Surgical treatment for colorectal liver metastases involving the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe

A comprehensive study and extensive review of the Caudate lobe: The last piece of "Jigsaw" puzzle

Many liver surgeons have updated their understanding of the liver in recent years because of detailed studies on the liver anatomy and the rapid advances in laparoscopic liver surgery. Despite newer approaches, concepts and methods, research on the caudate lobe continues to be based on case reports and several persistent challenges concerning caudate lobe surgery that are worth discussing. Based on the literature and the author's experience, this study considers and addresses the challenges associated with caudate lobectomy encountered by most liver surgeons. We searched PubMed for relevant articles in English for 'caudate lobe', 'cholangiocellular carcinoma', 'laparoscopic caudate resection', 'right-side boundary of the caudate lobe' and 'assessment of hepatic functional reserve' published up to May 2022. This study reviewed the anatomical history of the caudate lobe, focusing on the challenges associated with caudate lobe-related surgical resection. Due to the unique anatomical position of the caudate lobe, surgical strategy for caudate lobe resection is particularly important, and the technical requirements for hepatobiliary surgeons are also extremely strict. Therefore, understanding the anatomical history of the caudate lobe and discussing the challenges associated with caudate lobectomy is essential.

Value and prognostic factors of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

More than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. Hepatectomy is the preferred treatment for resectable liver metastases. This review provides a perspective on the utility and relevant prognostic factors of repeat hepatectomy in recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

DATA SOURCES

The keywords "recurrent colorectal liver metastases", "recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer", "liver metastases of colorectal cancer", "repeat hepatectomy", "repeat hepatic resection", "second hepatic resection", and "prognostic factors" were used to retrieve articles published in the PubMed database up to August 2020. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of references from key articles.

RESULTS

Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative chemotherapy, recurrence remains common in 37%-68% of patients. Standards or guidelines for the treatment of recurrent liver metastases are lacking. Repeat hepatectomy appears to be the best option for patients with resectable metastases. The commonly reported prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy were R0 resection, carcinoembryonic antigen level, the presence of extrahepatic disease, a short disease-free interval between initial and repeat hepatectomy, the number (> 1) and size (≥ 5 cm) of hepatic lesions, requiring blood transfusion, and no adjuvant chemotherapy after initial hepatectomy. The median overall survival after repeat hepatectomy ranged from 19.3 to 62 months, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 21% to 73%. Chemotherapy can act as a test for the biological behavior of tumors with the goal of avoiding unnecessary surgery, and a multimodal approach involving aggressive chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy might be the treatment of choice for patients with early recurrent CRLM.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatectomy is a relatively safe and effective treatment for resectable recurrent CRLM. The presence or absence of prognostic factors might facilitate patient selection to improve short- and long-term outcomes.

Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases Involving the Inferior Vena Cava: A Systematic Review

Combined hepatic and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving the IVC. Most of the existing data come from case reports or small case series. In this paper, a systematic review based on the PICO strategy was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Papers from January 1980 to December 2022 were searched in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Articles considered for inclusion had to present data on simultaneous liver and IVC resection for CRLM and report surgical and/or oncological outcomes. From a total of 1175 articles retrieved, 29, including a total of 188 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58.3 ± 10.8 years. The most frequent techniques used were right hepatectomy ± caudate lobe for hepatic resections (37.8%), lateral clamping (44.8%) for vascular control, and primary closure (56.8%) for IVC repair. The thirty-day mortality reached 4.6%. Tumour relapse was reported in 65.8% of the cases. The median overall survival (OS) was 34 months (with a confidence interval of 30-40 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 71.4%, 19.8%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the absence of prospective randomized studies, which are difficult to perform, IVC resection seems to be safe and feasible.

Percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to large vessels: a long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent to large vessels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2006 to February 2013, 452 patients with 605 HCC nodules were treated with US-guided percutaneous MWA. Into large vessels group (Group L), 139 patients with 163 lesions (diameter, 1.0-7.0 cm; mean, 2.5±1.1 cm) located less than 5mm away from large vessels were enrolled. And 313 patients with 442 lesions (diameter, 1.0-8.0 cm; mean, 2.5±1.2 cm) located more than 5mm away from hepatic surface, large vessels, gallbladder and gastrointestinal tract were included in control group (Group C). During the ablation, the temperature of marginal ablation tissues was monitored and controlled.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 24.5 months (range 2.1-87.7 months) in Group L, and 25.7 months (range 1.6-93.9 months) in Group C. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 157 of 163 (96.3%) tumors in Group L and 429 of 442 (97.1%) tumors in Group C, respectively (p>0.05). The 1-, 3- and 5-year local tumor progression rates and the 1-, 3- and 5-year accumulative survival rates in the two groups have no significantly statistical differences. In addition, no immediate or periprocedural major complications, no delayed complication of vessels or bile ducts injury were found in both of the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With strict temperature monitoring, US-guided percutaneous MWA is an efficient and safe technology in treating hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to large vessels.

Comparison of survival and quality of life of hepatectomy and thrombectomy using total hepatic vascular exclusion and chemotherapy alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and tumor thrombi in the inferior vena cava and hepatic vein

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) along with portal vein tumor thrombi (PVTT) is poor, and surgery has not been considered an option.

AIMS

To compare the outcomes and the quality of life (QoL) of patients with HCC and PVTT who underwent hepatic resection and thrombectomy for tumor thrombi in the inferior vena cava and hepatic vein with total hepatic vascular exclusion to the patients who received only chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received hepatectomy and thrombectomy (n=65), and those who received only chemotherapy (n=50). The surgical outcomes, survival, and QoL that was determined using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary instrument were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent surgery had a median overall survival of 17 months, compared with patients who underwent chemotherapy for 8 months (P<0.0001). Patients who underwent surgery had a median recurrence-free survival of 14 months, as compared with patients who underwent chemotherapy for 7 months (P<0.0001). The probabilities of 1-year recurrence in the surgery and chemotherapy groups were 27.7 and 70%, respectively (P<0.0001). The QoL total score of the surgery group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.0001). Surgery was slightly, though significantly more cost-effective than chemotherapy based on the quality-adjusted life years.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy and thrombectomy using the total hepatic vascular exclusion, is a viable surgical management for patients with HCC and PVTT, and is associated with longer overall survival and recurrence-free survival and better QoL than chemotherapy alone.

Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases involving the caudate lobe

BACKGROUND

Up to 5 per cent of liver resections for colorectal cancer metastases involve the caudate lobe, with cancer-involved resection margins of over 50 per cent being reported following caudate lobe resection.

METHODS

Outcomes of consecutive liver resections for colorectal metastases involving the caudate lobe between 1996 and 2009 were reviewed retrospectively, and compared with those after liver surgery without caudate resection.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent caudate and 432 non-caudate liver resection. Caudate resection was commonly performed as part of extended resection. There were no differences in operative complications (24 versus 21·1 per cent; P = 0·727) or blood loss (median 300 versus 250 ml; P = 0·234). The operating time was longer for caudate resection (median 283 versus 227 min; P = 0·024). Tumour size was larger in the caudate group (median 40 versus 27 mm; P = 0·018). Resection margins were smaller when the caudate lobe was involved by tumour, than in resections including tumour-free caudate or non-caudate resection; however, there was no difference in the proportion of completely excised tumours between caudate and non-caudate resections (96 versus 96·1 per cent; P = 0·990). One-year overall survival rates were 90 and 89·3 per cent respectively (P = 0·960), with 1-year recurrence-free survival rates of 62 and 71·2 per cent (P = 0·340).

CONCLUSION

Caudate lobe surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases does not increase the incidence of resection margin involvement, although when the caudate lobe contains metastases the margins are significantly closer than in other resections.

Isolated caudate lobe resection for hepatic tumor: surgical approaches and perioperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Caudate lobe of the liver is relatively inaccessible because of its deep location and lying between the major vascular structures. Therefore, isolated caudate lobe resection (ICLR) is a much challengeable operation.

