1
|
Patrono D, De Stefano N, Romagnoli R. Liver transplantation for tumor entities. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:255-265. [PMID: 38716718 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Tumor entities represent an increasing indication for liver transplantation (LT). This review addresses the most contentious indications of LT in transplant oncology. RECENT FINDINGS Patient selection based on tumor biology in LT for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) demonstrated promising long-term outcomes and preserved quality of life despite high recurrence rates. In selected cases, LT for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is feasible, with acceptable survival even in high-burden cases responsive to chemotherapy. LT following a strict neoadjuvant protocol for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) resulted in long-term outcomes consistently surpassing benchmark values, and potentially outperforming liver resection. SUMMARY While preliminary results are promising, prospective trials are crucial to define applications in routine clinical practice. Molecular profiling and targeted therapies pave the way for personalized approaches, requiring evolving allocation systems for equitable LT access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Patrono
- General Surgery 2U - Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Howell TC, Rhodin KE, Shaw B, Bao J, Kanu E, Masoud S, Bartholomew AJ, Gao Q, Anwar IJ, Ladowski JM, Nussbaum DP, Blazer DG, Zani S, Allen PJ, Barbas AS, Lidsky ME. Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:738-745. [PMID: 38704208 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and LT for iCCA. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with stage I-III iCCA between 2010 and 2018 who underwent resection or LT. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods stratified by management. Secondary analysis of patients undergoing transplant for CCA was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing database. RESULTS Of 2565 patients, 2412 (94.0%) underwent resection and 153 (5.96%) LT of whom 84 (54.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Utilization of LT remained between 3.9% and 7.8% annually. Unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for LT than resection (59.8% vs 39.9%, P = .0067), yet adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27; P = .58). On secondary analysis including 437 patients with all subtypes of CCA, unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for non-CCA indications (79% vs 52%-54%, P < .001). CONCLUSION Utilization of LT for iCCA remains low and many cases are likely incidental. Although partial hepatectomy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, our findings suggest that highly selected patients with unresectable iCCA may achieve favorable outcomes after LT. Granular, prospective data are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from transplant and allocate scarce liver grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Clark Howell
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Kristen E Rhodin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Brian Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Jiayin Bao
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Elishama Kanu
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Sabran Masoud
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Alex J Bartholomew
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Qimeng Gao
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Imran J Anwar
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Joseph M Ladowski
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Daniel P Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Sabino Zani
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Andrew S Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Michael E Lidsky
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kodali S, Connor AA, Thabet S, Brombosz EW, Ghobrial RM. Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Past, present, and future directions. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:129-138. [PMID: 37517983 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare biliary tract cancer with high mortality rate. Complete resection of the iCCA lesion is the first choice of treatment, with good prognosis after margin-negative resection. Unfortunately, only 12%-40% of patients are eligible for resection at presentation due to cirrhosis, portal hypertension, or large tumor size. Liver transplantation (LT) offers margin-negative iCCA extirpation for patients with unresectable tumors. Initially, iCCA was a contraindication for LT until size-based selection criteria were introduced to identify patients with satisfied post-LT outcomes. Recent studies have shown that tumor biology-based selection can yield high post-LT survival in patients with locally advanced iCCA. Another selection criterion is the tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with response to neoadjuvant therapy have better outcomes after LT compared with those without tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Another index that helps predict the treatment outcome is the biomarker. Improved survival outcomes have also opened the door for living donor LT for iCCA. Patients undergoing LT for iCCA now have statistically similar survival rates as patients undergoing resection. The combination of surgery and locoregional and systemic therapies improves the prognosis of iCCA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudha Kodali
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashton A Connor
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - R Mark Ghobrial
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu TC, Smith CP, Li JS, Burton J, Jackson NJ, Tao R, Ludmir EB, Raldow AC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pathologic complete response rates for patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated on liver transplant protocols. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:574-583. [PMID: 37986552 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many heterogenous orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) protocols exist for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Little is known about the incidence, predictors for, and the significance of achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR). METHODS We performed a systematic review through September 2022 of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to pool data across studies with reported pCR rates. Heterogeneity between treatment protocols was assessed via subgroup analysis. The pCR and 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were extracted as outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 15 studies reported pCR rates and were grouped by use of the Mayo protocol (4/15), stereotactic body radiation therapy (2/15), and an Other category (9/15). The pooled pCR rate among all studies was 32%. Both radiation technique and duration of CHT showed no significant association with pCR (p = 0.05 and 0.13, respectively). Pooled 1-year RFS and OS after any neoadjuvant therapy and OLT was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.91), and 91% (95% CI, 0.87-0.94), respectively. There was no 1-year OS difference detected among the three groups. pCR was not associated with OS in the meta-regression. Pooled 3- and 5-year OS among all studies was 72% and 61%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The pooled incidence of pCR was 32%. Differences in radiation technique did not appear to influence pCR rates and upon meta-regression, pCR was not a surrogate marker for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy C Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Clayton P Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joshua S Li
