Staged biliary reconstruction after liver transplantation: A novel surgical strategy for high acuity pediatric transplant recipients

The outcomes and biliary complications of a staged biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled massive bleeding and bowel edema are critical issues during liver transplantation. Temporal intra-abdominal packing with staged biliary reconstruction (SBR) yields acceptable outcomes in deceased donor liver transplantation; however, data on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are scarce.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1269 patients who underwent LDLT was performed. After one-to-two propensity score matching, patients who underwent LDLT with SBR were compared with those who underwent LDLT with one-stage biliary reconstruction (OSBR). The primary outcomes were graft survival (GS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were postoperative biliary complications.

RESULTS

There were 55 and 110 patients in the SBR and OSBR groups, respectively. The median blood loss was 6500 mL in the SBR and 4875 mL in the OSBR group. Patients receiving SBR-LDLT had higher incidence of sepsis (69.0% vs. 43.6%; P < 0.01) and intra-abdominal infections (60.0% vs. 30.9%; P < 0.01). Biliary complication rates (14.5% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.47) and 1-and 5-year GS (87.27%, 74.60% vs. 83.64%, 72.71%; P = 0.98) and OS (89.09%, 78.44% vs. 84.55%, 73.70%; P = 0.752) rates were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SBR could serve as a life-saving procedure for patients undergoing complex critical LDLT, with GS, OS, and biliary outcomes comparable to those of OSBR.

Transcriptional Profiling Underscores the Role of Preprocurement Allograft Metabolism and Innate Immune Status on Outcomes in Human Liver Transplantation

Objective

The adverse effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remain a principal barrier to a successful outcome after lifesaving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Gene expression during different phases of IRI is dynamic and modified by individual exposures, making it attractive for identifying potential therapeutic targets for improving the number of suitable organs for transplantation and patient outcomes. However, data remain limited on the functional landscape of gene expression during liver graft IRI, spanning procurement to reperfusion and recovery. Therefore, we sought to characterize transcriptomic profiles of IRI during multiple phases in human OLT.

Methods

We conducted clinical data analyses, histologic evaluation, and RNA sequencing of 17 consecutive human primary OLT. We performed liver allograft biopsies at 4 time points: baseline (B, before donor cross-clamp), at the end of cold ischemia (CI), during early reperfusion (ER, after revascularization), and during late reperfusion (LR). Data were generated and then recipients grouped by post-OLT outcomes categories: immediate allograft function (IAF; n = 11) versus early allograft dysfunction (EAD; n = 6) groups.

Results

We observed that CI (vs B) modified a transcriptomic landscape enriched for a metabolic and immune process. Expression levels of hallmark inflammatory response genes were higher transitioning from CI to ER and decreased from ER to LR. IAF group predominantly showed higher bile and fatty acid metabolism activity during LR compared with EAD group, while EAD group maintained more immunomodulatory activities. Throughout all time points, EAD specimens exhibited decreased metabolic activity in both bile and fatty acid pathways.

Conclusions

We report transcriptomic profiles of human liver allograft IRI from prepreservation in the donor to posttransplantation in the recipient. Immunomodulatory and metabolic landscapes across ER and LR phases were different between IAF and EAD allografts. Our study also highlights marker genes for these biological processes that we plan to explore as novel therapeutic targets or surrogate markers for severe allograft injury in clinical OLT.

