1
|
Williams FR, Vallance A, Faulkner T, Towey J, Durman S, Kyte D, Elsharkawy AM, Perera T, Holt A, Ferguson J, Lord JM, Armstrong MJ. Home-Based Exercise in Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Feasibility Study. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:995-1006. [PMID: 30859755 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Frailty is associated with increased mortality both before and after liver transplantation (LT). There are no standardized exercise programs, in particular home-based exercise programs (HBEPs), for patients awaiting LT. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of such a program in patients awaiting LT. Patients were randomly selected from the Birmingham LT waiting list and provided with a 12-week HBEP, including average daily step (ADS) targets and twice-weekly resistance exercises. Feasibility was based on patient eligibility (≥66% of waiting list), target recruitment (≥90% of n = 20), safety (no related serious adverse events), and adherence (≥66% adherence to 6-week HBEP). Measures of aerobic (incremental shuttle walk test [ISWT], ADS), functional capacity (short physical performance battery test [SPPBT]), and health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and hospital anxiety and depression score [HADS]) were taken at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks. 18 patients (50% male; median age, 55 years) were recruited. All domains of the study feasibility criteria were met. ISWT improved after 6 weeks (50 m; P ≤ 0.01) and 12 weeks (210 m; P ≤ 0.01), despite withdrawal of the telephone health calls. Similarly, improvements were seen in ADS (2700/day; P ≤ 0.01) and the SPPBT (2.5; P = 0.02) after 12 weeks. There was no difference in HADS (median difference [MD] -3; P = 0.69), but EQ-5D-5L after 12 weeks (17.5%; P = 0.04). In conclusion, a 12-week HBEP, incorporating both easy-to-apply resistance and aerobic exercises, is safe and feasible in patients awaiting LT. Measures of aerobic and functional capacity demonstrate trends toward improvement that warrant further investigation in a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Rhian Williams
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Vallance
- Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Faulkner
- Department of Anaesthesia, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Towey
- Department of Dietetics, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Durman
- Advanced Personal Trainer, Virgin Active Solihull, Solihull, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Kyte
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Mohamed Elsharkawy
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Thamara Perera
- Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Holt
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Ferguson
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janet M Lord
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Medical Research Council Arthritis Research UK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew James Armstrong
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gillis C, Buhler K, Bresee L, Carli F, Gramlich L, Culos-Reed N, Sajobi TT, Fenton TR. Effects of Nutritional Prehabilitation, With and Without Exercise, on Outcomes of Patients Who Undergo Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:391-410.e4. [PMID: 29750973 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 296] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although there have been meta-analyses of the effects of exercise-only prehabilitation on patients undergoing colorectal surgery, little is known about the effects of nutrition-only (oral nutritional supplements with and without counseling) and multimodal (oral nutritional supplements with and without counseling and with exercise) prehabilitation on clinical outcomes and patient function after surgery. We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis to determine the individual and combined effects of nutrition-only and multimodal prehabilitation compared with no prehabilitation (control) on outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal resection. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and ProQuest for cohort and randomized controlled studies of adults awaiting colorectal surgery who received at least 7 days of nutrition prehabilitation with or without exercise. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled risk ratio for categorical data and the weighted mean difference for continuous variables. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay; the secondary outcome was recovery of functional capacity based on results of a 6-minute walk test. RESULTS We identified 9 studies (5 randomized controlled studies and 4 cohort studies) composed of 914 patients undergoing colorectal surgery (438 received prehabilitation and 476 served as controls). Receipt of any prehabilitation significantly decreased days spent in the hospital compared with controls (weighted mean difference of length of hospital stay = -2.2 days; 95% confidence interval = -3.5 to -0.9). Only 3 studies reported on functional outcomes but could not be pooled owing to methodologic heterogeneity. In the individual studies, multimodal prehabilitation significantly improved results of the 6-minute walk test at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery compared with standard Enhanced Recovery Pathway care and at 8 weeks compared with standard Enhanced Recovery Pathway care with added rehabilitation. The 4 observational studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that nutritional prehabilitation alone or combined with an exercise program significantly decreased length of hospital stay by 2 days in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. There is some evidence that multimodal prehabilitation accelerated the return to presurgical functional capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsia Gillis
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Katherine Buhler
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lauren Bresee
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Francesco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Leah Gramlich
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nicole Culos-Reed
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tolulope T Sajobi
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tanis R Fenton
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Nutrition Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|