1
|
Beri A, Pisulkar SK, Paikrao B, Bagde A, Bansod A, Shrivastava A, Jain R. Quantitate evaluation of photogrammetry with CT scanning for orbital defect. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3104. [PMID: 38326414 PMCID: PMC10850061 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Facial deformities can be caused by cancer, tumours, trauma, infections, congenital or acquired defects and may lead to alteration in basic functions such as communication, breathing, and mastication and aesthetic thereby affecting quality of life. Traditional processes for manufacturing maxillofacial prostheses involve complicated, time-consuming and tedious processes for the patient and the operator. Impression of the defect area, which is the one of the crucial step in fabrication of prosthesis, is the longest and most difficult process as it requires a long contact with the patient. The digital revolution is now changing the landscape of prosthetic production and making the impression making procedure simpler. Digital technology reduces patient chair side time by providing more accurate display data in less time (3-5 min) than traditional methods. Digital impressions eliminate the need for bulky impression materials and provide a more comfortable patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arushi Beri
- Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India.
| | - Sweta Kale Pisulkar
- Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India
| | - Balaji Paikrao
- Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, M.S., 44200, India
| | - Ashutosh Bagde
- Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, M.S., 44200, India
| | - Akansha Bansod
- Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India
| | - Akshay Shrivastava
- Department of Orthodontics, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences (DU), Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India
| | - Ritul Jain
- Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Özcivelek T, Kılıçarslan MA. Full digital workflow of a 2-piece obturator with polyetherketoneketone in a patient with maxillectomy and trismus: A clinical and laboratory report. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 131:346-351. [PMID: 37487802 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
The computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing of a 2-piece definitive palatal obturator 3D printed from polyetherketoneketone and 2 acrylic resins with a fully digital workflow are presented for a patient who was diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma and who developed severely limited mouth opening after surgery and radiotherapy. The 18-month follow-up period revealed satisfactory function, tissue compatibility, retention, and esthetics for this patient with a maxillectomy and severe trismus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuğgen Özcivelek
- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan
- Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Medical Design Application and Research Center (MEDITAM), Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jablonski RY, Coward TJ, Bartlett P, Keeling AJ, Bojke C, Pavitt SH, Nattress BR. IMproving facial PRosthesis construction with contactlESs Scanning and Digital workflow (IMPRESSeD): study protocol for a feasibility crossover randomised controlled trial of digital versus conventional manufacture of facial prostheses in patients with orbital or nasal facial defects. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:110. [PMID: 37400919 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01351-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Facial prostheses can have a profound impact on patients' appearance, function and quality of life. There has been increasing interest in the digital manufacturing of facial prostheses which may offer many benefits to patients and healthcare services compared with conventional manufacturing processes. Most facial prosthesis research has adopted observational study designs with very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) documented. There is a clear need for a well-designed RCT to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of digitally manufactured facial prostheses versus conventionally manufactured facial prostheses. This study protocol describes the planned conduct of a feasibility RCT which aims to address this knowledge gap and determine whether it is feasible to conduct a future definitive RCT. METHODS The IMPRESSeD study is a multi-centre, 2-arm, crossover, feasibility RCT with early health technology assessment and qualitative research. Up to 30 participants with acquired orbital or nasal defects will be recruited from the Maxillofacial Prosthetic Departments of participating NHS hospitals. All trial participants will receive 2 new facial prostheses manufactured using digital and conventional manufacturing methods. The order of receiving the facial prostheses will be allocated centrally using minimisation. The 2 prostheses will be made in tandem and marked with a colour label to mask the manufacturing method to the participants. Participants will be reviewed 4 weeks following the delivery of the first prosthesis and 4 weeks following the delivery of the second prosthesis. Primary feasibility outcomes include eligibility, recruitment, conversion, and attrition rates. Data will also be collected on patient preference, quality of life and resource use from the healthcare perspective. A qualitative sub-study will evaluate patients' perception, lived experience and preference of the different manufacturing methods. DISCUSSION There is uncertainty regarding the best method of manufacturing facial prostheses in terms of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability. There is a need for a well-designed RCT to compare digital and conventional manufacturing of facial prostheses to better inform clinical practice. The feasibility study will evaluate key parameters needed to design a definitive trial and will incorporate early health technology assessment and a qualitative sub-study to identify the potential benefits of further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN ISRCTN10516986). Prospectively registered on 08 June 2021, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10516986 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Y Jablonski
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Trevor J Coward
- Academic Centre of Reconstructive Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Bartlett
- Maxillofacial Laboratory, Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew J Keeling
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Chris Bojke
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue H Pavitt
- Dental Translational and Clinical Research Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Brian R Nattress
