1
|
Lamperti M, Romero CS, Guarracino F, Cammarota G, Vetrugno L, Tufegdzic B, Lozsan F, Macias Frias JJ, Duma A, Bock M, Ruetzler K, Mulero S, Reuter DA, La Via L, Rauch S, Sorbello M, Afshari A. Preoperative assessment of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024:00003643-990000000-00227. [PMID: 39492705 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When considering whether a patient is fit for surgery, a comprehensive patient assessment represents the first step for an anaesthetist to evaluate the risks associated with the procedure and the patient's underlying diseases, and to optimise (whenever possible) the perioperative surgical journey. These guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (ESAIC) update previous guidelines to provide new evidence on existing and emerging topics that consider the different aspects of the patient's surgical path. DESIGN A comprehensive literature review focused on organisation, clinical facets, optimisation and planning. The methodological quality of the studies included was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. A Delphi process agreed on the wording of recommendations, and clinical practice statements (CPS) supported by minimal evidence. A draft version of the guidelines was published on the ESAIC website for 4 weeks, and the link was distributed to all ESAIC members, both individual and national, encompassing most European national anaesthesia societies. Feedback was gathered and incorporated into the guidelines accordingly. Following the finalisation of the draft, the Guidelines Committee and ESAIC Board officially approved the guidelines. RESULTS In the first phase of the guidelines update, 17 668 titles were initially identified. After removing duplicates and restricting the search period from 1 January 2018 to 3 May 2023, the number of titles was reduced to 16 774, which were then screened, yielding 414 abstracts. Among these, 267 relevant abstracts were identified from which 204 appropriate titles were selected for a comprehensive GRADE analysis. Additionally, the study considered 4 reviews, 16 meta-analyses, 9 previously published guidelines, 58 prospective cohort studies and 83 retrospective studies. The guideline provides 55 evidence-based recommendations that were voted on by a Delphi process, reaching a solid consensus (>90% agreement). DISCUSSION This update of the previous guidelines has covered new organisational and clinical aspects of the preoperative anaesthesia assessment to provide a more objective evaluation of patients with a high risk of postoperative complications requiring intensive care. Telemedicine and more predictive preoperative scores and biomarkers should guide the anaesthetist in selecting the appropriate preoperative blood tests, x-rays, and so forth for each patient, allowing the anaesthetist to assess the risks and suggest the most appropriate anaesthetic plan. CONCLUSION Each patient should have a tailored assessment of their fitness to undergo procedures requiring the involvement of an anaesthetist. The anaesthetist's role is essential in this phase to obtain a broad vision of the patient's clinical conditions, to coordinate care and to help the patient reach an informed decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Lamperti
- From the Anesthesiology Division, Integrated Hospital Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (ML, BT, SM), Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University General Hospital of Valencia (CSR). Department of Methodology, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Spain (CSR), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Cardiothoracic and vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Pisa (FG), Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara (GC), Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy (LV), Péterfy Sándor Hospital, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit. Budapest, Hungary (FL), Servei d'Anestesiologia i Medicina Periopeatòria, Hospital General de Granollers, Spain (JJMF), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Tulln, Austria (AD), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano - Meran, Italy (MB), Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University and Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria (MB), the Outcomes Research Consortium, Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (KR), Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany (DAR), Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy (LLV), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano - Meran (SR), Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Kore University, Enna (SR), Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, Ragusa, Italy (SR), Rigshospitalet & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen (MS) and Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Denmark University of Copenhagen, Denmark (AA)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Post-extraction bleeding complications in patients on uninterrupted dual antiplatelet therapy-a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 25:507-514. [PMID: 32572638 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03410-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental surgeons consider patients on antiplatelet therapy (APT) to be at a risk for perioperative bleeding during dental extraction. This fear often prompts them to consider a temporary withdrawal of the medication for a few days before extraction. Such withdrawal can have serious consequences, especially in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to analyze if patients on uninterrupted DAPT undergoing dental extractions had an increased risk of bleeding complications when compared with patients on no antiplatelet therapy. METHODS This prospective study included 120 DAPT patients and an equal number of age- and gender-matched non-APT patients undergoing dental extractions. Immediate and delayed bleeding complications in both groups were recorded. Interventions required to control the post-extraction hemorrhage were also analyzed. RESULTS Duration of DAPT medication ranged from 6 months to 13 years. Post-percutaneous coronary intervention was the most common cause for DAPT. A vast majority of patients in both groups underwent extraction of one or two teeth. Patients on DAPT had a 7-fold increased risk of immediate bleeding complications when compared with control group. All bleeding episodes were controlled with local hemostatic measures. Transalveolar extractions and localized periodontitis had a significant relationship to bleeding complications. CONCLUSION This study observed an increase in the risk of prolonged bleeding in uninterrupted DAPT patients undergoing dental extractions. Bleeding episodes were amenable to local hemostatic measures with favorable outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Dental extractions in patients on uninterrupted DAPT can be done safely. Resorting to temporary withdrawal of DAPT due to a fear of excessive bleeding is unnecessary.
