1
|
Arnelo U, Valente R, Scandavini CM, Halimi A, Mucelli RMP, Rangelova E, Svensson J, Schulick RD, Torphy RJ, Fagerström N, Moro CF, Vujasinovic M, Matthias Löhr J, Del Chiaro M. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy can improve the detection of skip lesions during surgery for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia: A pilot study. Pancreatology 2023; 23:704-711. [PMID: 37336668 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intraoperative pancreatoscopy is a promising procedure that might guide surgical resection for suspected main duct (MD) and mixed type (MT) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of intraoperative pancreatoscopy in patients operated on for MD and MT-IPMNs. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing surgery for suspected MD or MT-IPMN underwent intraoperative pancreatoscopy and frozen section analysis. In all patients who required extended resection due to pancreatoscopic findings, we compared the final histology with the results of the intraoperative frozen section analysis. RESULTS In total, 46 patients, 48% females, mean age (range) 67 years (45-82 years) underwent intraoperative pancreatoscopy. No mortality or procedure related complications were observed. Pancreatoscopy changed the operative course in 30 patients (65%), leading to extended resections in 20 patients (43%) and to parenchyma sparing procedures in 10 patients (22%). Analyzing the group of patients who underwent extended resections, 7 (35%) displayed lesions that needed further surgical treatment (six high grade dysplasia and one with G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor) and among those 7, just 1 (14%) would have been detected exclusively with histological frozen section analysis of the transection margin. The combination of both pancreatoscopy and frozen section analysis lead to 86% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the detection of pathological tissue in the remnant pancreas. CONCLUSION Intraoperative pancreatoscopy is a safe and feasible procedure and might allow the detection of skip lesions during surgery for suspect MD-involving IPMNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urban Arnelo
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Roberto Valente
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Asif Halimi
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Raffaella M Pozzi Mucelli
- Department of Radiology Huddinge, Karolinska University Hospital, O-huset 42, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery at Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Svensson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert J Torphy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Niklas Fagerström
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carlos Fernández Moro
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Miroslav Vujasinovic
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes Matthias Löhr
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Upper GI Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schleimer LE, Chabot JA, Kluger MD. Innovation in the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Same Operations, Narrower Indications, and an Individualized Approach to Decision-Making. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:655-677. [PMID: 37245941 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Historically, the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) has been operative. Early intervention for premalignant lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), offers an opportunity to prevent pancreatic cancer-with potential decrement to patients' short-term and long-term health. The operations performed have remained fundamentally the same, with most patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy using oncologic principles. The role of parenchymal-sparing resection and total pancreatectomy remains controversial. We review innovations in the surgical management of PCN, focusing on the evolution of evidence-based guidelines, short-term and long-term outcomes, and individualized risk-benefit assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Schleimer
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 8 Garden South, New York, NY 10032, USA. https://twitter.com/lschleim
| | - John A Chabot
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Herbert Irving Pavilion, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, Suite 819, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael D Kluger
