Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas: Morphology matters

Automated imaging analysis of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry on whole slide images of cell blocks from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Accurate grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) relies on the assessment of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC). While digital imaging analysis (DIA) has been employed for Ki-67 IHC assessment in surgical specimens, its applicability to cytologic specimens remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate an automated DIA for assessing Ki-67 IHC on PanNET cell blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 61 consecutive PanNETs and 5 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. Ki-67 IHC slides from cell blocks were digitally scanned into whole slide images using Philips IntelliSite Scanners and analyzed in batches using the Visiopharm Ki-67 App in a digital workflow. Ki-67 scores obtained through DIA were compared to pathologists' manual scores.

RESULTS

The Pearson correlation coefficient of the percentage of Ki-67-stained nuclei between DIA reads and the originally reported reads was 0.9681. Concordance between DIA Ki-67 grades and pathologists' Ki-67 grades was observed in 92.4% (61/66) of cases with the calculated Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.862 (almost perfect agreement). Discordance between DIA and pathologists' consensus reads occurred in 5 PanNET cases which were upgraded from G1 to G2 by DIA due to contaminated Ki-67-stained inflammatory cells.

CONCLUSIONS

DIA demonstrated excellent concordance with pathologists' assessments, with only minor grading discrepancies. However, the essential role of pathologists in confirming results is emphasized to enhance overall accuracy.

Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES)

BACKGROUND

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023.

RESULTS

The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

Review of Merkel cell carcinoma with solitary pancreatic metastases mimicking primary neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) but metastases to the pancreas are very rare. There are only a few cases of isolated metastases of MCC to the pancreas. Because of this rarity, it can be wrongly diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas(pNET), especially the poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) subtype, in which the treatment is vastly different than that of MCC with isolated metastases of the pancreas.

METHODS

An electronic search of the PubMed and google scholar databases was performed to obtain the literature on MCC with pancreatic metastases, using the following search terms: Merkel cell carcinoma, pancreas, and metastases. Results are limited to the following available article types: case reports and case series. We identified 45 cases of MCC with pancreatic metastases from the PubMed and Google Scholar database search and examined their potential relevance. Only 22 cases with isolated pancreatic metastases were taken for review including one case that we encountered.

RESULTS

The results from our review of cases of isolated pancreatic metastases of MCC were compared to the characteristics of the poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNEC). We found the following: (a) MCC with isolated pancreatic metastases occurred at an older age than PNEC and with male gender predominance (b) Most of the metastases occurred within 2 years of initial diagnosis of MCC (c) Resection of pancreatic mass was the first line treatment in case of resectable PNECs whereas resection of metastases was infrequently performed in MCC with pancreatic metastases.

The impact of surgery and survival prediction in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at assessing the impact of surgical treatments in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

A propensity score-matched analysis based on data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to assess the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with GEP-NETs.

RESULTS

A total of 7515 patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs from 2004 to 2015 were evaluated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. There were 1483 patients in the surgery group and 6032 patients in the nonsurgery group. Compared with patients in the surgery group, patients in the nonsurgery group were inclined to receive chemotherapy (50.8 vs. 16.7%) and radiation (12.9 vs. 3.7%) as treatment options. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed higher rates of overall survival (OS) outcomes for GEP-NETs patients who had been subjected to surgery (hazard ratio=0.483, 95% CI=0.439-0.533, P <0.001). Then, to reduce the impact of bias, a 1 : 1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed for the two groups of patients. A total of 1760 patients were assessed and each subgroup included 880 patients. In the matched population, the patients exhibited the ability to significantly benefit from surgery (hazard ratio=0.455, 95% CI=0.439-0.533, P <0.001). The OS outcomes for radiation or chemotherapy patients who had been treated with surgery were better than those of patients who had not been treated with surgery ( P <0.001). In addition, it was found that the OS of patients was not significant after rectum and small intestine surgery, whereas there was a significant difference in OS after colon, pancreas, and stomach surgery on the patients. Patients who had been subjected to surgery in the rectum and small intestines exhibited better therapeutic benefits.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GEP-NETs who are treated with surgery have better OS outcomes. Therefore, surgery is recommended for specified selected patients with metastatic GEP-NETs.

Surgical Management of G3 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare, aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. The World Health Organization 2017 and 2019 classifications further subdivided G3 NENs into G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Current guidelines favor medical management in most of these patients, and the role of surgical management is not well defined. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical management versus nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (end-of-search date: 16 July 2021) was conducted. Individual patient survival data were reconstructed, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising 1810 surgical and 910 nonsurgical patients were systematically reviewed. Publication bias adjusted meta-analysis of 12 studies (1788 surgical and 857 nonsurgical patients) showed increased overall survival (OS) after surgical compared with nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.53]. Subgroup meta-analyses showed increased OS after surgical management for both pancreatic and gastrointestinal primary sites separately. In another subgroup meta-analysis of G3 GEP NETs (not NECs), surgical management was associated with increased OS compared with nonsurgical management (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of G3 GEP NENs may provide a potential survival benefit in well-selected cases. Further research is needed to define which patients will benefit most from surgical versus nonsurgical management. The current literature is limited by inconsistent reporting of survival outcomes in surgical versus nonsurgical groups, tumor grade, differentiation, primary tumor site, and selection criteria for surgical and nonsurgical management.

Surgery, Liver Directed Therapy and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by grade (1–3) and degree of differentiation. Grade 1 and 2; well differentiated PNETs are often characterized as relatively “indolent” tumors for which locoregional therapies have been shown to be effective for palliation of symptom control and prolongation of survival even in the setting of advanced disease. The treatment of liver metastases includes surgical and non-surgical modalities with varying degrees of invasiveness; efficacy; and risk. Most of these modalities have not been prospectively compared. This paper reviews literature that has been published on treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases using surgery; liver directed embolization and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Surgery is associated with the longest survival in patients with resectable disease burden. Liver-directed (hepatic artery) therapies can sometimes convert patients with borderline disease into candidates for surgery. Among the three embolization modalities; the preponderance of data suggests chemoembolization offers superior radiographic response compared to bland embolization and radioembolization; but all have similar survival. PRRT was initially approved as salvage therapy in patients with advanced disease that was not amenable to resection or embolization; though the role of PRRT is evolving rapidly

The risk and prognostic factors for G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A retrospective analysis of the SEER database

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) for which little is known about their clinical features, treatment options, and survival prognosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk factors affecting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with grade 1 pNETs (G1 pNETs) and to provide a new theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of individuals with G1 pNETs registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) database was performed. Risk factors affecting OS and CSS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards model, and Fine-Gray competing-risk model.

