Concordance in advance care preferences among high-risk surgical patients and surrogate health care decision makers in the perioperative setting

Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: An International Clinician Questionnaire

Rationale: Critical illness is common in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM). Advance care planning (ACP) can allow these patients to express their care preferences before life-threatening illnesses. Objectives: To evaluate physicians' perspectives surrounding ACP in patients with HM. Methods: We administered a survey to intensivists and hematologic oncologists who care for patients with HM across Canada and the United Kingdom. Potential respondents were identified from institutions that have a hematologic-oncology program. The survey was disseminated electronically. Results: A total of 111 physicians completed the survey, with a response rate of 19% (39% across those who opened the e-mail); 52% of respondents were intensivists, and 48% of respondents were hematologic oncologists. Of the responses, 15.5% of physicians reported that ACP happens routinely at their institution, whereas 8.3% of physicians stated that code status is routinely discussed. ACP discussions were most commonly reported at the onset of critical illness (84.3% of respondents), during disease recurrence (52.9% of respondents), or during the transition to a strictly palliative approach (54.9% of respondents). Commonly cited barriers to ACP centered on physicians' concern about the reaction of the patient or family. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the need for earlier and more frequent ACP discussions in this high-risk population with a variety of barriers identified.

Preferences and Predictions Regarding Palliative Care in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit

INTRODUCTION

In the older intensive care unit (ICU) trauma population, it is common to have to make decisions about end-of-life. We sought to demonstrate uncertainty of patients and providers in this area.

METHODS

Our study is a prospective observational study of trauma patients 50 years and older admitted to the ICU. Patients or surrogates completed a survey including questions regarding end-of-life. Team members were surveyed with their expectation for patient outcome and appropriateness of palliative or comfort care. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were performed.

RESULTS

100 patients had data available for analysis. Surveys were completed by the patient for 39 while a surrogate completed the survey for 61 patients. There was a significant increase in uncertainty if a surrogate answered or if there had been no prior discussions about end-of-life. Nurse, resident, and attending predictions about hospital survival were similar with all groups predicting survival in 82%. 6-month survivors were only predicted to be alive 75% of the time. Ideas about comfort care were similar but there was more variation regarding a palliative care consult with nurses saying yes in 27% of surveys while physicians only said yes in 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

The significantly higher rates of uncertainty for both surrogates or in cases where no prior discussion had been had highlight the importance of having more conversations about end-of-life and documentation of advance directives prior to traumatic events. The difference in team member ideas about palliative care demonstrates a need for improved team communication.

Mortality After Elective Surgery: The Potential Role for Preoperative Palliative Care

BACKGROUND

Preoperative optimization is increasingly emphasized for high-risk surgical patients. One critical component of this includes preoperative advanced care planning to promote goal-concordant care. We aimed to define a subset of patients that might benefit from preoperative palliative care consult for advanced care planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined adult patients admitted from January 2016 to December 2018 to a university health system for elective surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with death within 1 y, and presence of palliative care consults preoperatively. Chi-square analysis evaluated the impact of a palliative care consult on advanced care planning variables.

RESULTS

Of the 29,132 inpatient elective procedures performed, there was a 2.0% mortality rate at 6 mo and 3.5% at 1 y. Those who died were more likely to be older, male, underweight (BMI <18), or have undergone an otolaryngology, neurosurgery or thoracic procedure type (all P-values < 0.05). At the time of admission, 29% had an advance directive, 90% had a documented code status, and 0.3% had a preoperative palliative care consult. Patients were more likely to have an advanced directive, a power of attorney, a documented code status, and have a do not resuscitate order if they had a palliative care consult (all P-values <0.05). The mortality rates and preoperative palliative care rates per procedure type did not follow similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative palliative care consultation before elective admissions for surgery had a significant impact on advanced care planning.

Chronic and Sudden Serious Illness, COVID-19, and Decision-Making Capacity: Integrating Advance Care Planning Into the Preoperative Checklist for Elective Surgery

Advance Care Planning (ACP) includes anticipating future medical decisions and designating a medical decision maker in the event of losing the capacity to make one’s own medical decisions. Many advantages can be seen to doing ACP before a crisis as well as revisiting these discussions over time as circumstances change. This case presentation is of a 74-year-old woman with multiple medical problems who had ACP discussions in the context of proposed surgery for colon cancer. These conversations highlight the elements of high-quality ACP and the importance of learning what patients mean when they employ phrases commonly referenced in these conversations. The planned surgery was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic but the discussions helped to guide decision-making when the patient became critically ill with COVID-19.