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Herbert Irving Pavilion, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, Suite 823, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramia JM, Cugat E, De la Plaza R, Gomez-Bravo MA, Martín E, Muñoz-Bellvis L, Padillo FJ, Sabater L, Serradilla-Martín M. Clinical decisions in pancreatic cancer surgery: a national survey and case-vignette study. Updates Surg 2023; 75:115-131. [PMID: 36376560 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01415-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Very few surveys have been carried out of oncosurgical decisions made in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC), or of the possible differences in therapeutic approaches between low/medium and high-volume centers. A survey was sent out to centers affiliated to the Spanish Group of Pancreatic Surgery (GECP) asking about their usual pre-, intra- and post-operative management of PC patients and describing five imaginary cases of PC corresponding to common scenarios that surgeons regularly assess in oncosurgical meetings. A consensus was considered to have been reached when 80% of the answers coincided. We received 69 responses from the 72 GECP centers (response rate 96%). Pre-operative management: consensus was obtained on 7/16 questions (43.75%) with no significant differences between low- vs high-volume centers. Intra-operative: consensus was obtained on 11/28 questions (39.3%). D2 lymphadenectomy, biliary culture, intra-operative biliary margin study, pancreatojejunostomy, and two loops were significantly more frequent in high-volume hospitals (p < 0.05). Post-operative: consensus was obtained on 2/8 questions (25%). No significant differences were found between low-/medium- vs high-volume hospitals. Of the 41 questions asked regarding the cases, consensus was reached on 22 (53.7%). No differences in the responses were found according to the type of hospital. Management and cases: consensus was reached in 42/93 questions (45.2%). At GECP centers, consensus was obtained on 45% of the questions. Only 5% of the answers differed between low/medium and high-volume centers (all intra-operative). A more specific assessment of why high-volume centers obtain the best results would require the design of complex prospective studies able to measure the therapeutic decisions made and the effectiveness of their execution. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04755036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Sol Naciente 8, 16D, 03016, Alicante, Spain. .,Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
| | - Esteban Cugat
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Puyol and Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto De la Plaza
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | | | - Elena Martín
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Muñoz-Bellvis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Universidad de Salamanca and Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium-CIBER-CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Francisco J Padillo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| | - Luis Sabater
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico, Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mario Serradilla-Martín
- Department of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prognostic impact of conservative surgery for pancreatic IPMNs. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101582. [PMID: 33892432 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent of pancreatic resection for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) remains an unresolved issue. The study aims at analyzing the prognostic impact of conservative surgery (CS) i.e. of pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy, versus total pancreatectomy (TP), for pancreatic IPMNs. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed and compared data of patients who had undergone pancreatic resection for IPMNs at our center between November 2007 and April 2019. Patients were divided into two main groups based on the extent of surgery: TP-group and CS-group. Subsequently, the perioperative and the long-term outcomes were compared. Moreover, a sub-group analysis of patients with IPMN alone and patients with malignant IPMN, based on preoperative indications to surgery and post-operative histopathological findings, was also performed. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were included in the TP-group and 73 in the CS-group. In 50 (39.7%) cases the frozen section changed the pre-operative surgical planning, with an extension of the pancreatic resection, in 43 (34.1%) cases up to a total pancreatectomy. Twenty-six patients (20.6%) with low-grade dysplasia at the frozen section underwent CS, while twenty (15.8%) underwent TP. Comparing these two sub-groups no differences were found in surgical IPMN recurrence, nor progression. The rate of overall postoperative complications was 56.6% in the TP-group and 57.5% in the CS-group (p = 0.940). Fifteen patients (20.5%) developed diabetes in the CS-group. None of the patients treated with CS developed a surgical IPMN recurrence or progression during the follow-up period. Comparing OS and DFS of the two groups, we did not find any statistically significant difference (p = 0.619 and 0.315). CONCLUSION A timely CS can be considered an appropriate and valid strategy in the surgical treatment of the majority of pancreatic IPMNs, as it can avoid the serious long-term metabolic consequences of TP in patients with a long-life expectancy. On the contrary, TP remains mandatory in case of PDAC or high-risk features involving the entire gland.
