Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer

Navigating Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Conversion: Insights From Recurrent Breast Cancer

Recurrent breast cancer presents clinical challenges due to its dynamic nature. Turning human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status from negative to positive upon recurrence is a rare but clinically significant phenomenon that can impact treatment decisions. We present the case of a 63-year-old female initially diagnosed with stage IIIA breast cancer, characterized as HER2-negative. However, upon recurrence eight years later, the patient exhibited HER2 conversion, indicating a positive status. Subsequent treatment adjustments were made based on this new HER2-positive status, leading to complete remission. HER2 conversion underscores the dynamic nature of tumor biology in recurrent breast cancer. This case highlights the importance of re-biopsy for accurate biomarker assessment and the necessity of personalized treatment strategies based on current molecular profiles. Understanding and recognizing HER2 conversion in recurrent breast cancer is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and guiding clinical management decisions. Further research is warranted to elucidate the frequency and clinical implications of HER2 conversion in recurrent breast cancer.

Current approach of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer

The surgical approach of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer has witnessed considerable evolution during the past 25 years. The previously undisputed gold standard of axillary-lymph-node dissection for staging has now been replaced by sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for patients with clinically negative axilla. For selected patients with limited sentinel-lymph-node involvement, completion axillary-lymph-node dissection can be omitted or replaced by axillary radiotherapy, reducing morbidity. The clinical interest of axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing and this approach might contribute to morbidity reduction, and to the further tailoring of future systemic and locoregional treatment decisions by response assessment. Refinement of the sentinel-lymph-node biopsy technique might overcome the slightly impaired success rates in this setting. New techniques for lymphatic mapping attempt to further simplify the procedure. In view of the declining influence of axillary nodal status on adjuvant therapy decision-making, ongoing clinical trials will evaluate whether sentinel-lymph-node biopsy can be avoided altogether in selected patients.

A mini-review on factors and countermeasures associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsies in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a new surgical technique for local axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) of breast cancer. Large-scale clinical trials have confirmed that undergoing SLNB and ALN dissection (ALND) showed no significant difference for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients in terms of disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrence-free survival. However, false-negative results are still the main concern of physicians as well as patients who undergo SLNB instead of ALND. The American Society of Breast Surgeons established a task force to suggest acceptable standards for SLNB. In 2000, the task force recommended that the identification rate for SLNB be 85% or higher and the false-negative rate be 5% or lower. This review focuses on clinical factors (tumor volume, multifocal/multi-center cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and skip metastasis), tracer techniques and pathological factors affecting SLNB and explores methods for reducing the false-negative rate.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early breast cancer. 

METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between January 2005 and December 2014. There were 120 patients who underwent SLNB with frozen section examination. Data collected included the characteristics of patients, index tumor, and sentinel node (SN), SLNB results, axillary recurrence rate and SLNB morbidity.  

RESULTS

There were 120 patients who had 123 cancers. Sentinel node was identified in 117 patients having 120 tumors (97.6% success rate). No SN was found intraoperatively in 3 patients. Frozen section results showed that 95 patients were SN negative, those patients had no immediate axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), whereas 25 patients were SN positive and subsequently had immediate ALND. Upon further examination of the 95 negative SN's by hematoxylin and  eosin (H and E) and immunohistochemical staining for doubtful H and E cases, 10 turned out to have micrometastases (6 had delayed ALND and 4 had no further axillary surgery). Median follow up of patients was 35.5 months and the mean was 38.8 months. There was one axillary recurrence observed in the SN negative group. The morbidity of SLNB was minimal. 

CONCLUSION

The obtainable results from our local experience in SLNB in breast cancer, concur with that seen in published similar literature in particular the axillary failure rate. Sentinel lymph node biopsy resulted in minimal morbidity.

[Sentinel lymph node-multicentric and multifocal tumors: a valid technique?]

Sentinel node biopsy without complementary axillary lymph node dissection was validated for T1-2 N0 unifocal breast cancer without previous treatment since several years. In the situation of multifocal multicentric breast tumors, this procedure was considered as a contraindication. The aim of this work was to analyse literature results to determine if sentinel lymph node biopsy can be considered as a valid option without complementary axillary lymph node dissection for negative sentinel lymph node.