Collapse
|
3
|
Doganay O, Atalay B, Karadag E, Aga U, Tugrul M. Bleeding frequency of patients taking ticagrelor, aspirin, clopidogrel, and dual antiplatelet therapy after tooth extraction and minor oral surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 2019; 149:132-138. [PMID: 29389336 DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.09.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative bleeding complications of ticagrelor, a newer oral antiplatelet, has not been studied in dentistry. Studies about bleeding status after oral surgical procedures in patients receiving continued antiplatelet therapy are also limited. We investigated the effects of continuing aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or dual antiplatelet therapy on the frequency of bleeding events in patients undergoing tooth extractions or minor oral surgery. METHODS In this retrospective study, patient demographic characteristics, medical history, type of antiplatelet therapy, dental procedures, and perioperative bleeding associated with tooth extraction or other minor oral surgical procedures were obtained from the dental records of 222 patients. Bleeding was classified as normal, mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS One hundred sixty-eight patients (75.7%) had 1 or more teeth extracted, and 54 patients (24.3%) underwent other minor oral surgical procedures. The most common single antiplatelet regimen was aspirin (n = 123; 55.4%), followed by clopidogrel (n = 22; 9.9%) and ticagrelor (n = 17; 7.7%). Sixty patients (27%) received dual antiplatelet therapy. The overall frequency of postoperative bleeding was 4.9% (11 of 222). The frequencies of postoperative bleeding in the aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and dual antiplatelet therapy groups were 3.2%, 4.5%, 5.9%, and 8.3%, respectively (P ≥ .5). None of the patients experienced prolonged bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Patients taking aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and dual antiplatelet therapy experienced acceptable rates of controllable postoperative bleeding after tooth extraction or minor oral surgical procedures. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS In accordance with recommendations from published studies and guidelines, antiplatelet medications, including dual antiplatelet therapy, should not be interrupted for tooth extractions or minor oral surgery.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sierra P, Gómez-Luque A, Llau JV, Ferrandis R, Cassinello C, Hidalgo F. Recommendations for perioperative antiplatelet treatment in non-cardiac surgery. Working Group of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology-Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, Division of Haemostasis, Transfusion Medicine, and Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Update of the Clinical practice guide 2018. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 66:18-36. [PMID: 30166124 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P Sierra
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Fundación Puigvert (IUNA), Barcelona, España.
| | - A Gómez-Luque
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España
| | - J V Llau
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Hospital Dr. Peset, Universitat de València, Valencia, España
| | - R Ferrandis
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Hopital Clínic i Universitari La Fe, Universitat de València, Valencia, España
| | - C Cassinello
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España
| | - F Hidalgo
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Regan DW, Kashiwagi D, Dougan B, Sundsted K, Mauck K. Update in perioperative medicine: practice changing evidence published in 2016. Hosp Pract (1995) 2017; 45:158-164. [PMID: 28749248 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1359060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This summary reviews 18 key articles published in 2016 which have significant practice implications for the perioperative medical care of surgical patients. Due to the multi-disciplinary nature of the practice of perioperative medicine, important new evidence is published in journals representing a variety of medical and surgical specialties. Keeping current with the evidence that drives best practice in perioperative medicine is therefore challenging. We set out to identify, critically review, and summarize key evidence which has the most potential for practice change. We integrated the new evidence into the existing body of medical knowledge and identified practical implications for real world patient care. The articles address issues related to anticoagulation, transfusion threshold, immunosuppressive medications, postoperative delirium, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, postoperative pain management, perioperative management of antihypertensives, perioperative fasting, and perioperative diabetic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis W Regan
- a General Internal Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | | | - Brian Dougan
- a General Internal Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Karna Sundsted
- a General Internal Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Karen Mauck
- a General Internal Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| |
Collapse
|