Consolidation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

Survival Outcomes of Patients with Esophageal Cancer Who Did Not Proceed to Surgery after Neoadjuvant Treatment

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study examined outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who did not undergo surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Patients receiving nCRT between 2012 and 2020 were divided into two groups: group 1 (scheduled surgery) and group 2 (no surgery). Group 2 was further categorized into subgroups based on reasons for not proceeding to surgery: group 2a (disease progression), group 2b (poor general conditions), and group 2c (patient refusal). Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Group 1 comprised 145 patients, while subgroups 2a, 2b, and 2c comprised 24, 16, and 31 patients, respectively. The 3-year OS rate was significantly lower in group 2 compared with group 1 (34% versus 56%, p < 0.001). A subgroup analysis showed varying 3-year OS rates: 13% for group 2a, 25% for group 2b, and 58% for group 2c (p < 0.001). Propensity score matching for group 2c and group 1 revealed no significant difference in 3-year OS rates (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

One-third of ESCC patients receiving nCRT did not undergo surgical resection. Overall survival in this group was generally poorer, except for those who refused surgery (group 2c).

Image-guided focused ultrasound-mediated molecular delivery to breast cancer in an animal model

Tumors become inoperable due to their size or location, making neoadjuvant chemotherapy the primary treatment. However, target tissue accumulation of anticancer agents is limited by the physical barriers of the tumor microenvironment. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubble (MB) contrast agents can increase microvascular permeability and improve drug delivery to the target tissue after systemic administration. The goal of this research was to investigate image-guided FUS-mediated molecular delivery in volume space. Three-dimensional (3-D) FUS therapy functionality was implemented on a programmable ultrasound scanner (Vantage 256, Verasonics Inc.) equipped with a linear array for image guidance and a 128-element therapy transducer (HIFUPlex-06, Sonic Concepts). FUS treatment was performed on breast cancer-bearing female mice (N= 25). Animals were randomly divided into three groups, namely, 3-D FUS therapy, two-dimensional (2-D) FUS therapy, or sham (control) therapy. Immediately prior to the application of FUS therapy, animals received a slow bolus injection of MBs (Definity, Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc.) and near-infrared dye (IR-780, surrogate drug) for optical reporting and quantification of molecular delivery. Dye accumulation was monitored viain vivooptical imaging at 0, 1, 24, and 48 h (Pearl Trilogy, LI-COR). Following the 48 h time point, animals were humanely euthanized and tumors excised forex vivoanalyzes. Optical imaging results revealed that 3-D FUS therapy improved delivery of the IR-780 dye by 66.4% and 168.1% at 48 h compared to 2-D FUS (p= 0.18) and sham (p= 0.047) therapeutic strategies, respectively.Ex vivoanalysis revealed similar trends. Overall, 3-D FUS therapy can improve accumulation of a surrogate drug throughout the entire target tumor burden after systemic administration.

Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulation Radiation Therapy Combined with Systematic and Standardized Management for Esophageal Cancer

Objective

To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulation radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with systematic and standardized management for esophageal cancer.

Methods

From January 2012 to January 2019, 200 patients with esophageal cancer who received radical chemoradiotherapy in our hospital were treated with lymphatic drainage area radiation prevention combined with systematic and standardized management. According to difference in radiotherapy methods, the patients were divided into local lesion 92 patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulation radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with systematic standardized management (SIB-IMRT group), and late course boost intensity-modulation radiation therapy (LCB-IMRT) combined with systematic standardized management 108 patients (LCB-IMRT group). The short-term eficacy of the two groups were compared. The dose volume parameters of the organ in danger are evaluated based on the dose volume histogram. The related adverse reactions during chemoradiotherapy were compared between two groups. The local control rate and survival rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

The recent total effective rates of rats in the SIB-IMRT group and LCB-IMRT group were 95.65% and 90.74%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean doses to left and right lung, heart and spinal cord in the SIB-IMRT group were significantly lower than that in the LCB-IMRT group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions such as radiation esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, radiation tracheitis, gastrointestinal reaction and bone marrow suppression between the SIB-IMRT group and LCB-IMRT groups (p > 0.05). The one-year and three-year overall survival rates in the SIB-IMRT group and LCB-IMRT groups were 82.61%, 42.39% and 77.78%, 34.26%, respectively, and the median survival times were 38 and 29 months, respectively. The local control rates in the SIB-IMRT group and LCB-IMRT group in one and three years were 84.78%, 56.52% and 75.93%, 41.67%, respectively. The 3-year local control rate in the SIB-IMRT group was higher than that in the LCB-IMRT group (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the 1-and 3-year overall survival rates between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

SIB-IMRT combined with systematic and standardized management in the treatment of esophageal cancer can reduce the amount of some organs at risk and improve the local control rate of the lesion.