Gastric body partition to avoid ulcerogenic risk and hypergastrinemia

Investigating biomechanical alterations and emptying patterns after various gastrojejunostomy strategy

Gastrojejunostomy is a prominent approach in managing distal gastric cancer that is unresectable due to gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Research has demonstrated that stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) exhibits superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional gastrojejunostomy (CGJ), however, the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains elusive. This study constructed 3D models of the SPGJ and CGJ based on the computed tomography (CT) images obtained from a patient diagnosed with distal gastric cancer. The biomechanical patterns of these procedures in the digestive system were subsequently compared through numerical simulations and in vitro experiments. The results of the numerical simulation demonstrated that the model following SPGJ promoted the discharge of food through the anastomotic orifice and into the lower jejunum. Furthermore, a decrease in passage size after partitioning, the low-level velocity of esophageal, and an increase in contents viscosity effectively inhibited the flow through the passage to the pylorus, ultimately reducing stimulation to tumor. The study also revealed that favorable gastric emptying is associated with a smaller passage and faster inlet velocity, and that lower contents viscosity. ​The experimental findings conducted in vitro demonstrated that SPGJ exhibited superior efficacy in obstructing the flow near the pylorus in comparison to CGJ. Moreover, a decrease in passage size correlates with a reduction in fluid flow towards the pylorus. These results provide the foundation of theory and practice for the surgical management of patients with GOO resulting from unresectable distal gastric cancer, and have potential implications for clinical interventions.

Duodenal ulcer perforation: A systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on optimal surgical treatment of large duodenal defects arising from perforated ulcers, even though such defects are challenging to repair and inadequate repair is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic literature review of different surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal perforations, provide a narrative description of these techniques, and propose a framework for approaching this pathology.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for articles published in English between January 1, 1970, and December 1, 2020. Studies describing surgical techniques used to treat giant duodenal ulcer perforation and their outcomes in adult patients were included. No quantitative analysis was planned because of the heterogeneity across studies.

RESULTS

Out of 960 identified records, 25 studies were eligible for inclusion. Two randomized controlled trials, one case-control trial, three cohort studies, 14 case series, and 5 case reports were included. Eight main surgical approaches are described, ranging from simple damage-control operations, such as the omental plug and triple-tube techniques, all the way to complex resections, such as gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Evidence on surgical treatment of large duodenal defects is of poor quality, with the majority of studies corresponding to Oxford levels 3b-4. Current evidence does not support any single surgical technique as superior in terms of morbidity or mortality, but choice of technique should be guided by several factors including location of the perforation, degree of duodenal tissue loss, hemodynamic stability of the patient, as well as expertise of the operating surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

SR with more than two negative criteria, Level IV.