Balancing training and outcomes in total knee replacement: A ten-year review

The impact of surgical trainee involvement in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and outcomes

PURPOSE

Trainee involvement in patient care has raised concerns about the potential risk of adverse outcomes and harming patients. We sought to analyze the impact and potential consequence of surgical trainee involvement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures in terms of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Scopus databases in April 2021. Eligible studies reported on the impact of trainee participation in TKA procedures performed with and without such involvement.

RESULTS

Twenty-three publications met our eligibility criteria and were included in our study. These studies reported on 132,624 surgeries completed on 132,416 patients. Specifically, 23,988 and 108,636 TKAs were performed with and without trainee involvement, respectively. The mean operative times for procedures with (n = 19,573) and without (n = 94,581) trainee involvement were 99.77 and 85.05 min, respectively. Both studies that reported data on cost of TKAs indicated a significant increase (p < 0.001) associated with procedures completed by teaching hospitals compared to private practices. Mean overall complication rates were 7.20% and 7.36% for TKAs performed with (n = 9,386) and without (n = 31,406) trainees. Lastly, the mean Knee Society Scale (KSS) knee scores for TKAs with (n = 478) and without (n = 806) trainee involvement were similar; 82.81 and 82.71, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review concurred with previous studies that reported trainee involvement during TKAs increases the mean operative time. However, the overall complication rates and functional outcomes were similar. Larger studies with a better methodology and higher level of evidence are still needed for a resolute conclusion.

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty : similar outcomes for trainees and trainers

Aims

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used due to its financial advantages, overall resource usage, and convenience for the patient. The training model where a trainee performs the first TKA, followed by the trainer surgeon performing the second TKA, is a unique model to our institution. This study aims to analyze the functional and clinical outcomes of bilateral simultaneous TKA when performed by a trainee or a supervising surgeon, and also to assess these outcomes based on which side was done by the trainee or by the surgeon.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of all simultaneous bilateral TKAs performed by a single surgeon in an academic institution between May 2003 and November 2017. Exclusion criteria were the use of partial knee arthroplasty procedures, staged bilateral procedures, and procedures not performed by the senior author on one side and the trainee on another. Primary clinical outcomes of interest included revision and re-revision. Primary functional outcomes included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient satisfaction scores.

Results

In total, 315 patients (630 knees) were included for analysis. Of these, functional scores were available for 189 patients (378 knees). There was a 1.9% (n = 12) all-cause revision rate for all knees. Overall, 12 knees in ten patients were revised, and both right and left knees were revised in two patients. The OKS and patient satisfaction scores were comparable for trainees and supervising surgeons. A majority of patients (88%, n = 166) were either highly likely (67%, n = 127) or likely (21%, n = 39) to recommend bilateral TKAs to a friend.

Conclusion

Simultaneous bilateral TKA can be used as an effective teaching model for trainees without any significant impact on patient clinical or functional outcomes. Excellent functional and clinical outcomes in both knees, regardless of whether the performing surgeon is a trainee or supervising surgeon, can be achieved with simultaneous bilateral TKA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):29–34.

The opportunity cost of arthroplasty training in orthopaedic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Training the next generation of surgeons is a crucial role fulfilled by consultant orthopaedic surgeons. However we are increasingly constrained by limited time and resources. We sought to compare operative time and length of stay (LOS) for total hip and total knee arthroplasties (THA, TKA) performed by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon with those performed by supervised trainees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective database of arthroplasty procedures performed from 2015 to 2018 was collated. Primary surgeon grade was recorded. Patient demographics, ASA grade, LOS and operative time were recorded. For THA both cemented and uncemented arthroplasties were used. SPSS version 23 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

394 arthroplasty procedures were carried out during the study period. Trainee surgeons performed a high proportion of both THA (53.2%, n = 123) and TKA (44.8%, n = 73) surgeries. Trainees performed 57% of cemented THA procedures. LOS did not differ between consultant and trainee surgeons for THA (5.9 ± 4.8 days) or TKA (5.6 ± 4.1 days). Age had a significant effect on LOS (p < 0.001). For THA the mean operative time for trainees was 90.3 ± 19.23 min, 18.2 min longer than the consultant group. For TKA the mean operative time was 89.06 ± 18.87 min for trainees, 24.4 min longer than the consultant group.

