Stricter ioPTH criterion for successful parathyroidectomy in stage III CKD patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

Operative success is achieved regardless of ioPTH criterion used during focused parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Focused parathyroidectomy (F-PTX) guided by intraoperative parathormone (ioPTH) monitoring may result in higher operative failure rates from missed multiglandular disease (MGD) in patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (spHPT) when ioPTH levels do not reach normal range.

METHODS

A retrospective review included 690 patients with spHPT who underwent F-PTX and ioPTH monitoring were divided into 2 groups: >50% ioPTH decrease to normal range, and >50% ioPTH decrease to above normal range. Operative success, recurrence, bilateral/unilateral neck exploration (BNE/UNE), MGD were evaluated.

RESULTS

533 patients demonstrated >50% ioPTH decrease to normal range, and 157 patients >50% ioPTH decrease to above normal range. There were no differences in operative success 99% vs. 97%, recurrence 2.5% vs. 5%, BNE 12% vs. 11%, UNE 4% vs. 5%, or MGD 4% vs. 4%, (p > 0.05) with 46 months mean follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in operative success, failure, BNE, UNE or MGD regardless of ioPTH criterion used for F-PTX.

The effect of chronic kidney disease on intraoperative parathyroid hormone: A linear mixed model analysis

BACKGROUND

Reduced creatinine clearance is an indication for surgery in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, and a significant proportion of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy have chronic kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinetics of intraoperative parathyroid hormone decline during parathyroidectomy in patients who have chronic kidney disease compared with those with who have normal renal function.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy (n = 646). Patients were grouped based on estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than (normal renal function) or less than (chronic kidney disease) 60 mL/min/1.73m². All patients had intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring and ≥6-month postoperative serum studies to confirm surgical cure. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone kinetic curves were analyzed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Despite similar pre-excision values, patients with chronic kidney disease had significantly higher intraoperative parathyroid hormone values at 5 minutes (76 vs 58 pg/mL, P = .02) and 10 minutes (54 vs 37 pg/mL, P = .004) postexcision. No significant difference was observed in whether patients met Miami criterion by 5 minutes (chronic kidney disease 71%, normal renal function 78%, P = .255) or by 10 minutes (chronic kidney disease 95%, normal renal function 96%, P = .751) postexcision. Using a linear mixed model, glomerular filtration rate did not have a significant effect on the change in intraoperative parathyroid hormone over time.

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic kidney disease had significantly higher postexcision intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels. However, renal function did not affect the change in intraoperative parathyroid hormone over time, nor did renal function ultimately affect the likelihood of meeting the Miami criterion. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring remains useful in this population, although additional time points may be needed to observe normalization of values.

[Intraoperative measurement of parathyroid hormone in hyperparathyroidism]

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) determination is based on the short half-life of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the rapid analytical technology. The IOPTH provides functional information regarding correction of the overproductive state in hyperparathyroidism (HPT) and is superior to macroscopic evaluation of the parathyroid gland (PG) as well as any (intraoperative frozen section) form of histology (so-called biochemical frozen section). In this article the relevance and evaluation of IOPTH is defined for the most important forms of HPT, for primary HPT, renal secondary and tertiary HPT, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and parathyroid carcinoma and clinical scenarios based on the currently available data. It becomes apparent that the additional benefits of IOPTH depend on diverse prerequisites of the specific type of HPT, the diagnostics as well as individual patient factors and strategic considerations for resection. Overall, the costs for IOPTH are comparably low and seem to be justified with respect to the gain in quality. In the hands of specialized endocrine surgeons IOPTH is an essential tool for intraoperative decision-making and quality assurance.

Recent advances in the understanding and management of primary hyperparathyroidism

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a hormonal disorder whose prevalence is approximately 1–2% in the United States of America. The disease has become more recognizable to clinicians in an earlier phase and, at present, patients can be diagnosed with “classic”, “normocalcemic”, “normohormonal”, or “mild, asymptomatic” primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery, with a focused parathyroidectomy when possible, or a four-gland exploration, is the only way to cure the disease. Cure is determined by use of intra-operative parathyroid hormone monitoring with long-term cure rates ranging from 90–95%. Newer adjuncts to surgery include CT or PET imaging and near-infrared immunofluorescence. This article highlights updates in parathyroid disease and advances in parathyroid surgery; it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the disease process or a review of surgical indications, which can be found in the AAES guidelines or NIH Symposium on primary hyperparathyroidism.

The role of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) determination for identification and surgical strategy of sporadic multiglandular disease in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT)

Intraoperative PTH monitoring (IOPTH) made minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in patients with primary HPT possible. However, with the increasing accuracy of preoperative localization studies there is a growing discussion if IOPTH is necessary in patients with localized single gland disease (concordant preoperative localization studies). Different interpretation criteria have been developed - each with their particular advantages and disadvantages, but the "perfect" criterion is still missing. Despite several pitfalls, which can be recognized intraoperatively and do not necessarily lead to a more extensive surgery, IOPTH seems to be a useful adjunct in surgery for PHPT. However, according to current guidelines, selected patients may be operated without IOPTH but need to be informed about the possibly increased risk of recurrent disease.