Results

A total of 751 patients were included, most of whom were white (77.2%) women (53.9%) under the age of 60 years (54.9%), of whom 66 died of pNETs (8.78%) and 34 died of other causes (4.52%). Patients who were older than 60 years at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.866, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.242-2.805) had worse OS. And stage in the regional extent (HR = 1.777, 95% CI: 1.006-3.137) or distance extent (HR = 4.540, 95% CI: 2.439-8.453) had worse OS. Patients who delayed treatment after diagnosis had shorter CSS (delayed treatment < 1 month: HR = 1.933, 95% CI: 0.863-4.333; delayed treatment ≥ 1 month: HR = 2.208; 95% CI:1.047-4.654). Patients with lymph node metastasis (HR = 1.989, 95% CI: 1.137-3.479) or distant metastasis (HR = 5.625, 95% CI: 1.892-16.726) had worse CSS. Acceptance of surgery can significantly improve the patient’s OS and CSS. OS (partial pancreatectomy [PP]: HR = 0.350, 95% CI: 0.182-0.672; pancreatectomy and duodenectomy [PD]: HR = 0.426, 95% CI: 0.222-0.815; total pancreatectomy [TP]: HR = 0.495, 95% CI: 0.193-1.267). CSS(PP: HR = 0.148, 95% CI: 0.0054-0.401; PD: HR = 0.332, 95% CI: 0.150-0.730; TP: HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.254-1.872).

Conclusion

Age and stage were identified as independent risk factors for OS. Delayed treatment, N stage and M stage were independent risk factors for CSS. Only surgery was identified as independent protective factors for OS and CSS.

Assessing the Role of Operative Intervention in Elderly Patients With Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Resection of locoregional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) is typically recommended, but there is a paucity of data on the management of elderly patients.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2004-2016) was queried for patients 80 years or older with localized PanNENs. Patients were grouped as nonoperative or operative management. Postoperative outcomes and survival were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 591 patients were included: 202 underwent resection, and 389 did not. Increasing age and pancreatic head tumors were associated with lower likelihood of resection. The overall 90-day mortality rate was 6.4%, which was higher for pancreatoduodenectomy than distal pancreatectomy (13.6% vs 5.1%, respectively). Operatively managed patients had longer median survival (80.8 vs 45.0 months, P < 0.001), and this association was independent of tumor location. On multivariable Cox regression, resection remained associated with longer survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.95). Among operatively managed patients, age and tumor location were not associated with survival; however, greater comorbidity and high-risk tumor-specific features were associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of nonfunctional PanNENs in elderly patients is associated with improved survival compared with nonoperative management. Resection could be considered in appropriate operative candidates, regardless of tumor location, but the perioperative mortality rate must be considered.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Although the gastrointestinal tract (including the pancreas, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) is the most common site for extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), the current treatment patterns of locoregional GEP NEC and in particular, the role of surgical resection is unclear.

Methods

Data from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 were used for this study.

Results

Of 2314 GEP NEC cases (stages I–III), 52.5% were stage III. Colon was the most common site (30%); 30.9% of all cases were small cell morphology. Age, morphology, stage, and primary site were associated with significant differences in treatment patterns. Management of NEC mimicked that of adenocarcinomas arising at the respective sites: colon NEC most likely to be treated with surgery and chemotherapy; anal and esophageal NEC was primarily likely to receive chemotherapy and radiation, and rectal NEC mostly likely to receive trimodality therapy. However, 25%-40% of patients did not undergo surgical resection even at sites typically managed with curative resection, and there was a trend toward lesser resection over time. The prognostic impact of surgical resection was significant across all stages and correlated with variations in survival across primary sites. Even in patients undergoing chemoradiation, surgery was the only prognostic variable that significantly affected survival in stages I–II patients (HR 0.63) and showed a strong trend in stage III (HR 0.77) patients.

Conclusions

Treatment patterns in GEP NEC vary considerably according to stage and primary tumor site. Surgery significantly improved survival in stages I–II patients and showed a strong trend in stage III patients regardless of primary tumor location and other perioperative therapies.

Progress in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a heterogeneous and orphan group of neoplasms that vary in their histology, clinical features, prognosis, and management. The treatment of PNETs is highly dependent on the stage at presentation, tumor grade and differentiation, presence of symptoms from hormonal overproduction or from local growth, tumor burden, and rate of progression. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved many novel treatments, which have altered decision making and positively impacted the care and prognosis of these patients. In this review, we focus on the significant progress made in the management of PNETs over the past decade, as well as the active areas of research. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Management of Primary Hepatopancreatobiliary and Ampulla Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Background: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, and ampulla is rare and usually arises in case reports, and thus to date, no studies have well described the treatment options and outcomes of those patients. Methods: The data of 108 patients diagnosed as hepatopancreatobiliary and ampulla LCNEC between 2004 and 2015 were retrieved from the surveillance, epidemiology, and final results. Results: In the entire cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. For nonmetastatic patients, the median OS was 32 months for surgery of the primary tumor alone (n = 17), 19 months for surgery of the primary tumor and adjuvant therapy (n = 19), and 1 month for nonsurgical treatment (n = 8). For metastatic patients, the median OS was 14 months for patients who received surgery of the primary tumor with and without adjuvant therapy (n = 16), 9 months for patients undergoing adjuvant treatment alone (n = 30), and 1 month for patients who had no treatment (n = 16). Multivariate analysis revealed that surgery of the primary tumor was an independent factor for improved survival. Conclusions: This disease offers a very poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Radical resection is the first choice for resectable tumors, whereas surgical resection of the primary tumor plus adjuvant therapy might represent a valid option for metastatic disease. However, further studies are needed to confirm this.

Role of 3D Volumetric and Perfusion Imaging for Detecting Early Changes in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

There is a major shortage of reliable early detection methods for pancreatic cancer in high-risk groups. The focus of this preliminary study was to use Time Intensity-Density Curve (TIDC) and Marley Equation analyses, in conjunction with 3D volumetric and perfusion imaging to demonstrate their potential as imaging biomarkers to assist in the early detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Experimental Designs

A quantitative retrospective and prospective study was done by analyzing multi-phase Computed Tomography (CT) images of 28 patients undergoing treatment at different stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using advanced 3D imaging software to identify the perfusion and radio density of tumors.

Results

TIDC and the Marley Equation proved useful in quantifying tumor aggressiveness. Perfusion delays in the venous phase can be linked to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-related activity which represents the active part of the tumor. 3D volume analysis of the multiphase CT scan of the patient showed clear changes in arterial and venous perfusion indicating the aggressive state of the tumor.

