfront surgery.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with decreased OS for early-stage gastric adenocarcinoma, even for patients with clinically positive nodal disease. In addition, the lack of survival improvement with a surgery-first approach in patients with disparities deserves further study.

Real-world treatment patterns and survival for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The "real world" treatment mode and clinical efficacy of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) are unclear. Meanwhile, the role of immunotherapy in the clinical practice is also puzzling. We conducted the research to investigate the statue of "real world" LAESCC. The clinical data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma which met the criteria from January 2010 to December 2019 have been retrospectively analyzed, and the distribution of clinical treatment patterns has been analyzed. They cover such aspects as dfferences in survival time and further analysis of the differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who received immunotherapy and those who did not receive immunotherapy. What is more, Cox risk regression model has also been used to evaluate the risk factors affecting the prognosis of LAESCC. The cases of a total of 5328 newly diagnosed patients with esophageal cancer were collected, and a total of 363 patients were included in the study, with a median age of (46.2 ± 7.8) years old; 84 (23.1%) and 279 (76.9%) patients received 1L and ≥ 2L, respectively; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (74.1%) and paclitaxel combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (14.3%) were the main first-line treatment options; fluorouracil combined with cisplatin regimen-based chemotherapy (63.8%) was the main treatment option for ≥ 2L, of which 69 patients (25.3%) received immunization treatment; OS of patients with 1 line of therapy and ≥ 2L were (22.4 ± 7.2) months and (38.7 ± 8.5) months, respectively, and the comparison between groups was statistically significant (P < .05); among 69 patients with ≥ 2L who received immunotherapy, PFS and The OS was (14.6 ± 6.9) and (45.3 ± 9.7) respectively, and the comparison between the groups was statistically significant (all P < .05). Cox multivariate analysis has shown that clinical stage, immunotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and ≥ 2L are the main factors affecting OS. and immunotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and ≥ 2L are independent factors affecting PFS. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is currently one of the standard treatments for LAESCC, and most patients are still willing to receive second-line or above treatments. Adding immunotherapy to standard treatment modalities may further optimize clinical treatment modalities and improve patient outcomes.

Serum CYR61 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of esophagogastric junction tumor

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction tumor (EGJ) is a rare but fatal disease with a rapid rising incidence worldwide in the late 20 years, and it lacks a convenient and safe method for diagnosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of serum CYR61 as a biomarker for the diagnosis of EGJ tumor.

METHODS

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to estimate CYR61 levels in sera of 152 EGJ tumor patients and 137 normal controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. The Mann-Whitney's U test was used to compare the difference of serum levels of CYR61 between groups. And chi-square tests were employed to estimate the correlation of the positive rate of serum CYR61 between/among subgroups.

RESULTS

Serum CYR61 levels were statistically lower in EGJ tumor and early-stage EGJ tumor patients than those in normal controls (P<0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) of this biomarker in EGJ tumor were 88.2%, 43.8% and 0.691, respectively, and those for early stage of EGJ tumor were 80.0%, 66.4% and 0.722, respectively. Analyses showed that there was no correlation between the clinical data and the levels of CYR61 (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that CYR61 might be a potential biomarker to assist the diagnosis of EGJ tumor.

Burgeoning study of sentinel-node analysis on management of early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents an organ-preserving alternative to surgical resection of early gastric cancer. However, even with ESD yielding en-bloc resection specimens, there are concerns regarding tumor spread such as with larger lesions, ulcerated lesions, undifferentiated pathology and submucosal invasion. Sentinel node navigational surgery (SNNS) when combined with ESD offers a minimally invasive alternative to the traditional extended gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy if lack of lymph node spread can be confirmed. This would have a clear advantage in terms of potential complications and quality of life. However, SNNS, though useful in other malignancies such as breast cancer and melanoma, may not have a sufficient sensitivity for malignancy and negative predictive value in EGC to justify this as standard practice after ESD. The results of SNNS may improve with greater standardization and more involved dissection, technological innovations and more experience and validation such that the paradigm for post-ESD resection of EGC may change and include SNNS.