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Beuer F, Huettig F, Röhler A, Kraemer-Fernandez P. Accuracy of capturing nasal, orbital, and auricular defects with extra- and intraoral optical scanners and smartphone: An in vitro study. J Dent 2021; 117:103916. [PMID: 34875273 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This in vitro study compares the scanning accuracy of various stationary and portable as well as extra- and intraoral devices for capturing oncological defects. METHODS A 3D-printed model of a nasal, orbital, and auricular defect, as well as one of an intact auricle, were digitalized (n = 7 per device) with a stationary optical scanner (Pritiface), a portable extraoral optical scanner (Artec Space Spider), two intraoral scanners (Trios 4 and Primescan), and a smartphone (iPhone 11 Pro). For the reference data, the defect models were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000). For quantitative analysis, the root mean square error value for trueness and precision and mean deviations in millimeters were obtained for each defect type. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test. For qualitative analysis, a colorimetric map was generated to display the deviation within the defect area and adjacent tissue. RESULTS Statistically significant interactions were found in the trueness and precision for defect and scanner type. CONCLUSION The Primescan and Artec Space Spider scanners showed the highest accuracy for most defect types. Primescan and Trios 4 failed to capture the orbital defect. The iPhone 11 Pro showed clinically acceptable trueness but inferior precision. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The scanning devices may demonstrate varying accuracy, depending on the defect type. A portable extraoral optical scanner is an universal tool for the digitization of oncological defects. Alternatively, an intraoral scanner may be employed in maxillofacial prosthetics with some restrictions. Utilizing a smartphone in maxillofacial rehabilitation should be considered with caution, because it provides inconsistent accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Unkovskiy
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Dental Materials and Biomaterial Research, Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany; Department of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, 19с1, 119146 Moscow, Russian Federation.
| | - Sebastian Spintzyk
- Section Medical Materials Science and Technology, Tübingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; ADMiRE Lab-Additive Manufacturing, Intelligent Robotics, Sensors and Engineering, School of Engineering and IT, Carinthia University of Applied Sciences, 9524 Villach
| | - Florian Beuer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Dental Materials and Biomaterial Research, Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Huettig
- Department of Prosthodontics at the Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery with Dental School, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, Tbingen 72076, Germany
| | - Ariadne Röhler
- Section Medical Materials Science and Technology, Tübingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Pablo Kraemer-Fernandez
- Department of Prosthodontics at the Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery with Dental School, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, Tbingen 72076, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sunitha T, Rajalakshmi R. Multi-modal image fusion technique for enhancing image quality with multi-scale decomposition algorithm. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING: IMAGING & VISUALIZATION 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2020.1830437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T.O. Sunitha
- Department of Computer Applications, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, India
| | - R. Rajalakshmi
- Department of Computer Science, Noorul Islam College of Arts and Sciences, Kumara Coil, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jablonski RY, Osnes CA, Khambay BS, Nattress BR, Keeling AJ. Accuracy of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion versus laser scanning. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 122:333-338. [PMID: 30955940 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Fabrication of conventional facial prostheses is a labor-intensive process which traditionally requires an impression of the facial defect and surrounding tissues. Inaccuracies occur during the facial moulage because of soft-tissue compression, the patient's reflex movements, or the lack of support for the impression material. A variety of 3D imaging techniques have been introduced during the production of facial prostheses. However, the accuracy of the different imaging techniques has not been evaluated sufficiently in this clinical context. PURPOSE The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the difference in accuracy of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion and laser scanning against a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reference scan. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten gypsum casts of oncology facial defects were acquired. To produce reference models, a 3D volumetric scan was obtained using a CBCT scanner and converted into surface data using open-source medical segmentation software. This model was cropped to produce a CBCT mask using an open-source system for editing meshes. The multimodal image fusion model was created using stereophotogrammetry to capture the external facial features and a custom optical structured light scanner to record the defect. The gypsum casts were also scanned using a commercial 3D laser scanner to create the laser-scanned model. Analysis of the best fit of each experimental model to the CBCT mask was performed in MeshLab. The unsigned mean distance was used to measure the absolute deviation of each model from the CBCT mask. A paired-samples t test was conducted to compare the mean global deviation of the 2 imaging modalities from the CBCT masks (α=.05). RESULTS A statistically significant difference was found in the mean global deviation between the multimodal imaging model (220 ±50 μm) and the laser-scanned model (170 ±70 μm); (t(9)=2.56, P=.031). The color error maps illustrated that the greatest error was located at sites distant to the prosthesis margins. CONCLUSIONS The laser-scanned models were more accurate; however, the mean difference of 50 μm is unlikely to be clinically significant. The laser scanner had limited viewing angles and a longer scan time which may limit its transferability to maxillofacial practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Y Jablonski
- Academic Clinical Fellow and Specialty Registrar, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | - Cecilie A Osnes
- Research Assistant, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Balvinder S Khambay
- Professor, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Brian R Nattress
- Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Keeling
- Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|