1
|
Sontag AF, Kiselev J, Schaller SJ, Spies C, Rombey T. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients into routine health care: a realist review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:192. [PMID: 38350947 PMCID: PMC10863196 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10665-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of prehabilitation as a new preoperative care pathway to optimise perioperative outcomes, its implementation into routine health care is widely pending. Frail patients might particularly benefit from prehabilitation interventions, but facilitating and hindering factors need to be considered in the implementation process. Thus, our aim was to derive a programme theory on what prehabilitation programmes work for frail patients in what circumstances and why. METHODS Following Pawson's realist review approach, preliminary programme theories on facilitators and barriers were established. General and topic-specific databases were searched systematically for facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients. Articles were included if they dealt with multimodal prehabilitation programmes prior to surgery in a frail population and if they contained information on facilitators and barriers during the implementation process in the full text. Based on these articles, refined programme theories were generated. RESULTS From 2,609 unique titles, 34 were retained for the realist synthesis. Facilitating factors included the individualisation of prehabilitation programmes to meet the patients' needs and abilities, multimodality, adaption to the local setting and health care system, endorsement by an ambassador and sharing of responsibilities among a multidisciplinary team. Central barriers for frail patients were transportation, lack of social support, and inadequate, overwhelming information provision. CONCLUSIONS Implementing prehabilitation as a new care pathway for frail patients requires organisational readiness and adaptability to the local setting. On an individual level, a clear understanding of responsibilities and of the intervention's goal among patients and providers are necessary. Added attention must be paid to the individualisation to fit the needs and restrictions of frail patients. This makes prehabilitation a resource-intense, but promising intervention for frail surgery patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42022335282).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Frederike Sontag
- Berlin School of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörn Kiselev
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan J Schaller
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str.22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Rombey
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frigerio I, Malleo G, de Pastena M, Deiro G, Surci N, Scopelliti F, Esposito A, Regi P, Giardino A, Allegrini V, Bassi C, Girelli R, Salvia R, Butturini G. Prognostic Factors After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer Initially Metastatic to the Liver. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8503-8510. [PMID: 35976466 PMCID: PMC9383677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12385-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Resection of initially oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following response to first-line chemotherapy is controversial. We herein updated a previous case series to investigate the oncologic outcomes and preoperative factors that could drive the decision-making process. Methods This retrospective analysis was limited to patients with liver-only synchronous metastases who experienced complete regression of the metastatic component and underwent pancreatectomy between October 2008 and July 2020 at two high-volume institutions. Clinical-pathologic variables were captured, and inflammation-based prognostic scores were calculated. Recurrence and survival analyses were performed using standard statistical methods. Results Overall, 52 patients were included. FOLFIRINOX was the most employed chemotherapy regimen (63.5%). Post-treatment tumor size, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significantly decreased relative to baseline evaluation. The median time from diagnosis to pancreatectomy was 10.2 months, while the median time from chemotherapy completion to pancreatectomy was 2 months. Major postoperative complications occurred in 26.9% of patients, while postoperative mortality was nil. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from pancreatectomy were 16.5 and 23.0 months, respectively, and the median OS from diagnosis was 37.2 months. At multivariable analysis, vascular resection, operative time, prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with OS. Operative time, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte count (SII), and PNI were associated with DFS. Conclusions We confirm promising outcomes of selected patients who underwent pancreatectomy following downstaging of liver metastases. The absence of vascular involvement of the primary tumor, good nutritional status, and low inflammatory index scores could be useful to select candidates for resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Frigerio
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Deiro
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Surci
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Filippo Scopelliti
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Regi
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giardino
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Allegrini
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Girelli
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|