Conclusion

TIDC and 3D volumetric analysis can play a significant role in defining the response of the tumor to treatment and identifying early-stage aggressiveness.

A case of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma with a favorable clinical response to pembrolizumab

A 76-year-old man with epigastric pain developed 1 month earlier was referred to our department for additional screening and treatment after abdominal ultrasound revealed a mass shadow in the pancreatic head and liver. Blood biochemistry revealed signs of mild jaundice and hepatic dysfunction. Abdominal contrast-computed tomography revealed an irregular hypodense mass with poor enhancement in the pancreatic head and several hypodense nodules in the liver. Endoscopic examination revealed duodenal infiltration signs. The biopsied duodenal mucosa contained atypical cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios; the cells stained positive for CD56, chromogranin, and synaptophysin, and the Ki-67 index was 90%. Accordingly, pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PanNEC) was diagnosed. Platinum-based chemotherapy (6 courses) and streptozotocin (10 courses) were adopted as the first- and second-line regimens, respectively. However, the patient showed progressive disease (PD). Pembrolizumab was added as a third-line regimen (13 courses) after confirming PanNEC with high microsatellite instability (MSI-high). Despite a temporary partial response (PR), the patient showed PD by the end of the 13 courses and died 1 year and 7 months after diagnosis. Although there is no established PanNEC therapy, those with MSI-high may respond favorably to pembrolizumab. Therefore, we should ascertain the MSI status of any PanNEC in routine practice.

A Subset of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas in the Gastroenteropancreatic Tract May Evolve from Pre-existing Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

In the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) include well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and high-grade NE carcinomas (NECs), which are thought to make up separate and mutually exclusive tumor entities. Little is known, however, as to whether there may be any pathogenetic link between them. Clustering analysis of a 10-gene panel generated from a previously reported next-generation sequencing analysis on 48 GEP-NENs with clinical annotations was used in the study. Unsupervised cluster analysis showed three histology-independent clusters, namely, C1, C2, and C3, which accounted for 44% of patients but the entire array of mutations. All but two NECs fell into the clusters, yet with different prevalence rates (p < 0.0001). A model was devised according to which NETs were likely to evolve into NECs upon progression of C3 into C1 and C2, despite different morphology. The median Ki-67 labeling index was 5% in C3 showing better prognosis and 50% in C1 and C2 experiencing worse prognosis, with an impressive intra-tumor heterogeneity of diversely proliferating tumor areas. This study suggests that a subset of large cell NECs in the gastroenteropancreatic tract may evolve from pre-existing well-differentiated NETs.

Surgery of the primary tumour in 201 patients with high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The benefit of surgery in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) is uncertain. The present study aimed to investigate outcomes after tumour surgery in patients with high-grade (Ki-67 > 20%) GEP NEN or MiNEN stage I-III or stage IV. We analysed data from patients treated in the period 2007-2015 at eight Nordic university hospitals. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression. We included 201 surgically resected patients, 143 stage I-III and 58 stage IV, with 68% having neuroendocrine carcinoma, 23% MiNEN, 5% neuroendocrine tumour G3 and 4% uncertain NEN G3. Primary tumours were located in colon/rectum (52%), oesophagus/cardia (19%), pancreas (10%), stomach (7%), jejunum/ileum (5%), duodenum (4%), gallbladder (2%) and anal canal (1%). For patients with stage I-III, median DFS was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.5-18.5) and median OS was 32 months (95% CI = 24.0-40.0). For patients with stage I-III and an R0 resection, median DFS was 21 months (95% CI = 4.9-37.1) and median OS was 39 months (95% CI = 25.0-53.0). For patients with stage IV, median PFS/DFS was 4 months (95% CI = 1.9-6.1) and median OS was 11 months (95% CI = 4.8-17.2). For patients with stage IV and an R0 resection, median DFS was 6 months (95% CI = 0-16.4) and median OS was 32 months (95% CI = 25.5-38.5). Performance status > 1 and colorectal primary were associated with poor prognosis. There was no difference in survival between patients with high-grade GEP NEN and MiNEN. Surgery of the primary tumour in patients with loco-regional high-grade GEP NEN or MiNEN led to good long-term results and should be considered if an R0 resection is considered achievable. Highly selected patients with stage IV disease may also benefit from surgery.

Radical resection of large metastatic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma complicated by splenic vein thrombosis and sinistral portal hypertension

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

There are limited reports in the literature of radical surgical resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC). In patients with non-functioning PNEC (NF-PNEC) within the tail of the pancreas tumours can cause splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) and subsequent sinitral portal hypertension (SPH). Radical surgical resection in such patients with concomitant liver metastasis has not previously been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 67-year old female patient who presented with a large NF-PNEC within the tail of the pancreas with liver metastasis. We performed a distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, partial gastrectomy and liver resection to achieve radical resecton.

DISCUSSION

All patients with NF-PNEC within the tail of the pancreatic should be considered for radical surgical resection. In the presence of multi-visceral involvement and complications such as SVT and/or SPH multi-speciality surgical expertise is likely to be required.

CONCLUSION

Radical multi-visceral resection for large NF-PNEC can be safely performed in the presence of SVT and SPH.

Update on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The incidence gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) has dramatically risen over the last three decades, probably due to the increased detection of asymptomatic lesions. The diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected GEP-NENs is based on conventional imaging, endoscopy, pathology, and functional imaging, including ⁶⁸Gallium-DOTATATE PET and ¹⁸F-FDG PET. The choice of the best treatment strategy should be based on the evaluation of tumor-related features and patient's characteristics. A conservative management, consisting of active surveillance or endoscopic resection, has been advocated for patients with small, incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning tumors without features of aggressiveness. On the other hand, surgery with lymphadenectomy, also with a minimally invasive approach, represents the gold standard for the curative treatment of localized disease. Moreover, surgical resection plays an important role also in the context of a multimodal treatment strategy for patients with advanced GEP-NENs. Finally, a wide range of medical therapies, comprising somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, target therapies and several chemotherapy regimens, can be offered to patients with advanced GEP-NENs not amenable of surgical resection, according to the biological and molecular features of their disease.

Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic analysis can preoperatively predict G1 and G2/3 grades in patients with NF-pNETs

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic score (rad-score) and the grades of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) and evaluate the potential of the calculated MRI rad-score to differentiate grade 1 from grade 2/3 NF-pNETs.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed 157 patients with surgically resected, pathologically confirmed NF-pNETs who underwent magnetic resonance scans from November 2012 to December 2019. Radiomic features were extracted from arterial and portal venous MRI. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method were used to select the features. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between the MRI rad-score and NF-pNET grades. The MRI rad-score performance was assessed based on its discriminative ability and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The MRI rad-score, which consisted of seven selected features, was significantly associated with the NF-pNET grades. Every 1-point increase in the rad-score was associated with a 35% increased risk of grade 2/3 disease. The score also showed high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.775). The best cut-off point for maximal sensitivity and specificity was at 0.41. In the decision curves, when the threshold probability was higher than 0.3, the rad-score used in this study to distinguish grades 1 and 2/3 NF-pNETs offered more benefits than the use of a treat-all-patients or a treat-none scheme.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI rad-score showed a significant association with the grades of NF-pNETs. Thus, it may be used as a valuable non-invasive tool for differential NF-pNET grading.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 may be heterogeneous and could be classified into two distinct groups

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PanNEC)-G3 often presents along with genetic abnormalities such as KRAS, RB1, and TP53 mutations. However, the association between these genetic findings and response to chemotherapy and prognosis has not been clarified. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features of PanNEC-G3.

METHODS

We performed a subgroup analysis of the Japanese PanNEN-G3 study (multicenter, retrospective study), which revealed that Rb loss and KRAS mutation were predictors of the response to platinum-based regimen in PanNEN-G3. We re-classified WHO grades of PanNENs using the 2017 WHO classification and then analyzed the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in 49 patients with PanNEC-G3.

RESULTS

The rates of Rb loss and KRAS mutation in PanNEC-G3 were 54.5% and 48.7%, respectively. Patients with Rb loss and/or KRAS mutation showed a higher response rate to first-line platinum-based regimen than those without Rb loss or KRAS mutation (object response rate 70.0% vs 33.3%, odds ratio 9.22; 95% CI 1.26-67.3, P = 0.029), but tended to have shorter overall survival rates than those without Rb loss or KRAS mutation (median 239 vs 473 days, hazard ratio 2.11; 95% CI 0.92-4.86, P = 0.077).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PanNEC-G3 have varied clinical outcomes for platinum-based regimen. When grouped based on Rb loss and KRAS mutation, there seemed to be two groups with distinct prognoses and responses to the platinum-based regimen. PanNEC-G3 could, therefore, be classified into two distinct groups based on immunohistochemical and genetic findings.

Curative Surgery and Ki-67 Value Rather than Tumor Differentiation Predict the Survival of Patients with High-grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the role of surgery in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (hg-NENs) and Ki-67 > 20%.

BACKGROUND

Although surgery is the first treatment choice in patients with low-grade NENs, whether it increases the survival of patients with hg-NENs is debatable.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2018, 63 patients pathologically diagnosed with hg-NENs treated at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed, and OS was compared between each treatment group.

RESULTS

The median observation time was 21.2 months, and the median Ki-67 value was 52%. Patients with hg-NENs were classified into low Ki-67 (Ki-67 < 52%) and high Ki-67 (Ki-67 ≥ 52%) groups. Multivariate analysis for OS identified surgery (P = 0.013) and low Ki-67 value (P = 0.007) as independent risk factors, while morphological differentiation defined by the WHO 2017 criteria showed no association with OS. Patients with low Ki-67 value subjected to R0/1, R2, and chemotherapy had a median survival time (MST) of 83.8, 16.6, and 28.1 months, respectively. The MST for R0/1 group was significantly longer than that for chemotherapy group (P = 0.001). However, no difference in survival was reported between patients from R0/1 and chemotherapy groups with high Ki-67. Ki-67 value could determine RFS (P = 0.006) in patients that underwent R0/1 surgery for pancreatic hg-NENs.

CONCLUSION

R0/1 surgery predicted prognoses in the low Ki-67 group. The indication of surgery for patients with hg-NENs did not depend on tumor differentiation.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is unknown. However, current guidelines recommend a watch-and-wait strategy for small nonfunctional PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk stratification and prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of PNETs to guide decision-making for lymphadenectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies reporting either risk factors of LNM in resected PNETs or survival of patients with LNM. The weighted average incidence of LNM was calculated according to tumor characteristics. Random-effects metaanalyses were performed, and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the impact of LNM on overall survival (OS). In subgroup analyses, NF-PNETs were assessed.

RESULTS

From a total of 5883 articles, 98 retrospective studies with 13,374 patients undergoing resection for PNET were included. In all PNETs, the weighted median rates of LNM were 11.5% for small (≤ 2 cm) PNETs and 15.8% for G1 PNETs. In NF-PNETs, the rates were 11.2% for small PNETs and 10.3% for G1 PNETs. LNM of all PNETs (HR 3.87, 95% CI 3.00-4.99, P < 0.001) and NF-PNETs (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.81-8.83, P < 0.001) was associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM is potentially prevalent even in small and well-differentiated PNETs and is associated with worse prognosis. A watch-and-wait strategy for small NF-PNETs should be reappraised, and oncologic resection with lymphadenectomy can be considered. Prospective and controlled studies are needed in the future.

Natural history and clinical outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms based on the WHO 2017 classification; a single-center experience of 30 years

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This single-center study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes and long-term prognosis of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) based on the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 classification.

METHODS

We enrolled 245 patients with PanNENs treated at Kyushu University Hospital between January 1987 and March 2018. PanNENs were categorized according to the WHO 2017 classification or further subdivisions of Ki-67 index. Clinicopathological features, median survival time (MST), and prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The number of PanNENs, especially non-functioning PanNENs, has increased over the last decade. The mean MST of all patients was 202 months; which was longest in patients with NET G1 (n = 145, MST = 261 months) relative to NET G2 (n = 72, 132 months), NET G3 (n = 3, 34 months) and NEC G3 (n = 17, 9 months). Prognosis in patients with surgery as the first-line treatment was significantly better than in those with drug therapy. However, 26% of patients who underwent curative resection developed recurrence after a median time of 28.7 months. In unresectable PanNENs (n = 97), the MST and 5-year survival rate were 78 months and 55.8%, respectively. Poor differentiation, Ki-67 index of >10% and presence of liver metastasis were significant unfavorable predictors. Response to first-line therapy (stable disease/partial response) and three or more treatment regimens were significant favorable predictors for unresectable PanNENs according to multivariate analyses (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the utility of the WHO 2017 classification for PanNENs in the real clinical setting. For better prognosis in PanNENs, the use of three or more regimens should be considered.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are increasingly recognized entities, whose incidence has dramatically grown during the last two decades. Surgery plays a pivotal role in their management as it represents the only chance of cure. Since PanNENs display a wide range of aggressiveness, their surgical management needs to be tailored on tumor's and patient's characteristics. Currently, there are several open questions and burning issues in the field of PanNEN, such as the management of asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) ≤ 2 cm. An active surveillance of these small lesions has been demonstrated to be safe although the available evidences are only based on retrospective studies. On the other hand, formal pancreatic resection associated with lymphadenectomy represents the gold standard for patients with localized NF-PanNEN > 2 cm or NF-PanNEN ≤ 2 cm in the presence of symptoms, dilation of the main pancreatic duct or suspicion of nodal metastases. Surgery plays also an important role in the setting of metastatic disease. In particular, surgery is generally recommended in the presence of low-grade, resectable, metastatic disease, but several series have reported also a survival benefit of palliative primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The role of surgery in PanNEN G3 is still controversial. Indeed, surgery is associated with an improved survival in patients with well-differentiated PanNET G3, whereas there is almost no survival benefit in case of poorly differentiated lesions.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Over the years, there have been significant advances in systemic treatments for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Despite these advancements, uncertainty remains regarding how to best sequence available therapies. For well-differentiated and metastatic panNETs that are somatostatin receptor (SSTR) avid on functional imaging, first-line therapy typically consists of somatostatin analogs (SSAs), given their favorable toxicity profile and overall low burden for patients. When progression of disease is observed on an SSA, multiple treatment options are available, including the targeted agents everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), as well as chemotherapy, with the latter often preferred for those panNETs of heavy tumor burden, higher grade, and/or more aggressive behavior clinically and/or radiographically. Here, we review panNET classification, currently available systemic treatments, therapy sequencing, and areas of active investigation to further our treatments for the disease.