Collapse
|
5
|
Keane MG, Afghani E. A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Premalignant Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1284. [PMID: 33808853 PMCID: PMC8003622 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasingly common clinical finding. They represent a heterogeneous group of lesions that include two of the three known precursors of pancreatic cancer, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN). Given that approximately 8% of pancreatic cancers arise from these lesions, careful surveillance and timely surgery offers an opportunity for early curative resection in a disease with a dismal prognosis. This review summarizes the current evidence and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPMN/MCN. Current pre-operative diagnostic tests in pancreatic cysts are imperfect and a proportion of patients continue to undergo unnecessary surgical resection annually. Balancing cancer prevention while preventing surgical overtreatment, continues to be challenging when managing pancreatic cysts. Cyst fluid molecular markers, such as KRAS, GNAS, VHL, PIK3CA, SMAD4 and TP53, as well as emerging endoscopic technologies such as needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and through the needle microbiopsy forceps demonstrate improved diagnostic accuracy. Differences in management and areas of uncertainty between the guidelines are also discussed, including indications for surgery, surveillance protocols and if and when surveillance can be discontinued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elham Afghani
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang KS, Ciprani D, O'Shea A, Liss AS, Yang R, Fletcher-Mercaldo S, Mino-Kenudson M, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Weissleder R. Extracellular Vesicle Analysis Allows for Identification of Invasive IPMN. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1345-1358.e11. [PMID: 33301777 PMCID: PMC7956058 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Advances in cross-sectional imaging have resulted in increased detection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and their management remains controversial. At present, there is no reliable noninvasive method to distinguish between indolent and high risk IPMNs. We performed extracellular vesicle (EV) analysis to identify markers of malignancy in an attempt to better stratify these lesions. METHODS Using a novel ultrasensitive digital extracellular vesicle screening technique (DEST), we measured putative biomarkers of malignancy (MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6, Das-1, STMN1, TSP1, TSP2, EGFR, EpCAM, GPC1, WNT-2, EphA2, S100A4, PSCA, MUC13, ZEB1, PLEC1, HOOK1, PTPN6, and FBN1) in EV from patient-derived cell lines and then on circulating EV obtained from peripheral blood drawn from patients with IPMNs. We enrolled a total of 133 patients in two separate cohorts: a clinical discovery cohort (n = 86) and a validation cohort (n = 47). RESULTS From 16 validated EV proteins in plasma samples collected from the discovery cohort, only MUC5AC showed significantly higher levels in high-grade lesions. Of the 11 patients with invasive IPMN (inv/HG), 9 had high MUC5AC expression in plasma EV of the 11 patients with high-grade dysplasia alone, only 1 had high MUC5AC expression (sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%). These findings were corroborated in a separate validation cohort. The addition of MUC5AC as a biomarker to imaging and high-riskstigmata allowed detection of all cases requiring surgery, whereas imaging and high-risk stigmata alone would have missed 5 of 14 cases (36%). CONCLUSIONS MUC5AC in circulating EV can predict the presence of invasive carcinoma within IPMN. This approach has the potential to improve the management and follow-up of patients with IPMN including avoiding unnecessary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine S Yang
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Debora Ciprani
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aileen O'Shea
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew S Liss
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert Yang
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ralph Weissleder
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stoop TF, Del Chiaro M. ASO Author Reflections: The Beneficial Effect of High-Volume Center Experience on Surgical Outcomes After Total Pancreatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:878-879. [PMID: 32783120 PMCID: PMC7677144 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08986-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Department of Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet at Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Department of Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet at Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scholten L, Latenstein AE, Aalfs CM, Bruno MJ, Busch OR, Bonsing BA, Koerkamp BG, Molenaar IQ, Ubbink DT, van Hooft JE, Fockens P, Glas J, DeVries JH, Besselink MG. Prophylactic total pancreatectomy in individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PROPAN): systematic review and shared decision-making programme using decision tables. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:865-877. [PMID: 32703081 PMCID: PMC7707864 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620945534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals with a very high lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; for example, hereditary pancreatitis and main-duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, may wish to discuss prophylactic total pancreatectomy but strategies to do so are lacking. Objective To develop a shared decision-making programme for prophylactic total pancreatectomy using decision tables. Methods Focus group meetings with patients were used to identify relevant questions. Systematic reviews were performed to answer these questions. Results The first tables included hereditary pancreatitis and main-duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. No studies focused on prophylactic total pancreatectomy in these groups. In 52 studies (3570 patients), major morbidity after total pancreatectomy was 25% and 30-day mortality was 6%. After minimally invasive total pancreatectomy (seven studies, 35 patients) this was, respectively, 13% and 0%. Exocrine insufficiency-related symptoms occurred in 33%. Quality of life after total pancreatectomy was slightly lower compared with the general population. Conclusion The decision tables can be helpful for discussing prophylactic total pancreatectomy with individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Scholten