Mapping lymph nodes in cancer management - role of (99m)Tc-tilmanocept injection

Two decades ago, lymphatic mapping of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) was introduced into surgical cancer management and was termed sentinel node navigated surgery. Although this technique is now routinely performed in the management of breast cancer and malignant melanoma, it is still under investigation for use in other cancers. The radioisotope technetium (^99mTc) and vital blue dyes are among the most widely used enhancers for SLN mapping, although near-infrared fluorescence imaging of indocyanine green is also becoming more commonly used. ^99mTc-tilmanocept is a new synthetic radioisotope with a relatively small molecular size that was specifically developed for lymphatic mapping. Because of its small size, ^99mTc-tilmanocept quickly migrates from its site of injection and rapidly accumulates in the SLN. The mannose moieties of ^99mTc-tilmanosept facilitate its binding to mannose receptors (CD206) expressed in reticuloendothelial cells of the SLN. This binding prevents transit to second-echelon lymph nodes. In Phase III trials of breast cancer and malignant melanoma, and Phase II trials of other malignancies, ^99mTc-tilmanocept had superior identification rates and sensitivity compared with blue dye. Trials comparing ^99mTc-tilmanocept with other ^99mTc-based agents are required before it can be routinely used in clinical settings.

A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric breast cancer: SMMaC trial

BACKGROUND

Multicentric breast cancer is often considered a contra-indication for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy due to concerns with sensitivity and false negative rate. To assess SLN feasibility and accuracy in multicentric breast cancer, the multi-institutional SMMaC trial was conducted.

METHODS

In this study 30 patients with multicentric breast cancer and a clinically negative axilla were prospectively included. Periareolar injection of radioisotope and blue dye was administered. In all patients SLN biopsy was validated by back-up completion axillary lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

the SLN was successfully identified in 30 of 30 patients (identification rate 100%). The incidence of axillary metastases was 66.7% (20/30). The false negative rate was 0% (0/20) and the sensitivity was 100% (20/20). The negative predictive value was 100% (10/10).

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy in multicentric breast cancer seems feasible and accurate and should therefore be considered in patients with multicentric breast cancer and clinically negative axilla.

Diagnostic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for studies published before October 31, 2012. Pooled values for the sentinel lymph node identification rate, sensitivity, false-negative rate, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (987 patients) was included. The pooled identification rate, sensitivity, false-negative rate, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 95.2%, 86.3%, 13.7%, 94.2%, and 95.0%, respectively. The subgroup with high methodological quality showed a mean identification rate of 95.4% for SLNB validation trials and 94.2% for SLNB alone trials, and mean sensitivity of 91.0% for SLNB validation trials and 84.2% for SLNB alone trials.

CONCLUSION

The SLNB procedure has shown a high sensitivity rate, but the pooled sensitivity and false-negative rate were worse in SLNB alone trials than in SLNB validation trials.

[Sentinel node biopsy in patients with multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: A 5-year follow-up]

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure in multiple breast cancer is a controversial issue. We have aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sentinel node (SN) detection in patients with multifocal or multicentric breast cancer as well as the safety of its clinical application after a long follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective descriptive study was performed. Eighty-nine patients diagnosed of multiple breast cancer (73 multifocal; 16 multicentric) underwent SLNB. These patients were compared to those with unifocal neoplasia. Periareolar radiocolloid administration was performed in most of the patients. Evaluation was made at an average of 67.2 months of follow-up (32-126 months).

RESULTS

Scintigraphic and surgical SN localization in patients with multiple breast cancer were 95.5% and 92.1%, respectively. A higher percentage of extra-axillary nodes was observed than in the unifocal group (11.7% vs 5.4%) as well as a significantly higher number of SN per patient (1.70 vs 1.38). The rate of SN localization in multicentric cancer was slightly lower than in multifocal cancer (87.5% vs 93.1%), and the finding of extra-axillary drainages was higher (20% vs 10%). Number of SN per patient was significantly higher in multicentric breast cancer (2.33 vs 1.57). No axillary relapses have been demonstrated in the follow-up in multiple breast cancer patients group.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB performed by periareolar injection is a reliable and accurate staging procedure of patients with multiple breast cancer, including those with multicentric processes.