Surgery with Radical Intent: Is There an Indication for G3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

BACKGROUND

While platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard treatment for advanced grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) according to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines, the role of radical-intended surgery in these patients, as well as the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, are still controversial. The aim of the present work is to describe, in a retrospective series of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) G3, the overall survival (OS) rate and risk factors for death after radical surgery. Secondary aims are the description of median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and of the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multicenter analysis of a series of stage I-III GEP-NEN G3 patients receiving radical surgery (R0/R1) with/without adjuvant chemotherapy was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients from eight neuroendocrine tumor (NET) referral centers, with median follow-up of 23 months (5-187 months) were evaluated. While 28.6% of cases had NET G3, 71.4% had neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 (NEC G3). The 2-year OS rate after radical surgery was 64.5%, with a statistically significant difference in terms of Ki67 threshold (cut-off 55%, P = 0.03) and tumor differentiation (NEC G3 vs. NET G3, P = 0.03). Median RFS after radical surgery was 14 months, and 2-year RFS rate was 44.9%. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy provided no benefit in terms of either OS or RFS in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery with radical intent might represent a valid option for GEP-NEN G3 patients with locoregional disease, especially with Ki67 value ≤ 55%.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Observation Following Resection for Patients With Nonmetastatic Poorly Differentiated Colorectal Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) provides a survival benefit in patients with nonmetastatic poorly differentiated colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (CRNECs) following resection.

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence to support the association between use of AC and improved overall survival (OS) in patients with CRNECs.

METHODS

Patients with resected non-metastatic CRNECs were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OS of patients in different treatment groups.

RESULTS

A total of 806 patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 met the study entry criteria. Of these, 394 patients (48.9%) received AC. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median OS was significantly longer for AC versus observation [57.4 (interquartile range, IQR, 14.8-153.8) vs 38.2 (IQR, 10.4-125.4) months; P = 0.007]. In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, AC was associated with a significant OS benefit [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.84; P < 0.001]. The results were consistent across subgroups stratified by pathologic T stage, pathologic N stage, and surgical margin status. Subgroup analysis according to tumor location demonstrated improved OS in the adjuvant therapy cohort among patients with left-sided neuroendocrine carcinomas (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.68), but not in those with right-sided disease (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nonmetastatic CRNECs may derive survival benefit from AC. These findings support current guidelines recommending AC in patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in the colon and rectum. Efforts in education and adherence to national guidelines for NECs are needed.

Management of Well-Differentiated High-Grade (G3) Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for pancreatic NET was updated to include a new category of well-differentiated high-grade (Ki 67 > 20%) pancreatic tumors (NET G3), distinct from high-grade poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). NET G3 are considered a molecularly, radiologically, and prognostically distinct entity compared to NEC and NET G1/G2. The optimal first-line management in NET G3 and sequencing therapies remains a challenge awaiting future trials taking into consideration the unique characteristics of this category. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence in the management of NET G3.

Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor G3 and Carcinoma G3 Should be Considered Separately

BACKGROUND

The role of surgery in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm grade 3 (pNEN-G3) treatment remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the role of surgery for pNEN-G3, which has recently been reclassified as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor-G3 (pNET-G3) and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma-G3 (pNEC-G3), with and without metastases, respectively.

METHODS

We analyzed a subgroup of patients from the Japanese pancreatic NEC study, a Japanese multicenter case-series study of pNEN-G3. Pathologists subclassified 67 patients as having pNET-G3 or pNEC-G3 based on morphological features. We compared the overall survival (OS) rates among patients who were grouped according to whether they had undergone tumor-targeted surgery for tumors without (SwoM) or with (SwM) metastases, or non-surgical procedures (NS).

RESULTS

Data from 21 patients with pNET-G3 (SwoM, n = 6; SwM, n = 5; NS, n = 10) and 46 patients with pNEC-G3 (SwoM, n = 8; SwM, n = 5; NS, n = 33) were analyzed. OS of patients with pNET-G3 was significantly longer after SwoM and SwM than with NS (p = 0.018 and p = 0.022). In contrast, OS did not significantly differ between either SwoM or SwM and NS (p = 0.093 and p = 0.489) among patients with pNEC-G3.

CONCLUSION

The role of surgery should be considered separately for pNET-G3 and pNEC-G3. Although SwoM and SwM can be considered for pNET-G3, caution is advised before considering SwM and SwoM for pNEC-G3.