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda Glas
- Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Patient Organisation, 'Living with Hope', Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Hans DeVries
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
[Quality of indications in cystic lesions of the pancreas]. Chirurg 2020; 91:736-742. [PMID: 32642818 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01217-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Cystic tumors of the pancreas (PCN) have increasingly gained importance in the clinical routine as they are frequently diagnosed as an incidental finding due to the continuous improvement in cross-sectional imaging. A differentiation is made between non-neoplastic and neoplastic cysts, whereby the latter has a tendency to malignant transformation to a varying extent. Therefore, they can be considered as precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer (PDAC). In addition to a detailed patient history and examination, imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) are used for the differential diagnosis. The indications for surgical resection of these lesions are based on the current European guidelines from 2018; however, the content is not evidence-based but relies on knowledge and recommendations from experts. According to these consensus recommendations asymptomatic serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) are serous lesions with a low tendency for malignant transformation and can be monitored. In contrast resection is warranted for all mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) >4 cm and all solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which are differentiated into main duct (MD-IPMN) and branch duct type (BD-IPMN) IPMN based on the position in the pancreatic duct system, should be resected as MD-IPMN and mixed type (MT)-IPMN. The risk of malignant transformation in BD-IPMN is variable and depends on risk factors, which are defined clinically and by imaging morphology. The treatment management is therefore carried out on an individual basis following risk estimation. In order to quantify the quality of indications in PCN and thereby also contributing to optimized medical care, prospective long-term studies are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
van Huijgevoort NCM, Del Chiaro M, Wolfgang CL, van Hooft JE, Besselink MG. Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: current evidence and guidelines. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 16:676-689. [PMID: 31527862 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0195-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are a heterogeneous group of pancreatic cysts that include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, serous cystic neoplasms and other rare cystic lesions, all with different biological behaviours and variable risk of progression to malignancy. As more pancreatic cysts are incidentally discovered on routine cross-sectional imaging, optimal surveillance for patients with PCN is becoming an increasingly common clinical problem, highlighting the need to balance cancer prevention with the risk of (surgical) overtreatment. This Review summarizes the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of PCN, including the quality of available evidence. Also discussed are the most important differences between the PCN guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association, the International Association of Pancreatology and the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, including diagnostic and follow-up strategies and indications for surgery. Finally, new developments in the management of patients with PCN are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine C M van Huijgevoort
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stoop TF, Ateeb Z, Ghorbani P, Scholten L, Arnelo U, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M. Impact of Endocrine and Exocrine Insufficiency on Quality of Life After Total Pancreatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:587-596. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07853-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
12
|
Scholten L, Stoop TF, Del Chiaro M, Busch OR, van Eijck C, Molenaar IQ, de Vries JH, Besselink MG. Systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life after total pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1735-1746. [PMID: 31502658 PMCID: PMC6899549 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have traditionally been reluctant to perform total pancreatectomy because of concerns for brittle diabetes and poor quality of life (QoL). Several recent studies have suggested that outcomes following total pancreatectomy have improved, but a systematic review is lacking. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken of studies reporting on outcomes after total pancreatectomy for all indications, except chronic pancreatitis. PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), and Cochrane Library were searched (2005-2018). Endpoints included functional outcome and QoL. RESULTS A total of 21 studies, including 1536 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. During a median follow-up of 20·8 (range 1·5-96·0) months, 18·6 per cent (45 of 242 patients) were readmitted for endocrine-related morbidity, with associated mortality in 1·6 per cent (6 of 365 patients). No diabetes-related mortality was reported in studies including only patients treated after 2005. Symptoms related to exocrine insufficiency were reported by 43·5 per cent (143 of 329 patients) during a median follow-up of 15·9 (1·5-96·0) months. Overall QoL, reported by 102 patients with a median follow-up of 28·6 (6·0-66·0) months, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, showed a moderately reduced summary score of 76 per cent, compared with a general population score of 86 per cent (P = 0·004). CONCLUSION Overall QoL after total pancreatectomy is affected adversely, in particular by the considerable impact of diarrhoea that requires better treatment. There is also room for improvement in the management of diabetes after total pancreatectomy, particularly with regards to prevention of diabetes-related morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Scholten
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T F Stoop
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J H de Vries
- Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|