Evolution, lessons learned, and contemporary outcomes of esophageal replacement with jejunum for children

The History and Legacy of the Foker Process for the Treatment of Long Gap Esophageal Atresia

Historically, children afflicted with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) had few options, either esophageal replacement or a life of gastrostomy feeds. In 1997, John Foker from Minnesota revolutionized the treatment of LGEA. His new procedure focused on "traction-induced growth" when the proximal and distal esophageal segments were too far apart for primary repair. Foker's approach involved placement of pledgeted sutures on both esophageal pouches connected to an externalized traction system which could be serially tightened, allowing for tension-induced esophageal growth and a delayed primary repair. Despite its potential, the Foker process was received with criticism and disbelief, and to this day, controversy remains regarding its mechanism of action - esophageal growth versus stretch. Nonetheless, early adopters such as Rusty Jennings of Boston embraced Foker's central principle that "one's own esophagus is best" and was instrumental to the implementation and rise in popularity of the Foker process. The downstream effects of this emphasis on esophageal preservation would uncover the need for a focused yet multidisciplinary approach to the many challenges that EA children face beyond "just the esophagus", leading to the first Esophageal and Airway Treatment Center for children. Consequently, the development of new techniques for the multidimensional care of the LGEA child evolved such as the posterior tracheopexy for associated tracheomalacia, the supercharged jejunal interposition, as well as minimally invasive internalized esophageal traction systems. We recognize the work of Foker and Jennings as key catalysts of an era of esophageal preservation and multidisciplinary care of children with EA.

Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture After Repair of Esophageal Atresia

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic strictures (AS) after esophageal atresia (EA) repair are common. While most respond to endoscopic therapy, some become refractory and require surgical intervention, for which the outcomes are not well established.

METHODS

All EA children with AS who were treated surgically at two institutions (2011-2022) were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical repair was performed for those with AS that were either refractory to endoscopic therapy or clinically symptomatic and undergoing surgery for another indication. Anastomotic leak, need for repeat stricture resection, and esophageal replacement were considered poor outcomes.

RESULTS

139 patients (median age: 12 months, range 1.5 months-20 years; median weight: 8.1 kg) underwent 148 anastomotic stricture repairs (100 refractory, 48 non-refractory) in the form of stricturoplasty (n = 43), segmental stricture resection with primary anastomosis (n = 96), or stricture resection with a delayed anastomosis after traction-induced lengthening (n = 9). With a median follow-up of 38 months, most children (92%) preserved their esophagus, and the majority (83%) of stricture repairs were free of poor outcomes. Only one anastomotic leak occurred in a non-refractory stricture. Of the refractory stricture repairs (n = 100), 10% developed a leak, 9% required repeat stricture resection, and 13% required esophageal replacement. On multivariable analysis, significant risk factors for any type of poor outcome included anastomotic leak, stricture length, hiatal hernia, and patient's weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for refractory AS is associated with inherent yet low morbidity and high rates of esophageal preservation. Surgical repair of non-refractory symptomatic AS at the time of another thoracic operation is associated with excellent outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Procedural and Surgical Interventions for Esophageal Stricture Secondary to Caustic Ingestion in Children

BACKGROUND

Esophageal injury after caustic ingestion can vary in severity and may result in significant long-term morbidity due to stricture development. The optimal management remains unknown. We aim to determine the incidence of esophageal stricture due to caustic ingestion and quantify current procedural and operative management strategies.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was utilized to identify patients 0-18 years old who experienced caustic ingestion from January 2007-September 2015 and developed subsequent esophageal stricture until December 2021. Post-injury procedural and operative management was identified utilizing ICD-9/10 procedure codes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), esophageal dilation, gastrostomy tube placement, fundoplication, tracheostomy, and major esophageal surgery.

RESULTS

1,588 patients from 40 hospitals experienced caustic ingestion of which 56.6% were male, 32.5% non-Hispanic White, and the median age at time of injury was 2.2 years (IQR: 1.4,4.8). Median length of initial admission was 1.0 day (IQR: 1.0, 3.0). 171/1,588 (10.8%) developed esophageal stricture. Among those who developed stricture, 144 (84.2%) underwent at least 1 additional EGD, 138 (80.7%) underwent dilation, 70 (40.9%) underwent gastrostomy tube, 6 (3.5%) underwent fundoplication, 10 (5.8%) underwent tracheostomy, and 40 (23.4%) underwent major esophageal surgery. Patients underwent a median of 9 dilations (IQR 3, 20). Major surgery was performed at a median of 208 (IQR: 74, 480) days after caustic ingestion.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with esophageal stricture after caustic ingestion will require multiple procedural interventions and potentially major surgery. These patients may benefit from early multi-disciplinary care coordination and the development of a best-practice treatment algorithm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Qualitative features of esophageal fluorescence angiography and anastomotic outcomes in children

BACKGROUND

Indocyanine green (ICG) is commonly used to assess perfusion, but quality defining features are lacking. We sought to establish qualitative features of esophageal ICG perfusion assessments, and develop an esophageal anastomotic scorecard to risk-stratify anastomotic outcomes.

METHODS

Single institution, retrospective analysis of children with an intraoperative ICG perfusion assessment of an esophageal anastomosis. Qualitative perfusion features were defined and a perfusion score developed. Associations between perfusion and clinical features with poor anastomotic outcomes (PAO, leak or refractory stricture) were evaluated with logistic and time-to-event analyses. Combining significant features, we developed and tested an esophageal anastomotic scorecard to stratify PAO risk.

RESULTS

From 2019 to 2021, 53 children (median age 7.4 months) underwent 55 esophageal anastomoses. Median (IQR) follow-up was 14 (10-19.9) months; mean (SD) perfusion score was 13.2 (3.4). Fifteen (27.3%) anastomoses experienced a PAO and had significantly lower mean perfusion scores (11.3 (3.3) vs 14.0 (3.2), p = 0.007). Unique ICG perfusion features, severe tension, and primary or rescue traction-induced esophageal lengthening [Foker] procedures were significantly associated with PAO on both logistic and Cox regression. The scorecard (range 0-7) included any Foker (+2), severe tension (+1), no arborization on either segment (+1), suture line hypoperfusion >twice expected width (+2), and segmental or global areas of hypoperfusion (+1). A scorecard cut-off >3 yielded a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 93% (AUC 0.878 [95%CI 0.777 to 0.978]) in identifying a PAO.

CONCLUSIONS

A scoring system comprised of qualitative ICG perfusion features, tissue quality, and anastomotic tension can help risk-stratify esophageal anastomotic outcomes accurately.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic - II.