Postsurgical Management of Dilated Biliary Tract in Children: Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangial Drainage and Subsequent Percutaneous Ultrasound Cholangiography

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) and consequent percutaneous US cholangiography in managing the dilated biliary tracts of children who have undergone hepatobiliary surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixteen children (11 boys, five girls; age range, 3-144 months) who underwent hepatobiliary surgery from December 2016 to October 2018 and had US evidence of biliary dilatation were included. All patients had undergone US-guided PTCD because of elevated postoperative serum bilirubin levels or bile duct infection. Immediately after the PTCD procedure, diluted sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles dispersion was injected through the PTCD tube to evaluate the anastomosis and the intrahepatic bile duct tree. Laboratory results, including those of serum bilirubin measurement, liver function tests, and routine blood tests, were evaluated before and after PTCD. Nine of 16 patients also underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). The percutaneous US cholangiography findings were evaluated and compared with the PTC findings. RESULTS. Liver enzyme levels decreased after PTCD with a statistically significant difference from the values before PTCD. Percutaneous US cholangiography showed that the anastomosis in 6 of the 16 patients (37.5%) was patent and depicted the morphologic featuresof intrahepatic bile duct tree in five of these patients. In the other 10 patients, the anastomosis was completely obstructed, and percutaneous US cholangiography depicted the morphologic features of intrahepatic bile duct tree in eight patients. In the nine patients who underwent PTC, the percutaneous US cholangiographic findings were the same as the PTC findings. CONCLUSION. US-guided PTCD is helpful in relieving jaundice and inflammation in children who have undergone hepatobiliary surgery and have biliary dilatation. Findings at consequent percutaneous US cholangiography are comparable to those of PTC in depicting the anastomosis in these patients.

Staged Biliary Reconstruction After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Practical Surgical Strategy for High-Acuity Adult Recipients

Biliary complications (BC) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is strongly associated with inferior patient outcomes and increased healthcare cost. BC in high-acuity patients can be lethal. While the utility of staged biliary reconstruction after liver transplantation (SBRALT) has been reported in adult and pediatric OLT, biliary outcome data are scarce. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility and outcomes of SBRALT in high-acuity transplant recipients.

Methods

We conducted an analysis from our prospective database of 149 adult OLT between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2017. Mean follow-up was 26 months. Variables were compared for Group I: one-stage OLT with biliary reconstruction (N = 58) versus Group II: SBRALT (N = 91).

Results

Compared with Group I, patients in Group II had higher acuity of illness: median model for end-stage liver disease scores (19 vs 35 P = 0.002), requirement for pretransplant intensive care unit (29.3% vs 54.9%, P = 0.022), pretransplant renal replacement therapy (15.5% vs 48.4%), estimated blood loss (2000 vs 4750 mL, P < 0.001), and intraoperative packed red blood cells transfusion (4 vs 10 units, P < 0.001). For Group II, biliary reconstruction was performed between 1 and 6 days after OLT. Hepaticojejunostomy was performed in 8.6% (Group I) and 26.4% (Group II), P = 0.010. For Groups I and II, BC rates (8.6% vs 7.7%, P = 0.955) and 1-year graft failure-free survival rates (89.7% vs 88.2%, P = 0.845) were comparable.

Conclusions

Graft failure-free survival and biliary outcomes of SBRALT in high-acuity recipients are excellent and comparable to one-stage OLT for low-risk patients. SBRALT is a practical surgical strategy in complex OLT.

Two-staged biliary reconstruction with temporary complete external biliary drainage as a bailout procedure in a pediatric patient after difficult living donor liver retransplantation

Biliary leakage at the site of the hepaticojejunostomy after liver transplantation is a life-threatening complication. We herein present the case of a 7-year-old girl who underwent complete external biliary drainage during difficult living donor liver retransplantation as a bailout procedure. The patient had undergone duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in the initial living donor liver transplantation. In the retransplantation, Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction was planned but abandoned due to the critical condition in the operation. As an alternative procedure, the patient underwent complete external drainage using a 6Fr drainage tube with cuff. Five months after retransplantation when the nutrition status and physical strength of a patient recovered fully, RY hepaticojejunostomy was successfully performed. This is a case report of two-staged biliary reconstruction with temporary complete external biliary drainage used in pediatric liver retransplantation, which was performed after some months not a few days. It is a safe and feasible alternative when primary anastomosis is deemed to carry a high risk of bile leakage in cases of difficult liver transplantation in critically ill patients.