METHODS

Review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent ICLR for hepatic tumor.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (mean age 46.8 years) underwent ICLR for malignant (39 cases) and benign (7 cases) hepatic tumors. ICLRs were performed by 3 different approaches and in different ways of hepatic vascular control: without any vascular control in 7 patients, under Pringle maneuver in 26 patients, and under sequential inflow and outflow vascular occlusion in 13 patients. There were no perioperative deaths, and the postoperative complication rate was 8.7% (4/46). The mean operative time was 174.5 +/- 44.3 minutes and the mean estimated intraoperative blood loss was 504.4 +/- 356.2 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

ICLR is a technically demanding but safe procedure. Choice of surgical approaches and ways of hepatic vascular control should be based on tumor location and surgeons'experience.

The impact of caudate lobe involvement after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resections involving the caudate lobe are technically challenging with results from some centers indicating inferior outcomes. We assessed outcomes following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases involving the caudate lobe in a tertiary care center.

METHODS

Operative and oncological data from a prospectively maintained database were analyzed on 687 patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal metastases between 1993 and 2006. Patients were analyzed as those with caudate lobe metastases (CLM) and compared with those without caudate lobe involvement (NCLM).

RESULTS

Fifty-two of 687 patients had metastases involving the caudate lobe (8%). Patients with caudate lobe involvement were more likely to require an extended hepatic resection (75% vs 27%, P=0.001), perioperative blood transfusion (29% vs 14%, P=0.002), have a positive resection margin (57% vs 32%, P=0.001) and stay longer in hospital (12 vs 8 days, P=0.001). There was no difference in the complication rates (37% vs 29%) or 30-day mortality between the two groups (2% vs 1%). The median disease free (20 months vs 21 months), and cancer specific survival (42 months vs 59 months) were also similar in the CLM and NCLM groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although caudate lobe involvement adds to the technical complexity of hepatic resection, these patients can be offered long term survival, similar to other patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Caval invasion by liver tumor is limited

BACKGROUND

Successful hepatic resection with combined inferior vena cava (IVC) resection has been reported. The necessity of a combined IVC resection for hepatic malignancies that have attached to the IVC has not been fully evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study, 162 lesions for which preoperative CT findings suggested attachment to the IVC were evaluated. Patient survival rates were examined according to type of tumor and the operative procedure. For adenocarcinoma lesions, several CT findings, including extent of the IVC circumference attached to the tumor compared with the whole IVC circumference (E(IVC)), were evaluated in conjunction with IVC resection.

RESULTS

Among 162 lesions, 18 adenocarcinoma lesions were resected in combination with an IVC resection. Histologic IVC invasion was confirmed in eight patients. None of the 67 hepatocellular carcinoma lesions required concomitant IVC resection. Overall 5-year survival rate of the patients who underwent concomitant liver and IVC resections was 33.1%. Among the adenocarcinoma lesions, the positive predictive factors for IVC resection were an E(IVC) value > 25% and a peaked deformity of the IVC wall, according to a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most hepatic malignancies attached to the IVC wall can be completely removed without IVC resection. E(IVC) and deformity of the IVC on CT can be useful indicators for a concomitant liver and IVC resection. Careful separation of the liver and IVC is a key point for minimizing the size of the resected IVC and to avoid unnecessary IVC resection.

A comparison of right and extended right hepatectomy with all other hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases: a ten-year study

AIMS

Colorectal liver metastases are treated by a combination of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection. In this study we compared all major right-sided resections with left or parenchymal sparing resections.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n=283) who had successful hepatic resections for colorectal metastases from September 1996 to November 2006 were prospectively studied. Early and late outcomes of those who had right and extended right hepatectomies (RH) were compared with those who had all other types of liver resection (AOLR). Adjuvant therapy and pre-operative assessment were standardised for all.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the RH group were 84.1%, 54.3% and 38.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the AOLR group were 95.4%, 65.9% and 53.3%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates in the RH group were 69.5%, 34.4% and 25.5%, respectively and 68.4%, 34.91% and 34.91%, respectively in the AOLR group (p=0.46). Operative mortality was 3.9% in the RH group and 0.7% in the AOLR group (p=0.04). Morbidity was 31.3% in the RH group and 18% in the AOLR group.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing right and extended right hepatectomies for colorectal metastases have a greater operative morbidity and mortality and have a significantly worse overall survival compared to all other liver resections for the same disease.

Liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis

At some point in the natural course of colorectal cancer up to 50% of patients will develop metastasis to the liver. Historically only 20% of these patients would have to be deemed resectable, with an intent to cure, at the time of presentation. But with recent improvements in cross-sectional imaging, chemotherapeutic agents and advances in the techniques of surgical resection the emphasis of resection has now changed to 'who is not resectable' as opposed to 'who is resectable'. There are few contraindications to liver resection on the proviso that the patient is fit enough. As a result of this paradigm shift, 5 year survival rates are approaching 60%. Historically liver resection was perceived as a formidable operation but now liver resection for CRLM is safe and specialist centres are reporting mortality rates of less than 1%. This review briefly covers the standard techniques currently employed and some of the recent innovations being developed to improve resectability.

The safety and efficacy of radiofrequency and electrolytic ablation created adjacent to large hepatic veins in a porcine model

INTRODUCTION

Immediately adjacent to large hepatic veins, tumour ablation by radiofrequency or electrolysis may be impaired by heat or current sink effects. Ablation may also cause vessel injury and thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency and electrolytic ablative techniques adjacent to large hepatic veins.

METHODS

Electrolytic and radiofrequency zones of ablation were created adjacent to hepatic veins in large white pigs. After 72 h the zones of ablation created were examined histologically for (a) the extent of tissue necrosis up to the vessel and (b) the presence of intimal damage and mural thrombus in the veins.

RESULTS

An unexpected complication of electrolysis near large veins was cardiac tamponade. This current related phenomenon could easily be avoided. In seven of nine electrolysis zones of ablation necrosis was completely adjacent to the vessel wall, but in only four of seven radiofrequency zones of ablation. All zones of ablation were associated with intimal necrosis, and most with mural thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation of hepatic tumours by radiofrequency and electrolysis is unreliable adjacent to hepatic veins. Both techniques are associated with mural thrombus formation, and so risk thrombo-embolic complication. These ablative modalities are not recommended for zones of ablation adjacent to hepatic veins.

Two hundred liver hanging maneuvers for major hepatectomy: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To establish the indications of the liver hanging maneuver for major hepatectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The liver hanging maneuver, which is a technique of passing a tape along the retrohepatic avascular space and suspending the liver during parenchymal transection, facilitates anterior approach of major hepatectomy. However, the feasibility and limits of this maneuver have never been established in patients with different clinical backgrounds.

METHODS

Medical records of 242 consecutive patients considered for major hepatectomy using the hanging maneuver were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 242 patients, 14 patients (6%) were considered to have contraindication for this maneuver preoperatively because of tumor infiltration to anterior surface of retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). It was successful in 201 patients with overall feasibility of 88%. The feasibility increased significantly in the recent years as compared with the initial years (94% in 2003-2005 vs. 76% in 2000-2002, P < 0.0001). Bleeding during the retrohepatic dissection occurred in 5 patients (2%), which was minor due to injury of hepatic capsule in 3 (1%) and major due to injury of short hepatic vein in 2 (1%). In all cases, bleeding stopped spontaneously. The maneuver was abandoned in 27 patients, including 15 related to severe adhesion between liver and IVC. Univariate analysis showed that adhesion between IVC and liver was the only significant negative predictor affecting the feasibility. Cirrhosis, large tumor, preoperative radiologic treatments did not influence on the feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver hanging maneuver has 94% feasibility in recent years. Absolute contraindication is tumor infiltration to the retrohepatic avascular space. Adhesion between the IVC and liver has a negative impact of the feasibility. According to this indication, the hanging maneuver is easily achievable without risk of the major bleeding during the retrohepatic dissection.

