Characteristics of patients who are acutely admitted to hospital under surgical care and do not have a surgical procedure - Is there an alternative to admission?

Inefficient Admissions for Abdominal Pain Under an Acute General Surgical Unit

BACKGROUND

The acute general surgical unit (AGSU) model has become a standard of efficient acute surgical care. Whilst the AGSU has been compared to the traditional surgical model, there is a lack of research auditing referrals and admissions. This study evaluates abdominal pain referrals to AGSU and the necessity of admission.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult abdominal pain admissions was conducted over a two-year period at a single centre in metropolitan Victoria, Australia. The data were extracted from electronic medical records and key endpoints of data included the diagnosis, length of stay, investigations and subjective pain outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1587 patients met the study criteria of which 1116 (70.3%) had a non-surgical diagnosis with the majority having non-specific abdominal pain. The non-surgical patients had a lower median length of stay (25.3 h) compared to surgical patients (44.2 h, p < 0.001). They were less likely to have an abnormal haemoglobin (p = 0.004), elevated white cell count (p = 0.02) or elevated C-reactive protein > 50 mg/L (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, surgical patients had higher odds of having a CRP > 50 mg/L (p = 0.024) and a positive imaging result (p < 0.001). The patient's pain control also correlated with length of stay.

CONCLUSION

A large population of patients with non-specific abdominal pain are admitted to AGSU. These patients do not require surgery and have a short length of stay. Incorporating a negative CRP result and negative imaging result may be utilised in conjunction with optimised analgesia to help avoid these unnecessary admissions, thereby improving AGSU efficiency and workload.

Hybrid Surgical Hot Clinic (HSHC): Evaluation of Surgical Hot Clinic Services during COVID-19 Lockdown

Background

Surgical Hot Clinic (SHC) is an acute, ambulatory service for management provided on an outpatient basis. Following the start of global Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and as per the statement released by the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI), we also modified our services to hybrid SHC (HSHC) by mainly providing telephonic follow-up with an occasional face-to-face (F2F) service. We conducted a service evaluation to assess the effectiveness and serviceability of HSHC during a pandemic.

Methods

This service evaluation was conducted from 30th March till 26th May 2020. The pathway was developed to mostly telephonic consultation with selective face-to-face consultation at a designated area in the medical ambulatory unit. The analysis then performed using SPSS version 21.

Results

As the overall attendance fell in hospital, 149 patients, including 54(36.2%) male, and 95(63.8%) females, attended SHC during COVID-19 lockdown. Out of these 149, 87(58.3%) were referred from Accident & Emergency (A&E), 2(1.3%) from GP, 9(6.04%) after scan through radiology department, while 51(34.2%) after discharge from hospital. Out of those who have telephonic consultation (n = 98), 12 patients were called in for review with either blood tests or further clinical examination. In total, only 10 out of 149 patients required admission to the hospital, for either intervention or symptomatic treatment.

Conclusion

Hybrid Surgical Hot Clinic (HSHC) with both telephonic & face-to-face consultation, as per requirement, is flexible, effective and safe patient-focused acute surgical service during COVID-19 like crisis.

Magnitude of non-operative surgical emergency admissions; service implications for surgical and radiological practice

BACKGROUND

Financial sustainability is an area of sharp ongoing focus across the broad spectrum of the Irish Health Service. Recent attention has been drawn to the financial implications of non-operative surgical admissions, suggesting that some of these may be unnecessary.

AIMS

In this study, we aim to determine the volume of emergency surgical admissions to Mayo University Hospital (MUH), in particular, to identify the scale of non-operative admissions and to assess the wider inherent implications for acute hospital services.

METHODS

An electronic handover system for emergency surgical admissions was introduced in MUH in September 2014. All surgical admissions from September 1st 2014 to August 31st 2015 were identified from this prospectively maintained database. HIPE (Hospital Inpatient Enquiry) data were not used in this study. Theatre logbooks confirmed those patients who required operative intervention.

RESULTS

1466 patients were admitted as emergencies during the study period. 58 % (850) were male and median age was 48 years (0-100). Average length of stay was 5 days (range 1-125). 327 patients (22.3 %) required operative intervention. The most commonly performed procedure was appendicectomy (52.5 %). 48 (3.3 %) patients were transferred to other hospitals. 131 (8.9 %) admissions related to the acute urological conditions. Of the 1466 admissions, 546 underwent a CT scan, while 342 patients proceeded to ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

Almost 80 % of all surgical emergency admissions were discharged without undergoing a formal operative procedure while generating a significant workload for the radiology department. Changes in working practices and hospital network structures will be required to reduce the burden of non-operative emergency admissions.