Patterns of Recurrence after Resection for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Who, When, and Where?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pan-NENs) represent an increasingly common indication for pancreatic resection, but there are few data regarding possible recurrence after surgery. The aim of the study was to describe the frequency, timing, and patterns of recurrence after resection for pan-NENs with consequent implications for postoperative follow-up.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of pan-NENs resected between 1990 and 2015 at The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust. Predictors of recurrence were assessed. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier and conditional survival (CS) methods.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 487 patients with a median follow-up of 71 months. Recurrence developed in 12.3%: 54 (11.1%) liver metastases, 11 (2.3%) local recurrence, 10 (2.1%) nodal recurrence, and 8 (1.6%) metastases in other organs. Thirty-one (6.4%) died due to disease recurrence. Size > 21 mm, G3 grade, nodal metastasis, and vascular infiltration were independent predictors of overall recurrence. Recurrence occurred either during the first year of follow-up (n = 9), or after 10 years (n = 4). CS analysis revealed that nonfunctioning G1 pan-NEN ≤20 mm without nodal metastasis or vascular invasion had a negligible risk of developing recurrence. In the present series, after 5 years of follow-up without developing recurrence, tumor recurrence occurred only in the form of liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of pan-NENs is rare and is predicted by tumor size, nodal metastasis, grading, and vascular invasion. Patients with G1 pan-NEN without nodal metastasis and vascular invasion may be considered cured by surgery. After 5 years without recurrence, follow-up should focus on excluding the development of liver metastases.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology: An analysis of 14 patients

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported to be a useful marker for diagnosing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs). However, INSM1 expression in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology has not been examined. We evaluated INSM1 expression in the cytology of cases diagnosed with PNETs.

METHODS

We immunocytochemically stained INSM1 and Ki-67 in 14 PNET cases, and according to the 2017 World Health Organisation criteria, seven PNET Grade 1 cases, four Grade 2 cases and three Grade 3/neuroendocrine carcinoma cases were identified. As a control for INSM1 and Ki-67 expression, we used cytological specimens from 15 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

In PNET cases, INSM1-expressing tumour cells were identified in all cytological specimens of PNET. The median INSM1 expression rate in Grade 1 cases was 49.8% (mean ± standard deviation: 55.1 ± 12.5%, min: 39.3%, max: 74.1%), and in Grade 2 and Grade 3/neuroendocrine carcinoma cases was 81.1% (mean ± standard deviation: 77.6 ± 18.6%, min: 50.3%, max: 100%). However, there was no correlation between INSM1 and Ki-67 expression (r = -0.15). The median expression rate in PNET cases was 64.3%, which was significantly higher than that in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cases (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

INSM1 immunocytochemistry of cytological specimens obtained from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology can accurately diagnose PNETs; therefore, INSM1 could be an important diagnostic tool in assessing therapeutic strategies, including molecular-targeted therapy.

Systematic review of current prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare tumors whose natural history remains poorly defined. Accurate prognostication of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is essential for guiding clinical decisions. This paper aims to summarize all the commonly utilized and recently proposed prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms published in the literature to date.

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases, of the period from January 1, 2000-November 29, 2016, was conducted to identify all published articles reporting on prognostication systems of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles were included in our review, and a total of 25 classification systems were identified. There were 2 modifications of the World Health Organization 2004 criteria, 4 modifications of the World Health Organization 2010 criteria, 2 modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2010 staging system, 3 modifications of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 tumor, node, metastasis staging system, 7 novel categorial classification systems, and 2 novel proposed continuous classifications. The most commonly included variables included age, size of tumor, presence of distant and lymph node metastases, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count.

CONCLUSION

Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, of which the most commonly used systems presently include the World Health Organization 2010 criteria and the two tumor, node, metastasis staging systems by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society and the American Joint Commission on Cancer. However, prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms continue to evolve with time as more prognostication factors are identified. More validation and comparative studies are needed to identify the most effective prognostication system.

Exploring the surgical landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia in Austria: Results from the ASSO pNEN study group

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (pNEN) show increasing incidence and management is complex due to biological heterogeneity. Most publications report isolated high-volume single-centre data. This Austrian multi-centre study on surgical management of pNENs provides a comprehensive real-life picture of quality indicators, recurrence-patterns, survival factors and systemic treatments.

METHODS

Retrospective, national cohort-study from 7 medium-/high-volume centres in Austria, coordinated under the auspices of the Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology (ASSO).

RESULTS

Two-hundred patients underwent resection for pNEN, 177 had non-functioning tumours and 31 showed stage 4 disease. Participating centres were responsible for 2/3 of pNEN resections in Austria within the last years. The mean rate of completeness of variables was 98.6%. Ninety-days mortality was 3.5%, overall rate of complications was 42.5%. Morbidity did not influence long-term survival. The 5-year overall-survival (OS) was 81.3%, 10-year-OS 52.5% and 5-year recurrence-free-survival (RFS) 69.8%. Recurrence was most common in the liver (68.1%). Four out of five patients with recurrence underwent further treatment, most commonly with medical therapy or chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis revealed grading (HR:2.7) and metastasis (HR:2.5) as significant factors for relapse. Tumours-size ≥2 cm (HR:5.9), age ≥60 years (HR:3.1), metastasis (HR:2.3) and grading (HR:2.0) were associated with OS. Tumours <2 cm showed 93.9% 10-year-OS, but 33% had G2/G3 grading, 12.5% positive lymph-nodes and 4.7% metastasis at diagnosis, each associated with significant worse survival.

CONCLUSION

Resection of pNENs in Austria is performed with internationally comparable safety. Analysed factors allow for risk-stratification in clinical treatment and future prospective trials. A watch-and-wait strategy purely based on tumour-size cannot be recommended.

The Problem of High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors, Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, and Beyond

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors or poorly differentiated small/large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Distinguishing these entities relies on different genetic backgrounds and resulting different biology. The new classification creates several problems. Almost all clinical treatment data on neuroendocrine neoplasms do not stratify between well and poorly differentiated, providing insufficient help in treatment selection. Treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms should separate between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinoma, and depends on primary tumor site, stage, proliferation rate, and clinical course. This article addresses how to diagnose and treat gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, focusing on well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors versus neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPNETs): a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors represent 13% of all neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study is to analyze the phenotype and biologic behavior of resected cystic neuroendocrine tumors. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted until September 2016 using a search in Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE with the terms "cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm", "cystic islets tumors" and "cystic islets neoplasms". From the 795 citations recovered 80 studies reporting on 431 patients were selected. 87.1% (n = 387) were sporadic tumors and 10.3% (n = 40) corresponded to multiple endocrine neoplasia endocrine type 1. Were diagnosed incidentally 44.6% (n = 135). Cytology was found to have a sensitivity of 78.5%. Were non-functional tumors 85% (n = 338), and among the functional tumors, insulinoma was the most frequent. According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, 87.8% were limited to the pancreas (I-IIb), and 12.2% were advanced (III-IV). Disease-free survival at 5 years in stages (I-IIIa) and (IIIb-IV) was 91.5% and 54.2%, respectively; and was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in functional tumors. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia there was a higher incidence of functional (62.5%) and multifocal (28.1%) tumors. Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 60%. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors exhibit phenotypical characteristics which are different to those of solid neuroendocrine tumors.