Two hundred liver hanging maneuvers for major hepatectomy: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To establish the indications of the liver hanging maneuver for major hepatectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The liver hanging maneuver, which is a technique of passing a tape along the retrohepatic avascular space and suspending the liver during parenchymal transection, facilitates anterior approach of major hepatectomy. However, the feasibility and limits of this maneuver have never been established in patients with different clinical backgrounds.

METHODS

Medical records of 242 consecutive patients considered for major hepatectomy using the hanging maneuver were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 242 patients, 14 patients (6%) were considered to have contraindication for this maneuver preoperatively because of tumor infiltration to anterior surface of retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). It was successful in 201 patients with overall feasibility of 88%. The feasibility increased significantly in the recent years as compared with the initial years (94% in 2003-2005 vs. 76% in 2000-2002, P < 0.0001). Bleeding during the retrohepatic dissection occurred in 5 patients (2%), which was minor due to injury of hepatic capsule in 3 (1%) and major due to injury of short hepatic vein in 2 (1%). In all cases, bleeding stopped spontaneously. The maneuver was abandoned in 27 patients, including 15 related to severe adhesion between liver and IVC. Univariate analysis showed that adhesion between IVC and liver was the only significant negative predictor affecting the feasibility. Cirrhosis, large tumor, preoperative radiologic treatments did not influence on the feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver hanging maneuver has 94% feasibility in recent years. Absolute contraindication is tumor infiltration to the retrohepatic avascular space. Adhesion between the IVC and liver has a negative impact of the feasibility. According to this indication, the hanging maneuver is easily achievable without risk of the major bleeding during the retrohepatic dissection.

Resection of hepatic colorectal metastases involving the caudate lobe: perioperative outcome and survival

PURPOSE

To examine clinical features and outcome of patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases (LM) involving the caudate lobe.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for LM from May 1990 to September 2004 were analyzed from a multicenter database. Demographics, operative data, pathologic margin status, recurrence, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 580 patients, 40 (7%) had LM involving the caudate. Six had isolated caudate LM and 34 had LM involving the caudate plus one or more other hepatic segments. Patients with caudate LM were more likely to have synchronous primary colorectal cancer (63% vs. 36%; P = 0.01), multiple LM (70% vs. 51%; P = 0.02) and required extended hepatic resection more often than patients with non-caudate LM (60% vs. 18%; P < 0.001). Only four patients with caudate LM underwent a vascular resection; three at first operation, one after recurrence of a resected caudate tumor. All had primary repair (vena cava, n = 3; portal vein, n = 1). Perioperative complications (43% vs. 28%) and 60-day operative mortality (0% vs. 1%) were similar (caudate vs. non-caudate LM, both P > 0.05). Pathological margins were positive in 15 (38%) patients with caudate LM and in 43 (8%) with non-caudate LM (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 40 months, 25 (64%) patients with caudate LM recurred compared with 219 (40%) patients with non-caudate LM (P = 0.01). Patients with caudate LM were more likely to have intrahepatic disease as a component of recurrence (caudate: 51% vs. non-caudate: 25%; P = 0.001). No patient recurred on the vena cava or portal vein. Patients with caudate LM had shorter 5-year disease-free and overall survival than patients with non-caudate LM (disease-free: 24% vs. 44%; P = 0.02; overall: 41% vs. 58%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo hepatic resection for caudate LM often present with multiple hepatic tumors and tumors in proximity to the major hepatic veins. Extended hepatectomy is required in the majority, although vascular resection is not frequently necessary; when performed, primary repair is usually possible. Despite resection in this population of patients with multiple and bilateral tumors, and despite close-margin and positive-margin resection in a significant proportion, recurrence on the portal vein or vena cava was not observed, and long-term survival is accomplished (41% 5-year overall survival).