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jason Burton
- Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas J Jackson
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeng L, He C, Li X. Prognosis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after liver transplantation by size of tumor. Surgery 2023; 174:1094. [PMID: 36792459 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lingfeng Zeng
- Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
| | - Cheng He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaocheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schwenk L, Rohland O, Ali-Deeb A, Dondorf F, Settmacher U, Rauchfuß F. Liver Transplantation for Incidental Cholangiocarcinoma or Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma/Cholangiocarcinoma-Own Experiences and Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3609. [PMID: 37509271 PMCID: PMC10377009 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data about liver transplantation for mixed tumors from hepatocellular carcinoma to cholangiocarcinoma are limited. Furthermore, the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or combined tumors in a cirrhotic liver is considered a contraindication for transplantation. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with incidental cholangiocarcinoma or combined tumors after liver transplantation. METHODS In our descriptive analysis, data were evaluated from all patients since 2010 who received a liver transplant due to an assumed hepatocellular carcinoma at Jena University Hospital. Survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Between January 2010 and December 2022, an incidental intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was found in eight patients post-transplant. Four combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma and four sole intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were found. A recurrence through distant metastases from combined hepatocellular- and cholangiocarcinoma was found in one patient at one year after transplantation. Another patient developed a pulmonary primary tumor independently one year post-transplant. The recurrence rate was at 14.3%. While two patients died, the 1- and 5-year overall survival rates post-transplant were 87.5% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or combined hepatocellular- and cholangiocarcinoma could profit from liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Schwenk
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740 Jena, Germany
| | - Oliver Rohland
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740 Jena, Germany
| | - Aladdin Ali-Deeb
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740 Jena, Germany
| | - Felix Dondorf
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740 Jena, Germany
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740 Jena, Germany
| | - Falk Rauchfuß
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shannon AH, Ruff SM, Schenk AD, Washburn K, Pawlik TM. Updates and Expert Opinions on Liver Transplantation for Gastrointestinal Malignancies. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1290. [PMID: 37512101 PMCID: PMC10383519 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Transplant oncology is a relatively new field in which transplantation is used to treat patients who would otherwise be unresectable. New anticancer treatment paradigms using tumor and transplant immunology and cancer immunogenomics are emerging. In turn, liver transplantation (LT) has become a potential therapy for certain patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastasis, hepatocellular (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the liver. Although there are established criteria for LT in HCC, evidence regarding LT as a treatment modality for certain gastrointestinal malignancies is still debated. The aim of this review is to highlight updates in the role of LT for certain malignancies, including HCC, metastatic CRC, hilar CCA, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET), as well as contextualize LT use and discuss controversies in transplant oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander H Shannon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Samantha M Ruff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Austin D Schenk
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Kenneth Washburn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang Z, Jiang X. Efficacy and safety comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery for treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:122. [PMID: 37046191 PMCID: PMC10099833 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02754-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Currently, surgical resection is the most commonly performed and effective treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) worldwide. However, the prognosis of ICC is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The study also intends to explore whether chemotherapy should be introduced before surgery and which populations should be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHOD Four databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception dates to January 2022 for relevant articles. The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager Software (version5.3). The non-randomized interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies and the overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Moreover, the primary outcomes included 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were R0 resection, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS Five studies involving 2412 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year RFS, postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality between the two groups. However, the meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a better 5-year OS benefit in ICC patients than the upfront surgery group (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02-1.58), while the R0 resection rate was lower in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group than that in the upfront surgery group (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.91). CONCLUSION Compared with the upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery could prolong the 5-year OS without increasing the risk of postoperative complications in ICC patients. Considering that the patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery group had more advanced ICC cases, the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be more significant in patients with more advanced ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zijiao Yang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, China
- Regenerative Medicine Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, China
| | - Xia Jiang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, China.