Open issues on G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms: back to the future

The recent recognition that grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) can be divided into two different categories according to the histopathological differentiation, that is G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and G3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) has generated a lot of interest concerning not only the diagnosis, but also the differential management of such new group of NENs. However, several issues need to be fully clarified in order to put G3 NETs and G3 NECs in the right place. The aim of this review is to focus on those issues that are still undetermined starting from the current knowledge, evaluating the available evidence and the possible clinical implications.

Biology and Systemic Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

In recent years, there have been important scientific advances in the biologic characterization of neuroendocrine neoplasms and in their treatment. This review will describe these scientific advances, the evolving systemic treatment approaches, and important topics to be addressed in future research.

Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms using pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in prospective evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) grading. A total of 25 histologically proven patients with pNENs (30 lesions in total) who underwent DCE-MRI were enrolled. Lesions were divided into G1, G2 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and G3 NET/neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) groups based on their histological findings according to 2017 World Health Organization Neuroendocrine Tumor Classification Guideline. In addition, the same numbers of tumor-free regions were selected using as normal control group. For each group, pharmacokinetic DCE parameters: volume transfer constant (K^trans); contrast transfer rate constant (k_ep); extravascular extracellular space volume fraction (v_e); and plasma volume fraction (v_p) were calculated with Extended Tofts Linear model. Receiver operator characteristics analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic efficacy of these parameters in pNENs grading. There were significant differences of K^trans, k_ep, v_e and v_p between tumor-free areas and G1, G2 NET (P<0.001). The K^trans and k_ep of G1 NET were significantly lower compared with those of G2 ones (P<0.005). The area under the curve of K^trans and k_ep in differentiating G2 from G1 NET were 0.767 and 0.846, respectively. When K^trans was >0.667 and k_ep >1.644, the sensitivity of diagnosing G2 NET was the lowest (53.85%), but the specificity was the highest (93.75%). When K^trans was >0.667 or k_ep >1.644, the sensitivity of diagnosing G2 NET was 92.31%, but the specificity was 75.00%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of DCE-MRI, particularly the quantitative values of K^trans and k_ep, are helpful for differentiating G2 NET from G1 ones.

Preoperative imaging and pathologic classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET), whether hormonally secretory or not, is multidisciplinary and often multimodal. Surgical treatment plays a central role because complete resection is the only potentially curative treatment. The choice of the therapeutic plan for a PNET requires precise localization of the primary tumor (which may sometimes be multiple in case of genetic predisposition), confirmation of the diagnosis of PNET, a search for metastases (mainly hepatic), and identification of the main histoprognostic factors. This update focuses on the WHO 2017 histological classification and recent innovations in the preoperative assessment of PNET using conventional and isotopic imaging. The aim is to not only allow the mapping of primary and metastatic lesions but also to predict tumor aggressiveness.

Competitive Testing of the WHO 2010 versus the WHO 2017 Grading of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Data from a Large International Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) modified the grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from a three-tier (WHO-AJCC 2010) to a four-tier system by introducing the novel category of NET G3 (WHO-AJCC 2017).

OBJECTIVES

This study aims at validating the WHO-AJCC 2017 and identifying the most effective grading system.

METHOD

A total of 2,102 patients were enrolled; entry criteria were: (i) patient underwent surgery; (ii) at least 2 years of follow-up; (iii) observation time up to 2015. Data from 34 variables were collected; grading was assessed and compared for efficacy by statistical means including Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis, Harrell's C statistics, and Royston's explained variation in univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

In descriptive analysis, the two grading systems demonstrated statistically significant differences for the major category sex but not for age groups. In Cox regression analysis, both grading systems showed statistically significant differences between grades for OS and EFS; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two G3 classes of WHO-AJCC 2017. In multivariable analysis for the two models fitted to compare efficacy, the two grading systems performed equally well with substantially similar optimal discrimination and well-explained variation for both OS and EFS. The WHO-AJCC 2017 grading system retained statistically significant difference between the two G3 classes for OS but not for EFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO-AJCC 2017 grading system is at least equally performing as the WHO-AJCC 2010 but allows the successful identification of the most aggressive PanNET subgroup. Grading is confirmed as probably the most powerful tool for predicting patient survival.

Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: A SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases

BACKGROUND

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are poorly studied and are managed similar to lung NECs, which may not account for differences between the 2 groups of tumors as well as the heterogeneity within extrapulmonary NEC.

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1973 and 2012 were used to estimate the relative percentages of lung NECs and subgroups of extrapulmonary NECs, epidemiological patterns at these sites, and the median and 5-year overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Of 162,983 NEC cases, 14,732 were extrapulmonary; of these, 5509 were gastrointestinal (37.44%), 4151 were of unknown primary (28.2%), and 5072 were of other sites (34.4%). Lung NEC had the highest percentage of small cell morphology (95.2%) and gastrointestinal NEC had the least (38.7%), with the rest being other morphologies. Significant differences were noted with regard to median age (range, 48-74 years), percentage of cases of distant stage disease (24%-77%), and incidence according to sex and race. The median survival of patients with lung NEC was 7.6 months, that for patients with gastrointestinal NEC was 7.5 months (range, 25.1 months for NEC at the small intestine to 5.7 months for NEC at the pancreas), and that for patients with unknown NEC was 2.5 months. The 5-year survival rate for patients with local stage disease ranged from 58% to 60% for NECs of the female genital tract and small intestine to 25% for esophageal NECs. The primary tumor site remained statistically significant for survival even after adjusting for known prognostic variables (P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the largest study of NECs performed to date and also the first with comprehensive epidemiological data. Significant differences in incidence patterns and large variations in survival depending on anatomical site and morphological subtype were noted. A curative approach is possible for patients with nonmetastatic NECs. Cancer 2018;124:807-15. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Chemotherapy in NETs: When and how

The majority of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are well-differentiated tumours that follow an indolent course, in contrast to a minority of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) which exhibit an aggressive course and assocaited with an overall short survival. Although surgery is the only curative treatment for NETs it is not always feasible,necessitating the application of other therapies including chemotherapy. Streptozotocin (STZ)-based regimens have long been used for advanced or metastatic well-to-moderately differentiated (G1-G2) NETs, especially those originating from the pancreas (pNETs). In poorly differentiated grade 3 (G3) tumours, platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended as first-line therapy, albeit without durable responses. Although data for temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy are still evolving, this treatment may replace STZ-based regimens in pNETs due to its better tolerability and side effect profile. In addition, there is evidence that TMZ could also be used in the subgroup of well-differentiated G3 NETs. There is less clear-cut evidence of a benefit for chemotherapy in intestinal NETs, but still evolving data suggest that TMZ may be efficacious in particular patients. In lung and thymic carcinoids, chemotherapy is reserved for patients with progressive metastatic disease in whom other treatment options are unavailable. Overall, chemotherapy is indicated in patients who have progressed on first-line treatment with somatostatin analogues, have extensive tumour load or exhibit rapid growth following a period of follow-up, and/or have a high proliferative rate; it may occasionally can be used in a neo-adjuvant setting. Prospective randomised studies are awaited to substantiate the role of chemotherapy in the therapeutic algorithm of NETs along with other evolving treatments.

Prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1: Results from the DutchMEN1 Study Group

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study using the Dutch National MEN1 database, which includes >90% of the Dutch MEN1 population with data collected between 1990 and 2014. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks from the largest resected PanNET per patient were collected. MIB1 staining was performed and KI67 labeling index (LI) was determined by manual eye-counting under a microscope and by digital image analysis. Mitotic count was evaluated from hematoxylin & eosin stains. Association between WHO grade and (time until) development of liver metastases was calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine MEN1 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were included. Ten patients (14%) developed liver metastases and all had PanNETs ≥3 cm. WHO G1, G2 and G3 PanNETs were seen in 83% (n = 57), 16% (n = 11) and 1% (n = 1) respectively. In non-functioning PanNETs >2 cm, liver metastases occurred in 80% of WHO G2 PanNETs (4/5) compared to 23% (5/22) in WHO G1 PanNETs (p = 0.03) when WHO grade was based on mitotic count only. This significant association was not seen for WHO grade based on Ki67 LI. After five years, liver metastases in non-functioning PanNETs were not seen in tumors ≤2 cm, in 10% of the large WHO G1 (according to mitotic count only) tumors and in 60% of large WHO G2 tumors (p-value 0.000).

CONCLUSION

High mitotic count is correlated with poor prognosis in MEN1 patients with large non-functioning PanNETs.

A Practical Approach to the Classification of WHO Grade 3 (G3) Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor (WD-NET) and Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (PD-NEC) of the Pancreas

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (World Health Organization [WHO] G3) of the pancreas include both well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WD-NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-NEC). According to the WHO classification scheme, the diagnosis of this group of tumors is based on both the histopathology of the tumor and the assessment of proliferation fraction. However, the former can be challenging due to the lack of well-defined histologic criteria, and the latter alone (ie, >20 mitoses/10 high-power fields or Ki67>20%) may not sufficiently distinguish WD-NETs from PD-NECs. Given the considerable differences in treatment strategies and clinical outcome, additional practical modalities are required to facilitate the accurate diagnosis of high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. We examined 33 cases of WHO G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas and attempted to classify them into WD-NET, small cell PD-NEC (PD-NEC-SCC), and large cell PD-NEC (PD-NEC-LCC) or to designate them as "ambiguous" when an uncertain diagnosis was rendered by any of the observers or there was any disagreement in classification among the 3 observers. To simplify the interpretation, both PD-NEC-SCC and PD-NEC-LCC were considered together as PD-NECs in the final analysis. The initial approach was to assess microscopically a single morphologically challenging hematoxylin and eosin section from each case without the knowledge of Ki67 values, performed independently by 3 pathologists to assess the degree of diagnostic concordance, and then evaluate immunohistochemical staining for surrogate biomarkers of known genotypes of WD-NET and PD-NEC, respectively, and, lastly, complete a clinicopathologic review to establish a final definitive classification. Loss of DAXX or ATRX protein expression defined WD-NET, and abnormal p53, Rb, SMAD4 expression signified PD-NEC. When the chosen section displayed an element of WD histopathology, or other tumor sections contained WHO G1/G2 components, or there had been a prior established diagnosis of a primary WD-NET, the final diagnosis was rendered as a WD-NET with high-grade (G3) progression. If a component of conventional adenocarcinoma was present (in slides not seen in the initial review), the diagnosis was established as a combined adenocarcinoma and PD-NEC. All 3 pathologists agreed on the morphologic classification of 33% of the cases (6 WD-NET, 3 PD-NEC-SCC, and 2 PD-NEC-LCC), were conflicted on 2 cases between PD-NEC-SCC and PD-NEC-LCC, and disagreed or were uncertain on the classification for the remaining 20 cases (61%), which were therefore categorized as ambiguous. In the group of cases in which all pathologists agreed on the classification, the 6 WD-NET cases had either loss of DAXX or ATRX or had evidence of a WD-NET based on additional or prior pathology slides. The 7 PD-NEC cases had abnormal expression of p53, Rb, and/or SMAD4 or a coexisting adenocarcinoma. In the ambiguous group (n=20), 14 cases were established as WD-NETs, based upon loss of DAXX or ATRX in 7 cases and additional pathology evidence of high-grade progression from WD-NET in the other 7 cases; 5 cases were established as PD-NEC based upon abnormal expression of p53, Rb, and/or SMAD4; 1 case remained undetermined with normal expression of all markers and no evidence of entity-defining histologic findings in other slides. On the basis of the final pathologic classifications, the disease-specific survival was 75 and 11 months for the WD-NET and PD-NEC groups, respectively. Thus, we conclude that morphologic diagnosis of high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is challenging, especially when limited pathologic materials are available, and necessitates better defined criteria. The analysis of both additional sections and prior material, along with an immunohistochemical evaluation, can facilitate accurate diagnosis in the majority of cases and guide the appropriate clinical management and prognosis.

May we challenge the ENETS guidelines in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms? A quiz for French experts

INTRODUCTION

Recent guidelines have been published by a consensus of international experts (2016 ENETS (European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society) guidelines). Nevertheless, in case of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNEN) the ENETS guidelines fail to propose a unique strategy in some situations, due to the lack of high-level of evidence and the absence of formal agreement between the experts drawing up the guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey of 25 questions on panNEN was sent to 104 French experts challenging the guidelines. Questions focused on clinical situations in localized G-1/2 panNEN, localized G-3 panNEN, metastatic G-1/2 panNEN, and metastatic G-3 panNEN for which multiple options were proposed by the ENETS guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven experts (55%) have answered the survey. 18/25 questions obtained at least 50% similar responses, allowing a "consensus" or a "position statement". Among the results, surgery of small panNEN is preferred to surveillance in young patients; the temozolomide-capecitabine combination is favored instead of streptozotocin-based chemotherapy for G-1/2 metastatic panNEN.

CONCLUSION

French experts are mostly in line with the European guidelines, but some differences do exist. Whilst waiting for prospective studies, this survey helps physicians to propose standardized procedures and identifies situations where a step forward has been enabled by French experts. This questionnaire paves the way for a simplified therapeutic algorithm of panNEN.