DISCUSSION

At our institution trainee surgeons can be expected to take between 18 and 24 min longer to perform arthroplasty procedures. This should be factored into resource planning, as the training of orthopaedic surgeons is crucial to sustaining and improving health service provision.

Association between surgeon grade and implant survival following hip and knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between surgeon grade (trainee vs consultant) and implant survival following primary hip and knee replacement.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and Embase from inception to 6 October 2021.

SETTING

Units performing primary hip and/or knee replacements since 1990.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing either a primary hip or knee replacement, predominantly for osteoarthritis.

INTERVENTION

Whether the surgeon recorded as performing the procedure was a trainee or not.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was net implant survival reported as a Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. The secondary outcome was crude revision rate. Both outcomes were reported according to surgeon grade.

RESULTS

Nine cohort studies capturing 4066 total hip replacements (THRs), 936 total knee replacements (TKRs) and 1357 unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) were included (5 THR studies, 2 TKR studies and 2 UKR studies). The pooled net implant survival estimates for THRs at 5 years were 97.9% (95% CI 96.6% to 99.2%) for trainees and 98.1% (95% CI 97.1% to 99.2%) for consultants. The relative risk of revision of THRs at 5 and 10 years was 0.88 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.70) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.26), respectively. For TKRs, the net implant survival estimates at 10 years were 96.2% (95% CI 94.0% to 98.4%) for trainees and 95.1% (95% CI 93.0% to 97.2%) for consultants. We report a narrative summary of UKR outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence in the existing literature that trainee surgeons have worse outcomes compared with consultants, in terms of the net survival or crude revision rate of hip and knee replacements at 5-10 years follow-up. These findings are limited by the quality of the existing published data and are applicable to countries with established orthopaedic training programmes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019150494.

Surgery Performed by Supervised Trainees Does not Affect Outcome in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint (MTPJ) Arthrodesis

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is an index procedure for orthopedic trainees in the United Kingdom. There is an absence of evidence as to the outcome of surgery when performed by supervised trainees. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of fusion, complication rate and radiographic outcomes in first MTPJ arthrodesis performed by supervised orthopedic trainees with consultants. This is a retrospective cohort study of 117 patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis from August 2015 to December 2017 in our institute for hallux valgus (HV) deformity with first MPTJ arthrosis or for hallux rigidus. Patients were followed to a minimum of 1-year postsurgery and were given an open appointment thereafter. In the hallux rigidus group, there was no significant difference between the complication rate (p = .477), incidence of fusion (p = .663), postoperatively HVA (p = .763), and postoperative intermetatarsal angle (p = .539) between trainees and consultants. There was a significant difference in mean tourniquet time (p = .563) between trainees and consultants. In the hallux valgus group, there was no significant difference in the complication rate (p = .519), incidence of fusion (p = .786), tourniquet time (p = .075), postoperative HVA (p = .423), and postoperative intermetatarsal angle (p = .143) between the trainees and consultants. This is the first MTPJ fusion series that demonstrates good results can be achieved by supervised trainees performing the procedure. This would suggest that first MTPJ arthrodesis remains an opportunity for trainees to continue learning to perform under supervision whilst ensuring no change in outcome for the patient.

Trainee performed total knee arthroplasty is safe and effective: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between trainees and consultants

BACKGROUND

There are concerns that trainee performed knee arthroplasty (KA) may adversely affect patient outcomes. Demand for KA is projected to increase, and trainees must therefore be competent to perform it.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed identifying articles comparing outcomes following trainee versus consultant surgeon performed primary KA. Outcomes included rate of revision surgery, rate of infection, operation time, length of stay and functional outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted using Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMD). A quality assessment of studies and qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 9 studies of 92,309 arthroplasties, 80,655 were performed by consultants, 11,654 by trainees. The mean age was 69.2. There was no significant difference between the two groups' rate of revision (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.61-1.02; p = 0.07. Trainees were associated with a lower rate of infection (5 studies; OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03). There was no difference in the rate of neurological deficit, transfusion rate or thrombosis. There was no difference in operation time (5 studies; WMD 3.50; 95% CI -3.9-10.89; p = 0.35). The trainee group had less favourable functional outcome scores (7 studies; WMD -1.26; 95% CI -1.44--1.07; p < 0.01). However, this difference was not clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that supervised trainees can achieve similar outcomes to consultant surgeons andin selected cases, trainee performed supervised KA is therefore safe and effective.