- Regenerative Medicine Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quaresima S, Melandro F, Giovanardi F, Shah K, De Peppo V, Mennini G, Ghinolfi D, Limkemann A, Pawlik TM, Lai Q. New Insights in the Setting of Transplant Oncology. Medicina (B Aires) 2023; 59:medicina59030568. [PMID: 36984569 PMCID: PMC10058845 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) is the best strategy for curing several primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. In recent years, growing interest has been observed in the enlargement of the transplant oncology indications. This paper aims to review the most recent developments in the setting of LT oncology, with particular attention to LT for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA). Materials and Methods: A review of the recently published literature was conducted. Results: Growing evidence exists on the efficacy of LT in curing CRLM and peri-hilar and intrahepatic CCA in well-selected patients when integrating this strategy with (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or locoregional treatments. Conclusion: For unresectable CCA and CRLM management, several prospective protocols are forthcoming to elucidate LT’s impact relative to alternative therapies. Advances in diagnosis, treatment protocols, and donor-to-recipient matching are needed to better define the oncological indications for transplantation. Prospective, multicenter trials studying these advances and their impact on outcomes are still required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Quaresima
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Melandro
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Giovanardi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Kejal Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Valerio De Peppo
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mennini
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Ghinolfi
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Ashley Limkemann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3493020126; Fax: +39-06499701
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Krenzien F, Nevermann N, Krombholz A, Benzing C, Haber P, Fehrenbach U, Lurje G, Pelzer U, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M, Schöning W. Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020362. [PMID: 35053523 PMCID: PMC8773654 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This review discusses multimodality treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC). Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option and the central cornerstone of treatment. Adjuvant systemic treatment will be recommended after resection or in the palliative setting. Increasing knowledge of phenotypic subclassification and molecular profiling allows investigation of targeted therapies as (neo-)adjuvant treatment. High-dose brachytherapy, internal radiation therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization are among the interventional treatment options being evaluated for unresectable iCC. Given the multiple options of multidisciplinary management, any treatment strategy should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment should be directed by a specialized treatment center. Abstract Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is distinguished as an entity from perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Recently, molecular profiling and histopathological features have allowed further classification. Due to the frequent delay in diagnosis, the prognosis for iCC remains poor despite major technical advances and multimodal therapeutic approaches. Liver resection represents the therapeutic backbone and only curative treatment option, with the functional residual capacity of the liver and oncologic radicality being deciding factors for postoperative and long-term oncological outcome. Furthermore, in selected cases and depending on national guidelines, liver transplantation may be a therapeutic option. Given the often advanced tumor stage at diagnosis or the potential for postoperative recurrence, locoregional therapies have become increasingly important. These strategies range from radiofrequency ablation to transarterial chemoembolization to selective internal radiation therapy and can be used in combination with liver resection. In addition, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies as well as targeted therapies and immunotherapies based on molecular profiles can be applied. This review discusses multimodal treatment strategies for iCC and their differential use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Nora Nevermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alina Krombholz
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Philipp Haber
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Clinic for Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| |
Collapse
|